I have warned that the Democrats intentionally manipulated the black community by appearing to support their “Defund the Police” movement. Now that the Democrats returned control of the House, they suddenly rejected the “Defund the Police” movement. This is what I am talking about with respect to why Republics are so corrupt and worse than even a dictatorship or monarchy. The other forms of government do not pretend to care; they just exist. Republics are historically the most corrupt form of government, for they lie about everything to win seats and then do as they like, assuming the people are too stupid to remember the last time.
Our good friend John Spiropoulos continues his travels today on a coast-to-coast multi-state tour while en route to Washington DC for the January 6th MAGA rally. CTH will be sharing videos of John’s travels along the way.
Today John’s “Let’s Roll America” report is filed from New Mexico where he ran into long distance hauler Kray Langston. Mr. Langston represents the pride of our American grit that keeps our nation running. Kray has a message for President Trump:
“Keep Fightin‘!!“
You can support John at his GoFundMe-Here, as he travels through Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee and Virginia. Also any CTH member who would like the opportunity to meet up with John for his video segments can contact him via his email address: Spirovideo@aol.com
Additionally, for those traveling to Washington DC for the rally on January 6th, here’s some insider advice and helpful tips from a person who lives in the area – SEE HERE –
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis was questioned today about why he would wait to take a place in line for a COVID-19 vaccination. When answering the question the Florida governor had the best response: “When it’s my turn, I will be vaccinated. Granted I am an elected official, but whoop-dee-do, at the end of the day let’s focus where the risk is”…
Florida Governor DeSantis and South Dakota Governor Krisi Noem are the best two governors in the nation right now. Both focused on common-sense mitigation efforts within their states; both focused on freedom and economic liberty; and both showing strong leadership amid a nation now filled with totalitarian dictators.
Well done.
.
Guess which one of these politicians the establishment GOP will attempt to ram down the throat of Republican voters in the next presidential election….
I’ll eat a rice cake if I’m wrong…. but I guaran-damn-tee you the professional political class will work overtime to try and push decepticon favorite Nikki Haley. Bookmark it.
In 2015 and 2016 candidate Donald J Trump was able to break through the controls of the Republican party apparatus by gathering overwhelming grassroots support and then not backing down from the internal fight with the elites. The Trump movement is based on a non-special interest, color-blind and large coalition of middle-class workers and American patriots who want to see the best interests of our nation supersede all other issues.
Despite a similar populist style, albeit clouded with larger government intervention, what Donald Trump did with the RNC candidate Bernie Sanders refused to do with the DNC.
Yesterday a recent poll of GOP voters was released by Rasmussen. The results show 72% of republican voters want the Republican party to remain focused on the America-First MAGA message that lies at the heart of the movement.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 72% of Likely Republican Voters think their party should be more like Trump than like the average GOP member of Congress. Twenty-four percent (24%) see the average Republican in Congress as a better model. (more)
This is rather remarkable. In real time, during live testimony before a Georgia Senate Committee, a witness testifies to using Wifi capbility to enter the Fulton County voting system via the internet while the hearing was ongoing. WATCH:
Earlier today Missouri Senator Josh Hawleyannounced his intent to challenge the January 6th congressional certification of the electors. A group of approximately 30 House representatives, led by Mo Brooks, will be challenging from the lower chamber.
This sets up a dynamic where formal electoral challenges from both chambers of congress will be taking place based on evidence of election fraud in several key states. The objection will initiate a debate and roll-call vote to certify electors within both the House and Senate. Vice-President Mike Pence will preside over the debate in the Senate.
A combination of The Guarantee Clause (constitution) and the Electoral Count Act of 1887 (law), establishes the framework for some to argue a fraudulent 2020 election result can successfully be challenged during congressional certification on January 6, 2021. Thus five state legislatures -under Republican control- have sent dual-sets of electors to congress: Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Georgia and Pennsylvania.
[Article IV – Sec.4] The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
“The Guarantee Clause” – “At its core, the Guarantee Clause provides for majority rule. A republican government is one in which the people govern through elections. This is the constant refrain of the Federalist Papers. Alexander Hamilton, for example, put it this way in The Federalist No. 57: “The elective mode of obtaining rulers is the characteristic policy of republican government.” [citation] “The Clause requires the United States to prevent any state from imposing rule by monarchy, dictatorship, aristocracy, or permanent military rule, even through majority vote. Instead, governing by electoral processes is constitutionally required.”
Let us be clear… There is little framework for this type of constitutional issue. This is uncharted territory, and consequently there is no body of law or case study upon which to apply a historic reference. However, that said, the issue of Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe, producing a report about foreign election interference could be a fulcrum issue upon which “The Guarantee Clause” of the constitution may apply.
