A report has come out from a clerk in the Supreme Court describing what took place when the Texas case came up. Chief Justice Roberts said he did not give a “f–k” about precedent. He refused to accept the case claiming “we have riots” which in fact the entire Black Lives Matter movement has been protesting the very immunity police have been given not by Congress, but by the Supreme Court. It is the Court that has blood on its hands for creating immunity that was complained of in the Declaration of Independence.
Chief Justice Roberts swore an oath to defend the Constitution. He has abandoned that oath and is a disgrace to the nation. He has condemned the country to the rise in civil unrest that may even rise to the level of breaking the country apart. Civilization = rule of law. He has abandoned countless centuries of precedent which distinguishes tyranny from civilization.
More than 2000 years ago, Thrasymachus warned Socrates that there is no justice. It is always the will of those in power regardless if it is a democracy, aristocracy, or a tyrannical form of government. Justice Roberts is a disgrace to the entire Western Civilization. He should step down. He has violated his oath of office and is no longer qualified to sit in that court! He should go down as the second Justice to be impeached. The only Justice to be impeached was Associate Justice Samuel Chase in 1805. The House of Representatives passed Articles of Impeachment against him; however, he was acquitted by the Senate. He acted like a prosecutor rather than a judge. Nonetheless, the impeachment raised important constitutional questions over the nature of the judiciary. It was the termination of a series of efforts to expand judicial independence under the Constitution. The dispute also defined the limits of the impeachment power. What Chief Justice Roberts has violated was clearly the prohibition of the judiciary from engaging in partisan politics and confined judicial independence which Roberts has ignored.
Sidney Powell’s filings at the Supreme Court for Georgia and Michigan were given a response date of January 14th which means they then claim it is untimely and Biden will be sworn in on the 20th. Once again they are using procedures to avoid the issues raised and are now protecting the Deep State.
Meanwhile, Arizona and Wisconsin were immediately rejected by the clerk without explanation. This is really now treason against the United States. This is time that the Judiciary Act of 1925 MUST be presented as unconstitutional. Every Supreme Court Justice takes two oaths and they MUST defend the constitution. Claiming they have “discretion” means they no longer need to defend the constitution and they have left the country in the same position as for the civil war. Instead of ruling for or against which would at least raise the hope of claiming the storm, they have left the people to sort this out by nothing but violence which our computer has been projecting.
In an internet poll asking did Biden win, the responses are so skewed to “NO” it is indicative of what we will face. This is an international disgrace and the Supreme Court has shown it no longer can be trusted to defend the Constitution. If Trump is wrong, then just rule that way and end the rising hostility. Avoiding this issue that confirms we even have a real right to vote is a confirmation that the Supreme Court is no longer valid.
It was the Supreme Court that created immunity for police, politicians, and prosecutors along with judges out of thin air claiming they could not do their job if they could be sued. The Entire Black Lives Matter movement has been played for fools. The Democrats could have passed a law removing that immunity in 15 minutes. Instead, they have exploited the racial tension for political purposes and allowed the defunding of police to take place instead of correcting the wrong created by the Supreme Court.
Civilization cannot exist without the rule of law. The Supreme Court could have easily ruled it was insufficient evidence to show there was a fraud and this the election thus stands. Avoiding the issue indicates that they did not want the evidence to surface and are thus also conspiring against the people to end our liberty which was granted by the Founding Fathers. Refusing to rule can no only be seen as not wanting to address the evidence because it is serious. For the left press and the Democrats to even claim there was no fraud is a blatant lie. EVERY election has fraud. Dead people have been voting all the time. The honest thing to say is that the fraud DID NOT rise to the level of changing the outcome. That would at least be an argument. Claiming this is no fraud is a cover-up.
History will mark this decision, like Dread Scott, that in the absence of the rule of law, there is no government remaining and we are not the “people” but just the Great Unwashed. They are ruling against democracy just as John Kerry said. Trump appealed to “populism” and Kerry expressed it best for how the elite thinks of us:
“It’s really dangerous to play to the lowest common denominator of American, of global political life.” (Source: Yahoo)
What’s next? The Supreme Court will rule against the Second Amendment claiming the Founding Fathers were drunk and never intended to allow the Great Unwashed to possess any guns to prevent a revolution? After these maneuvers, the Supreme Court has lost all its integrity. The courts in America have become part of the Deep State.
