What newspapers are doing between the Print and Online Versions is beginning to really question their integrity and reveals why mainstream media is just not trustworthy any more. So if you Google something, it’s the online version that will come up – not the print edition. So they can print anything and then post online something completely different to defeat a Google search and mislead the public once again.

The New York Times changed what they reported in the “print” edition that clearly stated “wiretapped data” monitoring Trump’s people before the election in Watergate Style probably after realizing what they said might hurt Obama. Why is there such a stark difference between online and the print edition? Obviously, this is not a mistake. It appears to be a deliberate alteration of reporting.

This strange difference between online and print editions of stories seems to be a pattern that is emerging more and more. Mainstream Media is really getting involved in some shady covert manipulation of the pretend news or modern version of propaganda. They are not as smart as they think.

The very night of the debut of the Forecaster in London, I was getting all sorts of emails from London with clients saying the London Evening Standard put out a story saying “City bankers are worth every penny of their huge bonuses” attributing it to me. When I went to the online version, it had a picture of a different Martin Armstrong. I responded to clients sending those emails that no, there were wrong. They corrected me photographing the print edition, which had MY PICTURE not someone else who was in the online version. At first, I assumed this was just a mistake. But this practice of putting out two different versions is becoming a commonplace manipulation.

In my case, it was the very night of the debut of the film. It was way too coincidental. Obviously, suddenly reporting some head-hunter for banks with the same name using that headline was to make people think the opposite of what the film was all about and not go see it. They could have ran that story any other time. There was nothing taking place in London that warranted such a story since the only critical issue about bankers was the film the Forecaster.

This ploy of putting out two versions completely different from the print edition and online edition is to give them deniability. The Washington Post they say Trump is wrong and the New York Times never said such a thing but links to the online version. So one lies and the other swears to it. The Washington Post boldly displays their motto – “Democracy Dies in Darkness” which is something they should practice for they are the dark force spreading darkness over the whole land. This manipulation of the news between the print and online versions is taking place more and more often and it always seems to take place during an issue in controversy – which even included my film. As I reported before, the company that bought the distribution rights for the USA refused to put in theaters. Then NETFIX senior management overruled and would not allow it to be shown on their systems. We live in a world of political censorship.

The mainstream media thinks they are clever. These are by no means a simple mistake. The New York Times changing the story for the online version is really showing how low the mainstream media will go to support the Democrats. This is just getting really disgusting. When the press becomes part of the conspiracy against the people, like Pravda (Truth) in Russia under the Communists, you know the state is failing. There would be no reason for the New York Times and the Washington Post to be manipulating the news this aggressively if the state was not failing.

ANSWER: Those people who say this is a failure of capitalism and not socialism simply are trying to come up with an excuse as to why their dreams are not coming true. Democrats champion the poor and middle class but run to the rich for money. Why would bankers and hedge funds as well as Hollywood support Democrats if they are really hated so much? The answer is rather simple. They can bribe them for loopholes and favors.

The monetary and banking problems in the world today arise NOT so much from the failure of specific economic policies, but from deep-seated corruption and problems in institutional structures that have been created in response to socialism, which includes excessive regulation. Individuals clearly make mistakes in business but legislatures make bad laws and career politicians become detached from society, which is no different than any monarch. However, the institutions from which decisions and laws emanate are the core that determines the effectiveness of social operations and the value of social decisions. The more they create laws to solve an issue, they create other problems in the process.

Unless we change the immediate institutional structure of how government is designed, trying to impose centralized planning, we are not likely to get stable solutions to today’s economic-social problems. We exist between brief periods of economic stability and total government ineptitude resulting in erratic inflation and serious banking instability. The history of modern monetary and banking arrangements and government’s complete failure to manage society begs for meaningful reform. However, the likelihood of such reform is zero without the Crash & Burn, for he who holds the power in his hand will never let it go willingly.

The rhetoric against central banks clouds the issue. Government wants to spend other people’s money all the time, be they left or right. They only differance is on what to spend it on. However, they look to central banks to control the economy when they can only impact interest rates while money supply expands with velocity and contract when people lack confidence. The central bank has no possible power over fiscal spending and until the people stop complaining about central bankers and look at the whole problem, politicians will never be blamed for anything.

The impact of political interference on the workings of monetary and financial institutions is great under socialism implemented by people who have no experience whatsoever. Not surprisingly, many of our modern problems arise because politically generated structures are inappropriate to the real world. The hunt for money by government has cost billions in the private sector trying to cope with regulations to the point that the back offices in banks and risk management outnumber the the front offices actually doing business. This is only slowing down the economy and raising costs to the consumer who in turn only sees his living standard decline year after year.