Here’s where it gets interesting…. The Guarantee Clause puts the jurisdiction in the hands of the political bodies, executive branch and legislative branch, to decide the merit of any state vulnerability in their election outcome. There is little, if any, place for the judicial branch to play a role.
In Luther v. Borden (1849), the Supreme Court held questions involving the Guarantee Clause nonjusticiable, meaning that any remedy for a violation would lie with Congress or the President, not the federal judiciary. Nearly one hundred years later, the Court sweepingly declared that the guarantee of a republican form of government cannot be challenged in court. Colegrove v. Green (1946). (citation)
The federal government, not the state government, ultimately holds the responsibility to protect the entire United States from foreign interference within the Guarantee Clause. This would seem to apply to foreign election interference. “[B]ecause protection against invasion or domestic violence is normally available only from Congress and the President, the structure of this section suggests that the political branches have at least the primary duty to carry out its obligations.”
If DNI Ratcliffe produces a report (prior to January 6th) that outlines foreign interference in the election; and if the argument can be made the states with the contested (dual sets) of electors were subjects/targets of that interference; then a foundation to nullify the electors from the contested states is laid in congress.
In this approach the electoral nullification argument would appear to rest on The Guarantee Clause; where the state election outcome was not valid – as it is not representative of a republican form of government, and the majority vote requirement was manipulated.
If this type of legislative challenge was to take place, there is little precedent for the judicial branch to be involved except to qualify what role The Guarantee Clause would/could play and to what extent the nullification arguments are constitutionally valid.
Again, this is all uncharted territory. However, there are people claiming this process could work to keep President Trump in office. The disqualification of the contested state electors under this argument would ultimately fall upon Vice President Mike Pence who is also President of the Senate and in charge of the January 6th electoral vote certification.
There is a lot of “if-this-then” etc within this framework, and all of it ultimately is predicated on congress challenging the election (now appears likely); and VP Mike Pence then deciding which electors would be certified or nullified (long-shot); but that seems to be the argument some are making.
Immediately after Senator Hawley made his announcement, incredibly the multinational retail corporation Wal Mart responded via twitter with a snarky reply.
Good grief, it is stunning that Walmart would allow such a response. I will never step foot in their store ever again.
With the Georgia senate run-off race only a few days away, members of Georgia’s Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Elections and members of the Senate Judiciary committee will hold a hearing to study Georgia’s Election laws, and their past and present impact on the current Election cycle. The Hearing begins at 9am ET.
Each day, we’re bombarded (I’d say ad nauseam) with reports and news of more COVID-19 “cases,” whatever that term means.
You’d think that this term would be well defined, here, there and everywhere. I wish you luck in finding a standard, generally accepted definition of it. If you succeed, please let me know.
But, don’t despair, there’s a cure for it. Big Pharma is “on the case.”
Some Definitions of “Cases”
First, let’s see how Wikipedia defines it: Searching Wikipedia for the definition of “case,” at (accessed on Dec. 29, 2020, 6:21 pm EST) in this context. I could not find any reference to COVID-19, or any other medical meaning of the term “case” – none at all!
The CDC (U.S. Centers for Decease Control and Prevention); again just searching for a definition of the term “case” provides only such for Listeriosis: No mention of COVID-19—none at all.
Undeterred, further checking found a CDC definition, dating back to April, 2020, answering my quest. There, it states, under the Headlines (also accessed on Dec. 29, 2020) as follows :
”Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), 2020 Interim Case Definition, Approved April 5, 2020”:
Most interesting, at least in my mind is that “evidence of pneumonia”—by this definition alone—now qualifies as a clinical evidence of COVID-19 “infection.”
Clearly, several decades ago now, I must already have had contracted “COVID-19” already. At that time I felt pretty lousy and went to see our GP physician whose diagnosis of my condition was “pneumonia.” His advice then was: “Rest up and drink lots of fluids and in a few days you’ll be fine again.”
Indeed, having plenty of prescribed fluids on hand and following the good doctorcs advice, after a few days of rest I was eager and ready to go back to work.
And I had just thought of it then as a “case” of the common seasonal flu!
That truly begs the question:
What differentiates the “common flu” from “COVID-19?”
As far as I can reckon, the answer to that question is hard to come by.
Both the “flu” and COVID-19,” diagnosed via the unspecific “PCR” (polymerase-chain-reaction test), appear to test for similar or, perhaps even identical, biological fragments in one’s body.
The Wrong Pandemic
What’s of interesting significance in that regard is also a recent report in the journal Nature that states, inter alia,
“In May [2020], at the tail end of the first wave of COVID-19 deaths in many nations, and when some of the strictest lockdowns were in place, health workers noted an abrupt and early halt to the 2019–20 flu season in the Northern Hemisphere.”
