SIGN PETITION TO DEMAND JOE BIDEN BE TESTED FOR COGNITIVE FITNESS
It’s illegal to run a mentally incompetent candidate for office since it’s a nomination based on fraud, a bait and switch, for someone who can’t lead. If Joe were nominated, he’d be removed before the vote. Therefore, the Democrat Party will choose his replacement. Currently, the DNC is run by the farthest Left radicals, so will choose a far leftist replacement, unelectable in normal times. But Joe is not competent to even run a Scouting troop. So why do Democrats insist he’s fit enough to lead America?
WHY WE MUST DEMAND BIDEN BE TESTED FOR MENTAL COMPETENCE NOW!
Joe Biden is Running for US President in Less Than 90 Days
We will choose a president on November 3rd, 2020. It matters if a candidate is incompetent
Biden Stated August 5th He’s Not Been Tested & Won’t Allow Cognitive Exam
One of the more challenging facets to awakening the general public on the scale of corruption within Washington DC is the need for people to drop party designations. This is never more true than within the U.S. Senate where the “us -vs- them” mentality reigns supreme.
The system is created to self-sustain regardless of party affiliation. The Senate is one club with one perspective. Within that club rule #1 dominates: none of the members will ever expose another member. So when there is corrupt activity within the Senate no-one from within the institution with expose another. This is the way of the Senate and how it operates.
(L-R) Barrasso, Blunt, McConnell, Thune and Ernst.
Current Senate Leader Mitch McConnell has a leadership group who carry out the institutional objectives of the upper chamber as a body, they include: Senator John Thune (whip); Senator John Barrasso (conference chair); Roy Blunt (committee chair); Todd Young (NRSC chair); Jodi Ernst (conference vice-chair); and Chuck Grassley (president pro tempore). None of these senators make a move publicly without approval from Leader McConnell.
Today Senate Whip John Thune rebuked the mail-in ballot concerns expressed by President Trump. Thune does this because ultimately the objectives of the upper chamber are more favorably aligned if President Trump is removed.
WASHINGTON DC – […] Asked if he agreed with the president’s repeated charges that mailed-in balloting will lead to a “rigged election” and “massive voter fraud,” the Senate majority whip told reporters, “I don’t.”
“Mailed-in voting has been used in a lot of places for a long time and, honestly, we’ve got a lot of folks that, as you know, they’re investing heavily in trying … to win that war. It’s always a war too for mail-in ballots. Both sides compete, and it’s always an area where I think our side, at least in my experience, has done pretty well,” Thune answered, adding: “I think we want to assure people it’s going to work, it’s secure and if they vote that way it’s going to count.” (read more)
Prime Minister Trudeau testified before the Parliamentary Finance Committee on July 30th in connection with the WE Charity scandal, currently under investigation by Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion.
Canadians can be forgiven for wondering why.
Amping up the Trudeau charm, well lit and smiling directly into a high-resolution camera, coiffed hair blacker than beard; the relaxed PM was clearly focused upon communicating directly with voters, rather than answering questions from committee members.
The Trudeau brand was under attack, and the message for Canadians was that his Liberal government is doing a great job. The narrative ran that they would in fact be doing even more for Canadians, if it weren’t for Conservatives bringing up this nettlesome conflict of interest thing. Sure, he should have recused himself from approving the sole-source WE contract, but that wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for COVID-19…and his long-standing interest in youth-affairs. The Liberals’ commitment to providing financial assistance to students during COVID-19 led to an accelerated implementation of the CSSG Program…which caused the PM to slow down the approval process because of the increased scrutiny and appearance of conflict of interest that his family affiliation with WE would bring…before then failing to recuse himself from the process. The Civil Service made all the decisions anyway, not the PM. If the logic is difficult to grasp here…well….
Although it is impossible to disconnect the damming, feculent bright-red Liberal dots leading from WE to the Prime Minister, distraught Liberal spin doctors had obviously been billing some overtime on damage control.
The central pivot from conflict of interest and Liberal corruption seems to be good intentions and the tremendous benefit to young Canadians that could have been…if only the unfortunate scandal hadn’t blown up (read, if they hadn’t been caught).
Canadians should blame the Conservatives and Bloc Quebecoise, for making a mountain out of a mole-hill, really…when you think about it…from a Liberal prospective…
MP Pierre Poilievre – “What is the total dollar value of all expenses reimbursed and fees paid and any other consideration provided by the WE group to you, your mother, your spouse, your brother and any other member of your family? Just the total please.”
