Democrats’ Lies Have Serious Consequences


Posted originally on Mar 6, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Social Security Reform 1996

COMMENT: Good morning Marty,

As a financial advisor, I have already spoken to two elderly widow clients this week who are petrified that Trump will take away their SS they are counting on and they wanted to know if they can still support themselves if he does. I could not walk them away from the ledge and convince them that he will not be taking away SS. I tried telling him this is the same ploy used for 30 years and the Dem’s had the “Throwing Granny off the cliff” ads and that I was getting calls then about Bush eliminating their benefits. I told them that in fact he’s trying to save SS and reduce the taxation of it. I know there will be more calls to come. I wonder if your son-in-law has talked to any worried clients. The Dem’s lies have consequences.

Thanks,

Norm

ANSWER: I know. I was asked to revise SS back in the ’90s to convert it to a wealth fund investing in the country rather than just government bonds that will only fund the corruption. The Democrats refused to vote for it unless they could change the fund managers to people who only voted for the Democrats. I gave up trying to help in Washington. It was a joke. The corruption was so pervasive that it was a giant waste of time. The Dow was 6,000 area back then. The Social Security fund would have been flush with cash by now.

They do not understand that lower earners may not pay income taxes but are not exempt from Social Security. The vast amount of the lower middle class pays more in Social Security than income taxes. Then the government sends them a refund check, and they borrow from the poor and never pay them one penny in interest. The greater risk that they have is that the Democrats are so dividing the country it may not be able to stand united much longer. Then what? That is when Social Security will fail – not Trump.

The press is only pouring gasoline on the fire. They do not give a dam about the country and cannot see what they are doing is destroying their own future. Somehow, the words of Rodney King come to mind – Can’t we all get along?

The Computer Will Be Right – End of Democratic Party


Posted originally onMar 6, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Pig Congress

COMMENT: Dear Mr. Armstrong:

What I found really weird was that some Democrats were holding signs saying, “Musk Steals.”

Per its website, DOGE has saved $105B. In the name of all that is good and right, who are the ones stealing?! Where was this money going?! Wasn’t a good amount of this money routed to go, in fact, to the folks holding the signs and their party for their personal benefit at the expense of “We the People”?!

Is this the new, new “pot calling the kettle black” as some sort of weird mass brain washing campaign? It’s terrifying to me that some folks fall for this stuff and literally believe that Musk is stealing! We must wake up to see the forest for the trees!

I may have missed it, but I haven’t yet seen anyone calling out this colossal example of abject hypocrisy and true blindness.

Please continue doing what you do.

J

Fetterman_on_dEMOCRATS _A_sad_cavalcade_of_self_owns_and_unhinge

REPLY: Most Democrats reject democracy. It is either their way or no way. They have become so deep in their own lies and CORRUPTION that it is embarrassing internationally. The computer will be correct. It has never been wrong because it is not biased. I have warned that it is forecasting the collapse of the Democratic Party. Like the Federalists who also tried desperately to impose dictatorial power from a centralized government commanding and overruling local state culture and policies, this is their fate.

Democrats Denial

They are too stupid and too wrapped up in the demonic hatred of anyone who opposes them; they have become a cancer eating away at the unity of the United States. Sadly, this behavior leads to at least the collapse of their political party and the breakup of the United States, for they are too blind to see their own actions. In the worst-case scenario, we end up in a civil war. Their best days were when they advocated slavery.

government Bureacrats

They then turned to Marxism for FDR; then they tried civil rights with LBJ: all great labels but no substance. It has always been about just retaining personal power and the flow of money into their pockets, like USAID.

What are they fighting for? Transgender opera they were funding in Columbia?

They Are In A Bear Market!


Combined_Senate_House Democrats

Capitol Cosm


Posted originally on Mar 5, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Dems Want Taxes on Tips and Overtime


Posted originally on Mar 5, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Tax Robbery

The party of war voted in unison against ending taxes on tips and overtime work. Only one Republican voted against these measures, with 217 in favor. The Democrats are NOT the party of the working class and have been actively working to undermine the people for years.

Ending taxes on tips and overtime was one of Trump’s campaign promises, which is precisely why the Democrats struck down the bill. Laughably, the opponents stated they were concerned that losing $2 trillion in tax breaks over the next decade would hurt the national debt. The very people who have never seen a social program they did not want to fund are suddenly concerned about the national debt.

Franklin Taxes

Kamala Harris was in favor of these policies and had the backing of her party. Her feigned support was an effort to win over the people, no different from the failed promise of ending student loans. “It is my promise to everyone here, when I am president, we will continue to fight for working families, including to raise the minimum wage and eliminate taxes on tips for service and hospitality workers,” Harris told a crowd at the University of Nevada in August 2024.

The Democrats want everyone to be equally poor and dependent upon the government. Some lawmakers say eliminating tip taxes would be unfair to workers in states with a lower minimum wage. Under that line of thinking, should we penalize those who work in cities where, say, a meal is 5X the price as it would be elsewhere? Why should anyone out earn another in this fantasy socialist utopia? Minimum wage is a short-sighted political move that ignores the fundamental laws of supply and demand. Politicians always assume they can simply legislate prosperity, but history proves otherwise. Forcing businesses to pay higher wages does not magically create wealth—it destroys jobs, accelerates automation, and puts small businesses out of business.

