We all recall when the Democrats tried to drag former President Trump for suggesting a wall for the Southern border. He asked for $25 billion to build the wall and we are spending quadruple that amount on providing for migrants. The wall, the “Trump wall,” was considered “racist” and “Un-American” by VP Kamala Harris and a “medieval vanity project.” Now, Harris believes the time is right to fund the Trump wall.
Over eight to ten million people entered the United States under Biden-Harris, with Harris appointed as the point person to solve the problem. They have done absolutely everything imaginable to attract foreigners, going so far as to federally fund flights to the US for newcomers. Their policy was FAR BEYOND open borders as it enticed people to enter America illegally for a grand reward. The government continues to up the reward and there is no incentive to assimilate with society or return their country of origin.
I’ve joined my colleagues to introduce a bill that would rescind Trump’s order to construct the border wall. https://t.co/q26FovcZ8G
Harris has been supporting open border policies since acting as districting attorney in the late 2000s. In 2019, Kamala Harris tweeted that the migrant situation “is not an emergency” and continued to lie to the American public by utterly ignoring the invasion at our southern border. Governors at border states couldn’t get a word in with Harris and most Democrat cities also ignored the problem until migrants began arriving in droves in their neighborhoods. As you may remember, Texas Governor Greg Abbott of Texas went to far as shipping two buses of dreamers to her front door in Washington, DC.
“Trump’s border wall is a complete waste of taxpayer money and won’t make us any safer,” Harris exclaimed four years ago. This is typical political rhetoric. Vote for me, and I’ll fix your broken arm. Oh, your arm isn’t broken? Let us at the government do it for you!
Kamala Harris fails to offer unique ideas, perspectives, or, most importantly, for a presidential hopeful, any REAL solutions. I cannot comprehend how anyone could cast a vote for the same person who deliberately spent their entire political career creating this migrant crisis AND mocked the crisis as cities were overflowing with people from every nation on Earth. The cities were NOT laughing it off as their budgets were imploding, crime was soaring, civil unrest grew, and taxpayers became enraged that their taxes were going to subsidies others as they were adjusting to the new cost of living.
Harris simply does not have the aptitude to speak on the issue in public or private.
Posted originally on Aug 29, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
The migrant crisis in Canada has the nation in ruin. Home inventory has shrank to unseen levels as millions of migrants and foreign workers have caused a massive uptick in demand. Jobs are sparse, especially entry-level jobs, and over 1 million Canadians are out of work. More importantly, Canada’s population surpassed 41 million citizens, marking an all-time UNSUSTAINABLE high. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau would now like to make some slight adjustments to the temporary foreign worker legislation.
It is far too little, too late. These temporary workers are already in Canada and need jobs and accommodations. Still, new restrictions prohibit employers from hiring more than 10% of their total staff with foreign workers. Canada’s overall unemployment rate reached 6.4% in July. To bypass this fact, Trudeau is looking at unemployment on a city basis. Places where the unemployment rate is over 6% will not be able to hire foreign workers unless they are involved in agriculture.
“We need Canadian businesses to invest in training and technology, not increasing their reliance on low-cost foreign labour,” Trudeau said. “It’s not fair to Canadians struggling to find a good job, and it’s not fair to those temporary foreign workers, some of whom are being mistreated and exploited.”
Justin, you were the one who opened the floodgates and allowed Canadians to be exploited. You condemned anyone who questioned your open-border policy as a racist. Then, you implemented the foreign worker program under the guise that newcomers were needed to fill high-skilled labor positions. The Bank of Canada reported that migrant unemployment reached 11.6% in June. The low-skilled positions held by non-citizens have multiplied from 15,817 in 2016 to 83,654 in 2023.
The youth are struggling to enter the workforce as a direct result of foreign worker policies. Citizens are struggling to find housing in every nation that has implemented open border policies. How do you expect to multiply your population in a short amount of time without drastic changes to infrastructure? Canada, the US, Europe, and others have told migrant to come, bring their entire extended families, and the government will provide them with shelter, food, all basic living necessities at the expense of their own people. Can we even blame the migrants for taking up such an offer?
Mass deportations are the only option to quell costs. Even if Canada were to close its border today, the population of migrants would still be too high for governments to sponsor. Failed leaders like Trudeau played a nasty game with the lives of innocent individuals who perhaps were seeking a better life through foreign worker programs. This measure is merely placing a cup of water on a fire that is burning down a city. Canada needs major reform and that cannot happen through the same people who created the problem.
