Tag Archives: White privilege

Oct 18 2020

CNN Butchers the Facts on Late-Term Abortions


Re-Posted from Just Facts Daily By James D. Agresti October 12, 2020

In a so-called “fact check” of the vice-presidential debate between Mike Pence and Kamala Harris, CNN reporter Caroline Kelly presents a barrage of disinformation that hides the realities of late-term abortion and the agenda of the Biden–Harris campaign.

During the debate, Pence stated that “Joe Biden and Kamala Harris support taxpayer funding of abortion all the way up to the moment of birth, late-term abortion.” CNN, which begins each of its fact checks with the phrase “Facts First,” uses a flurry of falsehoods to undercut Pence’s factual statement.

The “Medical Term” Farce

CNN begins its fact check with an attempt to delegitimize the phrase “late-term” abortion by declaring it “is not a medical term.” This claim is flatly disproven by medical journals that have published articles with titles like:

These medical journals and others, along with Planned Parenthood, abortion clinics, and media outlets have used the phrase “late-term” on numerous occasions to describe abortions that are performed from as few as 14 weeks into pregnancy to as many as 35 weeks or later.

More importantly, a vice-presidential debate is not a medical forum, CNN is not a medical periodical, and journalism guidelines bluntly instruct reporters to avoid medical jargon:

  • The book English for Journalists emphasizes: “A common source of jargon is scientific, medical, government and legal handouts,” and “if you write for a newspaper or general magazine you should try to translate jargon into ordinary English whenever you can.”
  • The New Oxford Guide to Writing states: “Jargon is technical language misused. Technical language, the precise diction demanded by any specialized trade or profession, is necessary when experts communicate with one another. It becomes jargon when it is applied outside the limits of technical discourse.”
  • The book Writing for Journalists drives home the point: “Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.”

In violation of that journalism standard, journalists selectively use medical jargon in ways that obscure the facts that:

A common example of how media outlets use clinical jargon to sanitize the facts of abortion is by inconsistently and incorrectly using the word “fetus,” a medical term derived from a Latin word meaning “offspring” or “newly delivered.” Reporters frequently use this term to describe the object of an abortion, but they use the word “mother” to refer to a pregnant woman instead of the clinically accurate term, “gravida.”

And when the topic is not abortion, journalists often shun the word “fetus” and use “baby” or “child” in its place. In fact, the ombudsman of the Boston Globe once apologized to its readers because the paper used the term “fetus” to describe an unborn child who was killed when his mother was shot in the stomach. The apology was sparked by a torrent of criticism from readers who objected that the Globe “truly dehumanized” the “child” and that “every other news channel, TV, and newspaper called it a baby.”

Beyond their double standards, reporters often misuse the term “fetus,” revealing that they are out of their depth. Per Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary, a fetus is “the unborn offspring in the postembryonic period, after major structures have been outlined, in humans from nine weeks after fertilization until birth.” Simply put, the word “fetus” applies from nine weeks after fertilization until birth. Yet, numerous major news organizations have misapplied this term to both before and after this period.

Late-Term Abortions Are Not Rare

According to CNN, “Doctors say abortions performed later in pregnancy are exceptionally rare.” In truth, late-term abortions are far more common than deaths that the media portrays as frequent occurrences like firearm homicides, young adult Covid-19 fatalities, and murders committed by police officers.

A 2013 paper in the journal Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health estimates that “more than 15,000” abortions are performed each year in the U.S. “at 21 weeks or later.” The authors note that this amounts to about 1% of all abortions, “but given an estimated 1.21 million abortions in the United States annually,” “later abortions” add up to “a substantial number of abortions.”

Hence, these “exceptionally rare” late-term abortions are more numerous than the:

  • 12,000 murders per year committed with guns.
  • 6,000 Covid-19-related deaths of people under the age of 45.
  • 50 people per year who are executed under the death penalty.
  • 7 police officers per year who are arrested for murder or manslaughter in an on-duty shooting, and the 1–2 officers who are ultimately convicted of such crimes.