Socialism is the code word for total government control and the diminishing world of human rights. People look at labels but are blind to the reality of what is being labeled. Is LIFE INSURANCE the same as FIRE INSURANCE that covers you in case of a fire? So LIFE INSURANCE is covering you in case you live forever or is it really death insurance? The nature of anything can be distorted by its label.

When we look at the markets and try to ascertain the long-term direction, we must look at politics closely, for this holds the key. First, this is a Private Wave and that means the confidence in government is collapsing. Hence, the question for the direction of stocks, gold, interest rates, and the world economy, all hinges on how fast the perception of government collapsed on a global scale. Both sides of the aisle are corrupt and rotten to the core. Republican or Democrat, they are all in this for what they personally can grab and they are incapable of doing anything right for society because power corrupts.

It was the Democrats who came up with the Social Security scheme and designed it to be exactly as a fraud that anyone in the private sector would do to jail for. They used the Ponzi Scheme model where you take money from one person and pay another so they think they have a profit and more and more people come to invest. Here they would impose a tax upon the younger generation to pay for the older generation while telling people they were paying into a retirement fund. Of course, Congress used the money to fund spending for other things and stuffed the fund with government bonds preventing it from ever investing.

Nancy Pelosi, one of the most vile corrupt Democrats in the party, actually said: “The Republican bill is one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the richest people in our country — Robin Hood in reverse.”  Nancy Pelosi always bashes the “rich” when in fact she is constantly involved in money schemes and scandals with her husband. The scandals with Pelosi over money have been numerous. Her and her husband just walk on water and fill their pockets, for there is never enough for them. They have become notorious in real estate deals and install people in high places to get personal gains. They have been involved in insider trading in stock deals. She has steered projects in which she had a personal undisclosed interest. Her greed and scandals are endless, and many people in California want to secede from the United States because of Trump, yet they keep sending corrupt people to Washington like Nancy Pelosi and Diane Feinstein. Even some of the delusional people in Silicon Valley urged to secede after Trump won.

Pelosi may be one of the most corrupt politicians in the Democrats after the Clintons. Her comment that the Republicans are proposing “one of the largest transfers of wealth from working families to the richest people in our country” is just amazingly so dishonest. The very design of everything the Democrats have set up has been based upon a transfer of wealth from one generation to another. The structural design of Obamacare is another Ponzi Scheme.

It was the Clintons who denied the youth the right to bankruptcy on student loans to support bankers who said they had no collateral. Then the bankers demanded parents still cosign for a loan and then they had their house and bankruptcy was eliminated. Even if students died, many bankers still demanded money from the parents. This is what the Democrats did for student loans – the greatest transfer of wealth from students to the bankers in history. Chuck Schumer and Hillary along with Bloomberg were all there to start the new Goldman Sachs building.

The Democrats have screwed the youth once again with Obamacare. Their criticism of the Republican fix is that older people will have to pay more. Why? Because Obamacare forced the youth to buy insurance they did not need. This is the greatest transfer of wealth from the younger generation into the pockets of insurance companies (not the rich) who lobby and give Pelosi money. Insurance company PACs always donate directly to Pelosi. Here is a list of the Insurance companies donating to the Democrats to keep Obamacare rolling and Starr Insurance is at the top.

There is no money going to the “rich”; it goes to insurance companies. My personal insurance doubled as did my deductible and then I have coverage for young children I do not have but it’s there by law and I have to pay for it. The joke has become that you can just walk into a bar and tell the girls to line up, no worries, you are covered for unlimited maternity leave and children and there is no marriage requirement or age limit. That may be the only way to get your money’s worth out of Obamacare! Of course I suppose I could just adopt all the children in some community and they would all be covered as well.

What if I donated enough money and got Pelosi to create a scheme where everyone has to have terrorist insurance by law. You all have to pay me $15 a month for life. I would make $4.5 billion a year, could give her $1 billion, and we are all rolling in the money except you with no risk of having to pay a claim. If there is a claim, just file for bankruptcy. Isn’t this Obamacare? The youth must buy insurance they do not need. I have insurance I must pay for, for children I do not have. All of this is supposed to cover people who cannot get insurance otherwise? Just put them on Medicaid and call it a day! Why trust insurance companies at all? I have NEVER in my entire life ever had a claim actually honored by any insurance company. They are all a FRAUD – period!

The scheme is always the same – take from one generation to pay another. The problem is, they keep piling more and more on top of the youth, who more than 60% cannot find a job with the bogus degree they are now indebted with, and their standard of living is the lowest of any generation to date. They cannot see the long-term damage they are doing and of course mainstream media support the Democrats without any honest analysis.