Posted originally on Aug 29, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: I had an argument with my son that what they teach in school is never the truth, not even about history. I was trying to find that writing you did years ago that the GI Bill was enacted only because they defaulted on the soldiers twice before. If I remember correctly, I think you said Congress fled Philadelphia because of a riot by the soldiers from the Revolution that they also defaulted on as they did with the debts from the Continental Congress. My son said he never heard such a story and called it a conspiracy theory. We seem to be drifting further apart. We cannot agree on much of anything these days.
I guess Mark Twain’s comment about his father is still valid. It reminds me of that song in The Living Years. Perhaps we are in this endless generational war. Is this part of 2032?
Paul
ANSWER: Yes, Paul. It seems that these times are even dividing families. From the emails I get, I see that this is not unique. It appears to have begun with COVID. I had dinner with a friend who said his sister is in California and they have not spoken in years. My old partner Jack King, out of the blue, turned to me and said if he died, make sure his children got nothing and protect his second wife. Another two friends also no longer talk to their kids. Perhaps this is just part of the cycle going into 2032. We are witnessing that publicly with RFK as well.
My father wanted me to be a lawyer, but I did not want to follow that path. But when he was on his deathbed, we settled our differences with respect, and I am thankful for that. He was proud of me but would say that only to friends. Likewise, I always respected my father and what he taught me. I guess I had not told him how much I was also proud of him. At least we came to that understanding before he died. I guess those days of pride and respect are old-fashioned ideas in these days of chaos and uncertainty.
Perhaps your son respects you but cannot get the guts to tell you. Hopefully, he will come to see that what they teach in school is never the full story. There are no courses that connect all the dots. The only thing I regret is that the family name will die with me, although I am Martin VII. I have no heir to carry the name, so I guess that also dies in 2032. A neighbor is in his early 70s. He married someone in their 30s, and they are a great match. His wife is having twins. I am very happy for him since he is estranged from his prior children.
Turning to your question about defaulting on the military, you remembered correctly. As I pointed out, the new United States defaulted on ALL debts of the previous Continental Congress despite Article VI expressly stating in the Constitution that they would honor those debts. When George Washington became the first US president in 1789, the capital city of the United States was New York. Then, in 1792, he was re-elected for his second term. However, the capital district had moved to Philadelphia. They may teach that Philadelphia was the capital for ten years. Yet, before becoming the capital, Philadelphia had been the home to Congress. That is where even the Declaration of Independence was signed. But there is a lot more to it than just that.
What they do NOT teach in school because it would taint the image of the government. Congress fled Philadelphia much like the Senate of Rome fled when Julius Caesar crossed the Rubicon, and the people did not support the Senate but cheered Caesar. The unspoken history is that in 1783, there was an uprising of the military against Congress, who refused to pay what they owed them. They called it the Pennsylvania Mutiny that chased Congress out of Philadelphia.
The Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783 was an anti-government uprising over a sovereign default/debt crisis, not unlike Caesar crossing the Rubicon—nearly 400 soldiers of the Continental Army stormed Congress on June 17th, 1783. The mutiny and the refusal of the Executive Council of Pennsylvania to stop it was very significant. If you watched that series, I recommended the Sons of Liberty. The one man who walked out and refused to sign the Declaration of Independence was John Dickinson, who just so happened to be the President of the Executive Council of Pennsylvania and refused to act. I believe he was against the entire Revolution and supported the King. When Congress refused to honor the debts owed to the soldiers, curiously, Dickinson sought revenge and stood down, allowing the troops to go after Congress.
From March 1781, Congress shared the Pennsylvania State House (now known as Independence Hall) with the Supreme Executive Council of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Under the authority of the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have direct control over the military, except in times of war, and was largely reliant on state militias to enforce laws and keep order. There had been a previous uprising called the Mutiny of the Pennsylvania Line that occurred in January 1781. The soldiers had legitimate grievances since they were not paid in almost a year.
The Continental Army soldiers stationed in Philadelphia sent a message on June 17th, 1783, demanding payment as contractually required for their service during the American Revolutionary War. Congress had refused to pay the army. The soldiers, in response, threatened to take action that day if their complaints were not addressed. Congress just ignored them, calling their bluff. The soldiers did not act on their threat. However, two days later, Congress received word that about 80 soldiers had left their post at Lancaster, Pennsylvania, about 60 miles outside of Philadelphia. They joined the soldiers stationed in Philadelphia. Now, the group was nearly 500 men. They seized control of all weapons and stores and munition depot.