Most Late-Term Abortions Are Not for Medical Reasons

CNN claims that “abortions performed later in pregnancy” are “often” because “of a fetal condition that can’t be treated or in cases of maternal health endangerment.” This is a common talking point of abortion proponents, but the disclosures of abortion providers reveal just the opposite:

  • Martin Haskell, who is credited with inventing the partial-birth abortion procedure stated, “I’ll be quite frank: most of my abortions are elective in that 20-24 week range…. In my particular case, probably 20% are for genetic reasons. And the other 80% are purely elective.”
  • Renee Chelian, president of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, said of late-term abortions, “The spin out of Washington was that it was only done for medical necessity, even though we knew it wasn’t so.”
  • Doctors at two New Jersey abortion clinics independently revealed that each of their clinics was performing roughly 3,000 late-term abortions per year and nearly all of them were elective and not for medical reasons.
  • Ron Fitzsimmons, executive director of the National Coalition of Abortion Providers, stated that late-term abortion are “primarily done on healthy women and healthy fetuses.”

The statements above are corroborated by a study conducted by the Guttmacher Institute—a research organization whose “Guiding Principles” include support for legalized abortion. As summarized by the New York Times, the study found that “only 2 percent of abortions done after 16 weeks of pregnancy are done because of fetal abnormalities,” and such abortions are “most often performed to end healthy pregnancies because the woman arrived relatively late to her decision to abort.”

Biden and Harris Support Taxpayer Funding of Abortion Up Till Birth

According to CNN, Pence’s statement about Biden and Harris is “partially misleading and partially false” because “a Biden campaign official told CNN that Biden supports Roe v. Wade—the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion nationwide, as amended by Planned Parenthood v. Casey.”

However, the plain words of those court decisions prove that Pence’s statement is entirely accurate. This is because these rulings prohibit states from banning abortions at any stage of pregnancy if any abortionist claims it is for “the health of the mother.”

Importantly, Roe defines threats to a mother’s health so broadly that they can include practically anything. Some eye-opening examples of what Roe deems to be hazardous to “health” are the work of “child care,” the “stigma of unwed motherhood,” and “the distress” of parenting “an unwanted child.”

In Casey, the Supreme Court ruled that “Roe’s essential holding be retained and reaffirmed,” including “a confirmation of the State’s power to restrict abortions after viability, if the law contains exceptions for pregnancies endangering a woman’s life or health.”

Furthermore, Roe places all decisions about what constitutes “health” into the hands of abortionists. It does this by mandating that Roe “be read together” with Doe v. Bolton, a companion case that the Supreme Court issued on the same day. In Doe, the Court ruled that all abortion providers have full authority to decide if an abortion is necessary to protect a woman’s “health” based solely on their “best clinical judgment.”

Many states have passed laws that defy Roe and Casey, and Biden and Harris say that they will overturn all of them through a federal law that codifies Roe. They also support “repealing the Hyde Amendment,” which has restricted taxpayer funding of abortion for more than 40 years except in cases of rape, incest, and if the life of the mother is endangered.

CNN also alleges without evidence that “no candidate in either political party supports abortion ‘up to the moment of birth’,” but the fact is that Democrats blocked a bill in 2019 that would have required healthcare providers to “preserve the life and health” of children who are aborted and born alive. Harris was among the 42 Democrats who filibustered this bill in the Senate.

Summary

During the vice presidential debate, Mike Pence accurately and straightforwardly described the positions of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden on late-term abortions, noting that they support such abortions up to birth and want them funded by taxpayers.

Yet, CNN deceitfully claimed his statement is misleading in an article that it titled “Pence Echoes Trump’s False Claims at Vice Presidential Debate.” Furthermore, CNN laced its “fact check” with other canards that hide the harsh realities of late-term abortion and the fact that they are performed more than 10,000 times per year on healthy, conscious humans with healthy mothers.Share the Data

Oct 17 2020

The End of Free Speech


Facebook is zipping closed free speech

Had enough? It’s time to push back- if we don’t resist and push back BIG Tech will roll over us and our freedom will be lost forever!

Oct 17 2020

Klaus Schwab – The New Karl Marx Destined to Kill Hundreds of Millions


Armstrong Economics Blog/Socialist Re-Posted on Oct 16, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

The New York Times cheered Stalin and constantly reported that this was the way to the future. They are supporting once again this move to a Marxist Utopia. The New York Times hid the truth about Stalin. His great economic miracle was achieved by taking all the food from Ukraine to pretend Communism was working in Russia causing over 7 million to starve to death.

