Posted originally on Apr 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: We all know who copies your work and pretends it is his. He is out now scaring the world that the dollar is going to crash, for the Chinese are selling dollars. You are the only person with a real database. What is your view on the dollar?
WKN
ANSWER: I know who you are talking about. I get emails about him all the time. He likes the notoriety but lacks the staff or the database to provide his self-proclaimed forecasts. I will provide the specifics on the private blog. However, April has been our target for many months. The often people out there constantly calling for the demise of the dollar are MORONS. They never look outside of the United States. They may be claiming that China is dumping dollars, but they began liquidating US debt in the tens of billions in 2013, and accelerated that because of Biden’s Neocons post-2022. They pretend this is something new, all because of Trump. They make it sound like they are on top of this, but where have they been since 2013?
Trump is fulfilling the cyclical forecast. We have been expecting a sell-off into 2025, which has been the biggest target identified by our computer for the past few years. I have conveyed my concerns to people in Congress. I am not so sure this does not just go over everyone’s head. The volatility will rise even further next year. If we penetrate the 2025 low next year, then this selling of US debt will continue into 2030, if not into 2032. That will be because NATO launches its contrived war against Russia and utterly destroys the European economy and extinguishes the EU.
Posted originally on Apr 14, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Our Institutional Report covering Europe’s countries with their forecasts generally out to 2032 has been a monumental effort. We greatly appreciate your patience, but this is vital for the decision-making for future investment in Europe. Things are certainly different from the past. Countries like Sweden and Switzerland, which had been neutral during previous world wars, have surrendered their neutrality and will not prove a safe harbor for capital during this conflict. Sweden has joined NATO and even sent jets to Poland. Switzerland gave up all foreigners with accounts and seized over $8 billion of accounts belonging to Russians, abandoning its historic traditions.
This report covers countries that nobody else even covers.
This also addresses the War with Russia & The eventual breakup of the EU itself
577 Pages fully illustrated with Charts and Arrays Per County, covering Currency and share markets
This Report is massive, and the price is $10,000 per institution.
(Please email to let us know how many reports you may need)
Posted originally on Apr 8, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
James Garrison served in the U.S. Army Air Forces during World War II, joining the year before the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Jim Garrison’s military career trained him as a pilot and was assigned to the 8th Air Force in Europe. He flew reconnaissance missions over Nazi-occupied territories, contributing to intelligence-gathering efforts. His role involved photographing enemy positions and assessing bomb damage. By the end of the war, he attained the rank of lieutenant and was honorably discharged.
After WWII, Garrison joined the Louisiana National Guard while pursuing his legal education at Tulane Law School (graduated 1949). He remained in the National Guard throughout the 1950s, rising to the rank of lieutenant colonel. He retired from military service in 1957 to focus on his legal and political career. After the war, he obtained a law degree from Tulane University Law School in 1949. He then worked for the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for two years, stationed with the Seattle office.
His military experience informed his leadership style, but did not directly overlap with his later role as District Attorney of New Orleans (1962–1973). Garrison is better known for his controversial investigation into President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, which overshadowed his military contributions. Garrison’s military career demonstrated a commitment to service, though it remains a lesser-known aspect of his life than his legal and political endeavors.
Jim Garrison stepped into the middle of the Neocons’ nest of corruption. During the 1960s, they were scheming to get us to (1) invade Cuba, and (2) invade Vietnam. In both cases, they assumed the Russians were behind both and with all of their conspiracy theories that Russia was trying to destroy the United States, thanks to Kruschev’s boast We will bury you, which launched their attempt to seize control of the United States’ foreign policy.
President Kennedy violated the NEOCON FIRST RULE – NEVER TALK TO A RUSSIAN!. Kennedy and Khrushchev first met at the Vienna Summit in June 1961. Before meeting face to face, their contact began when Khrushchev sent Kennedy a message on November 9, 1960, congratulating him on his presidential election victory and stating his hope that “relations between [the US and USSR] would again follow the line along which they were developing in Franklin Roosevelt’s time.”