Of course, such trivia is not welcome by the purveyors of the many millions of vaccine doses against this novel covidian type of the coronavirus variety. Nor is it welcome by progress-minded folks at the World Health Organization and their prime disciples (Drs. Tedros, Fauci, Tam, etc.), nor by the movers and shakers (attendance by invitation only) at the World Economic Forum, nor the pharmaceutical giants which may reap great profits from their vaccine products, nor from government entities that may have the best in mind but are, nevertheless, just turning into fear-mongering ping-pong balls of the afore-mentioned.
For another opinion along this line of thought, A. Firstenberg summarized that in a recent post with the title “The Wrong Pandemic.”
With that in mind, please accept my Best Wishes for You and Yours for 2021!
In the past several days pro-Trump pundits began floating the idea that Vice-President/President of the Senate, Mike Pence, actually possesses plenary power to accept or reject Electoral votes he believes are fraudulent or fraudulently certified.
These Trump-supporters point to the 12th Amendment as the basis for this allegation. However, an unbiased reading of the 12th Amendment does not at first glance support this perspective. But… recent scholarship makes a compelling case for the assertion that the 12th Amendment indeed grants the Vice President/President of the Senate such plenary powers over acceptance of Electoral votes.
And if this is true, and if VP Pence were to nullify sufficient slates of Electors (even if he did not endorse competing slates of Republican Electors), the 2020 election would then transition into what is called a Contingent Election in the House of Representatives – the same form of election that elected Thomas Jefferson President. And a Contingent Election will re-elect Donald Trump – because such an election assigns each State only one vote – and Republicans control the majority of the votes because they control the majority of the States.
The ultimate preparation for a 12th Amendment battle is what our rag-tag teams of attorneys and activists are already doing: Building, refining, and organizing the mountains of evidence for election-changing fraud in the Six Swing States.
Since Election Night on November 3 these teams have also labored to rally support among Swing State Legislators, urging them to recall or nullify their State’s current slates of fraudulent Electors. These teams have invoked every possible mechanism to this end but have succeeded only in carrying off sparsely attended legislative informational hearings with no backing of leadership. Yet, their efforts are slowly having an effect.
This ‘persuade the State Legislators’ tactic is ongoing and remains a pivotal element on the path to reclaiming our stolen election. To this end all readers who support Trump must continue to call and email these State Legislators every single day between now and January 6, when the Electoral votes are formally counted.
(I would be honored to email my csv files of the email addresses of State legislators from GA, PA, WI and AZ – thus permitting you to compose your email text and then paste the email addresses into it – and hit Send). I also have example emails available (drawn from the ones I’ve sent nearly every day since the election). My email: williamlyles@hotmail.com.
The ultimate goal of this State Legislator initiative is to accumulate as many of their voices as possible calling into question the legitimacy of their own State’s election and communicating their allegations directly to VP Mike Pence – ASAP – and to Republicans in the U.S. House and Senate.
The greater the number of State legislator declarations the greater the justification for VP Pence to invalidate Electors from the Swing States. And, it must be kept in mind that VP Pence does not have to ‘replace’ the fraudulent Electors with Trump Electors – he merely needs to take the currently fraudulently certified Electors out of play.
To the extent he can do this, if it knocks both Biden and Trump below 270 votes, the wondrous Contingent Election, described above, can begin – which we win.
In addition to the “State Legislator initiative” described above, between now and January 6 Patriots need to overwhelm U.S. Republican House members and Senators – especially the Senators – with phone calls and emails.
We must demand of our Republican U.S. legislators that they OBJECT to the fraudulent slates of Electors from the Six scandalous Swing States. In particular, they must take whatever action is necessary that will lead to a Contingent Election.
Note: Phone calls are best because no U.S. Congressperson provides a direct email address – only those useless ‘form’ email boxes.
However, to date we do not have any Senators on the record confirming they will join a House member in Objecting to slates of Electors on January 6. At least one Senator is required for each Objection. We need to warn our Senators – now – that if they fail to act – aggressively – we will initiate Primary and Recall initiatives against them, beginning January 7, and without end.
We come now to the the third initiative comprising the “12th Amendment Plan” – the VP Pence initiative: VP Pence needs to be overwhelmed with emails and phone calls from Republicans, prevailing upon him to courageously refuse to accept Electoral votes from the Six Scandalous Swing States.
Motivated (hopefully) by the raucous demands of the 74 million Patriots who voted for Trump, our Republican State and Federal politicians will be motivated – finally – to take a deep dive into the growing treasure trove of hard evidence of election-changing fraud.
Now, in the final hours of this effort, this evidence of fraud will be sorely needed by U.S. Congresspersons to support their Objections to Electoral votes on January 6. Mike Pence will need this information to justify his assertion of Amendment 12 powers. And, most importantly, the American public will need this information to determine whether the 12th Amendment Plan is fully justified as a valid means for overturning the most comprehensively putrid and fraudulent election in American history.
