This election will be interesting as Goldman has owned both parties since the 1980’s!


What Would Goldman Sachs Do If It Loses Both Parties?

Trump-Sanders

 

The latest poll in New Hampshire shows Bernie Sanders has 53% support compared to Clinton’s 39% in the Monmouth University Poll released Tuesday, with Martin O’Malley in third place at 5%. Meanwhile, Trump soars well ahead of everyone else and Bush collapsed to 4%. This begs the question: What will Goldman Sachs do if it does not own both candidates? Goldman has owned both the Republican and the Democratic candidates since the late 1980s. This could be the FIRST election where the New York Bankers do not own either candidate. OMG! What will New York do? secede?

More problems in Britain!


Cameron – A Morally Corrupt Politician

EU-Cameron

 

Cameron is just an example of how morally corrupt politicians are no matter what country we talk about. Cameron promised a referendum on exiting the EU because he never in his wildest imagination contemplated that the British would leave the EU. So what does a corrupt politician do when he fears losing? He rigs the game. Cameron is now looking to postpone the referendum because the British people want out as a majority. The sex assault by the refugees is just the tip of it. With another 3 million coming in 2016, Merkel is destroying the very fabric of Europe. Cameron is trying to postpone any referendum until 2017 and will hope something will happen so he can just forget about the whole thing.

Withe bankers also being corrupt, they have tried to scare the British people saying if the Brits exit the EU, nobody would do business with them. Toyota, on the other hand, came out and stated bluntly the truth – they will of course continue to work with the UK. The British banks are in league with Cameron and are full of SHIT. This is the same scare-tactic the banks played on the Scottish exit and we saw similar nonsense in Greece telling the people they would “starve” because most food is imported from Europe.

Cae-PontifMax

Cameron has revealed his untrustworthy character trying to postpone any exit vote. This is exactly the same corruption which sparked the civil war in Rome and compelled Julius Caesar to cross the Rubicon. Why? Because the politicians would manipulate the calendar to postpone elections they know they would lose. The took advantage of the fact that the high priest, Pontifex Maximus, would arbitrarily adjust the calendar by inserting the leap days at his discretion. Solution? Bribe the high priest. The Senate fled and Caesar assumed the position of Pontifex Maximus and created to fixed Julian Calendar to end the arbitrary manipulation by priests thereafter. Cameron is following the same pattern – postpone a vote he knows he will lose.

corbyn Jeremy

God help Britain. Their choice is between a communist who thinks putting a maximum wage of people solves something, or Cameron who sees himself as a European before being British.

Major Changes are Coming in the EU!


French Politics are Turning Ahead of 2017

shutterstock_309769352

Comment: [Here is] a poll that may be of some interest to you. It says that the National Front is now enjoying a massive support among police and armed forces in France. It reaches now 51.5%. Back in 2012, it was 30%.

The comments of the “insiders” show a growing concern within the ruling elite. Basically, they say that because of terrorism, the socialist government is now praising and supporting the same security forces who actually are shifting to their main political opponent: Marine Le Pen. Even worse: they’re giving them more and more power and credits to achieve the fight against the islamist threat.

Here is a common analysis shared by the hardcore socialist within the state, behind closed doors: Hollande is following the path of Guy Mollet, the socialist Prime minister who gave up the government powers to the French Army back in 1956 when the Algerian conflict was expanding. It ended in 1958 with De Gaulle successful coup d’état.

De Gaulle actually was supported by the army and generals had prepared an airbone operation on Paris back then. If the civilian government were to refuse to let De Gaulle take over, the army would have used force to achieve it. The then government gave up and De Gaulle took office quietly.

So basically, what is remaining of the “Left” is panicking as they think the Police and Armed Forces would support a National Front victory. Which could indeed happen in 2017, 2017 will be 224 years after 1793, the year of the “Reign of Terror” organised by the republican government. At the moment, all powers were given the acting police minister (Committe of Public Safety). They had basically the ability to arrest anyone without charge and many were put under house arrest (about 500 000). THis lasted until 1794 with Robespierre fall.

Interestingly enough, in 1958, De Gaulle come back was officially launched by the army and the police. They called themselves “Committe of Public Safety”. The idea was to achieve victory in Algeria. But De Gaulle was a cunning politician and gave up quickly :

I don’t know if your computers foresee a National Front victory in 2017, or an apparent victory followed by a quick collapse of Le Pen government. But it seems that, if necessary, the Armed Forces and the Police have made their choice in case of a “civil war.

