In another exhibition of COVID madness, the governor of New York has banned indoor eating in New York City to stem the spread of the virus. However, the state’s own data shows a mere 1.4 percent of COVID-19 cases can be traced to restaurants.
It seems absolutely ridiculous when you think about proximity endeavors. Consider that airplanes, buses and trains have no social distancing at all – while restaurants were only allowed to operate at 25 percent capacity. Now restaurants can have no indoor service.
[New York Post] … In Manhattan, the capital of America’s restaurant business with more places, seats and customers than anywhere else, the new-infection rate is a mere 2.5 percent, compared with 5 percent in the state overall.
Yet absurdly, indoor dining is still allowed in most of the state including in areas with much higher infection rates.
The indoor ban’s the most painful to restaurant workers and to owners who went beyond the last mile to comply with the ever-changing rules for indoor and outdoor dining. (more)
Meanwhile…. Governor Cuomo plans to have a birthday bash:
Many people recognize there was an underlying organizational network operating within the key regions in the 2020 election, but few people have outlined the specific network and how it operates. In this video Phil Kline, former Attorney General of Kansas and current director of the Amistad Project, testifies to Wisconsin State Legislature about the corrupt and unequal influence of Facebook and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in the 2020 election.
Zuckerberg contributed $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a left leaning organization that has been providing these funds to towns, cities, and counties for election administration, via contributions to their general funds. WATCH:
A report within the Wall Street Journal does not necessarily come as a surprise; however, it also does little to provide solace for the lack of action by Attorney General Bill “Bondo” Barr. According to the article AG Barr has known about at least two investigations related to the Biden family since early spring 2020, and he worked to keep them quiet.
WASHINGTON DC – Attorney General William Barr has known about a disparate set of investigations involving Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings since at least this spring, a person familiar with the matter said, and worked to avoid their public disclosure during the heated election campaign.
[…] One investigation became public this week after federal investigators served a subpoena on Hunter Biden. The subpoena sought detailed financial information in connection with a criminal tax investigation by the U.S. attorney’s office in Delaware, according to people familiar with the matter.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan had also been looking at Hunter Biden’s business and financial dealings, as part of a broader criminal investigation that two people familiar with the matter described as an international financial investigation that had been going on for at least a year. (read more)
The institutional hypocrisy is enough to choke a hippo. Every rumor and supposition about Donald Trump was pushed directly into the media bloodstream by all ‘resistance’ operative in the DOJ, FBI and aggregate intelligence apparatus. Meanwhile, actual and demonstrable criminal conduct within the Biden family is carefully concealed to avoid any damage to the usurpation agenda.
Salt In Wound.
FUBAR !
Those who follow politics know the CTH motives for supporting Donald Trump have always been because all other candidates and politicians represent a systemic problem of deception within the Republic. They are part of a machine which operates on scheme and graft. SEE: “Why I Support Donald Trump” Part I, Part 2 and Part 3.
We stood open with our motive – opponents do not. We have previously used the metaphor that our constitutional republic was akin to the most beautiful classic car ever created, a beauty in desperate need of restoration.
This metaphor allowed us to present the question: Do we begin restoration to remove the rust with a ground up painstaking process intended to regain the full value, but will be exceedingly costly; or, do we as a nation once again put bondo over the rot and give it an appearance only paint job to maintain the impression?
Supporting Donald Trump means admitting the rot and disrepair we know exists. Supporting Donald Trump means not ignoring the insufferable issues evident by hiding problems, the rust, represented by Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Paul Ryan, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, et al under layers of shiny paint (See: McCain, Romney, Jeb).
Trump proposed we tear it down and begin an arduous but worthy process of rebuilding. Given that proposition, it would be silly to think we should take Lady Liberty to the restoration “finisher”.
We first need to take her to the world class team who will take her down to the frame, cut out the rust, and rebuild the foundation. This is the essential element in a proper restoration….. Anything else is just bondo applied to a corrupt system; which is exactly what AG Bill Barr appears to have done.
In a disappointing majority decision announced shortly before 6:30pm Friday evening, a majority of Supreme Court justices refused to take up a Texas lawsuit challenging four states in the 2020 election.
The court, with two dissenting options by Justice Alito and Justice Thomas, stated that Texas lacked a legal right to sue and did not have a legal interest in how other states carried out their elections.