Blog/Socialist

Posted Oct 16, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Video Player00:0000:52

So many people are really just ignorant. They think this election is about picking Trump v Biden. They are clueless because mainstream media is once again supporting this agenda of the Great Reset. Listen carefully to Schwab’s words. He expressly states “equality” which is the dream which began with Karl Marx.

The New York Times cheered Stalin and constantly reported that this was the way to the future. They are supporting once again this move to a Marxist Utopia. The New York Times hid the truth about Stalin. His great economic miracle was achieved by taking all the food from Ukraine to pretend Communism was working in Russia causing over 7 million to starve to death.

I strongly recommend you watch the movie Mr. Jones. This exposes the TRUE STORY of how the New York Times tried to support Communism in the United States back then, with their top journalist, Walter Duranty (1884-1957), who was their main man in Moscow. The New York Times promoted him to be awarded the Pulitzer Prize for that reporting on how Communism was Utopia and our future. When Gareth Jones (1905-1935) in March 1933 reported this was all a lie, the truth finally began to appear.

It took the New York Times until 1990 to admit to that their reporting which covered up the truth about Stalin and the massive starvation in an effort, like Schwab, once again selling “equality” as our salvation. The New York Times covered up the more than 7 million people who died of starvation in the Ukraine famine. The New York Times wrote that their reporting on the Russian Revolution constituted “some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper.” They never revoked his Pultizer Prize for writing fake news about Stalin.

It was the New York Times’ Walter Duranty who also met with Franklin Roosevelt and supported the move toward Marxism in the United States as the “New Deal”. It was the New York Times’ Duranty that helped install drastic progressiveness in taxation in the United States following Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. This is precisely what Schwab is proposing with “equality” in league with his buddy, Thomas Piketty.

https://videopress.com/v/RC3hGoft?preloadContent=metadata

Blog/Socialist

Posted Oct 16, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Video Player

So many people are really just ignorant. They think this election is about picking Trump v Biden. They are clueless because mainstream media is once again supporting this agenda of the Great Reset. Listen carefully to Schwab’s words. He expressly states “equality” which is the dream which began with Karl Marx.

The New York Times cheered Stalin and constantly reported that this was the way to the future. They are supporting once again this move to a Marxist Utopia. The New York Times hid the truth about Stalin. His great economic miracle was achieved by taking all the food from Ukraine to pretend Communism was working in Russia causing over 7 million to starve to death.

I strongly recommend you watch the movie Mr. Jones. This exposes the TRUE STORY of how the New York Times tried to support Communism in the United States back then, with their top journalist, Walter Duranty (1884-1957), who was their main man in Moscow. The New York Times promoted him to be awarded the Pulitzer Prize for that reporting on how Communism was Utopia and our future. When Gareth Jones (1905-1935) in March 1933 reported this was all a lie, the truth finally began to appear.

It took the New York Times until 1990 to admit to that their reporting which covered up the truth about Stalin and the massive starvation in an effort, like Schwab, once again selling “equality” as our salvation. The New York Times covered up the more than 7 million people who died of starvation in the Ukraine famine. The New York Times wrote that their reporting on the Russian Revolution constituted “some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper.” They never revoked his Pultizer Prize for writing fake news about Stalin.

It was the New York Times’ Walter Duranty who also met with Franklin Roosevelt and supported the move toward Marxism in the United States as the “New Deal”. It was the New York Times’ Duranty that helped install drastic progressiveness in taxation in the United States following Marx, Lenin, and Stalin. This is precisely what Schwab is proposing with “equality” in league with his buddy, Thomas Piketty.Video Player

Anyone who thinks this is an election of just Democrat v Republican is a fool. There is a serious agenda behind these lockdowns and they have been intended to prevent commuters and to crush the world economy. Even Australia rules out international travel at least until the end of 2021. All of this is to reduce air travel to reduce CO2. This is the real agenda that Schwab has been selling behind the curtain. He will probably go down in history surpassing the death toll of Karl Marx. His lockdowns have already reduced the food supply and this raises the prospect of famine coming into play by 2022.

Oct 16 2020

Biden’s Bodyguards


This has got to Stop or we have Lost our Country

Hard core tyranny has arrived in the United States. Thanks to the coup-minded Democrats, it has been creeping up on us after Trump was elected president. Now we have full-on Chinese-style stifling of free speech. Congress and the Deep State Swamp are complicit and have done nothing to protect our First Amendment.