There were some Russians who were anti-Khruschev and risked their lives to inform the US about his plans for Cuba and what became known as the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962. What the Neocons ignored was that there was a coup in Russia to overthrow Khruschev. They hated all Russians, no matter what.
I was just 10 years old when my father took me to Willingborough, New Jersey, during the 1960 campaign to listen to JFK. I shook his hand, but unlike Bill Clinton, that did not make me want to become president. I remember the hatred of those days. First, it was that the Pope was going to run the United States because he was Catholic. Then later, I remember people calling him a traitor for meeting with Khruschev.
Then the CIA proposed on March 13th, 1962, to kill Americans to create a false flag to blame Cuba to justify an invasion. This was Operation Northwoods. JFK concluded that these Neocons were deranged, evil, and had no problem killing people to create war. He wanted to terminate the CIA. The CIA was pulling off covert operations that were never authorized. Established in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy to unite several foreign assistance organizations and programs under one agency, statute law places USAID under “the direct authority and policy guidance of the Secretary of State.”
The goal of this agency was to counter Soviet Union influence during the Cold War and to advance U.S. soft power through socioeconomic development. USAID was subsequently established by the executive order of President John F. Kennedy, who sought to unite several existing foreign assistance organizations and programs under one agency. Anyone dealing with Washington has always heard that this was a mega slush fund. It started with the CIA, but the Democrats used it to promote their Marxist agenda. Kruschev was right, our enemy would come from within. Despite Marxism failing every time, the Democrats still preach the class warfare hatred of Karl Marx.
Video Player
00:00
00:23
Then, on June 10th, 1963, after the Cuban Missile Crisis, Kennedy made what has been called his Peace Speech. That seemed to have been the turning point when I would hear people talking, calling him a traitor. Then, about 5 months later, the Neocons assassinated JFK. John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States, was assassinated while riding in a presidential motorcade through Dealey Plaza in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963
Beginning in March 1964, Supreme Soviet presidium chairman and thus nominal head of state Leonid Brezhnev began plotting Khrushchev’s removal with his colleagues. Brezhnev had initially considered having Khrushchev arrested for treason. Cooler heads prevailed, and it was decided that persuading members of the Central Committee to support the ousting of Khrushchev was the better choice to avoid civil war. Khrushchev was absent from Moscow between January and September 1964, allowing the dissent to fester inside Moscow.
Garrison said in response to an NBC program that was highly critical of his pursuit of the alleged Kennedy assassination conspirators in New Orleans. On July 15, 1967, NBC allowed Garrison to give that response on the air.
Oliver Stone’s famous film, JFK, followed the prosecution of Jim Garrison and the tremendous effort to cover up the assassination of Kennedy and the immense effort to exonerate the CIA and maintain that Oswald was a lone shooter. Oliver Stone did a second film, a documentary, JFK Revisited.
The day after Kennedy was assassinated, Johnson had a meeting about going to war in Vietnam, all because the Neocons assumed that Russia was behind that. Robert McNamara, before he died, apologized, saying that they were wrong – it was just a civil war, and Russia was not involved.
Some say there is an unanswered question about the following timeline:
On March 1, 1967, Garrison arrested and charged New Orleans businessman Clay Lavergne Shaw with conspiring to assassinate President Kennedy, with the help of Lee Harvey Oswald, David Ferrie, and others.
On July 15, 1967, NBC allowed Garrison to give his response to NBC’s critical program about him.
On January 29, 1969, Shaw was brought to trial in Orleans Parish Criminal Court.
On March 1, 1969, a jury took less than an hour to find Shaw not guilty.
The question is, when did NBC obtain the evidence that Oswald could not have shot Kennedy, because NBC has a photo showing Oswald on the street at the time shots rang out? If that evidence was in the hands of NBC before July 15, 1967, then NBC let Garrison perform a dog and pony show when he gave his response to NBC’s “highly critical” program about him on air on July 15, 1967. If NBC obtained the evidence after July 15, 1967, but before January 29, 1969, it withheld crucial evidence from a criminal trial and thereby acquired every bad attribute, badge, and brand that anyone who withholds evidence must bear forever – obstruction of justice involving the assassination of a president.