Now, three days after their initial demand on the morning of June 20th, the State House was mobbed by a huge number of soldiers demanding payment. The soldiers blocked the door and initially refused to allow the delegates to leave. Alexander Hamilton (1757-1804), who at the time was a delegate from New York, stepped forward to persuade the soldiers to allow Congress to meet later to address their concerns. The soldiers yielded, allowing the members of Congress to adjourn that afternoon peacefully. However, Hamilton then called a small Congressional committee that night in secret to draft a message to John Dickinson, the President of the Executive Council of Pennsylvania. They asked him to protect Congress from the mutineers since they had no military. Hamilton had no intention of paying them. The letter threatened Dickinson that Congress would be forced to move elsewhere if Dickinson did not act.
The next day, June 21st, 1783, the Congress met again at the State House with members of the Pennsylvania Executive Council, including John Dickinson. The members of Congress petitioned Dickinson to protect the federal government. Dickinson said he would talk with the militia commanders and reply to Congress the next day. Dickinson, who walked out of the convention and refused to sign the Declaration of Independence, refused Congress’s request to protect them. The members of Congress then realized that perhaps Dickinson wanted the Congress to be wiped out. Congress fled Philadelphia and moved north to Nassau Hall in Princeton, New Jersey, which became the next capital of the United States.
George Washington, learning about the mutiny in Philadelphia on June 24th, ordered 1,500 troops under the joint command of Major General Robert Howe and Major General William Heath to suppress the mutiny. Some of the mutineers were finally arrested. Congress then called an investigation into the event from a position of safety in Princeton, New Jersey.
Some have argued that John Dickinson did not act because he was uncertain that the local militiamen would comply and protect Congress from their fellow soldiers. Yet, many suspected Dickinson’s loyalties since he had been an officer in the militia and supported the soldiers’ actions. Some also believed that since Dickinson refused to sign the Declaration of Independence, he was anti-federalist and against the entire Revolution. Dickinson’s refusal to comply with Congress’s request to bring full military action against the soldiers caused some hesitancy regarding Dickinson.
Congress then moved from Princeton, New Jersey, in early November 1783, transferred to the next capital, Annapolis, Maryland, and then back to Trenton, New Jersey, in November 1784. Finally, Congress then moved again to New York City in January 1785. It was not until the Constitutional Conventionin 1787 that the delegates decided to meet again in Philadelphia. Many assumed that Pennsylvania failed to protect Congress in 1783 due to Dickinson. This incident led many to insist that the federal government should have a separate location for its own security. Washington, DC, was a compromise between the North and the South. Jefferson agreed to support Hamilton’s idea of a national debt if the capital was to be removed to the middle of the colonies with land donated by Maryland and Virginia.
At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates agreed on Article I, Section 8, giving Congress the power “to exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States.”
After the Constitution was ratified by the colonies/states in 1788, the delegates agreed to keep New York City as the temporary federal capital. 1790, Congress passed the Residence Act, which created the District of Columbia. Robert Morris (1734–1806), a major funder of the Revolution, convinced Congress to return to Philadelphia while Washington, DC, was being built. As a result, the Residence Act declared Philadelphia to be the temporary capital for 10 years. In a final attempt to convince Congress to keep the capital in Philadelphia, the city began constructing a new presidential palace and expanding to Congress Hall. Those efforts failed, no doubt influenced by the failure of Dickinson in 1783. Congress met in Philadelphia for the last time on May 14th, 1800.
Herbert Hoover lost the 1932 election largely because he called out the army against the protests of the World War I veterans, the Bonus Army, who were protesting simply to be paid what they had been promised. Just as the 1783 Mutiny over the refusal to honor the promises to veterans, they pulled the same stunt on the World War I veterans. When World War II came, Congress passed the GI Act and this time honored their promises for if they did not, the Neocons could not expand around the world following Korea.
The Freeman’s Journal or The North-American Intelligencer Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Wednesday, July 02, 1783
Posted originally on the CTH on August 28, 2024 | Sundance
I’m not surprised, I’m just angry. According to Kevin Rojek, the head of the FBI’s Pittsburgh Field Office leading the investigation into the attempted assassination of President Trump, Matthew Crooks acted alone -no coconspirators- and the FBI has no idea what his motive was.
According to the representative for the “best men” the Federal Bureau of Investigation has, Crooks might have been a leftist or a far-right extremist, they are just not sure.
What the FBI does know is that no one taught or helped Crooks make complicated explosives, and they are sure he acted alone… for some mysterious reason…. that culminated in a bullet passing through the top of President Trump’s right ear.
The pretending that permeates the FBI is infuriating to me. It is almost difficult to write or share this stuff.
WASHINGTON – Six weeks after the assassination attempt against Donald Trump, the FBI still doesn’t know what motivated the shooter.
