Governments and Corporate Media Conspire With Facebook to Censor Anti-Establishment Speech


This is the end of Free Speech in Western Civilization.

Geopolitics, Globalization, And World Order: Part 1


Tyler Durden's picture

Submitted by Federico Pieraccini via Strategic-Culture.org,

Understanding the objectives and logic that accompany the expansion of nations or empires is always of paramount importance in helping one draw lessons for the future

In this series of four articles I intend to lay a very detailed but easily understandable foundation for describing the mechanisms that drive great powers. To succeed, one must analyze the geopolitical theories that over more than a century have contributed to shaping the relationship between Washington and other world powers. Secondly, it is important to expound on how Washington’s main geopolitical opponents (China, Russia and Iran) have over the years been arranging a way to put a stop to the intrusive and overbearing actions of Washington. Finally, it is important to take note of the possibly significant changes in American foreign policy doctrine that have been occurring over the last twenty years, especially how the new Trump administration intends to change course by redefining priorities and objectives.

The first analysis will therefore focus on the international order, globalization, geopolitical theories, their translations into modern concepts, and what controlling a country’s sovereignty means.

Before examining geopolitical theories, it is important to understand the effects of globalization and the changing international order it entails, a direct consequence of US strategy that seeks to control every aspect of the economic, political and cultural decisions made by foreign countries, usually applying military means to achieve this objective.

Globalization and the International Order

It is important to first define the international order among nations before and after the collapse of the Berlin wall, especially focusing on the consequences of existing in a globalized world.

For the first half of the twentieth century the world found itself fighting two world wars, then, during the Cold War, lasting from 1945 to 1989, the balance of power maintained by the US and USSR held the prospect of a third world war at bay. With the dissolution of the USSR, the United States, the only remaining world superpower, thought it could aspire to absolute domination over the globe, as was famously expressed through the Project for A New American Century. Putting aside for a moment perpetual wars, one of the key strategies towards fulfilling this objective was the so-called experiment of globalization, applied especially in trade, economics and finance, all of course driven by American interests.

Having achieved victory in the Cold War over its socialist rival, the world went from a capitalist system to a turbo-charged capitalist system. US corporations, thanks to this model of world globalized economy, have experienced untold riches, such as Apple and other IT corporations generating amounts of cash flow equivalent to that of small countries.

Banks and US financial institutions such as Wall Street incrementally increased their already considerable influence over foreign nations thanks to the rise of computer technology, automation and accounting deceptions such as derivatives, just to give one example. The FED implemented policies that took advantage of the role of the dollar in the globalized economy (the dollar is the premier world reserve currency). Over the years this has caused economic crises of all kinds all over the world, defrauding the entire economic system, consisting of schemes such as being able to print money at will, allowing for the financing massive wars, even going so far as lowering interest rates to 0% to keep banks and big corporations from failing – all a repudiation of the most basic rules of capitalism. All this was made possible because the US being the sole world power after 1989, allowing Washington to write the rules of the game in its favor.

Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, Wall Street, Big Oil and military corporations, health-care providers, the insurance and agricultural industries slowly replaced national governments, managing to dictate agendas and priorities. A political form of globalization has led to an expropriation of national sovereignty in Europe, with the creation of the Euro and the Lisbon Treaty signed by all EU nations in 2007.

Globalization has forced the concept of sovereign states directed by their citizens to be replaced with an international superstructure led by the United States, driving away even more citizens from the decision-making process. The European Union, and in particular the European Commission (not elected, but appointed), is unpopular not only for the decisions it has taken but also for the perception that it is an imposter making important decisions without ever having been elected.

Basically, with the end of the USSR, the international order went from a relationship between states made up of citizens to a relationship between international superstructures (NATO, UN, IMF, WTO, World Bank, EU) and citizens, with the weight of the balance of power decisively in favor of the globalists with the economic burden resting on the people.

The international order and globalization are therefore to be interpreted according to the logic of Washington, always looking for new ways to dominate the globe, preserving its role of world superpower.

It is also for this reason that it is important to understand some geopolitical theories that underlie US strategic decisions in the pursuit of world domination. These theories are some of the most important with which Washington has, over the last 70 years, tried to pursue total domination of the planet.