The New York lawsuit against the Trump administration -over disqualification of unlawful aliens in the 2020 election- was dismissed today by the Supreme Court [full pdf here] under procedural grounds.
However, that said, there is a clear indication where the outcome is likely to end-up once the court takes up the case next year.
The high court noted no harm currently exists because the census report hasn’t been delivered to congress to begin the representative apportionment.
The ruling was 6-3 on process, with justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer signing a dissent on the case. Justice Breyer wanted to fire a shot into the administration by outlining a liberal opinion/perspective of the issue:
…”The plain meaning of the governing statutes, decades of historical practice, and uniform interpretations from all three branches of Government demonstrate that aliens without lawful status cannot be excluded from the decennial census solely on account of that status,” Breyer wrote. “The Government’s effort to remove them from the apportionment base is unlawful, and I believe this Court should say so.”
Beyond the liberal argument this majority part should alarm everyone:
[…] “Everyone agrees by now that the Government cannot feasibly implement the memorandum by excluding the estimated 10.5 million aliens without lawful status,” the opinion later said. “Yet the only evidence speaking to the predicted change in apportionment unrealistically assumes that the President will exclude the entire undocumented population.” (read more)
In essence what the court is saying is they will not support unlawful aliens being excluded from the census and, as a consequence, congressional representation. It is just too early for them to decide because the harm has not been incurred.
This is an alarming position when cast against the recent SCOTUS decisions on 2020 election. Texas has no standing to file suit based on harm from election fraud, the voices of Texas voters are moot to the court; and now the same court is saying any unlawful alien residing in the United States should be granted a voice in government.
The Democrats certainly appear to have a compromising situation with Chinese spies inside their political network that extends well beyond Representative Eric Swalwell and Senator Dianne Fienstein. The California delegation of Democrats most certainly has the biggest exposure to having been infiltrated with Chinese operatives. It is all sketchy.
Think carefully about this part….. As noted in this interview segment Nancy Pelosi is claiming she was briefed on the Chinese spy compromise around Swalwell with McCarthy. However, simultaneously House Leader Kevin McCarthy states he found out through the media. Keep in mind McCarthy has only been part of the ‘Gang of Eight’ since Jan 2019 (he as minority leader and Pelosi taking over from Paul Ryan as House Speaker).
A Pelosi briefing prior to 2019 was in her role as Minority leader with Ryan as speaker (Nunes/Schiff as Chair/Ranking on HPSCI). Therefore either Pelosi was briefed outside the Go8 structure, or she is lying about briefing with McCarthy. While Pelosi is a notorious liar, the former explanation of a defensive briefing seems more likely.
That means U.S. intelligence officials during the Obama administration kept the Swalwell compromise secret and outside the Gang-of-Eight. Accepting that reality is further evidence the U.S. intel apparatus -writ large- was operating through the prism of politics.
I respect Dinesh D’Souza. However, on this issue I also disagree intensely.
The foundation of D’Souza’s reason for why he does not support a new political party, a MAGA or Patriot or (__fill in blank__) party, appears flawed. By saying a new party would only split the GOP, D’Souza is actually making the argument that creates Battered Conservative Syndrome; the DeceptiCon argument that protects the GOP wing. WATCH:
When the Tea Party rose to power and primaried a host of GOP politicians, it was the Republican party that attacked the conservative base and attempted to destroy the rebellion. McCain called us “hobbits” and McConnell called us “jihadists.” The threat from the Tea Party was felt amid the GOP. The GOP was *not* going to adjust.
Meanwhile Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama destroyed the center of their political party called the Blue Dog coalition, represented by Bart Stupak. The Blue Dogs were wiped out in 2010 because Democrats forced them into radical left-wing agenda items.
A new party, ie. ‘THE’ new party, would not be a carve out within the Republican club. A new party would be a coalition party of Democrats, Republicans and Independents. Need proof of the scale, look at the 2020 election for Trump. That’s the (fill__blank) party.
A new party would be a SECOND party to the UniParty occupants currently pushing more big government in Washington DC. The fact that we have decades worth of evidence (Patriot Act, Wall Street Lobbyists, K-St. etc.), and specifically the past ten years (omnibus spending bills, limitless debt ceiling, massive wasted stimulus, political bailouts, QE1/QE2, Obamacare, college tuition takeover etc.) shows that both Democrats and Republicans are two wings of the same big government bird.