After JFK’s assassination, Marina cooperated with authorities, including the Warren Commission. She testified that Lee owned a rifle resembling the murder weapon and acknowledged his pro-Castro sentiments and erratic behavior. Her testimony contributed to the Commission’s conclusion that Oswald acted alone.
Expressed Doubts Over Time:
In subsequent years, Marina began to express doubts. She questioned whether Lee could have acted alone and suggested the possibility of a conspiracy. In her 1978 book “Marina and Lee” and interviews, she speculated about external influences or a setup, though she did not outright deny his involvement.
Later Statements:
By the 1990s and 2000s, Marina continued to voice skepticism about the official narrative, emphasizing gaps in evidence and the plausibility of a broader plot. However, she stopped short of definitively exonerating Lee, often maintaining ambiguity about his exact role.
–
One document that the CIA has been hiding is the Gary Underwood document that states plainly that the CIA ASSASSINATED Kennedy. The reason this is important is that the Neocons are still running the show, lie about everything, and are in complete control of Europe, and are moving to achieve their ultimate goal – the total destruction of Russia, which is not fulfilling Ukraine’s ethnic cleansing of all Russians.
For example, Stone’s 1991 film “JFK” faced harsh pushback from historians for its suggestions that Kennedy’s death was the result of high-level conspiracies. Here, Oliver Stone appears after the most recent testimony before Anna Paulina Luna’s commission.
Conclusion:
Marina Oswald never categorically denied Lee’s involvement but evolved from initial cooperation with the official investigation to expressing persistent doubts about the lone-gunman theory. Her later remarks leaned toward skepticism, hinting at conspiracy possibilities without entirely absolving her husband.
World War III is unfolding before our eyes because the Neocons have been protected since the JFK assassination!
Posted originally on Apr 7, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, you have said that we have lost manufacturing because of taxes rather than tariffs. I believe you also said that a trade deficit is not a bad thing under your capital flow analysis. Can you please explain this? The press seems to say the opposite, but they are political fake news.
Thank you
GG
ANSWER: There are two account balances: the capital account and the trade/current account. Just because we have a trade deficit does not mean that it is negative for the economy. That is offset by the capital account, which is money coming in that is (1) foreign capital investing in the USA, from treasuries, shares, to real estate, and (2) US companies bringing capital home. Under Ronald Reagan, we had a rising trade deficit, but the economy was booming.
Volcker’s insane interest rates attracted foreign capital, causing the dollar to rise dramatically and sending even the British pound to nearly par in 1985. As the dollar rose, that brought down inflation, but it attracted foreign capital inflows. Interest expenditures flow through the current account when they flow outside the USA. That had nothing to do with goods or even services. It was interest payments on the debt.
The corporate tax rate in Michigan is a flat rate of 6% on federal taxable income (with certain adjustments) for C-corporations under the Corporate Income Tax (CIT), which replaced the Michigan Business Tax in 2011. The City of Detroit imposes a corporate income tax on businesses operating within its jurisdiction, a 2% tax on net income for corporations, and Michigan’s state corporate income tax rate of 6%.
If you look at where the US manufacturing hubs were, the local and state income taxes on top of federal taxes were the primary cause for manufacturing fleeing the USA. Add the fact that the Supreme Court ruled that because the federal income tax did not expressly exempt overseas income, that stupid decision meant Americans were subject to worldwide income on every level. I left New Jersey because if I held a conference in Hong Kong, I had to pay New Jersey 10% on top of the Feds for what? We held a conference in Philadelphia, and never again would I ever hold one there, for then I had to pay Philadelphia taxes, although I did not live or work there.
