Victor Davis Hanson reacts to Joe Biden entering 2020 presidential race on WMAL (04–25–19)


Published on Apr 29, 2019

SUBSCRIBE 1.2K
Historian and author of the new book The Case for Trump, Victor Davis Hanson analyzes Joe Biden’s 2020 campaign and its implications. Broadcast date: 04–25–19. All the videos, songs, images, and graphics used in the video belong to their respective owners and this channel does not claim any right over them

Douglas Murray in conversation with Jordan Peterson


Published on Sep 4, 2018

SUBSCRIBE 5.7K
This is a wide ranging and thought provoking conversation between Jordan Peterson & Douglas Murray on IQ, Politics and the Left.

Tucker Carlson Outlines Big Tech’s Moves To Control Political Speech…


This is a discussion point CTH has outlined for quite a while; the new aspect is the scale and scope of Big Tech’s latest effort to silence voices they define as against their interests.

President Trump has taken notice of the issue and over the past 48 hours he has been drawing additional attention to the problem.  Things are going to get a lot worse, a lot worse, in the days and months ahead.

.

In the final analysis, the big picture is about authoritarian control. Currently the largest tech companies are leveraging their power and influence to remove dissenting voices from commonly used social media platforms. Back in 2015 there was a prescient discussion between Matt Drudge and Alex Jones where this exact scenario was outlined.

Unfortunately, federal political leadership is aligned with Big Tech’s goals and opinions. This is one of the issues where the UniParty becomes most visible. There is a history of similar common cause that might provide reference.

In 2010 when the Tea Party was targeted by President Obama’s Attorney General, Eric Holder, the DOJ and IRS worked together to create the target list of voices they deemed adverse to their political interests. Because the establishment republican party was also a target of the Tea Party, the GOP and DNC viewed the Tea Party political rebellion as a common enemy. In 2019 and 2020 the same dynamic exists.

Populists, ordinary freedom loving Americans, are considered an enemy of the statists; adverse to the interests of the institutionalists. As a result DC politicians have no motive to confront Big Tech and their goals to silence voices based on inherent political views.

.

Paul Joseph Watson

@PrisonPlanet

“Dangerous”.

My opinions?

Or giving a handful of giant partisan corporations the power to decide who has free speech?

You decide.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMqlfwV4BA8 

20.8K people are talking about this

Lauren Southern

@Lauren_Southern

Lmao at establishment conservatives who think they won’t be labeled the new “dangerous” / “extremist” voices when those to the right of them are all banned. Good luck with that one guys 👌🏻

9,388 people are talking about this

Jeremy Boreing@JeremyDBoreing

Those suggesting Facebook can ban anyone for any reason because they are a private company do not understand the platform/publisher distinction or the special legal protections afforded the former.

10.7K people are talking about this

Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️

@SharylAttkisson

When did we decide, as Americans, that it’s ok fo govt & 3d parties to censor/ curate our info? That we cannot be trusted with unfiltered info? That we shd only be able to find info that *they* tell us is true on matters that are opinion or in legitimate dispute?

11.7K people are talking about this

Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️

@SharylAttkisson

When did we quit teaching/understanding that free speech means protecting the distasteful, lest we open the door for govt/3d parties to decide that whatever they oppose is “distasteful” and therefore to be banned?

11.3K people are talking about this

#Jordan Petersonn DESTROYS Regreassive #BBC reportecr


Published on Aug 6, 2018

SUBSCRIBE 3.6K
If you like my content you may have noticed i dont have ads and i cant apply for monetisation however. The way this page is funded is through the second largest home and business security provider in the world called VERISURE so if your concerned about the security of your home business or family click the link below for a free consultation. https://acnhomesecurity.co.uk/verisure This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has been for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitutes ‘fair use’ under section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright

 

Senator Whitehouse -vs- AG Barr Debating the Word “Spy”…


Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), asks Attorney General William Barr during the committee hearing about the content of the Mueller letter dated March 27, 2019 (provided below) which was leaked to the Washington Post and New York Times by Mueller officials.