The fear of “splitting the GOP” is the weaponized talking point of the GOP leadership who use that fear as a weapon to remain in power. Those who listen to that threat are suffering from battered conservative syndrome.
There is nothing conservative about expanding government, spending into oblivion, allowing open borders and simultaneously removing liberty and freedom. What exactly is being “conserved”? CTH has been making this argument for years.
2015 – A few days ago I took the time to read Jonah Goldberg’s expressed concerns about the support for Donald Trump and the state of current conservative opinion.
Toward that end I have also noted additional GOP media present a similar argument, and I took the time to consider.
While we are of far lesser significance and influence, I hope you will consider this retort with the same level of consideration afforded toward your position.
The challenging aspect to your expressed opinion, and perhaps why there is a chasm between us, is you appear to stand in defense of a Washington DC conservatism that no longer exists.
I hope you will indulge these considerations and correct me where I’m wrong.
On December 23rd 2009 Harry Reid passed a version of Obamacare through forced vote at 1:30am. The Senators could not leave, and for the two weeks previous were kept in a prolonged legislative session barred returning to their home-state constituencies. It was, by all measures and reality, a vicious display of forced ideological manipulation of the upper chamber. I share this reminder only to set the stage for what was to follow.
Riddled with anxiety we watched the Machiavellian manipulations unfold, seemingly unable to stop the visible usurpation. Desperate for a tool to stop the construct we found Scott Brown and rallied to deliver $7 million in funding, and a “Kennedy Seat” victory on January 19th 2010.
Unfortunately, the trickery of Majority Leader Harry Reid would not be deterred. Upon legislative return he stripped a House Budgetary bill, and replaced it with the Democrat Senate version of Obamacare through a process of “reconciliation”. Thereby avoiding the 3/5ths vote rule (60) and instead using only a simple majority, 51 votes.
Angered, we rallied to the next election (November 2010) and handed the usurping Democrats the single largest electoral defeat in the prior 100 years. The House returned to Republican control, and one-half of the needed Senate seats reversed. Within the next two election cycles (’12 and ’14) we again removed the Democrats from control of the Senate.
Within each of those three elections we were told Repealing Obamacare would be job #1. It was not an optional part of our representative agreement to do otherwise. From your own writing:
[…] If you want a really good sense of the damage Donald Trump is doing to conservatism, consider the fact that for the last five years no issue has united the Right more than opposition to Obamacare. Opposition to socialized medicine in general has been a core tenet of American conservatism from Day One. Yet, when Republicans were told that Donald Trump favors single-payer health care, support for single-payer health care jumped from 16 percent to 44 percent. (link)
With control of the House and Senate did Majority Leader Mitch McConnell or House Speaker John Boehner use the same level of severity expressed by Harry Reid to put a repeal bill on the desk of Obama for veto? Simply, NO.
Why not? According to you it’s the “core tenet of American conservatism”.
If for nothing but to accept and follow the will of the people. Despite the probability of an Obama veto, this was not a matter of option. While the method might have been “symbolic”, due to the almost guaranteed veto, it would have stood as a promise fulfilled.
Yet you speak of “core tenets” and question our “trust” of Donald Trump?
We are not blind to the maneuverings of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and President Tom Donohue. We are fully aware the repeal vote did not take place because the U.S. CoC demanded the retention of Obamacare.
Leader McConnell followed the legislative priority of Tom Donohue as opposed to the will of the people. This was again exemplified with the passage of TPPA, another Republican construct which insured the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal could pass the Senate with 51 votes instead of 3/5ths.
We are not blind to the reality that when McConnell chooses to change the required voting threshold he is apt to do so. Not coincidentally, the TPP trade deal is another legislative priority of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Yet you question the “trustworthiness” of Donald Trump’s conservatism?
Another bill, the Iran “agreement”, reportedly and conveniently not considered a “treaty”, again we are not blind. Nor are we blind to Republican Bob Corker’s amendment (Corker/Cardin Amendment) changing ratification to a 67-vote-threshold for denial, as opposed to a customary 67 vote threshold for passage. A profound difference.
Yet you question the “ideological conservative principle” of Donald Trump?
Perhaps your emphasis is on the wrong syllable. Perhaps you should be questioning the “ideological conservative principle” of Mitch McConnell, or Bob Corker; both of whom apparently working to deny the will of the electorate within the party they are supposed to represent. Of course, this would force you to face some uncomfortable realities. I digress.
