Donald Trump Interview – Federal Secret Service Calls CNN’s Jake Tapper and Jim Sciutto Liars…


Since the polls are rigged what they show is meaningless and all we can use to compare the message of the candidates is who shows up at rallies. If we use a real measure one could say that Hillary would be lucky to win one state; no one shows up at her rallies.

Italy’s Referendum


Mario Renzi

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; You said other nations would follow Britain. It appears that Italy is doing so with their referendum. Is this correct?

You are very famous in Germany by the way.

Thank you.

KG

ANSWER: Yes. Prime Minister Matteo Renzi has said that a victory in the poll would end Italy’s questionable political system which has prevented any government completing a full term since the Second World War. This may actually be part of the shift in politics coming in Italy. Nonetheless, a defeat will mean the end of the line for pro-Brussels direction of Italy. This referendum is all about changing Italy’s 1948 republican constitution which is legally required for popular consent.

This is a major political gamble for the pro-EU centre-left government akin to BREXIT. The opinion polls are showing many of the 50 million voters are undecided and the “No” camp gaining momentum in what will be a very close campaign. Support for opposition parties who want to leave Brussels have been certainly emboldened by Britain’s historic decision to leave the EU which is growing and the battleground will be this referendum.

Renzi may be forced out as was the case with David Cameron. Italy’s highest court gave the green light to a referendum that Prime Minister Renzi says will either guarantee political stability with staying in the EU or he will resign if voters do not approve the constitutional changes he hopes for.  The high court validated the more than 500,000 signatures required for the referendum. Now, the government has 60 days to set a referendum date which may come in November or as late as December. The referendum is most likely going to be held after parliament approves the 2017 budget, a draft of which must be presented by Oct. 20th, 2016 and approval by both houses would take about a month.

The protracted political uncertainty is a cloud hanging over all of Europe. It has been the mad ruch into Germany 10-year paper at negative rates showing that people are just parking money. This is not a question about making a return. They are buying the German paper assuming the euro will break and they will get Deutschemarks once again.

The actual reform proposed by this referendum would shrink the upper house, cutting the number of senators to 100 from 315, and stripping it of powers over the budget and its ability to bring down a government. Instead, it would have oversight of local, rather than national, issues. Renzi supports this to prevent the upper house from stopping his agenda. It would increase the powers of the federal government while diluting the 20 regions with respect to national policy. This will be accompanied by a new two-round voting system for the lower house. Here, Renzi says the changes should finally make Italy a governable country.

The rising opposition parties are very anti-immigrant. The Northern League in particular, warns that Italy is being stripped of any democratic checks thaty were designed to prevent a strong national government and the rise once again of some political strongman like Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. This is becoming the hot topic and this is a vote on the future of Renzi and Europe

5 Explosive Secret Intelligence Memos Everyone Must Read


We should never have done what we did for the next result was the creation of ISIS. Obama and Hillary created a monster and now they can’t stop it and this will bring Hillary down so at least there was some benefit.

Productivity unexpectedly drops for third straight quarter…


NOT A GOOD SIGN

IMF & Gold Reserves


IMF

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; People are adamant that there is a move to return to the gold standard. They claim various scenarios. Is there any such plot by the IMF and it seems strange that the ECB gold reserves are minimal. Can you explain the truth in this matter?

Thank you

GS

ANSWER: The IMF has actually been jockeying positions for decades to remove gold as a monetary instrument quite to the contrary of these reports. IMF Special Drawing Rights (SDR) was first established with one SDR being equal to 0.888671 gram of fine gold, which was the par value of the US dollar on July 1, 1944. The IMF acquired its gold holdings through four main channels. First, 25% of initial quota subscriptions to join the IMF and subsequent quota increases were to be paid in gold. This represents the largest source of the IMF’s gold. Furthermore, all payments of charges (interest on member countries’ use of IMF credit) were also normally made in gold. The structure was established with Bretton Woods and then a member wishing to acquire the currency of another member could do so by selling gold to the IMF. The major use of this provision was sales of gold to the IMF by South Africa in 1970–1971. Thereafter, member countries could use gold to repay the IMF for credit previously extended.

The IMF has decided to either return gold to member countries or to sell some of its holdings. The reasons for this are varied; between 1957 and 1970, the IMF sold gold on several occasions to replenish its holdings of currencies. The IMF also sold gold to the United States and invested in U.S. government securities to offset operational deficits during this same period.

The Second Amendment was to make the SDR the principle reserve asset in the international monetary system, paving the way to remove gold as the ultimate reserve asset. The Second Amendment to the Articles of Agreement in April 1978 fundamentally changed the role of gold in the international monetary system by eliminating its use as the common denominator of the post-World War II exchange rate system. Gold ceased to be the basis of the value underlying the SDR. The Second Amendment, therefore, abolished the official price of gold and ended any obligatory use in transactions between the IMF and its member countries. Consequently, the Second Amendment of 1978 decreed that the IMF would no longer manage the price of gold or establish a fixed price. This, in part, helped the rally initially to $400 by 1979.

Under the Second Amendment to the Articles of Agreement, the use of gold in the IMF’s operations and transactions was very limited. Furthermore, the IMF may sell gold outright according to prevailing market prices under the 1978 Second Agreement. It may accept gold in the discharge of a member country’s obligations (loan repayment) at an agreed price based on market prices. This officially ended the idea of a gold standard set out at Bretton Woods. If the IMF were to sell gold, it would require Executive Board approval by an 85% majority vote. Therefore, the Second Agreement eliminated any IMF authority to engage in gold loans, gold leases, gold swaps, or use of gold as collateral. The IMF also no longer had the authority to buy gold under the Second Agreement formally ending the gold standard.

So in short, the IMF had been desperate to remove gold as a monetary instrument. From the mid-1960s, the total central bank gold reserved fell by about 25% by 2007. There is no evidence of any intent to return to a gold standard, and if anything, the hope is that the IMF will take on the role of making the SDR the new reserve currency that will replace the dollar when everything crashes and burns.