The Democrats make it sound like these corporations are greedy, and they go offshore because they get to pay $10 an hour instead of $20. That is the LEAST of the problem. It is always the taxes. You need accountants, and then lawyers, all to make sure to have crossed every “t” and dotted every “i” and all of these expenses are far more than anything you pay an employee. Now the latest is auditing you to see if you have “contract” employees instead of employees, since you do not take out taxes and match taxes on a contract employee. I just went through that audit, and it cost me $25,000 IN LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING FEES to prove I did not owe anything.
When the government looks in the mirror, it sees itself as all-powerful. It has no idea about humanity. It’s always about them and never the people. Just look at all the states where manufacturing used to be. They left, and it was not because they were paying someone else cheaper wages. The Democrats have blamed the “rich” and corporations for the damage that they have done to society, all for their corruption and greed.
The current account of the United States is a critical component of its balance of payments, reflecting the nation’s economic interactions with the rest of the world. It comprises four main elements. As you look at this list, you will see what I am talking about that this is by no means simply goods and services. All dividends, interest, and profits from multinational corporations that flow out to foreign investors. Thus, selling US Treasuries to foreigners expands the “trade” deficit as interest is paid. Since China has 10% of the US national debt and interest expenditures of $1 trillion, in theory, we send them $100 billion in interest. Tariffs are not going to reduce that, but they could result in selling domestic assets and returning that investment home, which would then go through the Capital Account, reducing the Trade/Current Account Deficit. The Press and even most Congressmen do not understand this.
1. Trade in Goods and Services (Net Exports)
Goods:
Exports: Physical products sold abroad (e.g., machinery, aircraft, agricultural goods).
Imports: Physical products purchased from other countries (e.g., consumer electronics, oil, automobiles).
The U.S. typically runs a trade deficit in goods due to high imports.
Services:
Exports: Financial, educational, tourism, and intellectual property services provided globally.
Imports: Services purchased from abroad (e.g., foreign travel, software licensing).
The U.S. often has a surplus in services, partly offsetting the goods deficit.
2. Primary Income (Net Income from Abroad)
Investment Income:
Earnings from U.S.-owned foreign assets (e.g., dividends, interest, profits from multinational corporations).
Payments to foreign owners of U.S. assets (e.g., interest on Treasury bonds held by foreign governments).
Compensation of Employees:
Wages paid to foreign workers in the U.S. (outflow).
Wages earned by U.S. residents working abroad (inflow).
3. Secondary Income (Net Current Transfers)
Government Transfers:
Foreign aid, grants, and donations (e.g., U.S. financial assistance to other countries).
Private Transfers:
Remittances sent by foreign workers in the U.S. to their home countries (outflow).
Gifts or inheritances received from abroad (inflow).
Current Account Balance
The sum of these components determines whether the U.S. has a surplus or deficit:
Deficit: The U.S. has run a persistent current account deficit, driven by:
A large goods trade deficit (imports > exports).
Outflows from secondary income (e.g., foreign aid, remittances).
Partial offsets come from services surpluses and primary income (e.g., returns on U.S. overseas investments).
Key Implications
Reflects the U.S. role as a net borrower globally, financing consumption and investment through foreign capital inflows.
Highlights structural economic factors, such as reliance on imports and the dollar’s role as a reserve currency, and exporting dividends and interest on US investments.
Posted originally on Apr 7, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong, you have said that we have lost manufacturing because of taxes rather than tariffs. I believe you also said that a trade deficit is not a bad thing under your capital flow analysis. Can you please explain this? The press seems to say the opposite, but they are political fake news.
Thank you
GG
ANSWER: There are two account balances: the capital account and the trade/current account. Just because we have a trade deficit does not mean that it is negative for the economy. That is offset by the capital account, which is money coming in that is (1) foreign capital investing in the USA, from treasuries, shares, to real estate, and (2) US companies bringing capital home. Under Ronald Reagan, we had a rising trade deficit, but the economy was booming.
Volcker’s insane interest rates attracted foreign capital, causing the dollar to rise dramatically and sending even the British pound to nearly par in 1985. As the dollar rose, that brought down inflation, but it attracted foreign capital inflows. Interest expenditures flow through the current account when they flow outside the USA. That had nothing to do with goods or even services. It was interest payments on the debt.