MacKinder + Spykman + Mahan = World Domination

Heartland

The first geopolitical theory is the so-called Heartland theory, drawn up in 1904 by English geographer Sir Halford Mackinder. The basic principle was the following:

Heartland or Heartlands (literally: the Heart of the Earth) is a name that was given to the central zone of the Eurasian continent, corresponding roughly to Russia and the neighboring provinces, by Sir Halford Mackinder, the English geographer and author of Democratic Ideals and Reality; the Heartlands of the theory was submitted to the Royal Geographical Society in 1904.

The Heartland was described by Mackinder as the area bounded to the west by the Volga, the Yangtze River to the east, from the Arctic to the north and south from the western Himalayas. At the time, this area was almost entirely controlled by the Russian Empire.

For Mackinder, who based his theory on the geopolitical opposition between land and sea, Heartland was the “heart” button of all the earth civilization, because logistically unapproachable by any thalassocracy. Hence the phrase that sums up the whole concept of Mackinder’s geopolitics: ‘Who controls East Europe commands the Heartland: Who controls the Heartland commands the World-Island: Who controls the World-Island commands the world’».

In terms of countries, the Heartland consists mainly of Russia, Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, Mongolia, the Central Asian countries, and parts of Iran, China, Belarus and Ukraine.

Rimland

The second geopolitical theory, another important lodestar for US foreign policy, was developed in the 1930s by the American Nicholas J. Spykman, also a student of geography as well as a scholar of MacKinder’s theory. Spykman, thanks to advancing naval technology, added to the definition of the Heartland theory the Rimland theory. The Rimland is divided into four main areas: Europe, North Africa, Middle East and Asia.

 For ‘world island’ it means the Eurasian region, ranging from Western Europe to the Far East. If for Mackinder the Tsarist empire represents the aforesaid area-pin, Spykman instead focuses on the area around Heartland, i.e. Rimland, recognizing it as a strategic point of great importance. The Rimland is characterized by the presence of rich countries, technologically advanced, with great availability of resources and easy access to the seas. Its size at the same time makes sea and land attacked by both sides. On the other hand this means that its dual nature as a possible mediating zone between the two world powers: the United States and Russia. The greatest threat from the geopolitical point of view lies in the union between Heartland and Rimland under one power».

The Rimland essentially consists of Europe (including eastern Europe), Turkey, the Middle East, the Gulf States, India, Pakistan, Southeast Asia (Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines*, Thailand, Vietnam) and Japan.

As one can see from observing a map, the United States is not physically close to either the Rimland or the Heartland. They are both on the other side of two 6,000-mile oceans. The US is undeniably protected in this way, almost impervious to attack, with an abundance of resources and powerful allies in Europe. These are all characteristics that have favored the rise of the American superpower throughout the twentieth century.

But world domination is a different matter and, given the geographical location of the US compared to the Heartland and Rimland, first requires a large capacity to project power. Of course with two oceans in between, it is naval power through which power has been conveyed, especially in the early part of the last century.

Mahan and Maritime Power

The third geopolitical theory is based on the importance given to maritime (or naval) power. The author of this theory, propounded towards the end of 1800, was US Admiral Alfred Thayer Mahan.

 Mahan was a ‘precursor’ to international organizations. He assumed that through a union between the United States and Britain, being two maritime powers, they could unite to share the conquest of the seas. The key concept is that ‘the maritime powers are united in opposition to those continental.’ Mahan explains the concept of naval doctrine, which is the policy that states pursue in the maritime and military arenas. In order for a state to have a naval doctrine, it must possess a substantial navy, as well as of course access to the sea, adequate projection capability, adequate means, and have strategic objectives to be protected (such as security zones exposed to risk)».

As one can easily understand, these three doctrines are central to controlling the whole world. Dominating the Heartland is possible thanks to the control of the Rimland, and in order to conquer the Rimland it is necessary to control shipping routes and dominate the seas, relying upon the Mahan theory of maritime supremacy.

In this sense, seas and oceans of great geographic importance are those that encircle the Rimland: The East and South China Seas, the Philippine Sea, the Gulf of Thailand, the Celebes Sea, the Java Sea, the Andaman Sea, the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea, the Gulf of Aden, the Red Sea, and finally the Mediterranean.

In particular, straits such as Malacca, between Indonesia and Malaysia, or the Suez Canal, are of strategic importance due to their role as a transit route and connection between all the seas adjacent to the so-called Rimland.

