Posted originally on Oct 18, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
The European Union is beginning to change its stance on its open border policy. Over 1.14 million sought asylum in the EU last year, a completely unsustainable population spike. European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has faced harsh criticism from member states throughout the bloc who are calling upon Brussels to address the situation. Von der Leyen has now expressed interest in creating “return hubs” to house and deport migrants whose applications are denied.
I reported that Italy saw a 64% reduction in illegal migration under President Giorgia Meloni, who promised to curb immigration once elected. Instead of building shelters to house migrants with taxpayer funds, Meloni sought to build detention centers. Centri di Permanenza per il Rimpatrio (CPRs) or Repatriation Centers were extremely controversial but effective. Thousands of migrants were detained and deported if their application for asylum was denied. Word traveled that conditions in these centers were less desirable, making Italy less desirable for would-be intruders.
Ursula von der Leyen supported Meloni once she realized migrants were spilling into the rest of the bloc from Italy and has pointed to Meloni’s “out of the box thinking” to stop the inflow of newcomers. Specifically, the European Commission president stated that the Italy-Albania protocol proved effective whereby both nations signed a treaty that permitted Italy to send asylum seekers found in international waters back to Albania where they are then held in detention centers. “We should also continue to explore possible ways forward as regards the idea of developing return hubs outside the EU, especially in view of a new legislative proposal on return,” von der Leyen writes. “With the start of operations of the Italy-Albania protocol, we will also be able to draw lessons from this experience in practice.”
Now, 17 members of the EU sent a document to Brussels earlier in the month demanding border reform. “People without the right to stay must be held accountable. A new legal basis must clearly define their obligations and duties,” the members said. “Non-cooperation must have consequences and be sanctioned.” Suddenly, leaders of European nations realized that they were beneath Brussels in terms of power and had lost the ability to secure their own borders.
The 17 member nations are demanding that Brussels implements rules to detain and deport migrants who could be a threat to national security. Furthermore, they want to non-EU nations to accept their own citizens back once they are deported. As with everything, money rules all and these nations are willing to use trade and monetary gifts or aid as leverage, as Italy did with numerous African nations under the Mattei Plan.
Countless EU nations are attempting to control their borders, and in doing so, Brussels is relinquishing its power. Poland even attempted to announce a temporary suspension of asylum seekers the same week that Ursula voiced concern over the migrant crisis. The forced cohesion of the European Union is coming undone.
Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance
Mark Halprin gives his prediction about what will happen when President Trump wins the election. Tucker Carlson plays along, with both pretending not to remember what happened in 2016.
What Mark Halprin predicts, is exactly what happened in 2016. WATCH:
Every single thing in this response is exactly what happened in 2016. The silly part is both Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin pretending not to remember what happened. Some reminder pictures from 2016 below.
In 2016 the Democrats: ~ organized a refusal to certify the election ~ boycotted the inauguration ~ claimed Russia hacked the election ~ broke out in violent protests, including arson, on inauguration day ~ put their genitals on their heads ~ conducted violent protests ~ began the Trump-Russia campaign for the next two years; then tried impeachments.
Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance
In this interview Tucker Carlson talks with Mark Halprin, a well-connected journalist that Tucker Carlson cites as the epicenter of all political power and journalistic knowledge since the mid-1980’s. Accordingly, the magnanimous and enlightened Mark Halprin knows more about the institutions of electoral influence, political power structures, people and organizations of political influence than most journalists, so sayeth Carlson. And so, their discussion follows along.
If you are nostalgic for the time before you saw the strings on the political marionettes, and/or you like to remind yourself how you viewed politics in the era long before elections were decided by ballots instead of voters, you will enjoy this satiating conversation of how things used to be.
Both Halprin and Carlson pretend things are just like they were, while they apply 1998 political insight to the 2024 election year, and -for some reason- people discuss it.
However, if you have stopped pretending and you understand that modern political outcomes are determined by ballot systems, local ballot printing, fraudulent voter rolls to give the illusion of attribution to the locally printed ballots, and tabulation centers that conduct the necessary scanning of unattributed ballots to a number needed to generate the outcome, then this food-filled discussion about political sides between Halprin and Carlson ends up leaving you somewhat hungry.