Another example – How “conservative” is Lisa Murkowski?
A senator who can lose her Republican primary bid, yet run as a write-in candidate, and return to the Senate with full seniority and committee responsibilities?
Did Reince Preibus (then RNC Chair), or a republican member of leadership meet the returning Murkowski and demand a Pledge of Allegiance to the principles within the Republican party?
Yet you question the “allegiances” of Donald Trump?
Perhaps within your purity testing you need to forget minority leader Mitch McConnell working to re-elect Senator Thad Cochran, fundraising on his behalf in the spring/summer of 2014, even after Cochran lost the first Mississippi primary?
Perhaps you forget the NRSC spending money on racist attack ads? Perhaps you forget the GOP paying Democrats to vote in the second primary to defeat Republican Chris McDaniel. The “R” in NRSC is “Republican”.
Perhaps you forget. We do not.
Yet you question the “principle” of those who have had enough, and are willing to support candidate Donald Trump.
You describe yourself as filled with anxiety because such supporters do not pass some qualified “principle” test? Tell that to the majority of Republicans who supported Chris McDaniel and found their own party actively working against them.
Principle? You claim “character matters” as part of this consideration. Where is the “character” in the fact-based exhibitions outlined above?
Remember Virginia 2012, 2013? When the conservative principle-driven electorate changed the method of candidate selection to a convention and removed the party stranglehold on their “chosen candidates”. Remember that? We do.
What did McConnell, the RNC and the GOP do in response with Ken Cuccinelli, they actively spited him and removed funding from his campaign. To teach us a lesson? Well it worked, we learned that lesson.
Representative David Brat was part of that lesson learned and answer delivered. Donald Trump is part of that lesson learned and answer forthcoming – yet you speak of “character”.
You speak of being concerned about Donald Trump’s hinted tax proposals. Well, who cut the tax rates on lower margins by 50% thereby removing any tax liability from the bottom 20% wage earners? While simultaneously expanding the role of government dependency programs?
That would be the GOP (“Bush Tax Cuts”)
What? How dare you argue against tax cuts, you say. The “Bush Tax Cuts” removed tax liability from the bottom 20 to 40% of income earners completely. Leaving the entirety of tax burden on the upper 60% wage earners. Currently, thanks to those cuts, 49% of tax filers pay ZERO federal income tax.
But long term it’s much worse. The “Bush Tax Cuts” were, in essence, created to stop the post 9/11/01 recession – and they contained a “sunset provision” which ended ten years later specifically because the tax cuts were unsustainable.
The expiration of the lower margin tax cuts then became an argument in the election cycle of 2012. And as usual, the GOP, McConnell and Boehner were insufferably inept during this process.
The GOP (2002) removed tax liability from the lower income levels, and President Obama then (2009) lowered the income threshold for economic subsidy (welfare, food stamps, ebt, medicaid, etc) this was brutally predictable.
This lower revenue higher spending approach means – lower tax revenues and increased pressure on the top tax rates (wage earners) with the increased demand for tax spending created within the welfare programs. Republicans focus on the “spending” without ever admitting they, not the Democrats, lowered rates and set themselves up to be played with the increased need for social program spending, simultaneously.
Is this reality/outcome not ultimately a “tax the rich” program?
As a consequence what’s the difference between the Republicans and Democrats on taxes?
All of a sudden Republicans are arguing to “broaden the tax base”. Meaning, reverse the tax cuts they created on the lower income filers? This is a conservative position now? A need to “tax the poor”? Nice of the Republicans to insure the Democrats have an atomic sledgehammer to use against them.
This is a winning strategy? This is the “conservatism” you are defending because you are worried about Donald Trump’s principles, character or trustworthiness.
Here’s a list of those modern conservative “small(er) government” principles:
• Did the GOP secure the border with control of the White House and Congress? NO.
• Did the GOP balance the budget with control of the White House and Congress? NO.