A bit of history. Route to global domination

It was Hitler’s Germany during World War II that tried to put into practice the theory of geopolitics MacKinder was describing, managing to seize the Heartland but ultimately amounting to nothing with the final victory of the Red Army, who rebuffed and destroyed the Nazis.

After the end of World War II, the United States placed the Soviet Union in its crosshairs, with the intention of conquering the Heartland and thereby dominating the world. Alternatively, Plan B was to prevent other nations from teaming together to dominate the Heartland. This explains the historical conflicts between the US and Iran and between Russia and China, the three most important nations composing the Heartland.

Russia, since Tsarist times and throughout the Soviet period to today, has always been in the crosshairs of the United States, given its geographical location central to the Heartland.

Iran also constitutes a valuable piece of the ‘Heart of the World’, which was gifted to the Anglo-Americans courtesy the Pahlavi monarchy lending itself to the American plan to conquer the heart of the land. It was only after the 1979 revolution, which ousted the Pahlavi monarchy and installed an Islamic Republic, that Tehran became an enemy of Washington.

The reason why Afghanistan was invaded and Ukraine destabilized, and why the Belarusian leadership is hated almost as much as is the Russian one, is the same, namely, the geographical positions of these countries in composing the Heartland compels the US to conquer them as part of its grand strategy to dominate the world through the control of the Heartland.

The Republic of China, another constituent part of the Heartland theory, was during the Cold War the great Asian pivot thanks to Kissinger’s policy aimed at curbing the USSR and preventing the birth of a possible alliance between Tehran, Moscow and Beijing that would dominate the Heartland, especially in the late 1980s. The United States, instead of directly attacking China, used it against the Soviet Union. Washington’s primary goal, as well as to expand its influence everywhere, was to prevent any kind of alliance that would control the Heartland, specially preventing any alliance or understanding between Moscow and Beijing; but this will be very well explained in my third analysis on how Eurasia reunited to reject the American global empire.

Control of a nation

Historically, control of a nation takes place through military power that allows for a variety of impositions. Also, culture is part of the process of conquering a nation. Today, other than militarily, it is mainly economic power that determines the national sovereignty of a nation. In the modern world, especially in the last three decades, if you control the economy of a nation, you control the rulers of that nation. The dollar and neoliberal experiments like globalization are basically the two most powerful and invasive American tools to employ against geopolitical opponents. The application of military force is no longer the sole means of conquering and occupying a country. Obligating the use of a foreign currency for trade or limiting military supplies from a single source, and impeding strategic decisions in the energy sector, are ways the globalist elites are able to dominate a foreign country, taking control over its policies. The European Union and the NATO-member countries are good examples of what artificially independent nations look like, because they are in reality fully dispossessed of strategic choices in the areas mentioned. Washington decides and the vassals obey.

It is not always possible to employ military power as in the Middle East, or to stage a color revolution as in Ukraine. Big and significant nations like Russia, India, China and Iran are virtually impossible to control militarily, leaving only the financial option available. In this sense, the role of central banks and the de-dollarization process are a core strategic interest for these countries as a way of maintaining their full sovereignty. In going in this direction, they deliver a dramatic blow to US aspirations for a global empire.

The next article will focus on how the United States has tried to implement these strategies, and how these strategies have changed over the last seventy years, especially over the last two decades.

Here Are The Countries Where Millennials Will Have To Work Until They Die


Tyler Durden's picture

It turns out there is a downside to spending 120% of your annual income every year from the time you graduate college until that day you turn 40 and finally realize that you’re getting old and have absolutely no liquid assets and no hopes of ever retiring.  While the above strategy seemingly makes sense to our elitist, Ivy League-educated central planners at the Fed who have waged a nearly decade-long war on saving (because how can we have economic growth if people aren’t willing to lever their income 5x and spend every dollar they make?), the roughly 19% of Americans who are over the age of 65 and are still forced to work are probably wishing they could go back and do things slightly differently.

As Bloomberg points out, the percentage of 65 years olds working in the U.S. today is higher than at any point going back to at least 1965.

Millennials

 

Unfortunately, this looks to be a record that millennials are destined to beat.  As we recently pointed out (see “Most Millennials Have Less Than $1,000 In Savings, Live Paycheck-to-Paycheck“), the majority of millennials are living paycheck to paycheck.

A recent survey of millennials by HowMuch.net found that 51.8% of those aged 18-34 have less than $1,000 held between bank accounts and cash savings.

