Posted originally on Jul 5, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
YouTube recently removed an interview I participated in with Palisades Radio for mentioning this study. I have posted the video on Rumble at the bottom of this article and it can also be found on X and Spotify. “Differential Increases in Excess Mortality in the German Federal States During the COVID-19 Pandemic”conducted by Christof Kuhbandner, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Regensburg in Bavaria Germany, and mathematician Prof. Matthias Reitzner at Osnabrück University, found that COVID-19 vaccines had “no beneficial effects” but did increase the mortality rate.
Why are we prohibited from sharing scientific studies that dispel the COVID narrative? This group of German scientists found that excess mortality rates peaked alongside the months with the highest rate of vaccinations. “Given the surprising finding that a significant excess mortality only begins to appear in 2021, which then doubles in the following year 2022, the question arises which factors might be related with this sudden and strong increase in mortality long after the start of the pandemic,” the study noted.
“In fact, such a research strategy has already been used in a previous study where it has been examined whether the excess mortality observed in the different German federal states in the second half of 2021 varies with the COVID-19 vaccination rate in a federal state (Thum [32]). According to the results of this study, a significant negative correlation was observed, that is, theh igher the vaccination rate in a federal state, the lower the excess mortality, a finding that was interpreted in several media as evidence of the effectiveness of the vaccinations,” the paper later reads.
Areas with fewer vaccinations experienced fewer deaths. The virus itself had spread everywhere. We were told that the vaccine was the only method to prevent transmission and infection, only to be later told that the vaccine could do neither. The researchers found that vaccines and the virus itself were the only two variables to account for excess mortality over 2020-2022.
“The results of the correlation analysis show a very clear and simple picture: There are only two variables that are systematically related to excess mortality: COVID-19 and the vaccination rate. The fact that the vaccination rate in the second year of the pandemic is already highly negatively correlated with excess mortality as well as with the reported number of COVID-19 deaths and infections in the first year of the pandemic clearly shows that the less a federal state was affected by COVID in the first pandemic year, the more vaccinations were administered. The fact that this negative correlation suddenly reverses in the third year of the pandemic clearly shows that a new factor must have suddenly emerged that drove up excess mortality and the number of COVID deaths and infections in the federal states that were initially least affected by COVID-19.”
Additional funding is warranted to determine if the COVID-19 vaccine did, in fact, cause more deaths than the actual virus. Numerous studiespoint to this same correlation but are buried as disinformation. Imagine if the public knew that their governments permitted, if not forced, them to inject their families with a lethal poison. All confidence in governments utterly collapsed due to the pandemic, but trust continues to plummet as the truthbehind the pandemic is slowly peeled back layer by layer.
The Supreme Court’s decision on Trump’s immunity is out today. The Supreme Court ruled 6–3 that presidents enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution for official, but not unofficial, acts. They also noted that even comments that he thought the election was rigged as so many other people, “So most of a President’s public communications are likely to fall comfortably within the outer perimeter of his official responsibilities,” it added. Even in the case Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Court held that his obstruction of justice was still immune to civil suits. The Supreme Court issued a significant ruling on presidential immunity back in 1982, where it held that presidents enjoyed absolute immunity from civil liability for actions that fell within the outer perimeter of their official duties. Trump was still president on January 6th,
This decision shows that the United States cannot possibly stand beyond 2032 and perhaps as soon as 2029. Even the Supreme Court is reflecting this deep polarization of the nation. The dissent in this decision reflects the deep divide and why America is tearing itself apart at the seams. Here, the dissent insists that the Constitution does not shield a former President from criminal acts, which is clearly words simply because this is Trump.
The Washington Post, America’s version of Lenin’s Pravda, emphasizes that the law is determined by political ideology by writing: “The Supreme Court says presidents have “absolute” immunity for clearly official acts, but no immunity for unofficial acts. The high court’s 6-3 ruling along ideological lines sends the case back to the lower court to determine what acts alleged in Donald Trump’s indictment on charges of trying to subvert the 2020 election are official or unofficial. The ruling likely adds significant time and further appeals to the pending trial of the former president’s federal case in D.C.”
Held: A state prosecuting attorney who, as here, acted within the scope of his duties in initiating and pursuing a criminal prosecution and in presenting the State’s case, is absolutely immune from a civil suit for damages under § 1983 for alleged deprivations of the accused’s constitutional rights. Pp. 424 U. S. 417-431.
