They now want to Reduce Dog & Cat Ownership to Stop Global Warming


Well, it was only a matter of time that when you read between the lines concerning pet population of dogs and cats, the solution is to REDUCE their numbers – which is really what they argue for behind the curtain concerning humans. I have written previously how they really want to starve humans to reduce the population. I have previously told the story about attending a White House dinner in Washington back in 1996 and being seated with the entire Environmental group. It was a Washington elite political dinner and because I attended with my friend Dick Fox who was Chairman of Temple University and I was an adviser to the University, whoever it was that made the seating arrangements for these tables of 10  seated us with the environmental groups. This was in the mid-90s.

Dick was the one who kept trying to drag the truth out and there it came. These were the heads of the top three environmental organizations. They admitted that the real goal was to reduce the human population by making it difficult to expand and build houses. Labeling everything wetlands would reduce the ability to expand housing and thus shrink the population. When Dick got them to admit that he moved in for the bottom-line question and asked: “So who’s grandchild are you trying to prevent from being born? Your’s or mine?”

They now are targeting your pets. They already are taxing farmers per cow because they fart and are causing Global Warming. Now they are honing in on your dog or cat. The argument is that pets constitute about 25–30% of the environmental impacts of animal production in terms of the use of land, water, fossil fuel, phosphate, and biocides.  Their solution: Reducing the rate of dog and cat ownership, perhaps in favor of other pets that offer similar health and emotional benefits would considerably reduce these impacts.

What’s next? Quotas on having children? That did not work so well in China.

UN’s Global Compact for Safety, Orderly and Regular Migration


Austria and Hungary have now joined Trump in backing out the United Nations migration deal. The UN’s Global Compact for Safety, Orderly and Regular Migration, which is not actually legally binding on any country lacking jurisdiction or power in the UN over the entire world. This deal was finalized and it is widely seen as pro-migration and unrealistic. The greatest problem with this proposal is that the industrialized nations of Europe and America are in fact SOCIALIST states so migrants get benefits for coming that they would not get at home. The problem is that when mass-migration took place from Europe to America in the 19th century and the first near 50% of the 20th century, that migration was to freedom economically and the opportunity to work. The migration into Europe is by no means of the same quality. They go there with no prospect of employment, understanding or speaking the language, and live far better on state welfare that would possibly have at home. The incentives are completely reversed.

Trump pulled out of that deal and no both Austria and Hungary have joined as they are inundated with migrants who just have their hand out and drain the economy rather than adding to it. The UN’s Global Compact for Safety, Orderly and Regular Migration, is simply unrealistic and fails completely to understand that there is a huge difference between subsidized migration and migration for an opportunity. In the USA, Trump carried Florida with the legal Mexicans voting for Trump because they had to prove they could speak the language and had skills. The same took place in Britain where the Indians voted for BREXIT for most who migrated to Britain also had to have a skill set which was most commonly in the field of medicine. Those in power do not understand that those who learned skills to migrate are now upset at this idea of just opening up the doors under the welfare model. It undermines what they had to go through to make it to a new homeland.

BREXIT to be Signed by the Pi Target – November 21st, 2018?


COMMENT: Dear Martin

I am once again in awe of your mighty computer. I refer to today’s announcement by Dominic Raab that a deal on Brexit should be ready for the 21st November.
I am concerned that the UK Parlament will agree to this deal, which is a sell-out of all the main reasons we Brits voted to leave the EU. If this happens, I fear for how the majority will react.
Thank you for your remarkable service.

Sincerely

REPLY:

The most curious comment was made Dominic Rennie Raab in Britain, who is a British Conservative Party politician serving as Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, suggested that the UK’s increasingly absurd BREXIT negotiations with the EU could be completed in three weeks’ time. He said in a letter he had sent to a select committee that ended up being released in which he said he was happy to appear before it the committee on November 21st after “a deal is finalized”.

This has caused quite a stir to say the least. After all this insane attempt by Brussels to PUNISH Britain to leave their dictatorship which never stands for election, is quite amazing. Brussels has been pushing their own agenda to punish the Brits as a deterrent to others from leaving. However, the German auto manufacturers are screaming loud for their #1 market in Europe has always been the Brits. Punish Britain and Germany will enter a major economic downturn. Still, this deal will not be all it was hoped to be. It does not represent a clean break. The cartoon running around the net of PM May kind-of captured the spirit of the BREXIT negotiations.