The court rejected the Texas’ lawsuit without considering the specific merits of the state’s case.
Texas had asked the court to delay the official vote of the Electoral College, scheduled for Monday, Dec. 14, or prevent the four states from casting votes in the Electoral College for Biden. Justice Alito filed a short statement regarding the court’s disposition of the case and was joined by Justice Clarence Thomas.
The position of the Supreme Court raises an important question that now sits unresolved. If an individual citizen is determined not to have standing to challenge an election result; and if a group of citizens represented by their interest in a state, any state, is also denied standing to challenge an election result; then who can constitutionally challenge an election, any election, that is mired in controversy and demonstrable evidence of fraud?
From the Alliance:
An individual voter does not have standing to sue for election misconduct. (He/she is only one person and everyone cannot sue all the time for all elections.)
An official who may be adversely affected, cannot sue before an election in anticipation of bad conduct because it is speculative (not ripe)
An official who was adversely affected, cannot sue after an election claiming bad conduct because it is too late (latches)
A state does not have standing to sue on behalf of its citizens to remedy other states’ bad election conduct (no standing)
The result appears to be that no lawsuit involving the recent election cycle has been heard on the merits. Insofar as I am aware, the substance of misconduct claims have not been heard in court. (In fairness, there has been no decision on whether a state can sue itself for election misconduct.)
The U.S.S.C has created a constitutional right to abortion from emanations and penumbras. It has told us there is latitude to provide jobs and college admissions based on race or sex. The high court has created a constitutional right to burn the flag.
The Supreme Court, and other courts, have determined limits on constitutional rights to: free speech, bearing arms, freedom of assembly, religious worship, who can use which bathroom, whether the state can hang a murderer; whether men can compete in women’s sports; whether you can operate a restaurant, how hot your coffee can be, etc. ad nauseum.
However, when it comes to the citizen’s right to make sure his or her vote counts and is not nullified by corrupt and dishonest practices, the courts have decided that it is imperative they restrain themselves from taking a position on the merits.
They have thoughtfully informed us of constraints on them that no-one knew existed. The Friday ruling cites only a conclusion, but no reasoning.
If a state sues, is it not representing its citizens? Isn’t that, at the root, the only function of a state government? Are the citizens’ rights to an honest vote not affected if another state runs a bogus election and the first state’s votes become nullified?
Does a state not have standing to sue because the court anticipates it will not succeed on the merits? Why do courts ever bother to write legal opinions when they can save time and tell us the outcome they have in mind right away?
My untutored mind is having difficulty figuring out just who, and under what circumstances, has a legal right to a fair election.
Any thinking person can detect that forces are pushing us into a period of dangerous change. There is something nefarious in the air. Sometimes, reality that is foreign to anyone’s experience is hard to grasp. And so, we have millions of people confused as to what is actually happening.
In spite of stealing an election, the Left will have us believe they won the political and cultural war and now are in the process of removing the bodies in Washington, poised to take over. They are continuing to take down the symbols, the culture, the habits, much like Mao destroyed the Four Old Things, with 2 million dead, during his Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976… Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas.
The Left says our culture is filled with reminders and symbols of national sins, slavery and oppression. And yet, they are working toward developing their own slavery, and oppression, using their own brand of tyranny.
The Left has entered into an alliance with the Globalists and the Chinese Communist Party
The Left has entered into an alliance with the Globalists and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Russia has been swept aside as a communist failure.
The CCP is not successful because they are innovative, commercially or technically. Their achievements prevail because they are thieves. Their technology is our technology. The Chinese communists have purchased their way into our country by too many of us willing to sell. The Chinese are everywhere, Big Tech, the media, our corporations, education, and in the offices and beds of our politicians. And, they are in Canada. They have paid for and developed close relationships in the upper echelons of both our governments, including the Biden crime family. The CCP is setting up cells at universities all across America. The CCP has latched on to our freedom, not to copy it, but to use it to destroy us.
COVID was manufactured in China, the origin for so many novel diseases, as a last resort to remove Trump, as a cover and a dessert after the main meal, the United States. It is not a real pandemic. After watching scores of medical doctor’s testimonies, one can only conclude there is no real medical emergency. The World Health Organization, a highly political body, reports death rates all over the map. If you press them, they say that about 750 million people world-wide have been infected with COVID-19 with 1.04 million deaths. If you do the math the infection fatality rate is 0.1386%, similar to the 2018 seasonal flu with a rate of 0.1355%. The Spanish Flu, which killed some 50 – 100 million people had a world mortality rate of between 2.7% and 5.4% (PJ Media, Our World in Data).
