“Why Are We Inexorably Drawn Into This?” Steve Bannon Compares Iran Conflict To Vietnam


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: June 18, 2025, at 7:00 pm EST

Sam Faddis: “We Can’t Be In The Position Of Having A Foreign Country Telling Us What Has To Be Done”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: June 18, 2025, at 1:30 pm EST

LATEST: Iran Contacted White House For Negotiations, Sent Two Planes To Oman, Jack Posobiec Reports


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: June 18, 2025, at 1:00 pm EST

Troll – Zelensky – Catherine the Great


Posted Jun 19, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Catherine_the_great Russia

QUESTION: I was told that there are trolls who hate you and bombard anyone you do interviews with, in an attempt to prevent you from being on again. I was also told that they trace to Ukraine, and the rumor is you are on the death list of Zelensky. Does that bother you?

annonymous

REPLY: This is not the first time I have been told that. Any show I have been on that listens to this is obviously not really someone you would trust, since they would be adhering to the censorship of free speech. I am NOT against the Ukrainian people. I am against the Neocons who couldn’t care less if ANY Ukrainian is still standing at the end of the day. They are using Eastern Europe to wage war on Russia, and that includes Poland and Romania. I have heard comments like the Eastern Europeans were communists anyway. Where has this war benefited Ukrainians?

May 2 2014 Odessa Trade Unions House

Catherine II, the Great of Russia, ordered the founding and construction of the city of Odessa, where in 2014, the Neo-Nazi Ukrainians were openly killing Russians on the streets, which began this separatist movement. I have heard that I am on Zelensky’s death list. I believe he killed one of my sources in Ukraine, Gonzalo Lirawho was the first to expose that Zelensky was a coke-head.

Zelensky Pants on Backwards

How do you put your pants on backwards and not notice it? This is the guy destroying Ukraine and sacrificing the Ukrainian people for this Neocon agenda. I just have no respect for these people, and the trolls can target everyone I do interviews with, and if they will not have me on again, they are not worth much in this world that is neck-deep in corruption. I was told by one host that he got 10 emails trolling me in 15 minutes, and that was a trolling farm, not actual people. We may have more institutions today than before because what I have been told – “Now I know you are not one of them.” 

Olbia

Odessa was indeed founded by Catherine II, The Great, not by Ukrainians. It was the port located at the exact site of the Ottoman settlement of Khadjibey. Odessa was first mentioned in 1415 when it was known as Khadjibey. They even erected a monument in 1900 to Catherine as the founder of the modern city. The city takes its name from the ancient Greek settlement of Odēssos (Ὀδησσός) located in the region of modern-day Bulgaria (near Varna), not because it was built on the same site, but as part of a trend in the Russian Empire to use classical Greek names for new settlements in the northern Black Sea region.

olbia Dolphins
proto arrow heads

In essence, Olbia’s history is a story of Greek colonial ambition, remarkable prosperity built on frontier trade, deep entanglement with powerful nomadic neighbors, and a long, slow decline under relentless pressure from the steppe, finally succumbing to the Migration Period upheavals of late antiquity. Olbia was founded by settlers from the powerful Ionian Greek city of Miletus (in Asia Minor) around the middle of the 7th century BC (traditionally dated to 647/6 BC or 645 BC). It was an apoikia (colony) established primarily for trade and access to resources. This was the city-state that used bronze shaped in dolphins or arrowheads as money.

During the late 18th century, as the Russian Empire expanded southward and founded new cities in the newly conquered territories (New Russia), a deliberate policy was implemented to use names evoking the ancient Greek colonies that once dotted the Black Sea coast. This linked the new Russian cities to classical antiquity and European civilization. The specific name Odēssos was chosen. The most popular and enduring story involves Empress Catherine the Great. When discussing the founding of a new port city on the site of the captured Ottoman fortress of Khadjibey (Hacıbey) in 1794, someone suggested naming it after the nearby ancient Greek colony. However, the feminine form of the name was preferred to match the grammatical gender of “city” (gorod) in Russian. The ancient city’s name was masculine (Odēssos).

It’s often recounted that Catherine decreed the feminine form “Odessa” (Одесса in Russian Cyrillic). A persistent anecdote suggests that a French nobleman in her court, perhaps Armand-Emmanuel du Plessis (Duc de Richelieu, who later became Odesa’s famous governor), playfully referenced the Trojan War epic by saying something like “Que ce soit Odessa!” (“Let it be Odessa!”), alluding to the region’s Homeric connections (Odyssey -> Odessa). While this story is charming and widely told, historians consider it more a legend than a documented fact, although it reflects the classical influences of the time.