In Imber vs. Pachtman, 424 US 429 (1976), the Supreme Court was so anti-citizen that it handed prosecutors ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY no matter what. They have abused that power all the time, and they can target you because of who you are. They have driven people to suicide for being harassed and having their lives completely destroyed including members of their families, even for personal animosity or for political gain as Bragg is doing to Trump in New York, and God help you if you try to ever sue a judge for his bias as an official act. They anoint themselves with ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY, which is far above the law – but they want to imprison Trump because he is their political nemesis. Judges and prosecutors bestow ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY upon themselves, and there is NOTHING in the Constitution that dares to imply such a power.
We are rapidly approaching the fatal moment when it will be time to turn out the light on this experiment from 1776 by the Founding Fathers. Like all Republics, it has led to such corruption and moral deprivation that, as a unified nation, we will be unable to stand thanks to the polarization that is turning to deep-seated hatred. When Franklin was asked what kind of government they created, he replied, “Republic, if you can keep it.” We are reaching the end of the road. Civilization works when everyone benefits. It ceases to be viable when it divides, and one side assumes the power to abuse the other. Then the nation should split, for as we have seen today, there should have been no dissent unless you also remove all ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY from judges and prosecutors as well.
Posted originally on the CTH on July 1, 2024 | Sundance
…“The President is not above the law. But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution.”…
In a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court of the United Stated ruled that presidents have “absolute immunity” for official “actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.” [SEE RULING HERE] Also, “official acts” cannot be used as evidence against the president in a criminal case.
As expected, the high court instructed the lower trial courts to hold specific evidentiary hearings on each anti-Trump criminal count, and determine which counts, if any, related to official or unofficial acts.
The Supreme Court is essentially telling the lower courts to go back and look at each citation and review which claims are official acts and which claims related to unofficial acts. The Supreme Court ruled that presidents may not have immunity for non-official conduct. However, when the judicial review cannot differentiate, the court cannot look at motives for the decisions.
“In dividing official from unofficial conduct, courts may not inquire into the President’s motives,” the Court ruled. “Whenever the President and Vice President discuss their official responsibilities, they engage in official conduct.”
“The indictment’s allegations that Trump attempted to pressure the Vice President to take particular acts in connection with his role at the certification proceeding thus involve official conduct, and Trump is at least presumptively immune from prosecution for such conduct,” the Court added.
“The President enjoys no immunity for his unofficial acts, and not everything the President does is official. The President is not above the law. But under our system of separated powers, the President may not be prosecuted for exercising his core constitutional powers, and he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for his official acts,” the Court concluded. “That immunity applies equally to all occupants of the Oval Office.”
The Supreme Court held Monday not only that Donald Trump could not be prosecuted for official acts but that those acts could not be used as evidence of a crime.
“That proposal threatens to eviscerate the immunity we have recognized,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote. “It would permit a prosecutor to do indirectly what he cannot do directly — invite the jury to examine acts for which a President is immune from prosecution to nonetheless prove his liability on any charge.”
Chief Justice Roberts wrote the opinion for the majority. This ruling will certainly delay any further court action by Special Counsel Jack Smith during the DC Lawfare trial, until after the election in November.
The court ruled that Trump is absolutely immune from prosecution for any conduct “involving his discussions with Justice Department officials” — a significant segment of his federal indictment. For instance, this would seem to take off the table Trump’s interactions with Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark, a key figure who has been indicted in Georgia alongside Trump, as well as other top Justice Department officials telling Trump his voter-fraud theories were wrong.
It ruled that he is presumed immune from prosecution for pressuring then-Vice President Mike Pence to overturn the election on Jan. 6, 2021, because Trump’s acts “involve official conduct.” It said the burden is on the government to prove that prosecuting Trump for this wouldn’t “pose any dangers of intrusion on the authority and functions of the Executive Branch.”
It left open the possibility that Trump can be prosecuted for other actions, particularly those with regard to people outside the executive branch and in the states. It ruled that “this alleged conduct cannot be neatly categorized as falling within a particular Presidential function.”
All of which means some of Trump’s conduct can still be prosecuted, but some cannot. And figuring out what can and cannot be is still to be determined.
The other crucial point is this: The court ruled not only that Trump can’t be prosecuted for certain conduct, but also that conduct for which he is immune can’t even be used as evidence against him. So, his interactions with Justice Department officials, for instance, can’t be used to establish a criminal conspiracy to overturn the election. (link)
The international press has universally suggested that Biden’s showing played as poorly globally as at home. Poland’s foreign minister wrote that the debate brought to mind the fall of Rome. I continue to argue that the ONLY possible ticket to prevent World War III or at least nuclear war is for Trump and RFK to join together. The common ground is that they are both anti-war, and we NEED that desperately, for Hillary is licking her lips and rubbing her hands for the dream of becoming the first woman president.
