Posted originally on Mar 22, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
There is a major case before the Supreme Court that has broad implications for EVERYONE’s civil rights. An agency arbitrarily demanded that fishermen pay for the agency’s decision to regulate them, which was not in the statute, is the facts before the court. In short, the fishermen are objecting to a regulation that requires them to pay observers to ensure their vessels comply with federal regulations while at sea. In other words, you have to pay for a government agent to follow you while working every day.
Cape May, New Jersey-based commercial fishing operations, run by Bill Bright, Wayne Reichle, and Stefan Axelsson, filed a suit, Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which is backed became the lightning rod to overturn – Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984). Can you imagine if you had to pay the salary of a government observer to ride with you in your car to ensure you do not speed just to drive your car?
Following the oral argument in a closely watched administrative law case that could have a major impact on limiting the government’s arbitrary actions, it appeared that some U.S. Supreme Court justices would be open to limiting the opportunities for lower courts to defer to federal agencies’ legal interpretations in disputes over rulemaking known as the Chevron case.
Questions posed by U.S. Supreme Court justices during oral arguments suggested that a compromise on Chevron’s deference may be in the works.
Fishing groups asked the Supreme Court to overturn its 1984 ruling in Chevron, which established that federal judges must defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous laws in litigation over rulemaking. While some justices seemed receptive to such a move, others asked questions that indicated some reservations.
Completely overturning Chevron would eliminate a legal dictatorship for agencies. However, curtailing its conditions of use could accomplish many of the same aims without a high-profile rebuke of a 40-year-old precedent.
Justices Amy Coney Barrett and Elena Kagan appeared to be concerned about the effects of overturning Chevron. During oral arguments, they began exploring how the court might impose new guardrails around the use of the long-standing legal doctrine. Chief Justice John Roberts asked a few questions along the same lines, indicating he was perhaps hesitant about totally scrapping Chevron.
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson supported maintaining the Chevron deference as it is since they are Democrats and love big government. Still, with Justices Barrett and Roberts potentially closer to the limiting rather than overturning option and Justice Kagan exploring the middle ground, it looked like a compromise was in the air.
Justice Barrett gave a clue to a path forward when she coined the term “Kisorize” during her questioning of Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar. This demonstrated her curiosity about whether the high court could restrict the use of the Chevron doctrine similarly to the way it curtailed the use of the Auer deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous regulations in 2019’s Kisor v. Wilkie. Kisor argued that Auer deference forced judges to blindly give weight to agencies’ interpretations of their regulations—regardless of how the judges would otherwise interpret the regulations in their own independent judgment. This deference doctrine, to me, is a violation of the Separation of Powers because an agency will ALWAYS interpret its regulation to its own self-interest. This deference has been rooted in a presumption that Congress intended for courts to defer to agencies when interpreting their own ambiguous rules. The Court adopted that presumption, which has created an arbitrary and unconstitutional practice of authoritarianism, denied judicial review.
We are talking about the very foundation of our nation. The Constitution is NEGATIVE and was intended to be a restraint upon government – not a means to expand powers. Sotomayor and Jackson need to move to the center and just for once realize the very foundation of our Constitution was to RESTRAINT government to preserve our liberty.
Since there did not appear to be a 5:4 vote for overruling Chevron, that leaves restricting its application, if a judge is to defer to an agency’s legal interpretation under Chevron, the agency must clear a two-step process. At step one, the judge must determine if the statute the agency relies on as authority for its rule is ambiguous. Then, in step two, the judge must determine if the agency’s interpretation of that ambiguity is reasonable. This is where our rights will still slip through the cracks.
The Court could instruct judges not to be too quick to find ambiguity and to better define reasonableness. This is still a gray area. Step two would instruct judges to make sure an agency is acting with the force of law and to look for other statutory indications that Chevron may not apply in that case. This fine-tuning would avoid the formal overruling of a prior precedent that would do what is right but unlikely since agencies will cry over a loss of arbitrary power. It should be where the “best” interpretation of a law wins in court, even if there is this claim that their interpretation is “reasonable.” That would be the correct decision, but there goes the agency’s absolute power. What they do now is infer that statutory silence concerning their controversial powers constitutes ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. That is an outrageous abuse of power.