Catherine II The Great 10 Rubles

The name “Odessa” (Одесса) was formally established by Catherine the Great’s imperial decree on January 27, 1795 (new style calendar). The Neocons do not care about anyone but themselves. I feel sorry for the Ukrainian people. They had a country, they were free, until the Neocons decided to exploit them for their own personal hatred of Russians because the previous generation had been communists. They were just angry that communism collapsed all by itself, and they never got to shoot anyone. They cannot live without hating someone and waging wars endlessly to satisfy their personal vendettas.

These Neocons project onto Russians and Chinese the very same goals that they aspire to. They care nothing about history. There are NO Ukrainians there in Crimea. About 15% of the population are Tartars from the Mongol invasions. When the people of Crimea voted to join Russia, the Neocons claimed the vote was rigged. Why in God’s name would they want to be part of Ukraine with the ethnic cleansing and hated that the saw by the Neo-Nazis in Odessa in 2014? The people have a right to live in peace. The Minsk Agreement was intended to allow the Donbas to hold a referendum. This is not about human rights and more than Israel’s attack on Iran was about nuclear arms when they killed most of the leadership for this is about regime change.

Hold Elections in Ukraine – NOW!

End Zelensky’s Dictatorship and See What the People Want

Categories:Armstrong in the MediaRussia

Trump’s Legacy Crisis


Posted originally on Jun 18, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Trump sad

The Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Ryabkov has now explicitly cautioned the U.S. against providing direct military support to Israel or even considering such “speculative options,” warning that doing so “would radically destabilise the entire situation.” according to Russia’s Interfax news agency. His statement reflects Moscow’s concerns that the conflict could spiral out of control, potentially affecting Russia’s interests in the Middle East, where it has strategic partnerships and a military presence.

Trump today said he told Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, “Keep going.” He mentioned that he speaks with Netanyahu every day. “He is a good man,” Trump emphasized. Fox is pushing the same nonsense they did for the Iraq War, promoting this Neocon agenda of endless wars. The GOP messages sent to my phone claimed “79% of Americans agree with President Trump that Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon. Iran is looking for any signs of weakness from the United States. They want to test our resolve.” Absent from this is any consideration that this could spill over involving Russia and China, not to mention North Korea.  This is about regime change, not merely nuclear weapons. Iran doesn’t have to build a nuke; Russia and China can move them in, as we saw in the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, which was 63 years ago – (2 x 31.4).

2025_06_18_19_39_16_Inbox_m.armstrong314_gmail.com_eM_Client

Trump just put this out, and he is backing off from his threat to kill the Supreme Leader. That would set off a Holy War and piss-off both Russia and China. I hope to God that the Neocons pushing Trump forward here have a little common sense.

Israeli Shekel M Array 3 29 25

Bibi has come out and contradicted Trump, saying they have lost because Israel did not destroy the nuclear facility, which they knew from the outset they could not do. Bibi is another Neocon trying to create WWIII. He was on the ropes facing a no-confidence vote just 2 days before. The external enemy play sealed his position as it always does. This is trying to ensure that Trump will get directly involved in destroying that nuclear complex. This has been the intention from the outset. This is the timing array from February. It showed June was the start with high volatility, but August still remains a critical target.

AE WAR M Array 6 14 25

Our War Index had been targeting June as a Directional Change and a Panic Cycle. This does not look to be a 6-Day War.

Trump now faces what will define his presidency. Forget MAGA. That will be forever gone if he directly attacks Iran for Israel. He had once hoped for the Nobel Peace Prize. He will be remembered as the individual who is often credited with starting World War III. Yet, they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize for authorizing covert operations to overthrow Syria. Perhaps that is the new criterion: peace through bombing and the annihilation of your enemies is the new way to achieve peace.


I do Not Advise Trump

His Staff Would Never Let Me Near Him

Just for the Record

Did the Neocons Plot to Get Rid of Tulsi? China Enters & Iran Refuses to Surrender


Posted originally on Jun 18, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Tulsi Gabbord WikiLeaks_on_X_US_intelligence_assessed_just_weeks_ago_that_Iran_is_not_bu

The firestorm that has erupted since Tulsi Gabbard testified on March 25, 2025, that WikiLeaks had released on X June 14th, 2025, that the Supreme Leader of Iran had suspended the nuclear bomb development back in 2003, and that it was the Intelligence Community that made that assessment. Gabbard’s March 25 testimony before the US Senate Intelligence Committee stating plainly: “The intelligence community continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon,” has exposed with a Neocon plot for another weapon of mass destruction, or the Intelligence Committee intentionally falsified information they handed to Tulsi to discredit her in hopes Trump would get rid of her.