Posted originally on the CTH on June 28, 2024 | Sundance
Today President Donald Trump is holding a MAGA rally in Chesapeake, Virginia. These will be the first remarks by President Trump since his exceptional debate performance in Atlanta, last night. The anticipated start time is 3:00pm ET. Livestream links below.
Posted originally on Jun 27, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks alerted the public to a new threat to national security. No, the threat is not coming from a foreign entity or nation. The threat does not involve terrorism or the rising crime rates across all US cities. Biden’s Pentagon is deeply concerned about policies for nonbinary service members.
“We’ve heard concerns about … policies focused on the needs of nonbinary service members. Please know our commitment is resolute, just as it has been over the past three-and-a-half years, to continue our progress in full alignment with our focus on readiness and our focus on the well-being of our people, on which our readiness depends,” Hicks said. The Pentagon clarified her position to Fox News by stating the highest level of America’s defense intelligence is focused on its “all-volunteer force” to ensure its readiness to mobilize.
Now, the entire transgender agenda has been presented to the public in a way where children and adults who do not identify as their birth gender may become suicidal if we do not show blind compassion. The Pentagon is certainly not concerned about mental health, just look at how they have abandoned American veterans combatting various ailments from the wars the neocons create. I believe the Biden Administration has been obsessed with transgenderism for three reasons.
The first reason is that LGBTQ issues have become the latest trendy topic of divisive politics. We are no longer men and women. Gender must be a wide spectrum with no clear definition. This ties into reason number two where you can simply forget the nuclear family ever existed as the pillar of our culture. Everyone plays the same uniform role in society and there is no need for trust or loyalty to begin in the household. Both parents must work in this economy, as it provides the government with double the taxation. The public schools may indoctrinate and program the children as they see fit. Yet another reason why they are asking kindergarteners to choose their pronouns, read books questioning the nature of “boys” and “girls,” and are implementing laws so that parents cannot know what goes on at school as they work for their paycheck-to-paycheck life.
The third reason is something sinister that will come about after the next election. There are plans behind the curtain to draft women for the first time in American history. They are already asking women in European countries to sign up for military service. A woman who I know in Germany told me that she knows people up to the age of 59 who have been asked to register for armed services.
We are all “equal” so we should all be willing to die in the next war. The public sector will look after the children while the women are gone. Even Justice Jackson on the Supreme Court, Biden’s only appointee, has refused to define the term “woman” as they are being erased from our society under the guise of equality. The woke movement is not in favor of a subset pocket of individuals in our society. The government has been bashing these terms into our minds under Biden for a reason.
Here are the arrays from around the world, and they do show a shift for the 27th when we will witness CNN’s corrupt attempt to interfere in the 2024 election. This is all part of the cycle for the Decline & Fall of the United States and all of the West, for that matter. As I have said many times, CIVILIZATION works when everyone benefits. This has been turned into a civil war of words that inspires such hatred that the only solution will be the civil war to reestablish our right to freedom from tyranny.
CNN has lost all credibility, and it is a disgrace as a news organization crossing the line to a propaganda-conspiracy advocate. The polls now show that most people assume the CNN debate between Trump and Biden will by no means be an honest debate. CNN is desperate to undermine Trump, for they know the natural candidate will be Hillary Clinton – not Biden. Hillary is coming out with a new book this week in time for the debate as a warning to all. She is true to her Female-Nazi Days of bra-burning ’60s hatred of men, championing how she saved Afghan women from war and brave women dissidents defying dictators around the world such as Putin. (She needs to look in the mirror). This is how you prepare to be “drafted” for the Presidency in August because they know Biden will lose.
Gallup’s poll on CONFIDENCE continues to demonstrate that faith in Congress is now down to 8%. There is no sector showing where CONFIDENCE has increased. I personally no longer look at anyone’s Nightly News. CONFIDENCE in Television News is down to 14%. The computer is projecting the decline in CONFIDENCE into 2028 – I guess we will move BELOW zero by then. Our politicians worldwide no longer represent their people; they only represent the agenda they have been advocating dictated by the Neocon-Elites. Even the insane people at the World Economic Forum want to eradicate home gardens and air conditioning and reduce bathing and washing clothes. In this year, which was supposedly going to be laced with numerous central bank interest rate cuts around the world, the price of war is always inflation, and that is proving to be the real direction with the prospect of G10 nations quietly starting to resist rate cuts.