• Who gave us the TSA? The GOP
• Who gave us the Patriot Act? The GOP
• Who expanded Medicare to include prescription drug coverage? The GOP
• Who created the precursor of “Common Core” in “Race To the Top”? The GOP
• Who played the race card in Mississippi to re-elect Thad Cochran? The GOP
• Who paid Democrats to vote in the Mississippi primary? The GOP
• Who refused to support Ken Cuccinnelli in Virginia? The GOP
• Who supported Charlie Crist? The GOP
• Who supported Arlen Spector? The GOP
• Who supported Bob Bennett? The GOP
• Who worked against Marco Rubio? The GOP
• Who worked against Rand Paul? The GOP
• Who worked against Ted Cruz? The GOP
• Who worked against Mike Lee? The GOP
• Who worked against Jim DeMint? The GOP
• Who worked against Ronald Reagan? The GOP
• Who said “I think we are going to crush [the Tea Party] everywhere.”? The GOP (McConnell)
• Who worked against Donald Trump? The GOP
And, you wonder why we’re frustrated, desperate for a person who can actually articulate some kind of push-back? Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are what the GOP give us?
SERIOUSLY?
Which leads to the next of your GOP talking points. Where you opine on Fox:
“Politics is a game where you don’t get everything you want”
Fair enough. But considering we of questionable judgment have simply been demanding common sense, ie. fiscal discipline, a BUDGET would be nice.
The last federal budget was passed in September of 2007, and EVERY FLIPPING INSUFFERABLE YEAR we have to go through the predictable fiasco of a Government Shutdown Standoff and/or a Debt Ceiling increase specifically because there is NO BUDGET!
That’s a strategy?
That’s the GOP strategy? Essentially: Lets plan for an annual battle against articulate Democrats and Presidential charm, using a creepy guy who cries and another old mumbling fool who dodders, knowing full well the MSM is on the side of the other guy to begin with?
THAT’S YOUR GOP STRATEGY? Don’t tell me it’s not, because if it wasn’t there’d be something else being done – there isn’t.
And don’t think we don’t know the 2009 “stimulus” became embedded in the baseline of the federal spending, and absent of an actual budget it just gets spent and added to the deficit each year, every year. Yet this is somehow smaller fiscal government?
On February 28, 2018, at Convocation, North America’s largest weekly gathering of Christian students, director, and actor Jim Caviezel shared in convocation how through the Passion of the Christ, and Paul: Apostle of Christ, he wants people to meet Jesus.
Within the session Mr. Caviezel took a moment to share his perspectives on the political challenges we face as a nation. Remembering back to President Ronald Reagan Caviezel had some thoughts for the audience that ring a particular resonance today: “Set yourselves apart from this corrupt generation”….
Prompted to 24:08 just hit play:
Borrowing from Mike Vanderboegh – “This is no small thing, to restore a republic after it has fallen into corruption. I have studied history for years and I cannot recall it ever happening. It may be that our task is impossible. Yet, if we do not try then how will we know it can’t be done? And if we do not try, it most certainly won’t be done. The Founders’ Republic, and the larger war for western civilization, will be lost.
But I tell you this: We will not go gently into that bloody collectivist good night. Indeed, we will make with our defiance such a sound as ALL history from that day forward will be forced to note, even if they despise us in the writing of it.
And when we are gone, the scattered, free survivors hiding in the ruins of our once-great republic will sing of our deeds in forbidden songs, tending the flickering flame of individual liberty until it bursts forth again, as it must, generations later. We will live forever, like the Spartans at Thermopylae, in sacred memory.”
(H/T Gateway Pundit) Russell James Ramsland is the security and intelligence analyst who did the audit of the Dominion ballot counting machines in Antrim county, Michigan. Tonight on Newsmax Mr. Ramsland stated he suspects further evidence will come forward in the next few days that might “change the playing field.”
Given that many venues for evidence hearings have been shut down, I suspect this “something” relates to the Michigan lawsuit carried by Sidney Powell to the supreme court. Michigan has until January 14th to respond to the court.
“We conclude that the Dominion Voting System is intentionally and purposefully designed with inherent errors to create systemic fraud and influence election results.
The system intentionally generates an enormously high number of ballot errors. The electronic ballots are then transferred for adjudication. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency, and no audit trail. This leads to voter or election fraud.
Based on our study, we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.
[…] The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is of 1 in 250,000 ballots (.0008%). We observed an error rate of 68.05%. This demonstrated a significant and fatal error in security and election integrity.
[…] It is critical to understand that the Dominion system classifies ballots into two categories, 1) normal ballots and 2) adjudicated ballots. Ballots sent to adjudication can be altered by administrators, and adjudication files can be moved between different Results Tally and Reporting (RTR) terminals with no audit trail of which administrator actually adjudicates (i.e. votes) the ballot batch.