Regards.

Louis Philippe I (1830 to 1848)
Reply: What is shaping up is very similar to the first presidential election in France in 1848. This was the sovereign debt crisis that first hit the USA at the state level when the first and only president of the Second Republic was elected in a surprise election that took place on December 10, 1848. The French constitution at that time only included a provision for one round of voting, and in the absence of a majority for any candidate, the National Assembly would decide the next president.
Louis-Eugène Cavaignac was seen to be the guaranteed winner. The establishment political elites were backing Cavaignac and it was presumed that they would install him as president even if he did not win a majority.
1848 Second Republic
However, Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte won the election to everyone’s shock, taking 74% of the vote. Bonaparte was NOT a career politician so the elites explained his victory as if it were a fraud. They said he presented himself as “all things to some men.” However, he was the best of two bad choices between the Monarchist right supporters and the Legitimist/Orléanist royal households. Bonaparte was seen as a man who would restore order and put an end to the political instability that gripped France in the aftermath of the overthrown French monarchy in February 1848.
Bonaparte won a huge vote, which nobody in France has ever again matched. He is generally seen as the person who prevented a communist revolution, which was argued for by Marx’s friend Friedrich Engels back then. Bonaparte swept the votes from the non-politicized rural masses who saw the communist supporters in the cities as eager to take their land. The glory that had been Napoleon contributed greatly outside of the cities where the name of Bonaparte meant something.
1852 Republic Bonaparte
Of course, Louis-Napoléon Bonaparte staged his own French coup d’état on December 5, 1851, when he refused to leave office. This ended in the successful dissolution of the French National Assembly and re-established the French empire in 1852 as a republic. Louis-Napoléon implemented his popular reform programs that included the restoration of the right to vote (universal suffrage) that the National Assembly abolished when they tried to retain their own power, much like Brussels today where there is no right to vote for any member of the Troika.
1864 Napoleon III
Louis-Napoléon’s political reforms were popularly endorsed by constitutional referendum. He then reclaimed the throne of France as emperor under the name Napoleon III (1852-1870).coming in the EU

This 86 year cycle that Martin talks about is very real and well documented.


The Coming European Revoluition

European Revolutionary Cycle

SovDebtCrisis-Wave-86D

I have warned that 2017 will be the political year from hell. What I am illustrating here is the link between a sovereign debt crisis and the Revolutionary Cycle. In 1933, Roosevelt came to power in the USA and turned the country toward socialism. That same year, 1933, brought Hitler and Mao to power. So 1934 was the revolutionary year. Such revolutions do not always bring blood in the streets. The next one is due in 2020 and we should see the system we currently live under go completely upside-down.

The revolutions of 1848 were essentially a democratic movement and an uprising against the political elite. In 1848, Karl Marx published “The Communist Manifesto” with Friedrich Engels, and was exiled to London as a result. In London, where he lived the remainder of his life, he wrote the first volume of Das Kapital”. This undoubtedly influenced the revolutions that opened the door to communism/socialism. This also inspired the collapse of the old feudal structures and created independent national states. The revolutionary wave began in France in February 1848 when the French monarchy was overthrown. Communism actually began in France as a “commune” where people lived in one shared community with no individual property rights. It was the French who convinced Marx that communism would work better than just socialism, which he had advocated initially.

This 1848 revolution spread as a contagion, similar to what the American Revolution had done during the previous century. The contagion of 1848 spread to most of Europe and parts of Latin America. In total, it impacted over 50 countries. This was by no means a coordination or cooperation between various revolutionary trends around Europe.

Generally, a contagion is attributed to six factors: (1) widespread dissatisfaction with political leadership, as we have today; (2) demands for more participation in government and democracy, as republics have once again robbed us of our right to vote; (3) demands for freedom of press, which is manifesting today in the internet; (4) the demands of the working class, whom today have been oppressed by huge tax rates combined with income taxes and VAT at 20%+; (5) the upsurge of nationalism, which we are again watching unfold thanks to terrorism; and finally, (6) the regrouping of the reactionary forces based on the royalty, aristocracy, army, church and peasants, which is again unfolding as class warfare.