Try using Google to find a story deemed ‘politically incorrect’ by the Swamp. You will be redirected to their own narrative that they deem factual. It’s the same with science. You are only allowed to know the data from the scientists of their choosing. Facebook won’t allow anything else to be posted on their platform.

Twitter has banned the New York Post after that publication revealed smoking gun details of Hunter Biden’s Ukraine graft involving his father. Censoring real journalism is a disgrace.

All speech should be free. People are allowed to express hatred. Dirty books should be allowed to be sold at smut shops. But political speech is the most important. It’s paramount and yet it’s going away on social media, aided and abetted by our own government and tax dollars. The CIA helped Facebook get started. They worked with Zuckerberg because they knew such a platform would provide them with a honeypot of private information. The CIA has gone rogue. It has been corrupted (perhaps inevitably) by power-mad operatives just as those running the FBI are corrupt. Now our social media has succumbed to the same kind of tyranny.

Don’t like it? Start your own Facebook. Or Twitter. Or Google. That’s what we’re told, anyway. Most of us do not have a few billion dollars handy to do it. We may as well be told to start our own CIA or FBI. Why not start our own Federal Reserve? The other independent social media platforms that have tried to offer free speech will eventually succumb to tyrannical control. They will be bought out, shut down, or sued into bankruptcy.

We live in a new, high-tech age and social media have become our town square. It shouldn’t be turned into ‘Red Square” by the globo-socialists.

—Ben Garrison

Oct 15 2020

By Pillorying Trump, Democrats Ended Up Creating The Ultimate Underdog


The Hollywood, Democrat-media gang-up may remain impervious to their own self-destruction, but the watching world is not

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Judi McLeod —— Bio and Archives—October 14, 2020

Even in the midst of Government Mandatory Lock Down, with some people fearful they will contract Covid-19 from their own relatives, others are beginning to hear the still haunting strains of Bill Conti’s masterful ‘’Gonna’ Fly Now’ ‘Rocky’ theme.

Lost on self-centred arrogant Democrats: Just about everyone loves an Underdog—particularly Underdogs repeatedly targeted by a Democrat-media gang-up.

Deranged Democrats with the help of Hollywood and their running dog media have thrown everything except the proverbial kitchen sink at President Donald John Trump over the past four years.

Every vile smear has ricocheted back to home base, home base being the DEMOCRAT PARTY

Every vile smear from the early-day Stormy Daniels one,  through RussiaGate and Impeachment, all the way to the most recent attempt to frame the President of the United States as the world’s top Covid-19 infector has ricocheted back to home base, home base being the DEMOCRAT PARTY.

Giddy with the prospect of getting back into power, confident that Michelle Obama’s Mail-in Vote will give them enough votes for a Biden-Harris win; self-assured that now they got away with it once, they can lock down the whole country anytime they want, Democrats of our day have convinced themselves that NO ONE can stop them.

With no social distancing restrictions that apply to them, they’re already planning Election Night Whoopee! Parties and fireworks.  It’s only a matter of time they think before they can lay a laurel wreath on the befuddled head of Joe Biden, knowing it wont’t be long before they can knock it off and crown Sen. Kamala Harris as their long-awaited First woman U.S. president.

To the victor go the spoils, in this case, soils.  Democrats don’t have to worry about patriot insurrection, their BLM/Anita street mobs will take care of that.https://www.youtube.com/embed/KPhqU–Mq1A

But it I will take more than a Socialist Village to bury the landslide vote for President Trump

The yahooing and partying will continue as long as it takes to count the vote.

On Election Night, the media—including Fox News ,home of Chris Wallace—will spread the Fake News that Donald Trump is a goner.

Squeals of joy will erupt over the fruited plains on Election Night., from which Hillary Clinton can be heard barking like a dog.

But it I will take more than a Socialist Village to bury the landslide vote for President Trump.

The Democrat-media gang-up are truthfully and tragically unaware that their entire 2020 election strategy has already started to backfire on them: their hate spewing, name calling and attempted character-assassination of a duly elected President has, in the end,  made him The Underdog.

It’s part of human nature that the masses love underdogs.

Not only are the hundreds of thousands who line up to see their president, hundreds of boat and car parades a testament to that, but now Hillary’s “deplorables” are spontaneously chanting to Trump, “We love you!”

President Donald Trump could be the most beloved underdog in all history

President Donald Trump could be the most beloved underdog in all history.