As Visual Capitalist’s Jeff Desjardins notes, this echoes previous data we’ve seen – not just on millennials, but Americans in general. For example, we know that 14% of Americans have “negative” wealth. We also know that 62% of Americans don’t have emergency savings that could cover a $1,000 hospital visit or a $500 car repair.

Taking that into consideration, here’s a deeper dive into the more recent millennial data…

Courtesy of: Visual Capitalist

 

Meanwhile, as a testament to their strong work ethic, a study by ManpowerGroup recently found that roughly 30% of millennials envisioned taking an “extended break” from work at some point in their careers to “relax/travel/vacation” while another ~20% said they’d take a break to “pursue a life dream or hobby.”  Sure, why not?  If everything goes horribly wrong then taxpayers will be waiting to payoff your student loans for you…so no worries.

Millennials

 

And, unless you thought this was just a phenomenon limited to America’s snowflakes, turns out millennials all over the world have very little confidence in their ability to save.

Millennials

 

Well, at least we’re

KOMMONSENTSJANE – HOW WILL WE REDUCE THE DEBT?


There is no doubt that we have a very serious problem facing us especially with the boomers retiring.

kommonsentsjane's avatarkommonsentsjane

Image result for free photos of piggy banks

With the advent of the inauguration and all of the talk of saving money by trying to reduce the costs of planes, one thing PE Trump needs to also set up is a “piggy bank” to pay off the debt.  Hannity talks about the penny plan.  Will PE Trump set up a plan to also reduce our debt?

kommonsentsjane

View original post

Dear Liberals, Democrats and Cultural Marxists


Who Screwed Western Civilization? | Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux Who Screwed Western Civilization? | Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux


 

Benjamin Netanyahu – Christmas Message to Christians Around The World…


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a Christmas message for his “Christian brothers and sisters” around the world:

Source: Benjamin Netanyahu – Christmas Message to Christians Around The World…

Trump should tell the UN to lay off or get DE-funded from the US

trump-standing-in-gap411221112112111111121111111111111211111121111112111111111

President Obama’s Parting Shot Against Israel – U.N. Security Council Resolution Against Israeli Settlements…


(Via Reuters) The Obama administration on Friday allowed the U.N. Security Council to adopt a resolution demanding an end to Israeli settlements, defying pressure from U.S. President-elect Donald T…

Source: President Obama’s Parting Shot Against Israel – U.N. Security Council Resolution Against Israeli Settlements…

That A Hole Obama still has 4 weeks to screw up more things what a sore loser he is!

trump-standing-in-gap41122111211211111112111111111111121111112111111211111111

Technocracy the new Progressive Utopia


Part One

Barack H. Obama ran a Presidential campaign in 2008 based on Hope and Change which his supporters both White and Black assumed would be a new peaceful world without conflict and that there would be good jobs for everyone: and Obama got the Nobel peace prize just for the promise of that perfect world. Thomas More in his 1516 book on a perfect society called that kind of perfect society Utopia, which was also the name of the book, and that word has stuck ever since.  Eight years later we have no “real” jobs, society is in total disarray and we are on the brink of war with Russia; how could this be?  I would suggest that the result we actually have today is exactly what Obama and his supporters wanted to happen after he was elected President in 2008.  Remember he never did tell us what he was going to do, he only promised that he would fundamentally change the country.

Obama has been accused of being Muslin based on his early background and many of his actions while president and that could be true. However, more importantly he is also a Marxist/Communist, at heart, whom in their modern form are the global elites who are smart, educated and very, very wealthy and prefer to be called progressives. In Technocracy Rising a book published in 2015 and written by Patrick M. Wood who explains in great detail how the new world order (NWO) has formed from the ashes of three previously failed concepts which are: Communism, Socialism and Fascism. One could also add Islamism to this as well since all four isms require a very powerful central federal government to manage each of their visions of Utopia. Angelo M. Codevilla wrote an excellent book on those that want to rule us titled the Ruling Class which was publishing in 2010.

