Sadly way too many of the under 30 cohort have been brain watched in the public schools and are unable to think for themselves; so they get sucked into the black hole of the pop culture.
Tag Archives: TTIP
The Socialism Diet: 75% of Venezuelans Have Lost an Average of 19 lbs
At some point the weight loss will start killing people … 😦
Martin Schultz Wants to Give Refugees the Right to Vote in German Election
Armstrong Economics Blog/Germany
Re-Posted Feb 22, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
To win the election in Germany, the SPD & Greens want to move to change the law regarding voting rights. Essentially, they want to give the refugees a right to vote. They need not be an EU citizen nor do they need to pay taxes. The mere right to vote is you happen to be there at the time. Meanwhile, the SPD has now taken the lead in polls from Merkel. Martin Schulz, the German Social Democrats’ candidate for federal elections in September, is the very person who in the EU wants to federalize Europe and this scheme is intended to use anyone other than Germans to win the election.
The Social Democrats are 63.7% in favor of letting the refugees vote. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) poll shows 96.9% against Schulz’s idea. Can you imagine letting everyone from Mexico come into the USA and then vote if the United States should petition Mexico to join them? It seems the left is just totally insane. They will do absolutely anything to win and that means they will allow all of the Middle East to enter Germany and then outnumber the Germans in their own election?! Where is the logic here?
Spiegel, the German magazine reported: “In 1990, all of Germany celebrated the reunification of a country divided since World War II. But the optimism was naively misplaced. The real German division sees the North pitted against the South.” As Spiegel went on: “What happens when a blonde moves from Berlin to Bavaria? The collective IQs of both places go up — at least according to a favorite joke told in the German capital. And the Bavarians? They just call everybody not from their easy-going part of Germany Sau Preussen, or “pig Prussians.” In other words, not a lot of love is lost between the North and the South in Germany.”
Seven Weeks’ War, also called Austro-Prussian War, (1866), war between Prussia on the one side and Austria, Bavaria, Saxony, Hanover, and certain minor German states on the other. It ended in a Prussian victory, which meant the exclusion of Austria from Germany. This was the unification of Germany. Bismarck had maintained that he orchestrated the conflict in order to bring about the North German Confederation, the Franco-Prussian War and the ultimate unification of Germany.
Of course, the concept of Germany as a nation or distinct region within central Europe can be traced to Julius Caesar. It was Caesar who referred to the unconquered area east of the Rhine as Germania. Indeed, Germanicus was the name given to the great-nephew of Augustus, Caesar’s heir.
It was in 962 AD, when Otto I became the first emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, thereby establishing the medieval German state. Interestingly enough, if we square 31.4 we arrive at 985.96 years. Add that to 962 we come to 1947. Just on 51.6 year wave of the ECM thereafter brings us to the start of the Euro in 1999.
The likelihood of Germany dividing North v South is extremely high. This entire refugee issue was bad enough. For the SPD to try to give them votes to take control will set off an internal German civil war.
Norway Insane Property Boom or Capital Flight from Eurozone?
Armstrong Economics Blog/European Union
Re-Posted Feb 22, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Hello Martin, I was wondering if you could write a piece on the Norwegian real estate market? The market has gone complete mad the last couple of years with salaries declining, and housing prices booming. Over 40% of Oslo is now owned by people not leaving there. A lot of apartments are empty because people don’t care to rent them out, it is just for speculation. Will this continue or will the Sovereign debt crises drag the market down with it? Love your blog, and hope you can spare some time for little Norway!
HG
ANSWER: Actually, I will be speaking there in Norway in a few weeks. Most of this “speculation” is really parking money. They are not trying to actually make a profit, which is why they are not renting these properties out. This is about parking money outside of the Eurozone. This has been a bet against Brussels and the collapse of the Euro. When we look at the share market, we see an outside reversal to the upside in 2016 as our model warmed with a Panic Cycle. This too is money trying to get off the grid.
The is a picture of the Krone expressed in US dollars since 1927. Here also, the dollar is positioned to rally against the Krone and we should see a new high above that of 1985, but at the very least a rally to retest that level for the third time.
In the case against the Euro, the Yearly Bullish Reversal stood at 87125 and we closed 2016 at 86450 after reaching intraday for the year 89940. To have exceeded the Yearly Bullish for the Euro intraday yet failed to close above it warns that the rally in the Euro against the Krone is most likely coming to an end.