And the epic story doesn’t end there:

What will the seriously disgruntled do when realization hits home that Barack, Michelle Obama, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Company were on a track whose strategies proved useless; that it was mostly just the Democrats, Hollywood and media who hated Trump while We the People went on loving him?

Just for starters:

Welcome to a new 2020 Hollywood,  where not just Covid-19 keeps fans in darkened theatres from watching Hollywood heroes and heart throbs in mostly empty rows of seats.

Hollywood’s going bankrupt and is selling out to Communist China.

People are not willing to pay for Politics masquerading as Sports anymore as in football, basketball and baseball.

The whole world’s going bankrupt and will continue to do so as long as Lock Downs keep people from getting back to family-supporting jobs.

The Hollywood, Democrat-media gang-up may remain impervious to their own self-destruction, but the watching world is not.

Even though the masses may have to wait days, weeks or even months for news that Donald Trump won on Election Night, millions will get to say, ‘Welcome back to the Oval Office, PRESIDENT Donald Trump and call 2020 as ‘The Year of the Underdog’.

This is the Real News we’ll all be waiting for— no matter how long it takes because at the end of the day we know that “Patience gains all things!”

Oct 15 2020

Election 2020: Benign Popular Uprising Success?


Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Bob Hoye —— Bio and Archives—October 14, 2020

Politically, there have been essentially two kinds of uprisings. Each prompted by widespread dissatisfaction and hardship. One restores freedom and economic success. The opposite has been malignant revolutions; exampled by brutal dictatorships in France in the late 1700s and in Russia beginning in the early 1900s. In these, neurotic intellectuals turned existing dissatisfaction unto bloody horror shows and bureaucratic tyrannies.

Extraordinary attempt by control freaks to destroy a constitutional republic in order to impose authoritarian government

Taking advantage of crisis is not new, and there is more to the pattern.

In Europe, on every authoritarian experiment, the governing classes granted themselves the privilege of state murder.

Since 2016, America’s Left has been using every arrow in its quiver to bring down an elected president. In startling contrast, it now has the audacity to accuse Trump of possibly blocking the next transfer of power.

The most recent successful benign uprising occurred in 1989 when ordinary folk who were unarmed took on an armed and murderous police state. The symbol was bringing down the Berlin Wall, when controlling swamp critters suddenly lost the will to impose authority.

Suggesting hope for the current struggle for freedom.

Another example was England’s “Glorious Revolution” of 1688, which took down the last absolutist king. He had threatened to use French troops (globalism) in England. Seeing the political tide turning against him, King James reluctantly sought authoritarian solace in France.

Regrettably, the past few decades have recorded an extraordinary attempt by control freaks to destroy a constitutional republic in order to impose authoritarian government. This has now become so intense as to inspire another benign popular uprising. Which shocked the establishment in 2016.

More recently, Venezuela has been controlled to destitution

Will reform again be successful in November?

In order to remove any ambiguity of political banners such as Democrat or Republican, Bernieism or Bidenism, physics provides a practical definition of a totalitarian system.

“That which is not compulsory is prohibited.”

Which elegantly covers every political ambition from Communism to schoolboards. And, sadly, such ambition is now using any excuse to overwhelm constitutional norms. Bad weather and another influenza are caused by too many politically incorrect people.

The economic shutdown is the most severe since the 1930s famines when Bolsheviks forced Lysenkoism upon Russia’s agriculture.

More recently, Venezuela has been controlled to destitution.

The point to be made that in full fury authoritarians don’t care how much hardship they create, just so long as they are in control. Personal ambition that thrives on disasters it causes. And the governing classes have become, well, ungovernable.  But living well.

China’s revolution in the 1960s was guided by Mao’s “Great Leap Forward”. In 2011, Obama boasted about his form of community organization whereby “activist government could also be smart government”. The wonders of activism have been evident in Portland and other Democrat cities.

Soviet troops, tanks and machine guns put each attempt at reform down. Murderously

“Smart” is waiting discovery.

Obviously, the Left’s blatant ambition is causing shocking unemployment. With enough dissatisfaction to prompt an exceptional exodus from city-cores being ruined by Democrat activists. That some are voting with their feet and if these political refugees don’t take their socialist votes with them, they could become part of the reform movement.  Without the dislocation of moving, an easier step is to break the spell and vote for reform.