Patriots can hasten this process by mastering the evidence* themselves – the growing bounty of evidence of fraud – to the end of forcing it upon the legislators they contact – compelling the legislators to at least acknowledge the evidence for election-changing fraud and to cease their willful ignorance and denial.
If Patriot Republican dreams come true, if VP Mike Pence is trulyauthorized by the 12th Amendment to exert exclusive and plenary power over certification of slates of Electors (including the power to nullify fraudulent slates of Electors) and if VP Mike Pence is prepared to save America despite his certain knowledge he will then be reviled to the ends of time by half the population – and if he indeed nullifies the invalid slates of Electors – the nation will explode into Civil War.
When/if this transpires on January 6, the overwhelming cold Civil War already consuming us will likely transmogrify into violence and riots orders of magnitude larger than anything brought to us heretofore by Black Lives Matter or Antifa.
Sadly, this chilling scenario is all the more likely because current polling reveals 95% of Democrats believe Joe Biden was elected in a free and fair election. Consequently, if Republicans reclaim the election initially stolen from them – on January 6 – and given that Democrats (mostly) comprise the only Party reliably responsible for political violence in America, the 95% of Democrats who are certain their election was legitimate will unleash hell’s own fury of fire and violence upon our nation.
As predictably as the sun rising in the East.
But what alternative do Americans have? It takes no great mind to understand that if the vast and consuming fraud of the 2020 election is allowed to stand, if America possesses no mechanism by which to thwart this fraud’s rectification, our electoral process, and our country, are doomed and unsalvageable. By this standard, honor demands we endure temporary conflagrations no matter how unendurable.
For this old geologist the change from carbon causing cooling to causing global warming with no change in its place in the periodic table has been fascinating
Atweet from the National Weather Service in Miami: “Brrr! Much colder temps expected for Christmas. Falling iguanas are possible”.
On Christmas Day, the Associated Press reported: “With unexpectedly cold weather in the forecast and pandemic-related curfews. Florida is about to have a Christmas unlike any other in recent memory, and it may involve falling iguanas.”
It seems that the lizards which are cold-blooded like to sleep in trees. But when it gets unusually cold their body temperature drops enough, they go sort of dormant. And in losing their grip fall from the branches. Without warning, which was part of the weather alert that temps could be the lowest in some 21 years.
The outstanding climate site WUWT recently ran a list of over 100 climate alarms. These range from dire warnings about another ice age—from using too much fossil fuels—to global warming. For the same reason.
Fear of The World Frying
“The lowest winter temperatures are likely to increase in Northern Europe…The duration of the snow season is very likely to shorten and snow depth is likely to decrease.” – IPCC Climate Change, 2007.
“All simulations show the trend of less snowfall will continue into the future. And winter sports will no longer be possible.” – Liebnitz Institute for Oceanography, February 17, 2005.
However, this winter seems to be generating some concerning news stories – about too much snow. And even one about too much cold in Brazil.
“More Record Lows in Brazil” – Coutiniho, November 7, 2020.
“Snow Chaos – Record Snowfall Causes Mayhem in Austria” – Today, RTZ.Lu, December 9, 2020.
“Delhi, Weather: IMD Records Coldest October in 58 Years” – The Quint, October 31, 2020.
“Record Snowfall in New York State” – WGRZ.com, December 26, 2020.
“Texas Snowfall Almost As Far South As Austin” – NBC, Dallas-Fort Worth, December 28, 2020.
Fear of Another Ice Age
“The world has been chilling sharply…At twice what it would take to put us in an ice Age.” – Earth Day 1970, Kenneth Watt, Ecologist.
“Discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun’s rays that the Earth’s average temperature could fall by six degrees. Sustained emissions over five to ten years, could be sufficient to trigger an Ice Age.” – Washington Post, July 9, 1971.
Now, just where did the Washington Post sensationalism come from?
From a paper published by NASA physicists Rasool and Schneider in 1971:
“For aerosols, however, the net effect of increases in density is to reduce the surface temperature of the Earth. If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.”
In other articles at the time, “aerosols” mainly meant carbon particulates emitted by burning fossil fuels. Indeed, an article published by “New Scientist” in December 2003 quoted James Hansen on increasing amounts of particulate carbon in the atmosphere causing global warming.
Hansen, the “father” of global warming hysteria, was quoted: “It causes a strong warming effect”.
For this old geologist the change from carbon causing cooling to causing global warming with no change in its place in the periodic table has been fascinating.
But to go with the mandated fad, global warming due to whatever reason could eventually diminish fears about falling iguanas.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 