Russian hackers play phone prank on fool Democrat Maxine Waters
Its no wonder that our laws are so screwed up that woman needs to have a handler with her 24/7
EU could demand Britain pay multibillion-euro ‘Brexit bill’ to leave
The Brit’s should just simply tell them to go straight to hell and cut them off 100% right now.
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES THE TOP 30 REPORTERS ON HILLARY CLINTON’S PAYROLL
No surprise but good to know!
Obama Admin and Allies In State Dept. Intentionally Undermine Structural “Trump Peace Alliance” With Leak To Reuters of Secret 2016 Meeting….
When we shared the last research outline of what is being assembled by a quiet coalition of President Trump (U.S.A), Prime Minister Netanyahu (Israel), President Fattah Abdel el-Sisi (Egypt), King …
The Total Lack of Common Sense
Armstrong Economics Blog/Pension Crisis
Re-Posted Feb 20, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Martin – Given your compelling elucidation of the business cycle (which remains ineluctable even with central bank and regulatory distortion of money and markets), the avg annual return targets set by pension and retirement plans seems absurd. CalPERS had an annual bogey of 8% to meet via its active management. Even in a rapidly-growing economy whose markets were free from distortions, it seems that any fixed number could only rationally be set as a target if the investment horizon spanned several business cycles. This would allow at least some averaging over bull and bear phases to enable a fixed average return target like this to have any meaning.
This is not exotic – it seems commons sense. Do professional asset managers (or central bankers for that matter) make up nice-sounding goals that they know they cannot meet, or do they just not know what they are doing?
ANSWER: The fund managers are not really very professional. The majority of pension funds based their returns upon the standard 8% yield of long-term 30 year bonds. They have never actually adjusted their return expectations and thus the majority remain under-funded.
Do not apply this to all pension funds. We have helped many make the transition to the real world. When you have CALPERS where the decisions come often from the board, which is not professional, but political, therein lies the problem. The Social Security system is likewise a disaster. I tried to convert it into a wealth fund almost 20 years ago. The Democrats blocked it for anything to do with the free markets to them was risky. Thus, they stuff it with their own debt and then lowered interest rates. The fund is broke and you will see demands to raise taxes to cover the losses the politicians have created, yet they will of course blame someone other than themselves.
Someone who has simply managed a pension fund for the government is typically not qualified to be a private fund manager. If they were hired from the private sector to then clean up a public pension fund, then we have a different type of person. It will depend at that point on the board of directors and if they will allow the fund manager to make market decisions or will they still be overridden by politics.
Keep in mind that I often appear to be the lone analyst on many issues. This is ONLY because those with experience must sign confidentiality agreements to work for a fund or bank. They are not allowed to make comments for whatever they say would be attributed to their employer. I get tons of emails cheering often what I say because they are silenced. You really have to peek behind the curtain to comprehend what goes on because it really does defeat COMMON SENSE! It is like everything else. Nobody would have sat down and designed a financial or political system as we have today. This whole mess is just total insanity. It does not take a conspiracy, it takes stupidity. These people attribute such knowledge to people that is not justified. Some of these decisions do not make even the basic common sense tes
Sovereign Debt Crisis – Cycle Due 2017
Armstrong Economics Blog/Sovereign Debt Crisis
Re-Posted Feb 20, 2017 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Hi Martin It’s been 30 years since I first saw you speak and this year I’m taking my son to Orlando to see you for the first time. How time flies. That said why have you not talked about the 86 year Sovereign Debt cycle that is forecasting a Great Depression for 2017. Have the monetary powers delayed this?
Thanks for all you do.
See you in November.
JPG
ANSWER: No. 2017 is the start of this whole mess. We have bank runs in Greece because the prevailing view is that Merkel will not relent and Greece cannot pay. This is why we are holding two conferences this year because it is very important and it is why I highlighted Greece in the report we issued for 2017.
BTW, thank you for this old hand drawn chart I did so long ago. I didn’t have a copy of it. People do not realize that these forecasts were made decades ago.
We also marked that 2009 would be the turning point 30 years ago. This was equivalent to the 1923 turning point in a basket of currencies back then. So the 2009 target was correct and this implies that the 2017 target should also be correct. Th