Has the seemingly endless intrusion of in-your-face and in-your-wallet government become damaging enough to inspire another success by the benign popular uprising?

As reviewed above, these have included breathtaking reforms in 1989 and in 1688. Tragically, some benign uprisings were brutally quelled. Examples include East Germany in 1953, Hungary in 1956 and the one with the most hope was the “Prague Spring” of 1968.

Soviet troops, tanks and machine guns put each attempt at reform down. Murderously.

This was one of the points in American Spring published by this writer on July 2, 2016. The rhetorical question about an “American Spring” being quelled brutally as in Prague was rejected. But the attempt to overwhelm America’s constitutional regard for freedom and limited government has been staggering. Even becoming fanatical in using any ploy to depose an elected president.

Quite likely the equivalent has been unseen in some 200 years of parliamentary history in America, Canada or England.

Left, in all its apparitions, has gone berserk

Another question in the 2016 article asked about the likelihood of Trump winning and the answer was in “Flyover” vernacular – “You bet!”.

And the Left, in all its apparitions, has gone berserk. Hitherto, intruding authoritarians suffered little popular opposition. But since being hit by a widespread “No!” the Left has been thrashing around in a tantrum usually limited to four-year-old-children.

Moreover, the intrusion using weather and influenza fears has been the most radical in the senior economy since the last great experiment in authoritarian government in the 1500s. However, by the early 1600s in England statist intrusion became altogether too much with popular opinion eventually accomplishing a great reformation. 

Lately, the Left’s ambition seems similar to the early stages of the French or Russian Revolutions. Which is dangerous. Perhaps this is again becoming “too much”, inspiring another successful phase of the benign popular uprising. Will it be strong and soon enough to win the presidency?

In January this seemed probable, but the use of the Wuhan Flu in imposing authority has been remarkable. Dems are also using the contrived crisis to corrupt voting.

Left’s urgent mission prohibits criticism and debate, while obedience to dogma is compulsory

So, it comes down to having enough ordinary folk seeing through the gaming of fear and the rigging of the electoral system to prevail. Hitherto, elections in the two party system provided middle-of-the-road platforms. Issues were debated.

But now the Left’s urgent mission prohibits criticism and debate, while obedience to dogma is compulsory. With opposition being banned a Democratic win would end America as a constitutional republic—a political tragedy.

On the longer term, previous benign uprisings advanced when the experiment in unlimited government literally destroyed the economy. Which prompted a great reform of, as the Brits called it in the early 1600s, “Tyrannical Duncery”.

Too much of the latter is being imposed these days, but history suggests that another great reformation is underway.

Oct 15 2020

Schwab is Finally Starting to be Noticed


Armstrong Econonomics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Oct 15, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Oct 15 2020

Twitter & Facebook Censoring the Truth


Armstrong Economics Blog/Censorship Re-Posted Oct 15, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; You went from the most renowned economist in the world to a conspiracy theorist and now you are being regarded as the guy who really had the sources about the virus. Your sources about Russia and Ukraine turned out to be true. Your career is a cycle in itself. It has taught me that other sites like ___ ___who used to quote you and stopped are not worth my trust anymore. They seem to have an agenda. What’s next? You say these guys will not win. Do you have a timeframe?

Thank you for being straight when others are not

BK

ANSWER: It has been a campaign against anyone who questioned the virus narrative. I am not sure this particular site you mentioned specifically stopped quoting me because of COVID. It was probably because they are married to gold and inflation and, like YouTube, they do not want to quote people they disagree with. That is dangerous because they then become no different than what we see with COVID censorship. So, I don’t think they are conspiring because of COVID. They just sell the gold agenda and refuse to look at the possibility of what they have been saying has been the standard sales pitch since 1971. There are some sites pretending to be analysts but are being paid to take a particular view covertly. I do not believe they are one of those. Just a difference of opinion and philosophy.

Now that aside, we began picking up the unusual activity in capital flows in August 2019. By December our sources were talking about a virus and there was selling from key players that was very unusual. By January our sources were saying they were using our model to time the sale – January 18, 2020. By February, they were bragging about selling the high but saying at first they did not want to be greedy so that is why they sold. But they sold bonds as well so that was showing there was a deep concern that government debt would get in trouble – not the standard flight to quality. This time it was just to cash.