Now with Italy on the ropes and Portugal as well as Spain hinting that they too want to revise their budgets, as Merkel falls, many believe that Austerity will go with her. The chaos of Europe is just on the horizon. It would be extremely interesting if BREXIT were to be signed on November 21st, 2018. That would be an incredible event and without a clean break, it may be the event that takes Britain down with the EU. So far, Raab has been forced to backtrack once that letter became public

Wow – Andrew Gillum Campaign Uses Derogatory and Racial Slurs To Describe Florida Voters…


This is a little bit more than alarming. Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum’s staff is recorded on video making stunning racial and derogatory epithets toward Florida residents/voters. This is terrible; Florida deserves better.

…”Florida is a “F***ed up,” “cracker state,” “you have to appeal to white guilt”…

(Tallahassee) Project Veritas Action Fund has released undercover video from Florida gubernatorial candidate Andrew Gillum’s campaign, revealing his election strategy includes making empty promises to voters. This is the seventh undercover video report Project Veritas has released in a series revealing secrets and lies from political campaigns in 2018.  (continue reading)

PVeritas Action @PVeritas_Action

Anti-Fascist Turning Violent in Portland


The rising left Antifa movement is a conglomeration of left-wing autonomous, self-styled anti-fascist militant groups in the United States. The principal feature of Antifa groups is their use of direct action, harassing those whom they deem to be fascists, racists and right-wing extremists. They have actually become the very fascists and communists that pretend to object to. This is what I have warned about. The further you go to the left you meet the extreme right and both advocate violence but for different reasons.

Patriot Prayer members and Antifa members were facing off in downtown Portland. Police declared their actions as a civil disturbance and ordered everyone to leave. The police were confiscating weapons from the protesters showing that they are indeed violent. Welcome to the breakdown of all civility. These groups will simply be violent and threaten anyone who opposes their ideas.

The real problem is that they do not even understand was a Fascist is. Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian ultranationalism, characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy. Under Fascism, which they accuse Trump of being, he would then surrender control of his empire to the government. Certainly, Trump has no such policy. This is the problem that people even call the anti-Islam racist when Islam is a religion and not a race. The ignorance is just beyond all conception and these people are violent under labels they do not even understand.

When there was the Occuppy Wall Street protect of October 6th, 2011 in Philadelphia, it was right in front of my office at that time across from City Hall. They were not violent. But then too they were yelling slogans that sounded great to everyone but made no sense. I came out of the office and they yelled at me and called me a “Corporate Liberal” which I just looked at them in amazement. I was not sure what it was supposed to be. Was I some corporate director who gave money away? I still have never figured that one out but it always brings a chuckle.

Hillary Clinton Jokes About Confusing Eric Holder with Corey Booker: “They all look alike”…


Failed presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton and women’s rights advocate Kara Swisher sat down for a live podcast and taping in New York City. The media has focused on Mrs. Clinton remarks: “I want to be president”, which can be seen in the interview at 00:33:40.

However, there’s also an alarming joke told by Clinton that reflects her tone-deaf racial perspective. At the 01:04:30 moment of the interview Ms. Swisher mistakes Corey Booker for Eric Holder and Mrs. Clinton replies: “I know they all look alike“.

[Prompted – Just hit play]

.

Can you imagine the level of media and Democrat apoplexy if the leading figure within GOP politics cracked that kind of ‘racial joke’?

CNN: “This President Has Radicalized So Many More People Than ISIS”…


Appearing today on CNN with Jake Tapper, Julia Ioffe claims: “this president has radicalized so many more people than ISIS”.   Jake Tapper sits there and says nothing in response; seemingly ambivalent and supportive of this ridiculous attack construct.

This takes place within hours of President Trump calling out the dangers of this exact type of fake news advocacy.  In essence, Jake Tapper just proved the very point that President Trump made in his tweets.  WATCH:

.

Four Shots Fired Into Florida Republican Party Office…


Police in Volusia County have responded to four shots fired into a satellite office of the Republican party in South Daytona, Florida.  Thankfully no-one was injured and the shooting incident appears to have happened in-between operating hours on Sunday night to Monday morning when no-one was inside the building.

(Via Orlando Sentinel) At least four shots were fired into the Volusia County Republican Party’s office in South Daytona, police said Monday.

No one was injured, according to South Daytona police Capt. Mark Cheatham, but the shooting broke the offices’ front window and caused some damage to the drywall inside.

Cheatham said a volunteer reported the incident on Monday, which could’ve happened between Sunday afternoon and Monday morning at the office located at 2841 South Nova Road.

No eyewitnesses have been identified and investigators are in the process of tracking down surveillance footage from neighboring businesses, Cheatham said.