Every death is a tragedy, but If you are vulnerable to COVID, by all means protect yourself. Do not expect the world to stop, putting millions at risk for bankruptcy and ruin.
COVID-19 is a political tool being used by globalists, the CCP and the Democrat Party to move the world into a totalitarian socialist government system. If they have their way, the world you once knew will never be coming back. The lockdowns and the scare tactics are not about your health.
This ‘pandemic’ has birthed millions of fraud-ridden mail-in ballots
This ‘pandemic’ has birthed millions of fraud-ridden mail-in ballots, as a planned by-product of COVID, concentrated in battleground states, to poison our election process. It has fabricated a failed economy. Millions of Americans are desperate for aid and they will soon look to anyone who can help.
While many Republicans remain strangely, but not surprisingly, quiet, Democrats go about their business finalizing their plans for the takeover, completing the coup. The Democrats are busy, intent on representing every race, color, sexual and gender preference in their choices of more swamp creatures for the proposed Biden cabinet. The experienced or religious need not apply, except if you’re Muslim. But, Joe Biden will be nothing more than a footnote, a useful idiot in the Left’s struggle to turn America into a socialist nation.
In the meantime, no one seems to be caring about or tracking the carnage of small businesses, or the demise of the middle class for that matter. These businesses are closing by the tens of thousands. 40% of restaurants will be permanently closed by March, almost 40% of heart attack patients go untreated because of the pre-occupation with COVID.
Fear not, the Left is here with all the answers, a new ‘Democratic’ Socialist society that will ‘wash’ our culture of old ideas like capitalism, and Judeo-Christianity. They will bring us new old ideas like socialism, total equality regardless of personal industry, and political correctness, complete with censorship and tyranny. Say or write the wrong thing, get fired or censored, all for the common good. It is happening now.
Our culture has changed drastically in 50+ years of constant Progressive bombardment. Nabisco is selling their Ritz Crackers with two gay men wearing lipstick. Large corporations care nothing of morality, only money.
This is no time to be faint of heart, to shrink into the background. It’s a time to find your courage, to protect what you hold dear
The Left, with their affinity for China, is pushing us into a Chinese-style Cultural Revolution. Schools everywhere are being renamed, statues destroyed, removing the symbols, the names associated with ‘oppression’…people like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison. The Judeo-Christian culture is under full assault. Churches are being closed or attendance severely restricted. Gatherings, especially of potential patriotic ‘trouble-makers’ are being outlawed while Left-wing rioters are hands off. All because Democrats are concerned for our health.
If our Supreme Court should fail in their duty to preserve and protect our Constitution, all confidence in the law of the land will be lost by at least half of the nation. That will be the last peaceful attempt at safeguarding our country from a hostile takeover. As a result, a movement toward secession or even civil war could take shape.
This is no time to be faint of heart, to shrink into the background. It’s a time to find your courage, to protect what you hold dear. We will either have a political solution where the law and the Constitution is upheld, or we will have a military solution where bodies of the dead will pile up in the streets. Which will it be?
The cowards at the Supreme Court denied Texas standing in Texas v. Pennsylvania, the last major lawsuit standing between the drooling, senile Chinese puppet Joe Biden and the presidency.
It is a dark day for America.
Apparently, the vote was 7 to 2. Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissented.
FRIDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2020 ORDER IN PENDING CASE 155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot. Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins: In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___ (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
I have been warning that those in Washington DO NOT like outsiders. Only 106 republicans out of 196 joined Texas demonstrating that behind the curtain, nearly 50% of republican politicians prefer Trump to leave because he is not one of them. The Supreme Court avoided ruling claiming Texas had no standing which is completely false. Not giving a decision, either way, will propel civil unrest as each side claims they are right. Already people in Texas are talking about secession might be the answer for pro-Trump states. This time, we are approaching the break up of the United States and it may indeed be the only solution. No side has the right to oppress the other and the Supreme Court will NOT defend the people or the Constitution. The rule of law was the foundation of civilization, and refusing to comply with that duty condemns the nation to oblivion.