Here’s an example. Within the interview Mark Halprin notes that Kamala Harris campaign has raised over a billion dollars, and that’s just the money from inside the campaign; there’s much more from “outside groups and interests.” With jaw-agape Carlson curiously asks where that money came from? Halprin replies, “I have no idea,” and they simply move along.
Yes, the conversation is about various subsets of voters, black men who don’t support Harris as much, and a multitude of other various popular narratives that surround the 2024 election as written in various media. Let me cut to the proverbial chase, none of that stuff matters.
Yes, along the same approach expressed by the Halprin’s and Carlson’s of the world, Barack Obama might be calling out the “brothers” who do not intend to vote for Kamala Harris. However, in the real world of 2024 a very non-pretending James Clyburn might just as well say, “yes they are, they just don’t know it.” Why, because Clyburn controls the ballots of “the brothers”; their voting intent is irrelevant.
Thus, we highlight once again the distinction between voters and ballots that seems intentionally lost amid a constructed interview between the very enlightened Halprin and the curiously incurious Carlson.
What exactly is the value of the conversation when the subject matter surrounding it is as useful to the 2024 election as vinyl records to modern rap music. You decide.
To answer the question about Kamala Harris’ extraordinary fundraising, let’s just revisit demonstrable history.
First, James Clyburn’s operation was constructed during the Obama era through the financing of something called the Pigford Settlement. Yes, Pigford-I was the payment mechanism behind taxpayer funds being shifted from govt to the very specifically black community. The Clyburn team, along with legal powerhouses like Morgan & Morgan, were part of the payment distribution architecture.
With the capital to start the mechanics of the AME ballot scanning operation now financed, along comes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, set up by Elizabeth Warren, to funnel fines and pressure payments from the USA banking and finance sector to a host of progressive networks, ie community organizing groups.
There you go. That’s the ‘elevator speech’ answer behind the odd “I don’t know” retort of Mark Halprin.
What was the intent of this interview? I have no idea. However, what they discuss seems like a conversation that might have been pertinent to elections many cycles ago, but not now.
In the modern era facilitated by the rise of Teh One Lightbringer of all political truth, what many might remember as our promised “fundamental change,” voters are irrelevant to the outcome.
That said, there are very serious efforts underway to apply tactical civics in this new battleground. In that contest based on reality we destroy local ballot printing operations, block the use of fraudulent voter rolls and find industrious ways to stop the secret scanning operations within the AME network of 17 county tabulation centers.
If tactical civics are successful, and we are about to discover that “if” answer, then the conversation that Halprin and Carlson are currently having might reapply in the next election. However, until then, talking about what voters intend to happen while ignoring the irrelevance therein, seems to miss the proverbial point of where we are in the modern era of ‘ballot collection’ elections.
Chapters: 0:00 Become a Member at TuckerCarlson.com 1:23 The State of the Presidential Race 6:37 Does Kamala Harris Stand For Anything? 12:23 What Is Harris’s Relationship Like With Joe Biden? 14:34 Harris Can’t Answer This Simple Question 16:01 What Do Harris’s Donors Think? 17:26 Mark Halperin’s Reporting That Biden Would Give up the Nomination 28:45 The Worst Scandal in American Journalism 31:09 Was the Biden/Trump Debate a Setup? 40:17 Covering the Trump Campaign 51:54 How Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama Took Out Biden 1:02:19 Corporate Media’s Self-Destruction and the Future of News 1:10:43 Black Men Are Voting for Trump 1:16:32 Why Is Our Voting System So Complicated? 1:18:58 Who’s Winning the Swing States? 1:19:54 Who’s Winning Nevada? 1:21:40 Who’s Winning Arizona? 1:25:55 Who’s Winning Georgia? 1:27:36 Who’s Winning North Carolina? 1:28:54 Who’s Winning Wisconsin? 1:29:39 Who’s Winning Michigan? 1:30:32 Who’s Winning Pennsylvania? 1:34:00 Here Is What the Private Polls Are Saying 1:39:21 War and NATO 1:50:15 RFK Jr. Being Anti-Establishment 1:53:48 Who Is Running the Country Right Now? 1:55:11 Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Be the Biggest Mental Health Crisis in American History 1:58:49 What Happens If Trump Loses?