Gabbard’s remarks, now resurfacing as Israel intensifies its offensive, have some casting doubts over the legitimacy of the IAEA’s findings and the geopolitical motivations behind the strikes. A report by Al-Jazeera suggested that the timing of the attack, amid ongoing US-Iran nuclear negotiations, may indicate a strategic effort by Washington and Tel Aviv to mislead Tehran, expecting ongoing negotiations to enable Israel’s surprise attack.

Keep in mind that the Neocons also control the “IC” that Tulsi is informing Congress about their assessment. Tulsi did not pull this out of thin air. This is starting to smell more like a plot to get rid of Tulsi, whom they hate. If what she told Congress were true, then why does the Supreme Leader not say he had suspended the development in 2003 and offer UN inspectors to verify? Something does not smell right here.

A Dangerous Moment – The Targeting of Tulsi Gabbard


Posted originally on CTH on June 18, 2025 | Sundance 

For the sake of urgency I’m going to talk in direct and bold terms about the targeting of Tulsi Gabbard.  The IC system is attempting to remove her as a disruptive influence by using Iran as a wedge to get her out, but the issue they have with her has nothing to do with Iran.

CTH approaches this after being very concerned about Tulsi Gabbard’s ability.  Not because of intent, but rather because we doubted she understood the scope of the IC opposition aligned against the office of the Director of National Intelligence.

She started out with these weaknesses, but she learned quickly – grasped the opposition– and has become a transformative force within the Intelligence Community.  Director Gabbard’s recent efforts within the Intelligence Community Inspector General office is another feather in her cap of competence.  Gabbard is now a threat.

If President Trump allows or supports the removal of DNI Gabbard, he is opening up the backplate of his armor, and making himself vulnerable.  The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Chairman Tom Cotton, the disassembled National Intelligence Council and a host of Intelligence Community embeds would like to see Gabbard removed.   DC wants to see her removed because the traditional role of the DNI has been a willful tool of the Intelligence Community; Gabbard is not that.

As DNI Mrs Tulsi Gabbard has chased down intelligence community leakersreleased the JFK files, released Joe Biden’s domestic terrorism surveillance plan, intercepted an NIC plot to impeach President Trump (confirmed by Rubio), taken control of the Presidential Daily Briefing, and begun to confront the corruption within the IC Inspector General organization. These are actions, not words, and those actions speak boldly.  Suffice to say, her effectiveness has placed a target on her back.

In the past few weeks, ever since she began intercepting the ICIG issues and using her own personnel to monitor the IC network, she has been targeted with several direct smear campaigns. It is obvious the targeting is coming from inside the intelligence apparatus, and perhaps even the orbit around/under CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

She did make a strange video about nuclear weapons contrast against the horrific outcomes in Japan, but that seemed to be more of a personal video entry expressing a deep concern about nuclear weapons from her own perspectives.  I said it was weird when I saw it, but I put that into the context of ‘surfboard Tulsi‘, the DNI peacenik. No biggie.

However, with the Israel -v- Iran conflict encompassing the White House, there is a transparent objective to weaponize Tulsi Gabbard’s activity as a contrast against President Trump supporting military conflict in Iran.

This contrast is being stimulated by the same elements who want to see her removed for the reasons noted above.

The latest narrative du jour in the files includes:

WASHINGTON DC – […] Trump has increasingly mused about nixing Gabbard’s office completely, an idea he floated when he gave her the job. In the White House there have been discussions about folding its mandate into the CIA or another agency, according to one of the people familiar with his response to the video and two others familiar with the matter — though it’s unclear what that would mean for Gabbard. The Director of National Intelligence serves as the president’s principal intelligence adviser and oversees the sprawling U.S. spy community. (link)

First, “nixing Gabbard’s office completely” is exactly what the bad elements of the Intelligence Community would love to see.  Second, “folding its mandate into the CIA” is like a dream come true for the darkest elements of the IC and Senate enablers. And Third, “serves as the president’s principal intelligence adviser” is false.  That’s the job of the National Security Advisor, Marco Rubio.