I seriously doubt that the Supreme Court should overrule Chevron outright. Once you hand any power to those in government, it becomes like Communism. You can vote your way in, but you have to shoot your way out. They just can’t bring themselves to ever hand power back to the people, regardless of what the Constitution had to say about it. They have turned the Bill of Rights, which is a NEGATIVE restraint upon government, into a positive right you have, and then they claim you can waive that right, thereby constructively amending the Constitution so it no longer exists as applied to you.
Europe’s migrant crisis has been multiplying since 2015 when former German Chancellor Angela Merkelopened the gates to Syrian refugees. Everyone and anyone is now descending upon Europe, and with the backing of a centralized government in the form of the European Union, no agency can curb the unsustainable migration crisis because the invasion is deliberate.
Lionel Shriver, head of Frontex and the EU’s border and coastguard coalition, has said that there is nothing that can be done to control migration. “To put it bluntly,” the Dutchman Hans Leijtens told an interviewer from Germany’s Die Welt, “nothing can stop people from crossing a border, no wall, no fence, no sea, no river. Sometimes it’s pretended that you can just put a lid on top of the bottle, and then the migration stops. But that’s a misconception.”
Frontex’s budget increased from €143 million for 2015 when the crisis began to €543 million for 2021. The budget is expected to reach €10,000 by 2027. Now, what is the point of enforcing the border when the politicians are openly welcoming illegal migrants? The corrupt European Commission transformed Frontex into the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in 2015. At the same time, Merkle and others were urging refugees to head to Europe where they would receive a state-funded life.
“Who am I to condemn migrants?” Hans, the man responsible for controlling migration, said. “This talk of ‘stopping people’ and ‘closing borders’ can’t be our narrative all the time. My job is to strike a balance between effective border management and respect for fundamental rights.” Basically, he must appease Brussels and has no authority to act in a way that goes against their narrative.
Similar to the US, the people in charge refuse to recognize that there is a massive migration crisis happening. The house is burning but they will not call the fire department because they refuse to see the flames. Europe’s migrant crisis started before America’s because an anti-establishment candidate who did not obey the globalist agenda secured the vote. All of the World Economic Forum, BUILD BACK BETTER, nations are aligning on a policy of open borders despite the social and economic consequences.
Posted originally on Mar 20, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
For some time, I have reported that Special Forces have been in Ukraine, and Russia knows that. Now, leaked documents have confirmed that reality. Even in Vietnam, there were special forces there well before any official invasion. Ukrainians have used this, claiming that NATO is in Ukraine and hiding in schools using children as cover. Russia has been deploying thermobaric weapons, also known as a vacuum bomb, which is a type of explosive munitions that work by dispersing an aerosol cloud of gas, liquid, or powder, and it is more deadly than a conventional weapon of the same size. It uses the air around it, and this sucks in the oxygen – hence the vacuum bomb. Americans have been killed on the battlefield there, but they are private mercenaries. CNN reported that the dead American was Special Forces.
I have renowned sources, and I have been warning that the figures all along that Ukraine was winning have been nothing but propaganda NEOCONS also being pushed by Victoria Nuland’s sister-in-law, who runs the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), which is all about promoting war. They have been putting out the nonsense that Russia is losing and is weak to sell the idea that the West should just walk in and destroy Russia, and the Russian people will cheer for saving them from Putin.
I could say the same that the Americans would cheer if the Russians came to save us from the warmongering Democrats and RINOs. Both are just absurd statements. Putin is popular despite the BS from the ISW because he was NOT a Communist, and he was NOT an oligarch. To the Russian people – he was their savior from a corrupt government despite the nonsense that others put out because their assets were seized for illegal trading in Russia. Nobody wanted the opposition to Putin, for they were representing the old world of the USSR that nobody wanted to return to.
Like the Institute for the Study (promotion of) War (ISW), NATO is also an organization that only promotes war; when communism fell in 1991, NATO should have been disbanded or drastically reduced. Instead, it moved eastward, showing it was never about communism. The entire threat was supposed to have been COMMUNISM – not the Russian people as a race. NATO needs to keep the threat of war alive, or they will lose their jobs.