The corporate tax rate in Michigan is a flat rate of 6% on federal taxable income (with certain adjustments) for C-corporations under the Corporate Income Tax (CIT), which replaced the Michigan Business Tax in 2011. The City of Detroit imposes a corporate income tax on businesses operating within its jurisdiction, a 2% tax on net income for corporations, and Michigan’s state corporate income tax rate of 6%.
If you look at where the US manufacturing hubs were, the local and state income taxes on top of federal taxes were the primary cause for manufacturing fleeing the USA. Add the fact that the Supreme Court ruled that because the federal income tax did not expressly exempt overseas income, that stupid decision meant Americans were subject to worldwide income on every level. I left New Jersey because if I held a conference in Hong Kong, I had to pay New Jersey 10% on top of the Feds for what? We held a conference in Philadelphia, and never again would I ever hold one there, for then I had to pay Philadelphia taxes, although I did not live or work there.
The Democrats make it sound like these corporations are greedy, and they go offshore because they get to pay $10 an hour instead of $20. That is the LEAST of the problem. It is always the taxes. You need accountants, and then lawyers, all to make sure to have crossed every “t” and dotted every “i” and all of these expenses are far more than anything you pay an employee. Now the latest is auditing you to see if you have “contract” employees instead of employees, since you do not take out taxes and match taxes on a contract employee. I just went through that audit, and it cost me $25,000 IN LEGAL AND ACCOUNTING FEES to prove I did not owe anything.
When the government looks in the mirror, it sees itself as all-powerful. It has no idea about humanity. It’s always about them and never the people. Just look at all the states where manufacturing used to be. They left, and it was not because they were paying someone else cheaper wages. The Democrats have blamed the “rich” and corporations for the damage that they have done to society, all for their corruption and greed.
The current account of the United States is a critical component of its balance of payments, reflecting the nation’s economic interactions with the rest of the world. It comprises four main elements. As you look at this list, you will see what I am talking about that this is by no means simply goods and services. All dividends, interest, and profits from multinational corporations that flow out to foreign investors. Thus, selling US Treasuries to foreigners expands the “trade” deficit as interest is paid. Since China has 10% of the US national debt and interest expenditures of $1 trillion, in theory, we send them $100 billion in interest. Tariffs are not going to reduce that, but they could result in selling domestic assets and returning that investment home, which would then go through the Capital Account, reducing the Trade/Current Account Deficit. The Press and even most Congressmen do not understand this.
1. Trade in Goods and Services (Net Exports)
Goods:
Exports: Physical products sold abroad (e.g., machinery, aircraft, agricultural goods).
Imports: Physical products purchased from other countries (e.g., consumer electronics, oil, automobiles).
The U.S. typically runs a trade deficit in goods due to high imports.
Services:
Exports: Financial, educational, tourism, and intellectual property services provided globally.
Imports: Services purchased from abroad (e.g., foreign travel, software licensing).
The U.S. often has a surplus in services, partly offsetting the goods deficit.
2. Primary Income (Net Income from Abroad)
Investment Income:
Earnings from U.S.-owned foreign assets (e.g., dividends, interest, profits from multinational corporations).
Payments to foreign owners of U.S. assets (e.g., interest on Treasury bonds held by foreign governments).
Compensation of Employees:
Wages paid to foreign workers in the U.S. (outflow).
Wages earned by U.S. residents working abroad (inflow).
3. Secondary Income (Net Current Transfers)
Government Transfers:
Foreign aid, grants, and donations (e.g., U.S. financial assistance to other countries).
Private Transfers:
Remittances sent by foreign workers in the U.S. to their home countries (outflow).
Gifts or inheritances received from abroad (inflow).
Current Account Balance
The sum of these components determines whether the U.S. has a surplus or deficit:
Deficit: The U.S. has run a persistent current account deficit, driven by:
A large goods trade deficit (imports > exports).
Outflows from secondary income (e.g., foreign aid, remittances).