The economic damage is far greater than anyone expected. The powers in central banks are now scared to death about what happens when restrictions are lifted. So many lower-income people have lost their jobs. They have been forced into even greater poverty. We do not see the labor market coming back until the next turn in 2022. There will be food shortages that expand and we will see prices rise because of SHORTAGES rather than a booming demand from a robust economy.

Trump will probably win the in-person vote, so behind the curtain, they are focusing on trying to win the Senate. They need that to try to curb the investigation into the massive level of corruption.

Still, that said, some states like New Jersey are so corrupt they will NOT allow in-person voting. Everyone has to do the mail-in ballots. There will be no booth voting so there is no way they will have a count by November 3rd. This is part of the plan to be in a position to challenge the election to prevent a Trump victory at all costs. Between November into January, this will get nuts.

These real conspirators pulling the strings behind the curtain need Biden to win. This is about the Great Reset. I know what I am talking about. This is really an all-out war for the future. It’s not that Trump is a fantastic person. This is about he is simply standing in the way against these people who are out to steal our future. Anyone who votes for Biden blindly will be no different than the Russian who thought communism would bring Utopia. They suddenly discovered the only way to oppress the rich was that they too had to be oppressed and surrender all their rights.

The high tech companies are all in with Biden. Both Facebook and Twitter removed the New Your Post because it was against Biden. I personally have had enough of these companies. They have no right to censor the news. They are trying to turn the country into Communist Russia. Free Speech means I may not agree with the left, but they have an ABSOLUTE right to freely speak their position. They are lucky I am not President. I would revoke their licenses and investigate if they have been acting covertly with political entities to reshape the news. That to me is treason against everything the people are entitled to.  I do not agree with Hillary, but she has a right to speak. That is what freedom is all about.

As another reader wrote:COMMENT: Dear Marty,please watch this play in three acts unfold. Not even Sophokles or Shakespeare could have written it better.Kind regards,MichaelTwitter’s public policy chief departs to join Joe Biden’s transition teamhttps://nypost.com/2020/09/18/twitters-public-policy-chief-leaves-for-biden-transition-team/Smoking-gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to VP dadhttps://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/Twitter Blocks Users From Linking To The New York Post’s Bombshell Hunter Biden Reporthttps://thefederalist.com/2020/10/14/twitter-blocks-users-from-linking-to-the-new-york-posts-bombshell-hunter-biden-report/

Oct 15 2020

Leonardo DiCaprio is in League with Bill Gates


Armstrong Economics Blog/Conspiracy Re-Posted Oct 15, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Here we have yet another person pushing the climate change agenda who also has no scientific background to question the very words he is speaking. This is not a movie script to read. He too is trying to use his star-status to force people to lose their jobs and has been also a speaker at Schwab’s World Economic Forum in Davos. This has been the agenda and they are pushing this on world leaders bypassing any democratic process. For these people see us as the great unwashed and we are too stupid to understand what they so brilliantly have come to understand.

Oct 14 2020

Only Australia’s Sky News is Defending the People Against Schwab


Armstrong Economics Blog/Conspiracy Re-Posted Oct 14, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

Mainstream media is still desperately acting like the Nazis at Nuremberg — I was just following orders. ONLY Sky News in Australia has the guts to call out these people for what they are. Klaus Schwab and his academic dreams of reordering the world have to be exposed. A CLASS ACTION lawsuit should be filed against Schwab and his World Economic Forum; subpoena all the financial records and internal notes, and DO IT QUICKLY before he and others destroy them. Schwab’s arrogance has created over 300 million unemployed and he has been instrumental in advising world leaders to destroy their economies.

The World Economic Forum is a leftist organization and they are using their influence. They knew this virus was coming. Within weeks, he was standing by with his Great Reset. That lawsuit needs to be filed in the USA and it MUST NOT be in the Southern District of New York. That is the most corrupt court in the country and they will protect Schwab along with all the bankers that they are notorious for protecting.

The mainstream press really should be sued and put out of business for deliberately engaging in propaganda against both the people and furthering Soros’s One World Government. ABC, CDS, NBC, and CNN, along with the Washington Post, and the New York Times have deliberately pushed this virus into scare tactics to further Schwab’s Great Reset. We seriously need the Fairness Doctrine restored whereby ALL media must present both sides. They are a disgrace to the very spirit of free speech. So many people lost everything because of these people.