PM Trudeau – “Uh…I don’t have that exact figure…uh…reimbursing expenses is something done by an organization…uh…for example…so I don’t have…uh…those totals.”
Liberal MP Julie Dzerowicz (trying) – “Mister Speaker…uh…Point of Order…Mister Chair, sorry…not Mister Speaker. My Point of Order is what’s the relevance of these questions…uh…of ancillary…uh…fees paid to family members to the official motion…?”
Chairman Wayne Easter – “I don’t think that is a Point of Order Miss Dzerowicz, back to Mister Poilievre.” Poilievre – “So you are telling me that you don’t know how much immediate family members have been paid in expense reimbursements by this organization.” Trudeau – “Uh…my mother and my brother are professionals in their own right who…uh…have…uh engagements…uh…and have for many, many years with organizations across the country…” Poilievre – “Do you know?” Trudeau – “…uh…and I…uh…don’t have the details of their…uh…work…uh…work experiences of their…uh…expenses.” Poilievre – “What about your spouse? What is the dollar figure?” Trudeau – “Uh…WE…uh…I think WE Charity has been able to share those figures with you.”
Poilievre – “When was the last time that she had an expense reimbursed by WE Charity?” Trudeau – “Uh…I…uh…believe it would have been to uh…”
As one can gather from this short excerpt, the Prime Minister was less than forthcoming. It’s a fine line between pivoting and refusing to answer. In Court, it may well have led to a charge of Contempt. Perhaps a Contempt of Parliament charge would be appropriate here.
Trudeau’s repetitive and vexatious use of the word “uh”
Also telling was Trudeau’s repetitive and vexatious use of the word “uh”. In linguistics, “uh” is known as a “hesitation form”, or “filler word”. Filler words are often a red flag for deception. In Psychology Today, Professor Jack Schafer of Western Illinois University, a behavioral analyst for the FBI, explains. “Little words, often ignored in normal speech, can signal deception. Words such as um and uh indicate cognitive load. Liars experience increased cognitive load. Um and uh signal impending delays is speech. Liars need time to evaluate their answers to ensure their lie will be believed. Liars also need additional time to choose the right words to camouflage the truth. Truthful people do not need extra time to convey information.”
The Prime Minister wouldn’t lie though, would he?
So, what are the issues with WE-Gate exactly?
The growing Hydra-like list may keep Commissioner Dion up at night:
Was CSSG designed specifically for WE to administer?
Why the Canada Service Corps was not tasked with CSSG?
Why a sole-source contract?
Details of due diligence done, due to the fact that WE appeared to be in financial trouble and in violation of bank covenants. WE Board Members had resigned and mass layoffs of staff had occurred. WE had also never delivered a similar program previously.
Why was WE paid $30M upfront, and how will it repay taxpayers?
Why was a WE real estate shell company used, instead of WE Charity?
Why was a $30M upfront payment made on contract award?
WE claimed initially that the PMO had called, asking if they wanted the CSSG contract.
Who authorized WE, and why, to begin spending money on May 5th, prior to June 23rd approval?
Failure to recuse/Conflict of Interest –
PM has spoken for WE in past
WE has paid for Trudeau campaign ads/gave Trudeau a platform to connect with hundreds of thousands of young voters
WE has paid Margaret and Alexander Trudeau
WE has paid Sophie Trudeau
WE relationship with Katie Telford
WE paid Bill Morneau $42K expenses
WE employs two Morneau daughters.
Beyond the blatant corruption
Beyond the blatant corruption issues however, the CSSG model may have also been fatally flawed from birth. The very real possibility exists that CSSG could violate Minimum Wage laws. CSSG would pay a student up to $10 per hour, which is less than the minimum wages in all of Canada’s provinces and territories. If the concept of paid volunteers seems counter-intuitive, the law actually recognizes two classes of volunteers. According to Labour Law firm Goldblatt Partners, “Volunteers are not covered by the Employment Standards Act in Ontario, and need not be paid the minimum wage. But that does not mean that an employer can evade its obligations under the Act by classifying anyone as a volunteer. Only a ‘true volunteer’ is excluded from the protections of the Act…if a participating student views the program as a means to make a livelihood during a time that fewer summer jobs are available, they may be able to argue that they are not a ‘true volunteer.’” A class action lawsuit waiting to happen then.