Once upon a time, there was what was known as the Fairness Doctrine that did not require preapproval from a central place to decide if it was fair. It simply required that they present both sides. Therefore, they would have to have an opposing view to say why the other side is wrong. They did that when the President made that State of the Union Address. The opposition party gets the same amount of time to say he was wrong and why. It is about presenting both sides – not that someone approves it is fair or not, or you were to only present one side.
The Fairness Doctrine that once existed was a policy of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was — in the Commission’s view — honest, equitable, and balanced. The FCC eliminated the Fairness Doctrine in 1987, and in August of 2011, the FCC formally removed the language that implemented the Doctrine. Ever since then, the media has had a field day and has degenerated into the very same tool that the Communists used for their revolution in Russia.
This Fairness Doctrine should become law and extend to print media, including all newspapers! If the First Amendment DOES NOT protect free speech to scream “fire” in a theatre, then why does mainstream media have a right to distort the news to create their personal political agenda?
The mainstream media should be stripped of their license if they present unbalanced information and refuse to stop propagandizing. Freedom of the Press is not the freedom to report only what they want in the way they want. If they claim to be reporting news, then it has to be unbiased news. Opinion is for op-eds, and they must report both views. STOP THE PROPAGANDA NOW!
It would be interesting to see how many journalists would end up behind bars if they refused to report the facts. Nobody will report the truth about Ukraine. That is sad because they support the death of millions of people for politics.
Donald Trump will be stepping into what will prove to be the most corrupt debate in American History that is, at best, a left-wing minefield as CNN, whose moderators are prepared to embarrass the country with their bias and attempt to rig the election as always. CNN has long lost any dignity and has become such a LEFT PROPAGANDA Machine, they desire to have their personal taxes doubled if not tripled so they can sleep at night knowing that their money is going to Ukraine to kill Russians.
Mr. Trump accepted CNN’s invitation to debate Mr. Biden. Since then, Trump supporters have lamented as CNN exposed its true colors, establishing CNN’s biased and highly unfavorable terms of the debate. The candidates will have no live audience and no chance to interrupt each other. Jake Tapper, who is the lead political leftist for CNN, probably cries at night that he has personal material wealth as he prays for the day when he will own nothing and be extremely happy. He will be accompanied by Dana Bash/Schwartz, Jewish, whose family were Hungarian Jews who fled the Russians. They are the far-LEFT moderators; so far, they might find it hard to walk a straight line in a DWI test if pulled over.
Trump will be taunted and abused, and CNN will do everything in its power to steer America into the Democrats so they can wage World War III and get their ratings back up. Both Bash and Tapper have broadcast their disdain, if not personal hatred, of Donald Trump. Why expect anything different from CNN. They have even compared Trump using “the dehumanizing rhetoric of Adolf Hitler” and called his four years in office a “long national nightmare.” They just love death and destruction for the LEFT always see themselves as victims so they are now cheering World War III and hope all the Republican children are drafted and eliminated for the future.
Mainstream media is not going to be satisfied until they unleash civil war on America because of personal hatred and biases. NEVER in my entire life have I ever witnessed such disgusting people claiming to be journalists on both sides.
Walter Cronkite Jr. (1916–2009) On April 16, 1962, Cronkite succeeded Douglas Edwards as anchorman of the CBS’s nightly news. Cronkite became an American icon of integrity in the News
The days of respectful journalism are long gone. I grew up when we gathered around to listen to the nightly news. Personally, I do not watch anyone anymore.
Posted originally on the CTH on June 23, 2024 | Sundance
President Trump joins David Sacks, Chamath Palihapitiya, Jason Calacanis, and David Friedberg for an extensive panel interview on policy and current political events.
This interview and discussion comes approximately a week after President Trump was in California at the home of David Sacks talking to tech insiders, venture capitalists and young industrialists. WATCH:
VIDEO SEGMENTS: (0:00) Bestie intros: Big house talk! (1:37) Economy: Regulation, taxes, tariffs, taming inflation, de-dollarization (12:02) Federal debt: growth, spend control, where to cut, role of energy, nuclear (20:22) Foreign policy: Ukraine/Russia (25:05) Foreign policy: Israel/Palestine (28:13) Abortion: Stance on a national ban (31:09) Foreign policy: China (32:33) COVID: Origins, Fauci relationship, deep state, bad deals (39:39) Border: Wall, immigration, H-1Bs, recruiting global talent (46:07) JFK Files: Full release, importance of transparency (48:06) Debate prediction (50:15) Post-interview debrief
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America