Additionally, Whitehouse then goes on to debate the term “spy” with the Attorney General.

AG William Barr Outlines Scope/Timeline of OIG FISA Review…


During a round of questioning with Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) AG William Barr was asked about scale and scope of the current IG investigation [04:22 prompted].  In response to the question AG Barr replies:

“I don’t want to be too specific; I talked to Mike Horowitz a few weeks ago about it, and its focused on the FISA, the basis for the FISA, and the handling of the FISA application. But by necessity it looks back a little bit earlier than that.  The people I have helping me with my review will be working very closely with Mr. Horowitz.”

AG Bill Barr Senate Testimony on Mueller Report


U.S. Attorney General William Barr testifies to the Senate Judiciary Committee about the Mueller/Weissmann/Rosenstein report.  The hearing begins at 10:00am EDT.

UPDATE: VIDEO ADDED (Two Segments – Morning Session and Afternoon Session)

Morning Session:

Afternoon Session:

.

Fox News Livestream – Fox Business Livestream – Alternate Livestream – ABC Livestream

.

Victor Davis Hanson – The Case for Trump (Part 2)


Published on Apr 30, 2019

SUBSCRIBE 47K
March 7, 2019 – Victor Davis Hanson discussed the campaign, election, and presidency of Donald Trump. He’s interviewed by former Congressman Dave Brat (R-VA).

The End of Keynesian-Monetarist Theory


QUESTION: Thank you for your great work. I have read this article where Kudlow says: White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow predicted that it is possible the Federal Reserve won’t hike interest rates again during his lifetime: My question is do you think he is right? And what will the consequence be if the interest rate remains where it is – For example, the next 10 or 20 years?
P.S. Of natural causes, we do not know how long time Kudlow lives.
Best regards
L/Sweden

ANSWER: Perhaps he got bad news from his doctor or it is a political statement that is just absurd. What he is really saying is that Quantitative Easing has so destroyed the Keynesian model that there is now no other alternative for central banks to control the economy. If they raise rates, the budget explodes. We are witnessing the end of Keynesian.Monetarist theory.

Will Social Security Exist in 2021?


QUESTION: Hi Martin,
You mentioned in a 2016 blog post that “We will probably see the end of this Social Security program by 2021.772 (October 9, 2021)”. Does this forecast still have a high probability of occurring? If so, won’t this be devastating to retirees, especially those with little or no retirement savings? My employer no longer offers a pension plan to employees, only a 401K plan.
Ref. “Negative Interest Rates Destroying the World Economy”, Apr 17, 2016.
Kind Regards,
DA

ANSWER: I do not see this unfolding as a default. They will have to revise the system one way or another. There is more likely to be a huge split in interest rates from the private sector compared to the public at the federal level. As I have stated before, I tried to would with Congress back in the ’90s in reforming Social Security transforming it into a wealth fund that was allocated out among managers. The Democrats would not vote for it so this is why Social Security today cannot survive. It invests 100% in government bonds. That means it does not even earn a fair interest rate.

 

When people feared the private sector, AAA corporate rates soared peaking with the bottom of the stock market in 1932 and then declined to bottom with the rally into 1937. What we face now is the collapse of Social Security because it is restricted to buying only government debt where the interest rates are artificially maintained at absurdly low levels. Therefore, Social Security is already constantly being reduced in benefits. It cannot continue in this manner. It will have to be reformed and changed entirely. I do not believe that they will stop paying people. The way they default is reducing payments and the payments will not be enough to sustain themselves. Look at Venezuela. They honor their pensions, but what you get today will buy only a cup of coffee.

The likelihood of Social Security remaining as it is today is ZERO. Private sector rates will rise v manipulated government rates. We have entered into the Great Unknown economically. The Quantitative Easing of the Bank of Japan and the Europeans Central Bank have wiped out the free markets and ended government borrowing as a viable free market. The far more interesting aspect of interest rates will become the spread between corporate and public at the federal level.