The NEOCON movement really got started because the Communists’ mantra was to spread their economic religion, Marxism, to the world. Marxism so indoctrinated them that they thought this was the way of the future and that it would eliminate the business cycle. Keynes also tried to eliminate the business cycle. This dream of perpetual economic growth and endless deficit spending without ever paying a price down the road.
The New York Times was cheering Stalinism and stressed that this was the solution to the Great Depression. They were promoting Communism as most of the media back them, and they were putting out pure propaganda. It took the New York Times until 1990 to admit that their reporting covered up the truth about Stalin and the massive starvation in an effort, like Schwab, once again, to sell “equality” as our salvation. The New York Times covered up more than 7 million people who died of starvation in the Ukraine famine because it exposed that Communism had failed. The New York Times wrote that their reporting on the Russian Revolution constituted “some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper.” They never revoked his Pulitzer Prize for writing fake news about Stalin.
I strongly recommend you watch the movie “Mr. Jones.” This exposes the TRUE STORY of how the New York Times tried to support Communism in the United States back then, with their top journalist, Walter Duranty (1884-1957), who was their main man in Moscow—the New York Times promoted him to be awarded the Pulitzer Prize for reporting on how Communism was Utopia and our future. When Gareth Jones (1905-1935) reported in March 1933 that this was all a lie, the truth finally began to appear.
This is what we face ONCE AGAIN with mainstream media promoting World War III. They NEVER seem to give 2 cents for the people. This is always about their perceived agenda, as they did with COVID. We need a revolution in mainstream media, which has fallen so far that the vast majority no longer trust anything they report, and this is worldwide.
I reported from my sources that 100,000 Ukrainians had been killed in the first few months. I got the typical hate mail that claimed I was putting out Russian propaganda. My sources were from Ukraine – not Russia. Then Ursula delivered a speech and said 100,000 had already died. Zelinsky had he take that out of her speech, claiming that was CLASSIFIED information.
Trust me, if Zelensky is assassinated, it will be by Ukrainians who have figured out this guy is a puppet and is destroying his own country with a deal to be whisked off to a villa in Miami when the last Ukrainian falls. He is a comedian in high heels with ZERO expertise in military matters. He has suspended all elections because he would never win an election there after what he has done to Ukraine.
Only after more than 500,000 Ukraians are now dead have the press there begun to publish the truth. Borris Johnson flew urgently to Ukraine to ensure that Zelensky would reject any peace deal because the West was using Ukraine to try to weaken Russia so NATO could then move in for the kill. NOBODY ever expected Ukraine to defeat Russia, which had troops that were 10x that of Ukraine, without drafting people. The West has used the Ukrainian people for their objectives. Zelensky was never allowed to negotiate for peace. He was to destroy his own country for a villa in Miami.
We are now approaching that point where Ukraine is on the verge of losing everything. The first cyclical turning point of importance will be April 19/20, 2024. Zelensky has betrayed his own people, and some are starting to wonder if it is not payback for their hatred of Jews.
It was Lazar Kaganovich (1893-1991) who was Stalin’s right-hand man, who proposed and carried out the taking of food from Ukraine that left 7 million dead. The Ukrainians were wrong to blame Russians when Kaganovich was Ukrainian. Behind the facade of propaganda about Russia taking the food, Kaganovich was Jewish and many scholars quietly think he proposed that to also punish the Ukrainians for joining Hitler and exterminating Jews.
Only after becoming president did Zelensky claim publicly to be Jewish, who converted to Christianity, and his children were baptized Christian. Here, he is in an act joking about how they used to confiscate the wealth of Jews and Russians. Some wonder if he is not the 21st Century version of Kaganovich. TRUST ME – If Zelensky is assassinated, it will not be because of Putin. Many people now see him as a traitor to their own people. Even the Neonazis are starting to see he is another Kaganovich.
We are rapidly approaching the point where Ukraine may collapse. This is why Macrone came out and talked about sending in NATO Troops. We are approaching the day when the last Ukrainian is about to fall.
Europe wants war at all costs BECAUSE the financial system is collapsing. They never consolidated their debts, as I warned them that the Euro could not survive long-term without a single national debt. All they accomplished was to transfer the currency risk to the bond markets.