Partial offsets come from services surpluses and primary income (e.g., returns on U.S. overseas investments).
Key Implications
Reflects the U.S. role as a net borrower globally, financing consumption and investment through foreign capital inflows.
Highlights structural economic factors, such as reliance on imports and the dollar’s role as a reserve currency, and exporting dividends and interest on US investments.
Posted originally on Mar 31, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The USCongressional Budget Office is warning that the federal deficit has hit a point of no return. It is far too late to cut wasteful government spending. Politicians have kicked the can down the road for far too long and left us with a financial system held up through perpetual borrowing that cannot be reversed.
The CBO’s long-term forecast shows the federal deficit rising to 7.3% of GDP by 2055, but the figure is currently at 6.2% as of 2025 and this is an optimistic report. In contrast, the 30-year average from 1995 to 2024 was 3.9% of GDP. Public debt is projected to hit 156% of GDP by 2055, up from the 100% of GDP we face today.
Now the CBO mentioned that Trump’s tariffs could negatively impact the economy but we reached the point of no return years ago. Trump cannot be blamed for the current situation in the least. “Mounting debt would slow economic growth, push up interest payments to foreign holders of U.S. debt and pose significant risks to the fiscal and economic outlook,” the Long-Term Budget Outlook: 2025 to 2055 stated.
The Baby Boomer generation is at or nearing retirement and Social Security benefits are currently at 5.2% of GDP. The CBO believes this will reach 6.1% of GDP in 2055 but fail to recognize the fund is drying up. The Ponzi Scheme will come crashing down.
Interest expenditures alone have hit 3.2% of GDP as America. In 2024, the US spent $881 billion simple to finance its massive debt, and that figure is projected to reach $1.8 trillion by 2035. We spend more on servicing debt than we do on defense spending at this point.
Raising taxes cannot solve this massive issue, but that will not prevent the government from attempting to extort the people to cover their fiscal mismanagement. The government knows it is trapped and will continue to hold off on paying down their debt as long as possible. Worse still, other nations are decreasing their investments in Treasuries as we have seen with China and Russia. Japan is our main buyer now but they have their own colossal problems.
The debt crisis is global. America is far from the only nation facing an outright default, and as I have warned, we will see the pieces crumble one by one with America being the last frontier. This is precisely why Europe wants war because they are attempting to delay the inevitable collapse. Some believe they can confiscate Russian natural resources and save the day, but that is simply neocon fanfiction.
The ECM has pinpointed key turning points in the global economy, and the next phase of this crisis is unfolding right before our eyes. The sovereign debt crisis is inevitable, and as we approach 2028–2032, we will see capital flow away from the West once confidence in government collapses.
Posted originally on Apr 1, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The World Health Organization admitted that it has “no choice” but to cut its budget substantially. America’s exodus from the organization left the WHO with a budget gap of $600 million for FY2025, and it plans to cut expenditures by 20%.
The United States provided 16.3% of all funding from FY2022-2023, amounting to $1.3 billion of the organization’s $7.89 billion. Trump believes the WHO partnered with China to hide the origins of COVID-19, and he is particularly disgruntled that the US was paying 10X more into the organization compared to China at a cost of $500 million annually. “The World Health Organization has become nothing more than a corrupt Globalist scam…paid for by the United States, but owned and controlled by China,” Trump stated in November 2024. “I will not allow public health to be used as a pretext to advance the march of global government,” Trump stated before vowing to leave the organization.
“Dramatic cuts to official development assistance by the United States of America and others are causing massive disruption to countries, non-governmental organisations and United Nations agencies, including WHO,” WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in his e-mail to staffers. “While we have achieved substantial cost savings, the prevailing economic and geopolitical conditions have made resource mobilisation particularly difficult.”