The American Revolution really began in 1762 or 86 years before 1848. Indeed, the very same issue that sparked the American Revolution was the government’s practice of arbitrarily seizing assets and searching letters to see if anyone spoke anything derogatory against the government. The NSA today does exactly what the king’s men had done. In 2014 and 2015, the assets confiscated by police exceeded all the property stolen by criminals. The police have replaced the criminals in so many ways. They get to seize property and are rarely ever held accountable for killing citizens rashly. They always use deadly force rather than resolving issues without killing someone in the process.

These very same practices came to a head in the famous trial involving writs of assistance to the revenue officers, empowering them, at their SOLE discretion, to search suspected places at will. This eventually became the reason for the American Revolution and is what became known as the Fourth Amendment in the USA, which judges have swept away under the rug and no longer exists.

The legal case which became the seminal beginning was Entick v. Carrington and Three Other King’s Messengers, reported at length in 19 Howell’s State Trials 1029. The action, dated November 1762, was for trespassing and interfering with the plaintiff’s dwelling by breaking open his desks and boxes and searching and examining his papers.

The defense lawyer, James Otis, in Boston pronounced that the writs of assistance of the king were “the worst instrument of arbitrary power, the most destructive of English liberty, and the fundamental principles of law that ever was found in an English law book.” These writs of assistance allowed government employees to do whatever they wanted, as they continue to do today. It is our burden to prove we have rights – not theirs to restrain themselves. This has placed “the liberty of every man in the hands of every petty officer.”

Future president, John Adams, was there listening to Otis arguing in court. Otis, of course, lost with the judge only ruling for the king. “Then and there,” said John Adams, “then and there was the first scene of the first act of opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain. Then and there, the child Independence was born.”

This is what cycles are about. Fourteen years after 1762 marked the American Revolution in 1776 with the Declaration of Independence. After nearly one Pi Cycle (31.4 years from Otis’ speech) George Washington was sworn into presidency and the United States was born. It is always just a question of time.

The mere fact that we can observe regular cycles over long periods of time demonstrates one thing: we should never confuse the idea of FREE WILL of the individual with the collective action of society. You will never find 100% of the people in agreement. Thus, you are NOT compelled like a robot to agree with the majority. That is your individual FREE WILL. You would not be reading this if you were among the mindless majority. Society, however, moves within a continuum with a sense of perpetual continuous motion. I have stated this before, but it needs to be repeated. Focusing upon the personality of Hitler or Napoleon misses the entire point. It is

Society moves within a continuum with a sense of perpetual continuous motion. I have stated this before, but it needs to be repeated. Focusing upon the personality of Hitler or Napoleon misses the entire point. It is NEVER the individual who moves the majority; it is the majority that produces the individual. Hitler was imprisoned for what he considered to be “political crimes” following his failed Putsch in Munich in November 1923. While imprisoned, Hitler wrote Mein Kampf” (“My Struggle”). Dictating the book to Rudolf Hess, Hitler outlined his political ideology and future plans for Germany. Volume 1 was published in 1925 and Volume 2 in 1926. However, he came to power in 1933 or about 8.6 years after publication.

Society creates the leader, not the other way around. If we focus upon the economy, this turns the heat up for political change. Which individual takes the lead is not the important issue. Society will ALWAYS select someone. An individual cannot force their ideas upon society no matter how loud they scream. Therefore, societal history is indeed following physics like everything else. A body in motion will stay in motion until there is some resistance to slow it down. Government’s mismanagement grows larger and reduces economic growth to the point where we have tax rebellions that often result in revolution.

USA Net Cap 1960-1990 Annotated

History is, in fact, modeled by a deterministic, non-linear, dynamic system that displays chaotic behavior (Panic Cycles). Mapping the small changes within such a system that ripple through the entire mass is fascinating, for such changes are never seen by the actor as impacting a far more dynamic system. FATCA, for example, is directly reversing the global economic expansion by forcing Americans back into a domestic economic environment that is worsening the deflation external to the USA as the dollar is forced higher. The outflow of capital from the USA reconstructed the world economy, whereas now that single tax-hungry law set in motion the reverse consequence of destroying the world economy. Therefore, in a mathematical sense, the slightest deviation to the global economic system will eventually create a wildly divergent outcome. This act is inspired by the fact that government is incapable of managing itself, no less the economy that they do not even comprehend.