But, back to the show.
Poilievre (translation) – “I have a simple question for you. How many times does a Minister in your Government need to break the Ethics Act before being sacked? How many times?” Trudeau (translation) – “We…uh…take it very seriously, every time there are Ethics issues… Poilievre – “How many times?” Trudeau – “…and…” Poilievre – “How many times?” Chair – “The Prime Minister has the floor…and he has the right to answer. Mister Prime Minister”
He had the right to answer, but apparently not the ability.
How many times? That is the question…for all Canadians.
Great campaign slogan for Conservatives next election cycle…
During much of the 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary Clinton fell up and down stairs, including losing a shoe when she was tossed into a waiting van when she was purportedly overcome by heat while attending a Sept. 11, 2016, 9/11 Memorial event.
Hillary Clinton wobbling outside a van
“During the presidential campaign, cameras caught Clinton leaving the 9/11 memorial in Manhattan and collapsing into the arms of Secret Service agents as she got into a waiting van. She later announced she’d been diagnosed with dehydration and pneumonia.” (RealClearPolitics, Sept. 11, 2016)
“Raw video from the scene in New York showed Hillary Clinton wobbling outside a van before she falls and is assisted into the vehicle. Clinton abruptly left a 9/11 memorial event due to the heat, according to her campaign.
“MORE ON #HILLARY per witness: “unexpected early departure”; she stumbled off curb, “knees buckled”, lost a shoe as she was helped into van
— RickLeventhalFoxNews (@RickLeventhal) September 11, 2016
“Alternate angle shows a close-up of Clinton falling down:
NEW VIDEO HILLARY COLLAPSES SEIZURE FALLS SEPT 11 MEMORIAL
“A closeup shows a piece of metal falling out from her right pant leg”.
In the 2020 Election campaign, media attention focuses on presumptive Democrat Joe Biden’s apparent lack cognitive skills
“Perhaps most infamously, Clinton fell inside her home in 2013 on the eve of testimony before a Senate committee investigating Benghazi. She got a mild concussion and was treated for a blood clot near her brain. (Daily Mail, March 13, 2018)
“When she appeared in Congress to testify, she was wearing special prism eyeglass lenses, which are used to assist people experiencing double vision.”
Much ado was made by the media over Clinton’s seemingly unstoppable stumbling—which curiously ended with the beginning of the televised 2016 presidential debates.
In the 2020 Election campaign, media attention focuses on presumptive Democrat Joe Biden’s apparent lack cognitive skills.
Scads of online videos show Biden struggling to finish sentence he began, rhyming off incorrect states he’s visited and even seeming not to know what day it is.
Biden’s verbal misspeaks have called for his cognitive testing.
“Not a joke and not hyperbole – I’m hearing from people close to the situation that Biden’s cognitive decline is rapidly worsening and is becoming increasingly difficult to mask. The Democrats are going to have to make a decision soon.” (@dbongino, Aug. 2, 2020)
Cunning Democrats will do anything to replace Donald Trump with Joe Biden as president.
Maybe the Dems have already filled out their mail-in vote election ballots, Mr. B.
But what if both Clinton’s falls and Biden’s confusion are part of a Democrat political tactic called diverting the attention of the public?
Back in 2016 when Clinton was falling, millions were speculating about the state of her health. No one was talking about her Benghazi and email scandals anymore.
Cunning Democrats will do anything to replace Donald Trump with Joe Biden as president.
Taking advantage of the public’s fear of the pandemic, they are calling for a universal mail-in vote, and at last count, were well on their way to achieving it.
They have other dangerous games at play.
You can’t make this stuff up:
“Democrats are contemplating secession and potential civil war as they game out possible scenarios for a closely contested election, according to a report by Ben Smith in a New York Times column Sunday. (Breitbart, Aug. 2, 2020)
“The bulk of Smith’s column is devoted to the question of how the media will handle Election Night coverage, given that the result may not be known for weeks. Vote-by-mail, which many states have only recently adopted — ostensibly, to prevent the spread of coronavirus in polling places — could lead to an uncertain result.
“However, buried near the end of Smith’s column is a report that Democrats have participated in a “war game” in which they considered several possible outcomes of the election.