“Extensive analysis of the subject’s online search history as well as his specific online activity has provided us valuable insight into his mindset, but not a definitive motive,” Kevin Rojek, the head of the FBI’s Pittsburgh Field Office, told reporters Wednesday.
So far, he added, the FBI sees “no definitive ideology … either left-leaning or right-leaning” associated with the shooter, Thomas Crooks.
Rather, Crooks had “a sustained, detailed effort to plan an attack on some event” and considered multiple targets, according to Rojek. He became “hyper-focused” on Trump’s July 13 rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, after it was announced. Crooks fired eight shots at Trump from a rooftop that day, killing one person in the crowd, injuring two others and injuring Trump’s ear. Within seconds, a Secret Service sniper shot and killed Crooks.
There are no signs that Crooks had any co-conspirators or had links to foreign entities, officials said.
The FBI has accessed and analyzed material from encrypted email accounts he used, officials added.
[…] “We will never be able to determine exact motivation for why the subject flew the drone,” he added. (read more)
The FBI doesn’t know his motivation.
How about just accepting, the friggin’ guy was trying to kill President Donald Trump! This is not a super challenging motive to identify.
SUMMARY – In addition to bringing explosives, a detonator, a range finder, a backpack and an AR15 rifle to the rally, while finding a way to sit undetected -on a rooftop- directly underneath a counter-sniper position, the 20-year-old without a social media footprint apparently had air superiority and was flying his drone around the venue.
.
♦ […] “The 9th shot fired on J13 was from a Butler SWAT operator from the ground about 100 yards away from the AGR building. Shot 9 hit Crooks’ rifle stock and fragged his face/neck/right shoulder area from the stock breaking up. The SWAT operator who took this shot was a total badass; when he had sighted the shooter Crooks as a mostly obscured by foliage moving target on the AGR rooftop, he immediately left his assigned post and ran towards the threat, running to a clear shot position directly into the line of fire while Crooks was firing 8 rounds. On his own, this ESU SWAT operator took a very hard shot, one shot. He stopped Crooks and importantly, I believe the shot damaged the buffer tube on Crooks’ AR. I won’t be certain of this until I can examine Crooks’ rifle, but I’m 99% sure based upon reliable eye-witness ESU tactical officers who observed Crooks’ rifle before the FBI harvested it as evidence. This means that if his AR buffer tube was damaged, Crooks’ rifle wouldn’t fire after his 8th shot.” [Clay Higgins Report, pdf – page 4]
New footage that appears to be Thomas Matthew Crooks at the Butler, PA rally before shooting President Trump. pic.twitter.com/5HCGUWh6Yl
Posted originally on the CTH on August 28, 2024 | Sundance
I do not know much about Mark Halprin other than what I have discerned from watching him sporadically discuss politics for years. However, I have noticed in the last few years he is evolving toward a more sensible, pragmatic and non-pretending type of political analysis.
In this video below, Halprin speaks to something that everyone on the left is avoiding, the known problems with Kamala Harris as a candidate.
Brian Fallon is managing and hiding Kamala Harris, because Fallon and the rest of her handlers know there is very solid reasoning for why Kamala Harris was never considered a viable alternative to Biden before. A few short weeks ago, the professional left were riddled with anxiety over Joe Biden’s mental and cognitive status, while simultaneously those same people did not want Harris as a candidate because they knew she had no skills.
You don’t have to argue with them, just ask any Democrat/Leftists to name the greatest accomplishment of Kamala Harris and you will see them melt in front of you. Nothing about that has changed, and that’s why the DNC/Brian Fallon must hide Harris in order to maintain her ¹polling position. If they let Kamala campaign and talk to the media, she will tank just like Ron DeSantis did (for the same reason).
Listen to Halprin first. He’s right about this, and beyond his accuracy, what he says “might happen” – I would say is a virtual certainty.
“I’m warning those of you who want Trump to lose that by the middle of next month, there’s a real possibility, based on what I’ve seen in terms of public and private data … that Kamala Harris could be where Joe Biden was,” says Mark Halperin. “Only one electoral college path and not a particularly strong hold on it.”
“I’m warning those of you who want Trump to lose that by the middle of next month, there’s a real possibility, based on what I’ve seen in terms of public and private data … that Kamala Harris could be where Joe Biden was,” says @MarkHalperin. “Only one electoral college path… pic.twitter.com/yFZTN8gijS
¹Polling Position – I cannot emphasize this enough. The DNC (Obama/Clyburn) goal with Kamala Harris is polling position. They need her to have the biggest appearance of support possible. It is polling they need– REMEMBER THAT!