[…] A staggering number of votes required adjudication. This was a 2020 issue not seen in previous election cycles still stored on the server. This is caused by intentional errors in the system. The intentional errors lead to bulk adjudication of ballots with no oversight, no transparency or audit trail. Our examination of the server logs indicates that this high error rate was incongruent with patterns from previous years.
The statement attributing these issues to human error is not consistent with the forensic evaluation, which points more correctly to systemic machine and/or software errors. The systemic errors are intentionally designed to create errors in order to push a high volume of ballots to bulk adjudication.
[…] Research is ongoing. However, based on the preliminary results, we conclude that the errors are so significant that they call into question the integrity and legitimacy of the results in the Antrim County 2020 election to the point that the results are not certifiable.
Because the same machines and software are used in 48 other counties in Michigan, this casts doubt on the integrity of the entire election in the state of Michigan.” (source)
We have a small-jacket-patch that continues with, “… and return fire!” But, for today, we need to consider the reality of what is happening in America and to know that time is of the essence to get our house in order: financially, physically, and most importantly, spiritually. Let’s try our best to keep calm and remain prayerful for our nation, because the return-fire-part may be coming—soon—very soon.
As we begin, there are two main issues that each of one of us needs to fully appreciate.
Joe Biden will never be President of the United States.
The man who is currently President, Donald John Trump, will never secede.
No-Joe-There!
By the way, the term, ‘Joe Biden;’ is simply a collective term or short for Joe’s many ‘known-handlers’, because at the end of the day, there really is No-Joe-There!
We must also come to the reality that, although there is a preponderance of physical evidence along with literally thousands of sworn affidavits, submitted by brave American citizens, proving without a shadow of a doubt that Joe Biden’s handlers stole the 2020 Presidential election, in the end, however, it’s becoming increasingly clear that none of this evidence will matter.
There also have been many distracting and counter productive voices, such as the naysayers who look sadly at one another saying …What do we do now? We lost the Electoral College vote and…Mitch McConnell congratulated him on the floor of the senate. Firstly, Mitch is a RINO. There is also much confusing discussion about how the governors of seven swing states (illegally) certified the electoral votes for Biden; but the legislators did not certify those votes and presented parallel vote counts in favor of a Trump win. The governor does not get to decide who becomes president—the state legislators do. So, for the record, the Electoral College has NOT yet voted. Keep in mind, the media is complicit and wants you to believe the election is over. It is not. Some are saying they are waiting for the court to respond to multiple lawsuits but unfortunately the court has spoken, and will be no more. Or, that congress will decide on January 6, 2021. It is my belief that we will not have the luxury of time to wait until that date.
Mike Adams at News Target explains the situation best: “DNI John Ratcliffe has now publicly confirmed that the 2020 election experienced significant “foreign interference” from China and Iran, and possibly other nations, which fulfills the necessary conditions for Trump to trigger his 2018 executive order on foreign interference….John Ratcliffe knows China was involved in election theft and he’s about to unleash this fact upon the world… with huge ramifications for the ongoing allegations of widespread vote fraud and election rigging in the November 3rd election…. Now, the deep state elements who report to DNI, John Ratcliffe, are working overtime to delay this crucial report which is due (today) Friday, December, 18th. They are trying to bury the truth about foreign interference and delay Trump’s ability to act on this information.” This delay will not happen.
DNI Radcliffe will deliver this assessment to POTUS, as required
“Section 1 (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election the Director of National Intelligence, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in that election.”
DNI Radcliffe will deliver this assessment to POTUS, as required.
As Attorney Lin Wood said, “All the Supreme Court had to do was its job and this could have been avoided, but now it will be a military operation beginning any time between tonight and January 5th, 2021.”
A number of sources tell us that President Trump has ordered most of his administrative staff to exit the D.C. area and clear out. Something big is about to go down. Others, such as well know Tweeter, CodeMonkeyZ posted that multiple sources are telling him something huge was about to break big in terms of a “national emergency.” “Trump is about to make the biggest decision of his presidency.”
“The United States of America is a sovereign nation and our first priority is always the safety and security of our citizens.”
President Donald Trump tweeted: “The United States of America is a sovereign nation and our first priority is always the safety and security of our citizens.” He has cleared the deck, in preparation for invoking the Insurrection Act, which will activate a military response like this nation has never experienced before.
Our Heavenly Father please give President, Donald John Trump, the courage of his convictions and to do what is now necessary to save and then rebuild our Constitutional Republic once again.