Volusia County Republican chair Tony Ledbetter, told WFTV that “some sick person,” which he identified as “Democrats,” took their anger out on his office.

“You’ve got some sick person, and I’ll call them out, they’re Democrats. No Republican has any reason to come attack our location,” Ledbetter said.

Police have not released any information about potential suspects, their political affiliations or motive for the incident. (Read More)

Rick Scott

Shots fired into Volusia County Republican headquarters, police say

At least five gunshots were fired into the Volusia County Republican headquarters in South Daytona.

wesh.com

Boston🇺🇸Bobblehead @DBloom451

👷‍♂️🧟‍♂️ 🇺🇸

The Press Makes the News – They No longer Report It – A Sign of the End of Political Times


QUESTION:  Mr. Armstrong –
On 08/23 you wrote a blog entry that seems to espouse two incongruous claims: (1) That the press has distorted & propagandized its news reporting so egregiously now that the American people give little credence to what it tells them (as evidenced by the Gallup polls results you showed), and (2) That the press is yet still managing to rope-along enough gullible emotional people that they are dividing the country and will be at fault if it breaks-up. How do you reconcile these two assertions ?: Isn’t it more likely that the press is simply helping to incite those who already left-tending “true believers” as well as the deep state which is the real entity brokering all this enmity against Trump (and the real player with enough clout to foment/incite division of the country in service of its own selfish power & privilege) ?

SIC

ANSWER: I do not believe that the press is capable of altering society insofar as changing the minds of the majority. If you look at the presidential elections, only three people EVER won 60%-63% of the popular vote – FDR, LBJ, and Richard Nixon. If you look at the winning votes, you will see that most are in the min 50% range. Less than 10% of the people are independent. The bulk of the people are predisposed Democrats or Republicans. Those who watch CNN do so because they WANT to hear negative things about Trump and those who listen to Fox want to listen to negative things about the Democrats.

The Gallup Poll shows that there is a growing majority of people who are NOT stupid and realize that the press has gone way too far on both sides preaching to their constituents. Hillary raised twice as much money as Trump for the 2016 election. That proved above everything else that you can run all the TV ads bashing your opponent but you are only really preaching to the mindless people who will vote for their party REGARDLESS of the facts.

The press is increasing the violence factor just as Hillary has justified civil unrest. The problem is you will witness an equal and opposite reaction from the extreme right in opposition to the extreme left. Just as we have witnessed with the so-called pipe bombs that were duds. It is the Deep State who uses the press to shield and legitimize their objectives for they are there for personal power and corruption the same as you see the politicians in Britain calling to remain who have untold wealth involved in pensions from the EU at stake.

The Press is no longer “free” for they have simply become the American version of the old Soviet Pravda. They distort the facts and incite anger. They no longer report the news – they try to make it. Historically, when this takes place, it is part of the collapse in confidence that brings down the government. I went behind the Berlin Wall before it fell. The person I visited would always be looking around and spoke freely when we were alone. As soon as anyone came close, the political rhetoric came out praising how wonderful their government was. Nobody believed the media and nobody trusted the police. I have friend who fled Eastern Europe and came to America and Germany just to mention two. All say the same thing. They fled to escape the corruption and have discovered what they fled is infecting the West just as bad

Avenatti & NBC Get Caught Manipulating News?


Every time we turn around there is another so-called journalist who believes the freedom of speech is their freedom to distort the news to support what they would personally prefer. Now the controversy turns to spotlight Kate Snow at NBC who appears to have sat on a story given to her by the questionable activist lawyer Michael Avenatti who has opened said that Trump is not his president.

It turns out that  Avenatti put NBC reporter Kate Snow in touch in late September with a woman he told her would back up Swetnick’s allegations against Kavanaugh. The woman actually disputed Swetnick’s allegations and told NBC that Avenatti “twisted [her] words” just to make a case against Kavanaugh. While personally, I believe Avenatti’s professional behavior in all his cases he brings to try to unseat Trump way beyond ethical conduct. To publicly state that Trump is not his president demonstrates he is certainly not unbiased. Who is the liar now?

Avenatti is desperately trying to attack Trump on anything because he is trying to make a name for himself since he has also admitted he wants to run for president against Trump in 2020. I cannot imagine a better person qualified to know how to professionally lie to the people than a lawyer who defends porn stars. His exploitation of these women and his outrageous comments that Kavanaugh was involved in gang rapes is just so over the top, this, I believe, is a very dangerous guy who should not be allowed anywhere near the White House.