The Supreme Court has NO DISCRETION whatsoever to deny the petition and I do not say that as being supportive of the action. The only way to settle this dispute is to rule then both sides would have no choice but to settle down. This way, the election will always be in dispute. Biden got more votes in each of these swing states than Hillary or Obama which was NOT the case in any other state. This is indicative of fraud and it should have been addressed yes or no. This election was STOLEN not be Biden, but by an international agenda which has taken over the entire West and they needed Trump removed. Just look at the Agenda 2030 coming from Klaus Schwab and you will see the real future we face. This is the man who is destroying the future of civilization, will fail in his Marxist dreams, and will leave the West in shambles as the financial capital migrates to China.
UNCONSTITUTIONAL ON ITS FACE
The Judiciary Act of 1925 held that the Supreme Court would have the discretion to select what it wants to hear in direct violation of the Constitution, which has NEVER been addressed. The Constitution ONLY established the Supreme Court as part of a tripartite government and the separation of powers as laid out as essential to constrain tyranny by Montesquieu, who was also the inspiration for the Second Amendment which was to keep citizens armed rather than maintain standing armies to prevent war.
As such, the lower courts were created ONLY by statute under Congress and could just as easily be shut down. The only court required by the Constitution is the Supreme Court and every Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States are required to take two oaths before they may execute the duties of their appointed office – (1) the Constitutional Oath to defend it and (2) the Judicial Oath.
Therefore, anyone can see on its face that the Judiciary Act of 1925 is unconstitutional for it violates their oath to defend the constitution when they have the discretion to not hear cases. Previously, the Supreme Court ruled and ignored this time when it defined “discretion” by saying “the term ‘discretion’ denotes the absence of a hard and fast rule.” Langnes v Green, 282 US 531, 541 (1931). This means that those in power do not have to obey any law, even the Constitution. The Supreme Court also said, “it is obvious that discretion does not exist where there is no power to act except in one way.” Jones v SEC, 298 US 1, 18 (1936). When judges and politicians claim discretion, they claim to be ABOVE the law of men.
Now, turning to the Texas lawsuit, I agree with Justices Alito and Thomas that the court had “no discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction.”
Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers.
This case squarely fell within the original jurisdiction since it was a case “between two or more states” and therefore, this denial was in itself unconstitutional relying on the discretion granted illegally by the Judiciary Act of 1925. Obviously, the majority of the court simply did not want to get into this election dispute. Like Dread Scott, which tried to avoid the issue of slavery by ruling that blacks had no rights under the Constitution to avoid ruling which led to the Civil War, the Supreme Court has once again condemned the country to Civil War for is the Democrats try to implement the Agenda 2030, they will unleash violence no different than the Russian revolution. Klaus Schwab knows this will lead to revolution and has flipped to claiming if his agenda is NOT adopted there will be a revolution from the BLM movement he helped to inspire.
The Texas lawsuit turned on the Electoral College Clause.
“Constitutional Background The Electors Clause requires that each State “shall appoint” its Presidential Electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1, cl. 2
As set forth in the Complaint, executive and judicial officials made significant changes to the legislatively defined election laws in the Defendant States. … Taken together, these non-legislative changes did away with statutory ballot-security measures for absentee and mail-in ballots such as signature verification, witness requirements, and statutorily authorized secure ballot drop-off locations”
There is no doubt that they had an argument and that it fell squarely within the Original Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Alito and Thomas recognized that. The fact that the other 7 justices denied cert merely shows they did not want to rule on this matter which is an exercise of discretion that has now doomed the USA to continuing violence. In doing so, they have violated the civil right of the entire nation and condemned the world to the ruthless tyranny coming out of the World Economic Forum. Based upon information and belief, this entire “Build Back Better” movement has been designed by the marketing firm Edelman which already appears to be pushing this new world order and is also in a partnership with the World Economic Forum.
Here you have John Kerry claiming there is no return to normal because what existed before didn’t work despite the fact that even black unemployment was at a historic low. It didn’t work because the people voted for Trump instead of a career politician. Economically, the economy was booming until they started their attack using this virus.
Then you have Boris Johnson stating he will retrain adults for the new economy confirming he is deliberately using the lockdowns to destroy the economy for this New Green World Order of Schwab!
