Armstrong Economics Blog/medicine Re-Posted Aug 27, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Perhaps you will recall the early claims that there was a link between the lab in Canada and Wuhan, which were immediately called a conspiracy theory so they do not have to answer them. The samples of the first version of COVID match what was created in the National Microbiology Laboratory in Canada. Also buried deep in the story is that the scientist Dr. Frank Plummer was the director of Canada’s National Microbiology Lab, to whom the Gates Foundation handed a grant of $8.3 million. He died in Kenya weeks after the official start of the 2019 coronavirus outbreak on February 4, 2020, which happened weeks after a Gates Foundation simulation of a coronavirus outbreak.

As the story goes, Frank Plummer was the one who acquired the SARS coronavirus sample from an alleged Saudi patient at the NML Winnipeg Lab from Ron Fouchier, who was a leading virologist at the Erasmus Medical Center (EMC) in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. He was said to have been sent the virus by Egyptian virologist Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki who isolated and identified a previously unknown type of coronavirus from the Saudi patient’s lungs. Allegedly, Fouchier sequenced the virus from that sample sent by Zaki. This was the coronavirus sample that arrived at Canada’s NML Winnipeg facility on May 4, 2013. It was said that Frank Plummer is the one who received the sample. The Canadian lab grew and stocked the virus and used it to assess diagnostic tests being used in Canada. Winnipeg scientists worked to see which animal species could be infected with the new virus.

While the allegation has been that the National Microbiology Laboratory was targeted by Chinese agents in what could be termed as biological espionage, the claim that the virus was stolen from the Canadian lab by a Chinese biowarfare agent Xiangguo Qiu and her colleagues have sought to pin the blame on China. If this was the source that was smuggled to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the conspiracy claim that it was the Chinese who weaponized and leaked the virus does not jive with the sources I have who knew in advance that the virus was coming, all of which had nothing to do with a deliberate act by China.

Supposedly Alexander Kagansky, a Russian working on the virus, was allegedly stabbed and thrown from the window of his 14th floor flat. In Pennsylvania, Professor Bing Liu of the University of Pittsburgh was on the verge of a breakthrough in a scientific understanding of the new coronavirus but was shot dead. Then a World Health Organization (WHO) driver carrying coronavirus samples was shot dead in Myanmar. The WHO vehicle was carrying coronavirus test samples when it came under attack. The WHO confirmed that Pyae Sone Win Maung died of his injuries from the attack. Reuters reported that the vehicle had come under gunfire. Why attack a van carrying COVID samples?

Then there is the mysterious co-incidental death of all four African heads of state who spoke out against the COVID lockdowns and experimental vaccines. Very strange for so many people to be dying who opposed or perhaps had evidence against the narrative. Naturally, it is always a conspiracy theory, so the mainstream press need not waste its time to investigate anything.

Emails that have emerged show that a statement in The Lancet authored by 27 prominent public health scientists condemning “conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin” was organized by employees of EcoHealth Alliance, which is a non-profit group that just so happened to have received millions of dollars of US taxpayer funding to genetically manipulate coronaviruses with scientists at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Talk about conflicts of interest! Peter Daszak is the President of EcoHealth Alliance, and he sent nearly $600,000 to Wuhan, which is alleged to have been the source.

Ron Fouchier has admitted to creating killer viruses at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam to see what would happen if the H5N1 bird flu virus mutated and had the ability to spread in mammals. His involvement in COVID and Frank Plummer has also been avoided in any investigation. Why these people want to create such dangerous viruses to see what MIGHT happen in the real world is like the story of Dr. Frankenstein — they want to see if they could replace God in creation.

Interestingly, the earliest samples from early Wuhan COVID-19 patients show the presence of genetically modified henipah virus, which is one of the two types of viruses sent to China from the Canadian laboratory that was run by the conveniently now-dead Frank Plummer. They cannot swear that this virus discovered in the Chinese samples comes from the Canadian lab back in late March 2019. I maintain that this was a deliberate leak and it WAS NOT by the Chinese. If China wanted to unleash a biological weapon, they could easily target a specific gene sequence that would eliminate even a specific ethnic group. This is a standard coronavirus that resides in animals and will NEVER be eliminated. It is a respiratory virus and that will kill similar people who would have died because of the flu.

Therefore, there was NO strategic advantage to China release such a virus. They would never have anticipated the insane lockdown and deliberate intentional destruction of the Western economy. It was the Great reset which was a slogan already prepared and talked about in January 2019 at Davos. It was March 2019 when this COVID agenda began. The Green Climate Fund of the United Nations on April 10, 2020, had sprung into immediate action telling the world to use COVID to redesign the world:

While COVID-19 is causing untold suffering, the international response to this unprecedented health crisis in modern times offers an opportunity to direct finances towards bolstering climate action. GCF will continue to make critical investments in climate-resilient water resource management, health care facilities, agriculture and livelihoods – all of which are essential to subduing and overcoming the pandemic. Similarly, we will step up our efforts to catalyse green investment to relaunch economies on low-emission, climate-resilient trajectories. 

China has come out and threatened retaliation over blaming them for this COVID. All you have to do is follow the money trail and this leads to the World Economic Forum, United Nations, and the Gates Foundation. They all have gained substantially from COVID — not the Chinese. Because China has rejected the Great Reset and handing its sovereignty to Schwab’s United Nations proxy, it appears that they are deliberately trying to create war (1) to reduce the populations, and (2) they actually think that they can compel Russia and China to surrender to this global dictatorship.

The fact that mainstream media is behind this effort should be no surprise. It was not just the New York Times who was the champion of Stalin and believed that Communism was the answer to the Great Depression back in the 1930s, but going back further and the Spanish-American war was deliberately created by the press to simply sell more papers.

The Pulitzer prize was created because he was the real father of fake news and he left his fortune to create a prize to pretend he was a good journalist who did not engage in yellow journalism,