If there is one hope amid this looming and increasing drumbeat to remove her, it is that Marco Rubio likely can see exactly what the motives and intentions are from his former colleagues.  The elements targeting DNI Gabbard all come from SSCI Chairman Marco Rubio’s old tribe.

SoS/NSA Rubio might save her, as too may Vice President JD Vance.  Both of them are at the perfect distance to see the assembled drumbeat against Gabbard for what it is.  At least that is my hope.

I am not confident they will succeed removing her.  However, what I am confident about is that if Tulsi Gabbard is removed, she will not be replaced, and that’s as good as a win for the bad actors trying to target and survive Trump.

President Trump has no more juice or influence in the Senate.  That time is over.  Trump has exhausted all of the political capital he held in the upper chamber.  Every Republican Senator will now smile, nod and do whatever the heck they want regardless of how it impacts President Trump.  This is especially true for the SSCI who would control confirmation of a DNI replacement.  They don’t have to pretend any longer, Trump’s juice is gone.

If President Trump allows the Brutus crew in his orbit to isolate, ridicule and marginalize Tulsi Gabbard, he will be putting a significant part of his administration at risk.  This is the Six Ways from Sunday crowd.

Tucker Carlson Debates Senator Ted Cruz on Israel and Foreign Policy


Posted originally on CTH on June 18, 2025 | Sundance

Texas Senator Ted Cruz came from the Bush administration following his legal work on the Florida electoral challenge to George W Bush.  As Karl Rove notes in his book, Courage and Consequence, Cruz wanted to be the United States Attorney General for the Bush administration.  Dubya would not consider him, so Ted Cruz set about a new career path to run for the U.S. Senate from Texas.

Cruz worked as Texas Solicitor General (2003-2008), giving him statewide name recognition.  Ted Cruz ran for U.S. Senate and won in 2012.  In 2014 Robert Mercer (Breitbart) and Mark Levin began promoting Cruz as a presidential candidate for 2015/16; the ‘Cruz crew’ was born.  The same ‘Cruz Crew’ coalition later evolved into the Ron DeSantis team in 2023.  One of the four cornerstones of the Cruz/DeSantis political base, which includes a targeted evangelical following, has always been strong support for Israel.

This alignment is why we see the Cruz/DeSantis coalition as extremely supportive of the Israeli campaign against Iran, despite their generally soft support for President Trump on other matters.  Obviously, the political gravity of President Trump is very strong – so those with future aspirations must remain Trump-adjacent, if not directly in his orbit.

In this somewhat adversarial interview, Tucker Carlson confronts Senator Cruz about his support for Israel, against the backdrop of the current Israeli zero-sum conflict with Iran.  I am providing the interview for discussion only because the same conflict dynamic is playing out on several platforms, and it is of great interest to many Trump supporters.

Chapters:

0:00 Why Does Cruz Want Regime Change in Iran?
06:28 Is the US Currently Acting in Its Own Best Interest?
07:49 Was Regime Change in Syria Beneficial to the US?
12:31 Was the Iraq War a Mistake?
18:55 Why Aren’t US Politicians Focused on Fixing America’s Problems?
27:02 How Much Money Is the US Sending to Israel?
29:17 Does Cruz Think It’s Okay That Foreign Governments Spy on America?
31:47 How Much Money Has Cruz Taken From AIPAC?


38:22 To What Extent Is the US Government Influenced by Foreign Governments?
49:12 Is the Israel of the Bible the Same as the Current Israeli Government?
55:09 How Does Funding Israel Benefit the US?
1:11:54 What Happens Next in Iran?
1:13:42 What Really Is an Isolationist?
1:19:53 Are There Iranian Assassins Trying to Kill Trump?
1:30:18 Cruz Knows Nothing About Iran and Wants to Destroy It Anyway
1:32:55 Trump’s Response to Tucker’s Position on Iran
1:34:51 Cruz Refuses to Apologize for Supporting the Disastrous Ukraine/Russia War
1:46:55 Why Does Cruz Think Zelensky Is a Hero?
1:47:44 Why Did Cruz Support the Blowing up of Nord Stream?
1:50:12 Is Russia an Enemy of the US?
1:56:29 Is America the Moral Authority?

Patrick: “Central Banks Around The World Are Looking At Dollars More As A Liability Than An Asset”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: June 17, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST

“Take Out The Regime And It Opens Up To Civil War” Jack Posobiec Gives Iran Update Ahead Of NSC Meeting Results


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: June 17, 2025, at 8:00 pm EST