There is nothing left for doubt that this entire Agenda 2030 amounts to the take over of the United States. While many questioned Biden’s mental capacity to be president, this has NEVER been a contest between Trump v Biden. This has really been Trump v Schwab. This entire agenda of Schwab who is behind this power grab to hand it to the United Nations has been so well organized and Trump has been so outnumbered as not merely just Europe and Canada against him, but the United Nations, World Bank, IMF, and Schwab’s World Economic Forum. This is Schwab pushing his new version of Marxism. They are using the lockdowns NOT for a virus, but for climate change.
Schwab and crew have bought the media which is always left and this is why we have fake news. There is no way they will allow any comment to the contrary. This is the overthrow of everything and we are not entitled to put this to a vote. They are simply engaging in tyranny with a smile. This is the end of democracy for we are not smart enough to even vote.
This is not simply Communism where you will own nothing, this is feudalism for the super-rich will retain their wealth which is why Big Tech has been pushing their agenda to get rid of Trump.
WHY EVERYONE HAS STANDING IN A CIVIL RIGHTS CLASS ACTION
In the Supreme Court decision Bush v Gore 531 U.S. 98 (2000), it did raise the equal protection problem with different election procedures nationally. The court held Per Curiam:
Despite violating the Fourteenth Amendment by using disparate vote-counting procedures in different counties, Florida did not need to complete a recount in the 2000 presidential election because it could not be accomplished in a constitutionally valid way within the time limit set by federal law for resolving these controversies.
There were indications that the Court recognized the need for nationwide electoral reform under Due Process and the Equal Protection Clause. How states do their own elections do not impact other states. However, election anyone federally impacts the rights of everyone. Looking at the lower courts, at least one federal court has suggested that the courts could order a new election. In 1976, an Eastern District Court in New York heard a case, Donohue v. Board of Elections of State of NY, 435 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1976), where it was alleged that voter fraud in several urban locations took place not unlike what we see right now. In that decision, the court maintained that federal courts had a role to play in ensuring free and fair presidential elections. It held:
“It is difficult to imagine a more damaging blow to public confidence in the electoral process than the election of a President whose margin of victory was provided by fraudulent registration or voting, ballot-stuffing or other illegal means.”
Interestingly, the court didn’t find sufficient evidence that voter fraud had altered the outcome, or even occurred at all. Still, experts disagree about whether courts can order presidential elections to be held again. If there is a violation of rules that would change the election outcome, then the courts would be compelled to act and federally this is why Texas is suing Pennsylvania. Now 17 other states are joining Texas v Pennsylvania. What Pennsylvania and Georgia for that matter do to try to prevent recounts impacts the Equal Protection of the Law and Due Process rights of everyone else in the entire country.
ELECTION VIOLATED OUR CIVIL RIGHTS
Within the Legal Code Title 18, Section 241, it has been an important statutory tool in election crime prosecutions. It has long been held to apply only to schemes to corrupt elections for federal office. It has been applied to stuffing a ballot box with forged ballots, United States v. Saylor, 322 U.S. 385 (1944); United States v. Mosley, 238 U.S. 383 (1915) as well as preventing the official count of ballots in primary elections, United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941), which may come in handy in this election. This means private suites can be filed claiming that interfering with the ballots is a civil rights violation to all in the country.
Destroying voter registration applications is also applicable (United States v. Haynes, Nos. 91-5979, 91-6076, 1992 WL 296782, at *1 (6th Cir. Oct. 15, 1992)), as well as destroying ballots (United States v. Townsley, 843 F.2d 1070, 1073–75 (8th Cir. 1988)).
Anyone who exploits the infirmities of elderly or handicapped people by casting absentee ballots in their names is also a violation of civil rights, United States v. Morado, 454 F.2d 167, 171 (5th Cir. 1972), just as anyone who illegally register voters and cast absentee ballots in their names, United States v. Weston, 417 F.2d 181, 182–85 (4th Cir. 1969).
Anyone who threatens injury, threaten, or intimidate a voter in the exercise of his right to vote is also a serious actionable issue under this statute, Fields v. United States, 228 F.2d 544 (4th Cir. 1955). This even extends to someone who impersonates qualified voters, Crolich v. United States, 196 F.2d 879, 879 (5th Cir. 1952).
Since “in the run-up to Election Day 2020, Trump, and also Giuliani, were trying to find dirt on Hunter Biden’s international business dealings that would tank the campaign of Joe Biden, Biden has since won the presidential race, but Trump still refuses to concede,” must be true.