Although the vision of a Utopia is powerful, it is an illusion no different than a belief in a Heaven although at least Heaven can only be obtained after death by those that lead a good and moral life; while Utopia can be obtained in the here and now if only we would believe in our leaders who are our betters by their demonstrated superior abilities. Unfortunately this concept of Utopia is not possible since mankind is human and therefore by definition not perfect and worse we are very easily corrupted. Niccolo Machiavelli wrote probably one of the best works on those that desire power in The Prince published in 1513. Therefore to strive for Utopia is a fool’s game or worse a game played by only by those that want to rule but not be elected; the European Union (EU) was their first experiment in the NWO of technology based rule. The ruling body of the EU in Brussels is composed entirely of appointed people (best and the brightest) and not a single person that governs the EU is elected by the people. Perhaps this is the return to an aristocracy (monarchy) as discussed in the four stages of government in book VIII of the Republic written by Plato around 380 BC; so perhaps not much has changed in the past 2,400 years of human history.

Obama and his planned successor Hillary were the handpicked minions of the world cartel of the rich and powerful, i.e. George Soros and Bill Gates both documented members of the Technocracy. It was their task to complete the process of eliminating the U.S. Constitution and replacing it with a governing body similar to that installed in the EU. This was required because they needed total control of everything to make their vision of Utopia work and those that desired this had been at this task in earnest since the end of WW II through organizations such as the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and their workhorse the Intergovernmental Panel Climate Change (IPCC) which were all established along with many other agencies in the last half of the twentieth century. Hillary, the closer, was picked to complete the transformation of the European and North American counties into the NWO started by Obama the good guy.

The transformation to a NWO might have worked if the cartel members were as smart as they thought they were but since their motives were more for personal gain then a true Utopia (they knew that Utopia was not possible) the personal motives drove the transformation too quickly and their transformation started to break down after 2009. This transformation process was actually predicted in the book The Fourth Turning published in 1997 by William Strauss and Neil Howe as the result of the Boomer generation, those born between 1946 and 1964, comprising about 76 million babies who started the process of retiring 60 some years later around 2006. This generation caused a great deal of conflict as they progressed through their lives and according to Strauss and Howe the views of the Boomers would totally change America, however what was left unsaid in the book was whether that change would be good or bad. What happened just as the Boomers started to enter college in the mid 60’s was to shape them forever and their legacy will be what happens as they become the elder statesmen/women of America and what path they put the rest of us on.

Before we can continue, this discussion we need more background specifically on Karl Marx and his work in trying to develop a better political system; unfortunately for hundreds of millions who have since died trying to implement his theories he forgot one thing, human nature. Marx was obviously a very intelligent person and saw injustice in Europe as the industrial revolution transformed society in the Nineteenth Century. His theory was that all value came from “labor” was valid but was also incomplete; this was not his fault as no one back then saw the technology revolution that was to come in the twentieth century. Marx wrote almost 3,000 pages explaining his theories in Capital Vol. I, Vol. II and Vol. III but he left out the most important part which is how his system would be governed, the actual form of the government system required to support Marx’s concept was never developed by him.

Those that followed Marx focused on the means to achieve Marx’s workers’ paradise, Utopia but were never able to establish a government that wasn’t a dictatorship to manage that Utopia and so every attempt at doing this has in the end failed. Focusing here, on America, the Boomers were strongly influenced by the progressive movement (those that believed in Communist principles) in the first half of the twentieth century and one in particular was Saul D. Alinsky who wrote Rules For Radicals published in 1971 which became the bible for the progressive movement after World War II. Alinsky developed the concept of Community Organizing of which Barry Sorrento later after he left Indonesia to become Barack H. Obama followed in Chicago on his path to the US Presidency

Another important concept was developed by two progressives Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven both at Columbia University which Obama was to attend prior to Harvard. The ideas of these two progressives was to become known as the Cloward-Piven Strategy first published in a May 1966 article in the liberal magazine The Nation titled “The Weight of the Poor:” In essence the strategy was to use the laws of society to bring society down so it could be remade using progressive principles. The idea was used very successfully in the early 70’s which almost bankrupted New York City in 1975 by getting everyone entitled to “welfare” to enroll in the available programs.

The last element to be used to try and fundamentally transform America was the takeover of the Environmental movement by the progressives after the U.S.S.R. (Soviet Union) was dissolved on December 26, 1991. Prior to the 90’s there was a legitimate cause to protect the environment from “real” pollution; however, in the early 90’s the progressives took over and changed the movement into protecting us from “imaginary” pollution using the Cloward-Piven Strategy to create a strawman war against Carbon Dioxide the very key to all life on the planet.