Wages rise naturally in a real economic expansion when businesses compete for workers. That is how a free market functions. But when governments artificially raise wages, businesses respond logically—by cutting jobs, reducing hours, or passing the costs onto consumers through inflation. The very people politicians claim to be helping end up worse off, as their cost of living rises and entry-level jobs disappear.

Tipping culture is completely out of control in America. There is an expectation for consumers to pay a minimum of 20% in addition to inflated services, regardless of the quality of their service. Kiosks and self-checkout payment systems often ask for a tip. Consumers are less likely to go out when money is tight and the initial service has already risen due to inflation. Then, the government wants to take a portion of these tips AND the initial salary in most states. Whatever we must buy is then taxed; whatever we save is then taxed. Government greed knows no bounds. They’re too incompetent to manage funds, so they continue to squeeze our pockets, but it is never enough.

Taxing overtime pay is just another example of how clueless politicians are when it comes to economics. The entire purpose of overtime is to compensate workers for putting in extra hours beyond a normal workweek. Yet, instead of rewarding hard work, governments see it as another opportunity to grab more revenue. Why would the government disincentivize people from working? We are eager to keep our hospitals staffed, ports flowing, trucks moving, etc. but are discouraging a productive workforce by dipping into their earnings.

Do the Dems who voted against these policies hate the American people, Trump, or both? No one is buying their feigned concern for the national debt. If policymakers had any real understanding of economics, they would eliminate taxes on overtime and tips entirely. If you want a strong economy, you incentivize productivity, not penalize it.

Poland


Posted originally on Mar 5, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Poland ECM 1989 2041

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, I just write to you because you are the only source for reliable news and forecasting here in Poland and Estonia. Your computer forecast our election and the markets incredibly. I understand why people try to slander you. It is always kill the messenger because they cannot argue with the message. I was concerned that you said 2025 was 86 years from Hitler invading Poland. Do you have any updates? I fear for Poland’s future.

LK

2023 10 26 Poland_s_new_parliament_to_convene_on_November_13_president_English_Section_


ANSWER: Yes, President Duda called for a new Polish parliament to convene after the October 15th elections, one to be led by former (unelected) EU President Donald Tusk.

Poland Germany 3 28 1939

The tensions with similar rhetoric preceded Hitler’s invasion of September 1st, 1939, for several months. That began in January/February 1939, and curiously, it was about 8.6 months later when the invasion took place. The rhetoric is now equally hateful. This is not going to look good. Tusk wants war with Russia.

2025

This year is 86 years from the 1939 invasion of Poland. The target year 2025 was also showing up to the start of civil unrest in Romania. This is an important year overall for the Eastern European nations in general.

WarsawPoland_Stock_Index Q 3 3 25

The Warsaw Shar Index has an important Double Directional Change for the 2nd quarter here this year. With Trump suspending money to Ukraine, we must ask, will Europe pick up the tab? If not, will the Ukrainian politicians demanding Zelensky resign and flee the country while he still can? Maybe Britain will give him political asylum.

“Seven Ways from Sunday” Group Select One of Their Own to Deliver State of the Union Rebuttal


Posted originally on CTH on March 4, 2025 | Sundance

It doesn’t quite apex the previous selection of Nikki Haley in 2016 to deliver the State of the Union rebuttal targeting then candidate Donald Trump, however it does come close.

The seven ways from Sunday group have this year selected Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin to deliver the State of the Union rebuttal to President Donald Trump.   Slotkin is a CIA operative shifted into congress.

You might remember Slotkin was one of the Senators who attended the Munich security conference to praise Volodymyr Zelenskyy as part of the CODEL.

In the CIA’s need to oppose President Trump, they are getting a little sloppy with the transparency of their agenda.

In semi-related news…. Dan Bongino will soon discover for himself, the FBI runs two basic operations as part of their modern mission. Proactive, and Reactive operations.

Operation #1 is best defined as the “proactive mission.” Essentially the autonomic operational objective of the silo as it is administered. This is the resting compass heading of the organization; it’s functional position in statis.

The ‘proactive mission’ is to defend the interests of the DC system of government. The FBI monitors threats to government interests and takes action based on threats to the framework of DC governance.

Operation #2 is best considered the “reactive mission,” where the FBI is forced into investigative footing as an outcome of something that happens.

The ‘reactive mission’ runs first and foremost through the prism of the ‘proactive’ responsibility. The reactive investigative footing is the full deployment of resources to identify if the event presents the possibility of risk to the DC system.

Example of #2, a terror event is a “reactive” focus. The FBI is reacting to something, investigating some event that has already occurred. Often the reactive investigation runs across the proactive activity, and we discover a “known wolfe” who was not a proactive priority, because the threat was not to DC or Govt., specifically. Another example the NASCAR noose nonsense.

Example of #1, the Hunter Biden laptop, Ashley Biden diary, Awan Brothers, Clinton email server etc., these are all considered ‘threats’ to the DC/Govt system, and therefore they gain the full attention of the “Proactive Mission.”