Tedros is the first person in the 75-year history of the WHO who is not a medical doctor. Klaus Schwab supported him for that post, just as he recommended Lagarde for the IMF and then for the European Central Bank. He has also put in the head of the IMF from his board of the WEF as well. Schwab has the WHO in his back pocket. To put someone who is not a medical doctor at the head of the World Health Organization would be like putting Jeffrey Epstein as the head of a monastery.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was the second-largest donor to the WHO, and Gates used the organization to push the pandemic response, urging nations to use the very vacations he helped to fund. That man had ties to every globalist health organization. Still, Gates has come forward in recent weeks saying his organization simply can’t make up for the budget gap caused by the US withdrawing—and that is GOOD NEWS.
All the world leaders supporting the Great Reset were eager to relinquish complete power to the unelected officials at the WHO. The WHO wanted to seize the ability to force health mandates on the global population. The organization continually asks for global taxation in the name of health.
The scheme is to eliminate democracy. They accomplished that in Europe, where the people are allowed to vote only for an MP who has no power to overrule the Commission, which never stands for election, as is the case with the head of the EU, who is also UNELECTED by the people. The general belief is that the people are TOO STUPID to know what is best, and democracy became populism when Trump was elected. This proposal is clearly stated as part of the Great Reset put out by Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum.
The Pandemic Treaty would have allowed the WHO to bypass national laws and impose its will on the people. There has never been a more massive power grab than what we witnessed under the guise of the pandemic. The WHO attempted to force nations to sign a Pandemic Treaty in 2022 to ensure it could remain in control:
“The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed gaps in the governance, financing and systems needed to keep the world safe from epidemics and pandemics. There is an emerging global consensus around the need for an international treaty or other legally binding instrument, to provide the framework for a more coherent and coordinated response to future epidemics and pandemics.”
They had plans for global passports, taxation, and every method to provide a small group of unelected “visionaries” with centralized control over the world. The WHO is one of the organizations that was used to help them achieve their goal. As stated on the World Economic Forum’s website:
“To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.”
Now I could go on endlessly about the plans for the Great Reset, but focusing on the WHO’s involvement—their role was to weaponize public health to provide the WEF and UN with the ability to restructure the global economy. Trump’s withdrawal from the organization was a major win for global freedom. We will see the nations still on board with the Great Reset attempt to boost funding, as the power the pandemic provided was far too great to relinquish.
Posted originally on Mar 31, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced plans to cut its workforce by a quarter, eliminating 10,000 positions. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has vowed to gut the entire agency in his effort to Make America Healthy Again, vowing that eliminating excess bureaucracy will allow the agency “to do more with less.”
The agency plans to cut $11 billion in public health funding, and while Kennedy admits there will be a “painful period” ahead, one must look at the numbers and realize that these inflated agencies have not led to improved health care. “All of that money,” Kennedy said of the department’s $1.7 trillion yearly budget, “has failed to improve the health of Americans.”
America is one of the sickest nations in the developed world. Critics believe that these cuts will damage public health, but America is spending nearly 18% of its GDP on health care initiatives without results. The average American will not live to see 80 years of age. The average life expectancy stands around 76.4 years, according to the CDC, with women living an average of 79.3 years and men expiring sooner at 73.5. Those figures have been steadily declining each year. In comparison, the global average is 82.5 years.
The US ranks 32 out of 38 OCED nations for life expectancy. Yet, the US spends far more per capita on health compared to other developed nations. In 2023, America spent $13,432 per capita. In comparison, Switzerland and Germany, the second and third highest spenders, only pay a bit over $7,000 per capita and have healthier populations.
Young Americans (25-29) are dying at a rate 3X higher than their peers in advanced economies. Kennedy’s main platform has been to speak on behalf of the children of America, who are facing increased risks of illness compared to past generations. Kennedy claims 66% of children suffer from some form of a health condition, with other estimates putting this figure closer to 40%.
The Biden Administration increased the health department budget by 38% and inflated the workforce by 17%. Additional funding did not address the root causes of America’s health epidemic. Kennedy plans to consolidate 28 divisions into 15, and will cut regional offices from 10 to 5. A more cohesive agency will provide a “new era of responsiveness and a new era of effectiveness,” as we cannot continue funding measures that are not producing results.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 