The problem democrats had was not that Biden lost his marbles or was losing the election, the problem was that Biden was losing by a scale that was too big for them to cover. [CTH June 29, 2024]
Democrats didn’t need a switch-out candidate who could beat Donald Trump; they needed a candidate who can give plausibility to the Clyburn ballot counting results that will say Trump lost.
The issue they had with Biden was that he made the fraud too easy to see. The Democrats do not need a candidate who can win votes, the Democrats needed a candidate who can make fraudulent ballot results seem plausible.
The need to retain ballot plausibility is why the most important political narrative for the people who control Kamala Harris, is polling!
If her handlers think she will hurt her current polling by being visible, they will keep her hidden. If her handlers think she will hurt her polling by speaking, they will keep her quiet.
Everything Obama/Clyburn and the team will do is to manage the illusion of Kamala Harris in order to preserve the media polling narrative and thereby facilitate the determining factor of Ballot Harvesting (Obama) and Ballot Scanning (Clyburn).
Posted originally on the CTH on August 28, 2024 | Sundance
Kamala Harris has yet to give a press conference or sit down with any journalist to discuss the construct of a campaign around her. The media has largely tried to cover for this lack of openness, but even hardcore narrative engineers are starting to become twitchy at the extreme handling of Hawk Tuah Harris.
To deflect attention from the absence of questioning, HT Harris primary handler Brian Fallon, has arranged a scripted interview with CNN. Together with her sketchy running mate, Tim Walz, Mrs Harris will be questioned by Dana Bash in a taped interview which will be edited, smoothed and broadcast on CNN fake news tomorrow at 9pm ET.
WASHINGTON DC – Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, will face questions from CNN anchor Dana Bash in an interview expected to air 9 p.m. Thursday, the network announced Tuesday. The interview will take place in Georgia as the vice president is on a bus tour through the battleground state. (read more)
Posted originally on the CTH on August 28, 2024 | Sundance
The lawyers representing the campaign of Robert F Kennedy Jr have successfully removed RFK Jr from the ballot in Nevada after coming to an agreement yesterday with DNC lawyers who were suing to keep him off the ballot.
Essentially, team RFK JR just dropped their argument, acquiesced to the DNC position and the judge dismissed the case with prejudice. That removes RFK Jr from Nevada. [Filing Here] This is the same process the lawyers used to get Kennedy off the ballot in Pennsylvania.
That said, Michigan and Wisconsin are not removing Robert F Kennedy Jr from those state ballots.
MICHIGAN – […] Kennedy is on the ballot in Michigan as a candidate for the Natural Law Party, which nominated him at its convention earlier this year. Cheri Hardmon, a spokesperson for the Michigan secretary of state’s office, confirmed to NBC News that “minor party candidates cannot withdraw, so his name will remain on the ballot in the November election.
WISCONSIN – […] In Wisconsin, the state’s election commission met Tuesday to certify ballot access for presidential and vice presidential candidates. Even though Kennedy requested to withdraw his nomination petition as an independent candidate, the commission ultimately voted to decline that request, according to an archived video of the proceedings published by WisconsinEye, a nonprofit public affairs network.
“The statute literally says, ‘Any person who files nomination papers and qualifies to appear on the ballot may not decline nomination. The name of that person shall appear upon the ballot except in case of death of the person,’” Ann Jacobs, the chair of the commission, said to another commissioner struggling with the idea of keeping someone on the ballot who didn’t want to move forward with his candidacy.
“You’re giving me this touchy, feely: ‘I feel like this shouldn’t be the law.’ The law in this case is crystal clear,” she added. “I don’t disagree with you it’s weird but I don’t see we have any discretion here.” (MORE)
♦ SUMMARY: RFK Jr is gone from ballots in the battleground states of Arizona, Pennsylvania and now Nevada. Not Michigan and Wisconsin.
Florida, Texas and Ohio have also removed Kennedy, but those are generally Red.
The state to watch is now North Carolina, where ballots would have to be reprinted quickly if the RFK Jr intent is to withdraw. The Kennedy team have not requested to remove their candidate from North Carolina.
(VIA NPR) – “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been nominated by the We The People Party as that party’s presidential candidate to be listed on the ballot,” North Carolina State Board of Elections public information officer Patrick Gannon said. “That party has not informed the State Board of any plans to change its nomination.”
Gannon said that if We The People withdrew Kennedy’s nomination, state officials would have to consider if it would be practical to reprint ballots. As of Friday, nearly a third of North Carolina’s 100 counties had started the printing process. (MORE)
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