The result: the threat of secession by the entire West Coast, followed by the possible intervention of the U.S. armed forces
“In one scenario, John Podesta — the former chair of Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, and a leading figure in party circles — played former Vice President Joe Biden, and refused to concede the election.
“The result: the threat of secession by the entire West Coast, followed by the possible intervention of the U.S. armed forces:
“But conveniently, a group of former top government officials called the Transition Integrity Project actually gamed four possible scenarios, including one that doesn’t look that different from 2016: a big popular win for Mr. Biden, and a narrow electoral defeat, presumably reached after weeks of counting the votes in Pennsylvania. For their war game, they cast John Podesta, who was Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, in the role of Mr. Biden. They expected him, when the votes came in, to concede, just as Mrs. Clinton had.
“But Mr. Podesta, playing Mr. Biden, shocked the organizers by saying he felt his party wouldn’t let him concede. Alleging voter suppression, he persuaded the governors of Wisconsin and Michigan to send pro-Biden electors to the Electoral College.
In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned
“In that scenario, California, Oregon, and Washington then threatened to secede from the United States if Mr. Trump took office as planned.
“The House named Mr. Biden president; the Senate and White House stuck with Mr. Trump. At that point in the scenario, the nation stopped looking to the media for cues, and waited to see what the military would do.
“Notably, on Election Night in 2016, Podesta publicly refused to concede the election to President Donald Trump.”
Meanwhile, it suits the power-crazed Democrats if Joe Biden has serious cognitive problems—because if elected it won’t be Joe Biden but his vice president, Barack Obama and other Democrats running the White House.
Only God Almighty and in-person voting will stop that from ever happening.
The word behind the curtain is that these charges against Maxwell, and the unsealing of previously sealed documents, have put an end to any hope that the Democrats could draft Hillary to replace Biden. In a recently unsealed court document involving Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, Virginia Giuffre said that former Democratic President Bill Clinton was on Epstein’s island with “two young girls” from New York.
Guiffre was questioned by a lawyer named Jack Scarola who asked: “Do you have any recollection of Jeffrey Epstein’s specifically telling you that ‘Bill Clinton owes me favors?’” To which she answered: “Yes, I do.” Guiffre further answered. “It was a laugh though. He would laugh it off. You know, I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here kind of thing, and he laughed it off and said well he owes me favors.”
Hillary said as a child she did not dream of being president of the United States. She has stated: “It never crossed my mind.” Yet her marriage to Bill has been a political one and her ’60s women-lib dogma indeed made her dream of becoming the first woman president. Perhaps that was her problem. It was all about being a woman rather than what she could do for the nation. I have known many women politicians. Never in a single moment did I ever think about Margaret Thatcher as being a woman and neither did she. It was always about policy and the nation. It was not some quest to prove a woman could be the head of state. Hillary could never make that distinction, for it was all about just being the first woman president.
The famous interview of Gennifer Flowers was published in London but barred in the United States because it revealed that Bill had told her that Hillary was bisexual. That was always the word behind the curtain, which began within the first month after they were in the White House.
It appears that Hillary’s dream is turning into a nightmare. She picked Bill and drove him into politics. She was the real mastermind. Now, she will not be able to get past Bill’s reputation.
Who You gonna believe? Your lyin’ eyes or the Democrats?
Democrat Jerry Nadler recently claimed that Antifa violence was just a “myth”. Is Nadless Nadler so out of touch with reality that fire bombs, statue toppling and entire downtowns engulfed in violence and riots don’t even register with him?
Maybe. But maybe, it is because the Democrat party agrees with their frothing at the mouth radical base, that America is racist and bad and the whole country should be burned to the ground.
Our Dumb Donkey friend just keeps repeating the talking points and will not hear the truth, his fingers are firmly planted in his ears.
Hillary won in 2016.
Barr is a Russian Agent of Evil.
Everything is racist.
Biden is firmly in the lead in all polls.
Orange Man Bad!
Would you give the control of the country to delusional Democrats? With Biden as President- Every city will be Portland or Seattle.
At today’s assembly of Big Tech oligarchs; and contrast against a backdrop where Google Inc. could possibly be soon facing a DOJ antitrust case; Representative Jim Jordan delivers opening remarks that cut right to the heart of the matter. WATCH:
.
Even though the level of content manipulation that Google, Facebook and Twitter are pouring into the 2020 election cycle was anticipated, it is still incredible to watch them carryout the scheme so openly.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 