It must be true because Des Moines, Iowa based Senior U.S. Political Reporter Nikki Schwab for the Daily Mail, since Jan. 31, 2020 says so!
The Daily Mail story purports that “in the run-up to Election Day 2020”, Trump, and Giuliani, were no trying to win a presidency doomed to fail via Democrat voting fraud and open theft, they were spending the lion’s share of their time trying to dig up dirt on Hunter Biden’s international business dealings to tank Joe Biden’s non-campaign.
Who knew that “news” of the Hunter Biden corruption would be revealed long after the horse was out of the barn?
The Trump rallies attended by hundreds of thousands of Trump supporters, and live streamed to millions by Right Side Broadcasting and other networks were only the imaginations of deplorables.
Trump and Giuliani’s dirt-digging didn’t work because not only was all vote counting ground to a complete halt about 10 p.m. after folk went to bed on Election Night—but Lo and Behold, the news media crowned Biden ‘President-Elect’ within days.
Associating its origin with American showman P.T. Barnum “while early examples of its use are found among gamblers and confidence tricksters” (Wikipedia), “there’s a sucker born every minute”.
Most of them among the gullible who believe the Fake News of the current day media!
It’s Post Election 2020, and the media’s now reporting that the son of Schwab’s President-Elect is under investigation for his questionable Burisma holdings.
Who knew that “news” of the Hunter Biden corruption would be revealed long after the horse was out of the barn?
The media, that’s who!
According to the Daily Mail, The Wilmington computer repair shop owner who handed a copy of Hunter Biden’s hard drive over to Rudy Giuliani has closed his shop and skipped town.
But it was really The Delaware News Journal—not the Daily Mail—that first reported that John Paul Mac Isaac had left Wilmington, Delaware, according to a neighbor and a sign on his Trolley Square neighborhood store said it was closed.
“Mac Isaac’s lawyer, Brian Della Rocca, confirmed that the shop was gone – due to his client receiving death threats – but wouldn’t tell the newspaper if the neighbor’s account of him leaving Wilmington was true.” (Daily Mail, Nov. 24, 2020)
“Mac Isaac briefly became a central character in the presidential race when The New York Post reported on contents that allegedly came from Hunter Biden’s laptop that the store owner had handed over to the FBI – and also to a lawyer representing Giuliani, President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer.
“Emails that were purportedly on the laptop suggest that then Democratic nominee Joe Biden had met with an executive from Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian company that placed Hunter Biden on its board.
“Della Rocca also told The Delaware News Journal that his office is investigating whether the computer files that Giuliani said were from the laptop were actually from the laptop.
“Della Rocca said he did believe what Mac Isaac gave to authorities was authentic, though the News Journal points out that he couldn’t describe the process in how he would verify the contents of the hard drive.
‘I have no concern that the information on the laptop is legitimate information,’ he told the paper. ‘Now what was released [by Giuliani]? I don’t know. I don’t have that level of information yet.’
Why is it that the Intel Community always seems to have blown off the pop stand before prime witnesses leave town?
“After the October 14 New York Post story, given to the paper by Giuliani, Democrats, including House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, speculated the release was part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
“Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, a top Trump defender, said that wasn’t the case.
‘It’s funny that some of the people who complain the most about intelligence being politicized are the ones politicizing the intelligence,’ Ratcliffe said on Fox News Channel. ‘Unfortunately, it is Adam Schiff who said the intelligence community believes the Hunter Biden laptop and emails on it are part of a Russian disinformation campaign.’
‘Let me be clear: the intelligence community doesn’t believe that because there is no intelligence that supports that. And we have shared no intelligence with Adam Schiff, or any member of Congress,’ Ratcliffe added.
“Days later, however, more than 50 former intelligence officials signed on to a letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop story ‘has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation,’ according to Politico, which obtained the letter.
If you can believe him, Mark Zuckerberg says the FBI sent Facebook a warning over the NY Post story.
Meanwhile, Mac Isaac seems to have taken the same route as Dirty Dossier MI6 spy/activist Christopher Steele who went on the lam in —-but at least didn’t try to fob off his beloved pet cats on any of his next door neighbors.
Why is it that the Intel Community always seems to have blown off the pop stand before prime witnesses leave town?
Maybe that’s an upcoming story for Nikki Schwab over at the Daily Mail.
Story brought to you by ‘President-Elect’ Canada Free Press.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 