Judge James A. Shapiro – Face of Tyranny


Armstrong Economics Blog/Rule of Law Re-Posted Aug 30, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

This is an unbelievable story of a rogue Judge James A. Shapiro who has just proven he is UNQUALIFIED to be a judge and should be removed from the bench FORTHWITH!!!! In a stunningly illegal decision that is 100% against the Constitution and everything the United States stood for, this crazy judge, Sua sponte (Latin for “of one’s own accord; voluntarily”), in the most unprecedented legal decision I have ever heard, stripped a mother of all parental rights over her son because she was NOT vaccinated. This judge presides at Chicago’s Daley Center, stripped Rebecca Firlit of custody because she refuses to get a vaccination shot. Worse is the fact that the judge simply asked her if she was vaccinated on his own accord. It was never brought up by her ex-Husband. Of course, his disgusting lawyer admitted he was surprised, but now he defends the judge showing he too should be disbarred.

A huge is to listen to a dispute between two people. He is not allowed to Sua sponte raise a defense that was not presented. This shows he was not acting as a legal adjudicator but has a BIASED and is obviously incompetent to think for himself and strips a mother of her right to see an 11-year-old son BECAUSE he believes in vaccines. Her husband should have made such an argument and then you get to put on a defense. Here, her husband made no such request and the judge denied her Due Process of Law for she was never allowed to put on defense against getting a vaccination.

It is people like Judge Shapiro who will create an armed revolution for the purpose of a court to maintain civilization by providing a forum for two parties to present their case. When that is denied, then the ONLY recourse is to an armed revolution. Civilization is about rules that we all follow. Tyranny is when there are no rules and those in power just do as they like which is what he has ruled in this case.

Edward Gibbon wrote of Emperor Commodus (177-192AD) with who historian agree began the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, that his abuse of the legal system denied any ability to obtain Due Process of Law. In the end, the ONLY recourse was a revolution because they simply assassinated him which h then cast the Roman Empire into civil war.

distinction of every kind soon became criminal. The possession of wealth stimulated the diligence of the informers; rigid virtue implied a tacit censure of the irregularities of Commodus; important services implied a dangerous superiority of merit; and the friendship of the father always insured the aversion of the son. Suspicion was equivalent to proof; trial to condemnation. The execution of a considerable senator was attended with the death of all who might lament or revenge his fate; and when Commodus had once tasted human blood, he became incapable of pity or remorse

(Book 1, Chapter 4).

That day is coming. This tyranny will not be accepted and the tyrants who think they can simply do whatever they like will discover that history is not on their side.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.