Dr. David Nabarro, Britain’s envoy to the World Health Organisation(W.H.O.) has contradicted the WHO and his own Boris Johnson. Nabarro has condemned mass coronavirus lockdowns calling them the “ghastly global catastrophe” which has caused the unprecedented crash of the world economy. Nabarro has correctly appealed to world leaders this past weekend telling them to stop “using lockdowns as your primary control method” of the coronavirus.
Nabarro has correctly pointed out that the only thing lockdowns achieved was to increase poverty rather than potentially saving lives. This is in direct contrast to W.H.O. chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, nicknamed Tedros the Terrible, who as far back as April gave his full support to lockdowns and even warned against lifting them too soon as reported back on April 10, 2020, in most mainstream media. In May, the WHO came out and justified the lockdowns saying the virus has jumped because of ending lockdowns too soon.
WHY? The lower-paying jobs require physical presences from being a waitress to working on oil rigs or planting crops. The only people who could work from home were the upper-class white-collar jobs. Even the people who clean office buildings have lost their jobs. These are the people who lack savings and these lockdowns have put at risk a massive civil uprising from February 2021 onward.
The key politicians have most likely been bribed because they are so nasty they cannot have any rational expectation to run for reelection. They MUST have been offered golden parachutes to further this agenda of the Great Reset. The problem they did not encounter is the dramatic rise in poverty they have unleashed that Guarantee Basic Income, their attempt to bribe the lower-income to surrender their jobs and future, will not suffice. These people will NEVER climb the economic ladder by keeping people down with minimal subsistence.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett intends to honor her mentor, the late Justice Antonin Scalia in her opening speech to the Senate. As I have explained, candidates for the Supreme Court NEVER appeared before the Senate until 1925 when one senator objected because he was being investigated.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett before the Judiciary Committee is a former law clear to former Justice Scalia who has invoked his judicial philosophy that she tries to mirror. According to her opening statement, Judge Barrett is stating clearly that she learned a critical lesson from Scalia to “apply the law as written, not as the judge wishes it were.” Of all the Supreme Court decisions I have read which are far too many to even number, no other legal mind ever impressed me so much as Justice Scalia. He was truly an unbiased person and applied the law as a strict constructionist.
Judge Barret states: “Justice Scalia taught me more than just law. He was devoted to his family, resolute in his beliefs, and fearless of criticism. And as I embarked on my own legal career, I resolved to maintain that same perspective. There is a tendency in our profession to treat the practice of law as all-consuming, while losing sight of everything else. But that makes for a shallow and unfulfilling life. I worked hard as a lawyer and a professor; I owed that to my clients, my students, and myself. But I never let the law define my identity or crowd out the rest of my life.”
While Michael Bloomberg was offering to pay all felon’s fines in Florida if they would vote, what he failed to understand is that Trump is liked by prisoners for he is the first president to reform the laws. Under Obama, he deported more people than Trump ever dreamed of. The Clintons signed in the harsh drug laws that extended the time for blacks. But even more against these assumptions that Democrats are for the people and Republicans are only for the rich, the greatest reform in the drug laws was championed by Justice Scalia.
In Apprendi v New Jersey, this decision championed by Justice Scalia was based upon strict construction. It was a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice John Paul Stevens, along with Souter, Thomas, Ginsberg, and Scalia. Steven was put on the court by a Republican President as was Scalia, Thomas, and Souter while Ginsberg was appointed by Clinton. Justices Rehnquist, Kennedy, and O’Conner were appointed by Ronald Reagan and Justice Breyer was also appointed by Clinton. That court was 7 republican appointees v 2 Democrat. That decision demonstrates that all this yelling about Barreett will tip the court 6-3 and the world will come to an end we have heard so many times and it is just nonsense.
In the Apprendi decision, the dissent written by Justice O’Connor conceded: “Today, in what will surely be remembered as a watershed change in constitutional law, the Court imposes as a constitutional rule the principle it first identified in Jones.” She was correct. But under her view, the government need not apply law and judges should be free to sentence you to whatever they think is appropriate in their mid. That is the reestablishment of tyranny.
I am comfortable that Judge Barrett will defend the constitution which is actually NEGATIVE not positive! I would love to collaborate with lawyers who have the guts to challenge that fundamental principle. In Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297 (1980), the Supreme Court of the United States held that states participating in Medicaid are NOT required to fund medically necessary abortions for which federal reimbursement was unavailable. The Court also held that the funding restrictions did not violate the Fifth Amendment or the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. Effectively, the Bill of Rights is a negative restraint upon government rather than a list of positive rights of the individual.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Fifth Amendment
The Bill of Rights is written in a NEGATIVE tone, whereby it is a restrain upon government. Courts now allow people to waive every right. Can you then be sentenced to 18 months and state you waive your right to life and wish to be executed? No judge would grant that motion. Yet they hold you can waive your right not to be tortured by waiving your right to remain silent. In a case Braswell v US, they held that corporate officers can be denied their Fifth Amendment rights because the corporation has none.
Clearly, under strict construction, there is NO power of government to create even lockdowns. The Harris court held: “Where, as here, the Congress has neither invaded a substantive constitutional right or freedom, nor enacted legislation that purposefully operates to the detriment of a suspect class, the only requirement of equal protection is that congressional action be rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest. ” The death rate of COVID-19 is no greater than the Flu. There is NO legitimate governmental interest at stake.
