The lack of integrity among the press is becoming just in your face. The New York Times published an amazing endorsement of Hillary Clinton on Saturday in hope that they can persuade their readers readers to overlook all the scandals of Hillary and make her Present. I would understand not endorsing either, but to ignore the law, the corruption, and common sense, merely reveals that the New York Times cannot be trusted. This is even more astonishing from the standpoint that the New York Times was the paper to break the story on Hillary’s emails on March 2nd, 2015. It was also the New York Times that published “2008 Crisis Deepened the Ties Between Clintons and Goldman Sachs” explaining how Hillary came to help rescue their image. It was the New York Times that reported how Hillary kept changing her story on the emails. To simply ignore all of this as if it never happened leave one speechless at the political attempt to manipulate the public. This is what the New York Times actually wrote in their endorsement:

“In any normal election year, we’d compare the two presidential candidates side by side on the issues. But this is not a normal election year. A comparison like that would be an empty exercise in a race where one candidate — our choice, Hillary Clinton — has a record of service and a raft of pragmatic ideas, and the other, Donald Trump, discloses nothing concrete about himself or his plans while promising the moon and offering the stars on layaway. (We will explain in a subsequent editorial why we believe Mr. Trump to be the worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history.)”

To call Trump the “worst nominee put forward by a major party in modern American history” is just astonishing and leave one with their mouth wide-open. Emails, corruptions, Clinton Foundation taking money from foreign governments when Hillary is Secretary of State all means nothing. This is clearly a desperate attempt by the ESTABLISHMENT to rig the election just as the media did in Britain to convince the people they should surrender their dignity to Brussels. There too they predicted a major depression and collapse of Britain if they people voted to exit Europe. Nothing of the sort has unfolded and the scare tactics of mainstream media in that instance was deplorable.

The New York Post has said it best. This election has captured in their bold headline: American journalism is collapsing before our eyes. Indeed, this is the end of mainstream media. If Trump wins, this victory may see the decline and fall of mainstream media once and for all. As the younger generation abandon such media, even Warren Buffett has said he would only invest in local community newspapers.  USA Today has been offering buy-outs for employees with over 15 years on the job who are 55 or older to reduce the work force.

TV began to displace newspapers with their nightly news programs and coverage of political debates live. That started the process of the decline and fall of newspapers. Now the internet is hear and the younger generations do not buy newspapers. The lifeblood of media has been advertising revenue. That has turned the tide. There is a growth of 15.7% in advertising revenue, but it is all on the internet with not increases appearing for TV or newspapers. This biased and foolish endorsement of Hillary by the New York Times has simply exposed that they are part of the ESTABLISHMENT and this is really what is under attack in these elections on a global basis. It is like supporting Napoleon in the Battle of Waterloo on that fateful day of June 18th, 1815.

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; Does you computer still project a Trump victory? It is beginning to look like it might be right.

ANSWER: Yes. It does not change. It projected that many years ago and it projected a rise in this anti-establishment/3rd Party movement would begin in 2016 following the 2015.75 turning point. It will not change based upon some new event. This is not me projecting my opinion. A lot of people have opinions – the talking head of TV as people call them.

We should see this election with a big turnout much the same as BREXIT. Donald Trump has taken nearly $ 100 million in just three months by small donations – more than any Republican before ever in history. That is actually more than two million donors than support his rival Hillary, whose money comes really from only large donors, such as banks and hedge funds. They OWN Hillary and she outspends Trump. If we look at this measurement, the PEOPLE are lining up behind Trump more than Hillary.

This is the data that PROVES this is not my opinion. We have been showing these charts at conferences all the time. Our target has ALWAYS been 2016. This is not some fashionable forecast we just made up.

This is the view from the Electorial College.Note the blue line (Democrats) against the red line (Republicans). Look at how the Democrats peaked with the Great Depression and have been making lower high ever since. That is the classic bear market definition. Now look at the red line. You see higher high all the way into the 1990s. We may see the demise of the Democratic Party because it is clear, those in power in Washington are Democrat BEFORE they are American. They have made their choice to support Hillary regardless of what she has done. Therefore, they are Democrats FIRST and perhaps Americans even in third place after self-interest.

The Republican Party was infiltrated with the old right-wing Southern Democrats who pushed Reagan into the White House. They are now against Trump and turning back to Hillary because they want to invade other countries and rule the world – Nation Building. Trump has remade the Party so it has changed back to its pre-Reagan base. The Democrats were the party of Andrew Jackson who was the slave owner who did abuse his slaves and they remade themselves to fool the black community that they were their champions. It was amazing that they remade themselves. Hillary still claims she represents the poor minorities, calls people “Jew Bastard” and takes money from Saudi Arabia who is against women’s rights and gays. She claims to be against Wall Street, but the majority of her money comes from bankers and hedge funds.

That is the bottom-line. Just look at the donations and you see Trump has more LITTLE PEOPLE than Hillary. People vote, not hedge funds and banks. We will see. The debate tonight may be the defining moment. Our models on market have long been projecting September as a turning point followed by the next big one in January in many markets.