World Climate is a variable and always has been as anyone that studied the subject prior to the late 70’s early 80’s understood; further Carbon Dioxide which has now been ruled a pollutant by the U.S. Supreme Court first in 2007 and then again in 2009 is however an absolute requirement for life to exist on the planet and more is beneficial to life rather than less, further the current Carbon Dioxide levels in the Holocene geological epoch, which is what we are in now, are well below geological averages.

nwo-04

Part Two

On November 22, 1963 our President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas by those I now believe were the people that were to become the New World Order (NWO) movement 20 some years later. The movement was actually formally started by President George H. W. Bush who signed UN Agenda 21 in 1992 for the United States and referred to it as the One World Government OWG. Then in 1993 President William J. Clinton signed Executive Order #12852 to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development and with that order the progressive transformation of America was started.

Of course back then we couldn’t know any of that and it seemed the assassination was either from the mob or the Communists’ as we were led to believe by the media. But now looking back at that period what happened in 1963 when Lyndon Baines Johnson (LBJ), Kennedy’s VP, became President after Kennedy was assassinated was a series of events that would have dire consequences for the United States. These events started with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964 which immediately escalated the low level conflict in Vietnam to a full scale war and which eventually caused the deaths of almost 60,000 American soldiers and gave us over 300,000 wounded to somewhat care for and forget, I was one of them. It also split the country into warring factions for generations.

Decades later when I read David Habersham’s The Best and the Brightest published in 1972 I first realized that intelligence alone was insufficient to make a good ruler and in fact could be an actual hindrance. The sad thing was we got nothing for this war except a lot of disillusioned citizens; so was this escalation in Vietnam only a distraction for what was to come next in 1965? When LBJ rammed through the U.S. Congress 87 pieces of legislation that were to totally change the makeup of the country, and not all for the good, as all the problems that we have now stemmed from what happened in 1964 and 1965.  The LBJ agenda designed to change America for the better contained four related but different objectives.

  • The first was called the “Great Society” with legislation upholding civil rights, public broadcasting, Medicare, Medicaid, aid to education, the arts, urban and rural development, and public services.
  • The second was the “War on Poverty” which contained Civil rights bills that banned racial discrimination in public facilities, interstate commerce, the workplace, and housing.
  • The third was the “Voting Rights Act” which banned certain requirements in southern states used to disenfranchise African Americans.
  • Lastly was the “Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965” where the country’s immigration system was reformed and all racial origin quotas were removed (replaced by national origin quotas).

All of these programs had some or maybe even a lot of merit but there were also consequences, some of them major, which were all ignored. The bottom line was this was way too much to do absorb at one time and so it went very bad over the next 50 years. The question that comes to mind now is how all could this major work could be put together in only a few months while LBJ was simultaneously assuming the office of the president and then having to run for election an additional few months later. Eighty Seven major pieces of legislation conceived written and passed in 1965. That is something that had never been done before or after.

Looking back we can see what the plan was, a total remake of our society, but back then it wasn’t obvious or we would have stopped it.  The devil that was in these programs was the fracturing of the single American culture into multiple sub cultures and as any student of history and political thought understands that is never good and is often fatal for those countries that try doing that. Montesquieu explains in his 1748 book The Spirit of the Laws the problems with multiple cultures or sentiments as they were then called within a single government. Further he implied that to change the form of the government the culture would need to be changed first. The progressives knew this and have done a very good job which maybe irreversible of changing American culture so they could get their NWO.

This was done primarily through two means that became prevalent in the early 90’s which were Political Correctness (PC) and Multiculturalism; although other destructive factors were also in play. The result was we eliminated the differences between good and bad so that no one would be hurt; there were no differences between people, sexes or cultures so no one was better than any other one. And at the same time we were told that we were not American’s we were White Americans, Black Americans, and Hispanic Americans etc. etc. which was very strange since this was the exact opposite of the teaching that we are all the same.

As bad as all this cultural change was it was not all that was being done to us as economists and politicians who thought they knew how everything worked (the best and the brightest) came up with what was obviously a Ponzi scheme that we could have an economy where everyone was college educated and blue collar work was almost eliminated and this could be done by shipping the dirty nasty blue collar work off to other places in the world for others to do the dirty work while we enjoyed the all benefits.  Besides being a totally insane concept how they ever thought this would work just shows just how twisted the thinking was of those in power, like George Soros who’s self-proclaimed best moment in his life was turning his fellow Jews into the German Nazi’s who were over running Europe during the early stages of WW II. This twisted man made billions by shorting counties currencies and causing them economic distress for his personal gain. He is now one of the driving forces in the NWO to include heavily financing the Democrat party and other groups including many Republicans’.