God Speed Donald Trump, there are approximately 80 million Patriots who are right there beside you. Amen.
Ten months into the madness, there are now only two classes of people in the United States: those who tremble at the “national public health emergency,” and those who see Covid-19 being used to destroy America.
The first group “wears a mask,” and “socially distances,” and “follows the science.” The latter wonders: “what has happened to this country,” and believes they are watching America go down the drain before their eyes.
This catastrophe can be explained by looking at one man: Dr. Anthony Fauci. In fact, the sheeple’s worshiping of this bureaucrat signals the triumph of the Deep State, the “permanent government,” that Donald Trump was elected in 2016 to dismantle, but unfortunately has not. His presidency is now on life support.
Since the beginning, Dr. Fauci has refused to state the obvious
In March 2020, on the CBS News show “60 Minutes,” Dr. Fauci, one of the leading members of President Trump’s coronavirus task force, said there was no reason for people to wear a mask and that doing so would “only help people to feel good,” to paraphrase.
This was true because of SCIENCE. However, the Democrats hijacked the science to initiate their heinous takeover of America. Besides wearing a hazmat suit all the time, it is a fact that there is never, ever going to be any way to protect all individuals completely from catching a virus. This is the reason that wearing a face mask should have been a choice from the beginning, if you wanted, to protect YOURSELF, while in public. There is no way that lockdowns should ever have been necessary to “protect” people from a virus that so far 99.9 percent of Americans have survived. The only path was to have society continue, wait for a vaccine, and to isolate anybody vulnerable to the virus, specifically, the elderly, and those with underlying medical conditions, who form the overwhelming majority of “Covid-19 deaths,” and even those numbers cannot be relied upon, because of the politicization of the so-called “pandemic.”
In no time in the history of the world have countries imposed these draconian lockdown measures. So, the question, of course, is why? And the only reasonable assumption is to ruin the great economy that President Trump built and to prevent his certain re-election.
Since the beginning, Dr. Fauci has refused to state the obvious: that the only solution to coronavirus is the development of “herd immunity,” the idea that a virus must go through the population, be survived by most everybody, and then combined with enough people being vaccinated to produce a safe environment, free from further infection.
Fauci: “that umbrella of herd immunity”
That is until this Monday, Dec. 14, when Dr. Fauci predicted that the United States could achieve herd immunity against Covid-19 by “the end of the second quarter 2021” after vaccines are more widely deployed, according to NBC News. Fauci called it “that umbrella of herd immunity.”
Month after month in 2020, anyone who has championed the notion that any solution for Covid-19 must include some sort of “herd immunity,” has been ridiculed, lambasted, and called callous for wanting millions of Americans to die.
So, what changed for Dr. Fauci to finally say the words without equivocation, “herd immunity,” besides that President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed,” has facilitated several pharmaceutical companies producing Covid-19 vaccines in record time? The Left, and the Democrats, and the Deep State believes that President Trump will no longer be in the White House after Inauguration Day, Jan. 20, 2021.
Oh, but what about the recent “spike” in Covid-19 deaths this month, Mr. Freedom-loving, Anti-Masker Guy? Well, it just so happens that the highest months for death in the United States are December, January, and February. We are entering the death season, Covid-19 or not.
Coronavirus is the “tip of the spear” in the violent uprising against the United States of America
In the immortal words of Swedish, teen-ager, environmentalist Greta Thunberg, “How Dare You,” dismiss so easily the 300,000 Covid-19 deaths in the United States. Ok, average age of Covid-19 deaths in the United States: 78 years old, which is exactly the average life expectancy in the country. Of those under 65 who have died, 90 percent had two or more underlying medical conditions. Isolating the elderly and vulnerable was always the correct strategy, as nearly every healthy person who caught Covid-19 in 2020 has lived, including this writer.
This article can only briefly connect the Covid-19 hysteria to the stealing of the election from President Trump in November. Only that “mail-in” ballots were permitted to be distributed because of Covid-19, illegally frankly, creating the alleged “margin of victory,” for Beijing Joe Biden.
We have witnessed a coordinated attempt to steal an election, and it is the radical Left and the media that have used Covid-19 as its implementation strategy for destroying the country. Coronavirus is the “tip of the spear” in the violent uprising against the United States of America. The American People await the president to “Break the Glass,” and fulfill his oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 