Roman-Christian-Persecution

Therefore, it is not that one man can make a difference. I tried that route and quickly saw that the best ideas were still ignored due to the self-interest of those in charge. Consequently, it is NEVER the individual, but society, that must reach the point where it seeks an answer and embraces a new idea. Rome collapsed during the 3rd century; this is when the Christian Persecution really surged. Some argued the gods were angry because there were too many Christians and this is why they did not respond to the prayers of the Romans. Eventually, more and more people took the opposite view that their prayers were not answered because they were false gods. Christianity took off and Constantine plundered the pagan temples, pronouncing Christianity as the new religion so he could confiscate that wealth and restart the empire by moving the capital to a brand new city — Constantinople (Istanbul today).

Rome collapsed during the 3rd century; this is when the Christian persecution really surged. Some argued the gods were angry because there were too many Christians and this is why they did not respond to the prayers of the Romans. Eventually, more and more people took the opposite view that their prayers were not answered because they were praying to false gods. Christianity took off and Constantine plundered the pagan temples, pronouncing Christianity as the new religion so he could confiscate that wealth and restart the empire by moving the capital to a brand new city — Constantinople (Istanbul today).

Therefore, history repeats because humanity never changes. What drives it is the majority swinging back and forth much like Republican vs. Democrat political victories. History is not made by the ideas of individuals; the individuals are produced as a response to the shift in the flow of history that behaves in a continuous manner by responding in the same manner to forces no matter what century we look at. Once we abandon the deep analysis of people like Hitler and step back from the individual to observe the collective community, suddenly history takes shape, which conforms, like everything else, to the laws of physics. So yes, we will see a European revolution. It is inevitable.

A rape game called ‘Taharrush’ is what might have happened in Germany during NYE assaults


The simplest solution (Occam’s Razor) to this barbaric action of Taharrush is to ban ALL Muslims from any Western Country.!

*(WAKE UP AMERICA! THIS COULD BE YOUR MOTHER, WIFE, DAUGHTER)* – Terrified German woman dragged screaming into subway by ‘refugees’


Sun Tzu’s The Art Of War explains in great detail what hand how War is conducted. It applies today just as it always has and if we continue to ignore that principles laid out in the great work then we exist at our own peril. Our women (wife’s daughters and children) will be raped, slaughtered and taken as sex slaves unless the men of West Civilization wake up and do what they have to do. There are still enough ‘real’ men left that we can stop this before it is to late.

lSlS HANDBOOK TEACHES HOW TO BLEND IN ‘WEAR CROSSES’ TO KILL


Muslims that practice the dictates of their ‘cut’ ISLAM are evil people one and all. they need to be called out for whop they really are or we will all be very very sorry.

The Four Jihads


Whenever there is Islamic violence the media uses the word “terror” not jihad. The problem is that the jihad of murder is only one of the four jihads and it is the least of jihads. The jihad of murder will kill people, but the jihad of money, speech and writing brings us closer to Sharia. Sharia annihilates a civilization.

Civilizational jihad is found in the content of our new textbooks which praise Islam as the greatest of civilizations. These new textbooks are filled with half truths, which cannot be challenged. The jihad of textbooks will destroy the thinking of a generation.

The jihad of money has invaded our universities which reject critical thought about Islam in exchange for donations from the Saudis. The Islamisation of universities is far worse than murder.

Another jihad that is killing us is found in religious dialogues. The idea sounds wonderful, but the ignorant Jews and Christians just smile and nod their heads as they agree that Islam is so wonderful. Debate is absent by consent. And another nail is driven into the coffin of our civilization.

The jihad of murder is the very least of our problems.

Yuge Endorsement – Godmother of Conservative Principles, Phyllis Schlafly, Endorses Donald J Trump for President…


THIS IS YUGE make sure it is spread to all who can read! To the rest there is no hope until we go back to where we were 50 years ago and eliminate federal control of everything!!

The Professional Political Machine Says: “Donald Trump is Not Conservative” (Part 2)…


One can differ on details of these plans but from where where now these kinds of changes are exactly what are needed. Therefore we can be sure no one will like them in the GOPe or the progressive left which wants total control of everything!