The economists and politicians’ that concocted this scheme based the logic on the early stages of the industrial revolution where we transitioned from agriculture to production which created the middle class. After WW II and the Korean conflict technology was taking off and what was envisioned was a “service” based economy where, in essence, everyone was to be employed as white collar college educated. There is no way this was ever possible and I even wrote my economics theses in collage on this subject in 1965 which was that as technology advanced there would be a dislocation in the work force as fewer and fewer people would be able to do the complex tasks. Therefore, work needed to be provided in proportion to those able to do it or fewer and fewer people would be supporting more and more people, that didn’t or couldn’t work, which is the Ponzi scheme they created. It all sounded good as the U.S. Government financed the shift of manufacturing to Japan, China and India by selling them U.S. Government securities creating a trading system by which they send us cheap goods and we send them the jobs (means) to make them. I’m sure you the reader can see how well that worked.

United we stand, divided we fall used to be what we were about in America and the country grew by assimilating a diverse range of people that came here to be free, work and raise their families, without any federal assistance. And prior to the changes instituted by LBJ in 1965 we were much more one culture than multiple cultures and the result was that we were the shining light on the hill or maybe more the ones that went to the moon and back in 1969 a feat still not equaled 47 years later. But while we basked in our accomplishments we didn’t understand that our very roots, what it meant to be an American, were being chopped up and destroyed on the altar of equality of outcome and income redistribution which are the very heart of progressivism.

The result of this insanity was that by 2015, fifty years after being started by LBJ, every institution that had been built and rebuilt over 5,000 years of progress by mankind had been totally destroyed and the country was collapsing both culturally i.e. marriage and family and economically i.e. fewer good jobs mounting debt and the loss of much of our national sovereignty. Watch this U-Tube video from Bill Whittle for what the progressive politicians’ did to the city of Detroit, Google THE MOST SHAMEFUL INJUSTICE as an example of what I’m saying here.

nwo-03

Part Three

In the book the Fourth Turning the greed of the Boomers, they were first called the “me generation”, was likely to cause a second American civil war as they bankrupted the country with their plush retirement programs. Government employees at all levels along with teachers and some Police and Fire in certain states retire with pensions worth more per year than they were making before their retirement. Of course this is not all of them but it is a big enough group that it is a serious national problem today, and not limited to America as the EU has the same problem and it’s even more serious there than here.

The next two generations that follow the Boomers, Generation X and the Millennials’ were left far behind as the Boomers ran rough shod over the economy and society taking everything they could for themselves. Wall Street which financed the Boomers that broke up the manufacturing base and shipped the ‘good’ jobs to Asia did that for personal gain, the large contingent of boomers that used drugs established the drug lords in Mexico to supply them, the boomers running today’s business want cheap labor so they want open borders. But the worst of them went into politics and both Democrats and Republicans (the best and the brightest), conspired to create either an Oligarchy or possibly even a Monarchy in which they could rule the rest of us. The Boomers that went in this direction like the Clintons and the Bushes knew that they had to change the culture. The work of President Johnson in 1965 gave them everything that they needed and as the Boomers graduated from college many of them went into teaching and so by the 90’s they had coopted a large portion of the education system and were helped by the newly created Department of Education in doing so with federal funds that were available only if federal rules were followed.

In the U.S. Constitution the federal government was specifically banded from direct involvement in the states by the Tenth Amendment; but the federal government could tax the people so that increased taxes could then be used to bribe the states to follow rules they could not dictate directly with the peoples own money. There are only a few colleges left, i.e. Hillsdale that have resisted this process which means only the wealthy can go there. What happens now is that whenever a state balks at a federal regulation the federal government tells them they will stop highway funds or education funds or any of the other funds the feds supply. The power of the purse!

Those that betrayed us reside mostly in Washington, the 100 Senators, the 435 Representatives, the President, the Vice President and the 9 Judges of the Supreme Court and they decided they wanted to be rulers, not elected officials, beholding to we the citizens.  These traitors don’t work for us they work for and get their power from those with the real power of huge wealth and money, the special interests. Those super elites are like Bill Gates that are multi-billionaires and to be in the top ten you need to have more than $40 billion while the other 1,816 with only a mere billion to $39 billion mostly don’t even count. These are the NWO people that want to rule us.