Understanding the FBI is a matter of understanding the priority of the organization is defending the interests of DC/Govt as the primary objective, the Proactive Operation, the standard setting.

The Reactive Operation is considerably less important and encompasses the after-action Homeland Security mission.

The FBI is a sub-silo of the much more significant Parent silo, the CIA.

It is the CIA who controls the operational mission focus of the FBI.

THE NEXT VIETNAM: Steve Bannon On Ukraine Having No Interest In A Peace Deal


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: Mar 3, 2025, at 7:00 pm EST

Ep. 3585a – US Crypto Reserve Established, Gold Reserve Established, Next Phase Coming, Taxes


Posted originally on Rumble By X 22 Report on: Mar 2, 2025 at 5:15 pm EST

The Epstein Files


Posted originally on

pOSTED originally on Mar 4, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Epstein Ornament

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, I found your initial comment that Epstein was not a pedophile offensive. Then, with time and saying there were over 200 girls, you pointed out these were all high-profile people interesting. Then your last comment that the real question nobody asks is who did he work for? Is this why there seems to be holding back the files?

GG

Epsteins Island

ANSWER: I believe they have stepped into a pile of shit, as they say, and it stinks so bad, they can’t get it off their shoes. I believe the spin of this is seriously wrong. Epstein was working for someone, and the people who flew with him to his island were his marks or real victims. In other words, the object was to get evidence on them to blackmail them into doing whatever.

Look, the legal age is 16 in England, not 18. They are free from parental control, can leave home, can start a family, can get married, can start work, can pay taxes, and can join the military forces.

Epsteing Andrew

Now, look at this map. Epstein has an island in the US Virgin Islands. If he were really concerned about obeying the law, he would have bought an island in the British Virgin Islands. JUST CROSS THAT BORDER and everything would have been legal. If it was legal, then what was the point. I doubt that most middle-aged men could tell the difference if a girl was 17 or 18 by just looking at them.

This was a professional honey trap. I doubt this was just for fun, and I doubt that this was to blackmail people for Epstein’s personal benefit. This had to be an operation for someone else and he was paid to get people into compromising positions to do certain things.

Hoover J. Edgar
Anna_Chapman_mug_shot

J. Edgar Hoover was probably the most powerful non-elected person in modern American history. As FBI director from 1924 through his death in 1972, he used the tools of state to create a power base that was unrivaled in American history. Speaking with members of Congress over the years and staff, they would recount how Hoover would use blackmail and intimidation against members of Congress. He would go to their office and say I just wanted to let you know that this came up about something you had done. He would say if the FBI discovered this fact, perhaps your opponent might. They would have to thank him and then they were on his short leash.

Anna Chapman was a Russian Spy caught in New York City. She was swapped for American spies in 2010 and made headlines in New York. She was stunningly beautiful as well as stunningly successful. Well, if you are going to betray secrets, this is far better than the rubber hose treatment. She became known as Vladimir Putin’s weapon of mass distraction.

Honey Traps were very common during the Cold War. The KGB would send stunningly beautiful Russian women to entangle men in strategic positions. This is a very old trick to get information. In my opinion, this was the real gold of Epstein—to get people in compromising positions so his real benefactors could have leverage. Who was his real boss? Some say Israel.

The Truth Behind Romania


Posted originally on Mar 4, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

2025_03_03_16_13_52_Work_on_Largest_NATO_Europe_Base_Begins_in_Romania

QUESTION: I read your post on Romania. Why have the EU and US interfered in the Romanian election? Is it just because they would be anti-EU? But then why was the US involved? What am I missing?

PW

NATO Air Base

ANSWER: It’s all about Russia, Russia, Russia. They needed to nullify the election in Romania because they were building the largest NATO airbase in Europe. They intend to attack Russia and take back Crimea and the entire region. They want to take all the warm water ports, shut down Russia, and drive it into bankruptcy.

Everything they do is to create World War III. They are no different than Zelensky, who is not interested in peace. He is a NeoNazi who pretended to be Christian, just like George Soros, and only said he was Jewish after he became President so nobody would look at his background, making jokes about confiscating assets from Jews and Russians.

Robert MacNamara was the Neocon who took us into Vietnam. He said they thought Russia was involved. He apologized and said it was just a civil war. It has been nothing by Russia, Russia, Russia for decades. They did not care that communism collapsed, and the Russian people did not want to conquer Europe. NATO has no purpose if there is peace with Russia. They need to promote war constantly, and they instruct the leaders not to dare speak with Putin. That ensures there will never be peace.

Thus, Romania is a strategic pawn in this chess game with Russia. They do not care about the Romanian people whatsoever. How dare they select someone who wants to take Romania out of NATO and the EU!

Romania_Bet Y Arrsay 3 1 23

Here is the forecast from 2022 for the Romanian share market. Note that the turning point was 2025. I feel very bad for the Romanian people. The EU looks at you as irrelevant in their quest to take Russia’s $75 trillion worth of natural resources, which is twice the US National Debt. Then Europe will rise to reestablish what was the old Roman Empire, and the upstart USA will be reduced to a subservient position.