Meanwhile, NATO has changed the terms that the US would approve F16s only to defend Ukraine. NATO says they have permission to fly into Russia to attack anything inside Russia. There is NO HOPE to avoid war without a wholesale change in leadership among ALL Western governments because they now NEED war. There are plenty of people who are just brainwashed and think what the world needs is to destroy Putin. The sanctions did not work, and our computer warned the West that it would lose. This is total insanity.
Others are silently cheering war in hopes of reducing the population, all to reduce CO2.
Nobody seems to think about the future or WHAT IF they are wrong.
Posted originally on Mar 20, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |
The video above is an accurate depiction of how Millennials and Gen Z are operating in today’s economy. They were told that working hard and obtaining a higher education could afford the American Dream. Instead, they are unable to access home ownership, begin families, and are crippled by debt. Analysts now seem perplexed at the birthrate crisis and why the younger generations are not having families. Those unfamiliar with stark differences in the cost of living over the last few decades do not understand that the promises made to the younger generations were built on lies.
The ad above was put forth by Coinbase, and while I have explained that crypto is NOT the solution, I do believe the solution will begin when the younger generations rise up. Those in Congress will not live to see the implications of the bills they pass. Once upon a time, a family could live comfortably on a salary of one. The head of the household need not have an extravagant job to support a family, as a worker at a factory could manage to supply his family with all they needed.
Even in 1985, when the average person in the Baby Boomer generation turned 30, the average home in America was $82,800. In 2019, when Millennials turned 30, the average home price soared to $313,000. Gen Z is looking at a home price over $400,000. Now, the average income in the 1980s was around $23,464, meaning it would only take a few years to pay off a home that continued to appreciate in value. Yet we must factor in everything such as the price of tuition, inflation (goods, food, energy), the need for dual income and childcare services. There are endless variables but it all leads to a dead-end American dream for the youth.
This year, 2024, begins a sharp change in sentiments and a directional change followed by a major turning point in 2025. I have not seen the computer project something like this since 1985. Four of six models show a Trump victory, but the establishment simply will not let him win. Neither side will accept defeat, and we are looking at massive civil unrest paired with a war that will likely escalate over the summer months prior to the election that may be the last election held in the US. The computer shows real GDP in the US will decline into 2028, and inflation will rise due to international wars that produce absolutely nothing.
The Great Reset set for 2030 is NOT the solution, and their plan will fail. The world will change by 2032, but not due to the Great Reset. We are looking at the collapse of republican forms of government. By the time we get to 2032, that will be the light at the end of the tunnel. The USA will eventually break into three primary regions: 2) the South & Midwest Bible Belt will join together against, 2) the Northeast, and 3) the Pacific States will be their own la-la-land. The volatility will begin in 2024, but by 2032, the United States of America will not exist as it does today. The dollar will no longer be the reserve currency, as the yen will take its place. This does not mean that the world is ending, but rather, revolution is coming as the current system is collapsing before our eyes.
Attached is a PDF file that is explaining how we have gotten to the point that a Third World War is very likely. The blame for this resides in Klaus Schwab who created the World Economic Form (WEF) in 1971. Schwab has written two books on his theories which are a cross on Marxism and Technocracy which will be explained in the attached paper. His first book published in 2016 was The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the second published in 2020 was COVID-19: The Great Reset. In this book Klaus has the help of Thierry Malleret a French economist. Klaus and is associates have since 1971 has taken over the European Union (EU) as his followers now hold most if not all key EU positions.
Klaus and his supporters believe that only “technical” people are capable of ruling us. Because only people with degrees in science, engineering economics and medicine to name a few and the intelligence and know how to properly rule us. His long term goal is Trans-humanism, which is the belief that “WE” can be uploaded into an danced computer and therefor live forever. I have background in the fields need to do this if it was possible and my option is Klaus is dreaming. The attached book is a free download and the one that is attached here is a “Version 01” and there will be new uploads of this book as justified by new data and research.
The image below reflects the world that Klaus wants to create. As you can see he lives in the Utopian upper city and we live in the Primitive Serf/slave lower city.
This is the world that the world elites want to make!
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 