Donald Trump understood what was happening to our country and knew that we were at a turning point in history as predicted by Strauss and Howe in their book The Fourth Turning and he saw that if Hillary got elected the result would be very bad and so he decided to stop the change or at minimum control the change. Trump knew this because he could see what was happening in the 2010, 2012 and 2014 elections as there was an obvious movement building for change as the public no longer trusted the politicians. This was not just in American movement it was all of Western Civilization as the BREXIT election in England showed and so trump declared his candidacy and joined the movement. Those of us that had formed the movement first as the Tea Party immediately adopted him as the leader of the movement as we could see that he understood us.

Trump ran a campaign targeted at the movement Tea Party plus  and used the media to reach us despite the all-out effort to stop him by the Democrats, many Republicans, the national media and the Federal Government and since he had won the citizens he was not beatable. Is trump perfect, of course not, he is human, but as I see it none of the others even see the problem and further are not capable of making changes even if they wanted to.  The reason they are not capable is that to make any major change requires legislation be passed in the US Congress and since neither the Republicans nor the Democrats have the votes to do this it will require a super negotiator which means Trump who is the best in the country.  So I voted for him as did enough others that he is going to be the next president since he is the only one that actually seeks to put all of the broken pieces of America together again and has the necessary skill set to do it for us.

trump-standing-in-gap41122111211211111112111111111111121111112111111211111111

Clarification on India’s Gold Confiscation


rupee-12-21-2016

To make it clear, India is not going door to door to confiscate gold any more than FDR did. The reason so many $20 gold coins have survived is because there was no door to door confiscation. Banks and corporations who had records of gold were forced to turn their gold over and then FDR superseded all contracts overriding what was known as the “gold clause” in contracts. In 1935, the Supreme Court heard constitutional challenges to the abrogation of gold clauses in contracts and Treasury bonds. Gold clauses guaranteed that creditors would receive payment in gold dollars as valued at the time a contract was made. Due to the deflation that followed the Great Depression, this meant that debtors were forced to pay back much more than they owed originally in purchasing power.

To stop a looming wave of bankruptcies, Congress passed a Joint Resolution declaring all gold clauses null and void. The Supreme Court did not hold that the gold clauses must be enforced. With respect to Treasury Bonds, however, a plurality of the Justices concluded that the Joint Resolution was unconstitutional and that the bondholders were not entitled to relief in Perry v. United States 294 U.S. 330 (1935). The Court held that there is a clear distinction between the power of Congress to control the contracts of private parties when they interfere with the exercise of its constitutional authority and a power in Congress to alter or repudiate the substance of its own engagements when it has borrowed money under its constitutional authority. It further held that Congress cannot use its power to regulate the value of money to invalidate the obligations that the government has issued in the exercise of the power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. Clearly, the court used some very strange logic to ensure that FDR got away with his actions. This is why judges should NEVER be appointed by politicians.

The demonetization of the currency and the attempt to set limits on the amount of gold one may own is a two-prong attack on the cash economy in India. There is no confiscation of gold owned by banks, corporates, or individuals when they can CONFIRM and prove that the gold was purchased with above-ground taxed money. Therefore, the line in the sand is drawn between the underground and above-ground economy. The limits are applied to individuals in the cash economy to prevent them from buying gold with the cash to “launder” the money.

India was the fastest growing major economy in the world prior to the currency cancellation. The economic boom in India is more likely to abruptly halt for the last quarter of 2016 following the insane announcement of November 8, 2016, that India was scrapping the 500 and 1,000 rupee notes. This action has caused a collapse in the velocity of money, which is normally indicative of a depression. This brain-dead decision has drained billions of dollars worth of cash from the economy. Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s crazy action was aimed at tax evasion, which rendered about 86% of Indian banknotes effectively worthless overnight. This has to be the worst economic decision of the past century.

Indians are scrambling to banks with their old notes by December 30, 2016, but the tax implication have others just writing their money off or funneling it through the black market and spreading the money around by using individuals to try to cash in some portion.

Modi’s decision led to a stark US dollar rally for three weeks as the Rupee collapsed by about 4%. The Indian society relies on cash for more than 90% of transactions, and nearly every aspect of daily life has been effected. This was a bold action to force the economy into a fully taxed society all for the benefit of the government, of course. The gold ownership is allowed provided you PROVE you bought it with taxed money.