I would roll the dice with Judge Barrett and believe she would be on our side. It does not matter if a Republican or a Democrat appoints a justice. They do NOT always vote based upon their Party lines.
Yesterday the White House physicians released a statement outlining that President Trump is no longer a threat to shed the coronavirus and his recovery is excellent.
President Trump called-in to Maria Bartiromo earlier this morning to discuss his health, plans to restart rallies, the 2020 campaign and other issues in/around Washington DC.
What is becoming increasingly clear is that those in strategic power countries have been bribed to impose lockdowns etc, and other countries have followed their lead assuming they are correct. The Flu deaths and real COVID are about the same. Governments have NEVER shut down the world economy for the Flu. It is obvious that there has been a covert operation behind bribing politicians most likely in Germany, Britain, Canada, and Australia for starters. We would NEVER have closed the world economy for the upcoming flu season. The number of doctorscoming out against COIVID keeps growing. The more doctors who come out, the more others are encouraged to speak the truth.
A lock down protest
The press is corrupt and is working very hard to destroy our culture and society. You do not find it in the mainstream press in Germany. They keep trying to pretend these protests do not exist. They are the imagination of “conspiracy theorists” so there is nothing to report. This time, the Berlin protest was well organized and everyone kept the social distance so the police had no justification to attack the people ruthlessly as they have been doing.
I am warning right now, Europe is risking a violent uprising if it keeps this Great Reset agenda of Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates. From February onward there is a risk of civil unrest against this absurd agenda. Schwab with his vision of the Fourth Industrial Revolution all built of green energy is the fantasy of a typical academic. Nobody created the industrial revolution. No government invented the steam engine which set it in motion and they NEVER designed or managed it.
In fact, the government ALWAYS interferes and suppresses economic innovation. Britain imposed a law that anyone driving a new-fangled automobile had to have a man walk before it with a horn and a flag to warn people one of these machines was coming. By 1890, the mergers of all these small railroad companies led to the Marxist intervention known as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. Sherman saw that mergers reduced jobs in the light of Marxism. The internet has been created in the very same way. Small startups are bought out and further the advancement of the whole.
Schwab is so wrong it is laughable. It demonstrates that academics cannot learn everything without experience. Communism collapsed for the very same reason that a planned society cannot replace human ingenuity because bureaucrats, like academics, lack the experience to actually see how the economy evolves.
These people are HIGHLY dangerous for they are fulfilling what our computer has been forecasting – the collapse of Western Civilization and the shift to China of the financial capital of the world. We DESPERATELY need to stop these people. They are destroying our future and that of our children because of their arrogance and lack of experience. If they remove Trump, they win for he is the ONLY person who would dare to prosecute any of these people.
Trump returned to the White House yesterday and I happened to be listening to CNN. I was not surprised to hear an anchor railing against the president. We all know that the Fake News will sharply criticize Trump no matter what he does, but when he caught the virus, I was dismayed to see so many on the left wishing for his death. Many ’news’ outlets had him in grave condition. Wishful thinking on their part.
The CNN anchor didn’t wish Trump’s demise, but he was very angry. I was busy drawing and thought I was listening to Jake Tapper, the failed cartoonist who now caricatures the news in an unctuous and sanctimonious tone. When I heard him say ‘bullshit’ live on the air followed by taking the Lord’s name in vain I was surprised. I didn’t think Jake would stoop so low as to start cussing. I looked up and discovered it wasn’t Tapper, but rather Chris Cuomo. “Oh, that explains it,” I thought.
Trump handled the virus with aplomb. He rose above the negativity of the lowlife Deep State Marxist Swamp and walked back into the White House.
Here is the 2020 Election Forecast and Beyond. This is a special report that provides the Forecasting Arrays out for 12 years so this is not just the 2020 election. Here you will see firsthand why the markets crash and then rally and people are confused and this illustrates why I have said that I am not afraid of Trump but comes AFTER Trump and why elections may vanish post-2024.
Anyone can claim to have forecast the Trump victory in 2016 based on a gut feeling expressed logically for their reasons. Here the first four political models back in 2016 were all unanimous calling for a Trump victory – not my personal opinion. Only Socrates was able to forecast Trump’s victory years in advance and BREXIT. Neith was based on my personal opinion. The standard in the forecast is one opinion against another. We have to move beyond that if we ever hope to see the future consistently.
This nearly 200-page report provides the models on both the prospects for Trump based on the popular vote as well as the Electoral College. Then you will find the forecasts for the combined Senate and House – Congress with the system models, technical analysis, and the cyclical Arrays. This is followed by specific sections for the Senate and Congress.
Then you will find all 50 states covered with the model forecasts for the outcome of each state.
This is the report we would provide to those in power for each election. Because of the seriousness of what we face on a political level globally, we are making this report available to everyone. Those attending the World Economic Conference need not purchase this report – it is included in your ticket price.
We will be posting this report for downloads next week.
Earlier this afternoon President Trump held a radio rally with Rush Limbaugh and an estimated 50 million audience members tuned-in to listen and participate.
Rush Limbaugh has made the Ditto Cam broadcast and transcript of the event available to the public. It was an incredible event.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