NARCISSISM: […] If Trump wins, Obama might be seen as the aberration in the history of American politics, rather than Trump and his nativist authoritarianism. Obama acolytes have spent the last eight years rationalizing Trump as the last gasp backlash to the Democrat and his presidency. (link)
Posted originally on Oct 16, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: What do you think of this independent journalist _____ who claims Trump is not what people think and is pointing to people in his first cabinet?
FLA
ANSWER: Pure propaganda. I question what her motive is or if she is just ignorant of what is taking place in the Biden Administration. There is a serious lack of any inside knowledge of how things truly work behind the curtain. I strongly urge you to watch the new documentary of General Mike Flynn. Trump did not pick his own cabinet in 2016. The Deep State did and stuffed in people like John Bolton. Obama warned Trump not to give General Flynn a position because Obama was all about protecting the Deep State. Even Flynn states in his documentary that Trump was unaware of the dark corridors of Washington.
As I said before, I was part of the vetting process for people who wanted to be president. They would send me in to advise on how the world economy really worked. I was in Tokyo and asked to go to Texas on my way back to meet with Ross Perot that weekend when he suddenly withdrew, claiming nonsense over his daughter’s wedding.
Perot later blamed Bush for threatening him. But Ross did not know how the Deep State really controlled the country. They took out JFK and RFK both because they were a threat to the intelligence community. Like Trump, Ross was an outsider, which would not be allowed. Ross pulled out of the race, and the TRUE reason was they threatened to indict him and shut down his industrial airport under claims that drugs were being flown into that facility. Perot Field Fort Worth Alliance Airport is about 14 miles north of Fort Worth, Texas. The airport is mainly focused on cargo operations. It provides no major commercial passenger airline service. It was the world’s first purely industrial airport. That was at stake.
I know I was flying back from Tokyo for an urgent meeting with Ross, but it was canceled because he was threatened by force his withdrawal. This is the same MO they did to Flynn and eventually to me. Mark Pitman of Bloomberg News had just written a story about our operations. I was NOT managing money for the Japanese but buying their portfolios. I met Mark at the Hyatt Hotel by Grand Central Station. He vowed we are mot going to allow them to do this to you. Bloomberg pulled him off my case and would not allow him to write anything. They handed to David Glovin, who always supported the government. Bloomberg followed the order of the Justice Department and was by no means reporting the facts.
People make up conspiracy theories based on clips they might read. Unless you have actually been behind the curtain – you do not have any idea of what is really running this country.
A vote for Kamala is not for her. She will run nothing. The real president in the Biden Administration is Antony Bliken, just as Dick Cheney was the real President in Bush Jr.’s administration. And BTW, I was asked to be Chief Economic Adviser in that Administration and turned it down. So I know who even picks the cabinets.
I know for a fact that Bush Jr. did NOT pick Cheney – they picked Cheney. I was told that they needed qualified people to fill the cabinet because Bush Jr. was “stupid,” and you really do not see him out and about giving statements or speeches. This is not BS, nor is it speculation – I was there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted originally on the CTH on October 11, 2024 | Sundance
After initially seeing this on social media without context, I had to go look at the originating source material.
At first blush, it looks creepy, weird and ridiculous. After going to the source to see the reasoning for it, even with context it is creepy, weird and ridiculous.
I have come to the researched conclusion that “Leftism” is factually a mental disorder, requiring adherents to be part of a tribal mentality. If the tribe does stupid stuff, the individual does stupid stuff; that’s how modern Democrats operate, including their voting patterns. The arc of this modern slope goes from the self-centered, narcissistic “we are the world” stupidity (early 1980’s), all the way to today.
This video with Gretchen Whitmer is a small case study example. WATCH: (mute your sound)
.
The podcaster is a troubled and typical millennial known as Liz Plank. Together with Governor Gretchen Whitmer it does appear they decided to mock Holy Communion using a Dorito as the sacrament. Kamala Harris previously said Doritos chips (diabetes fuel) were her favorite snack.
The podcast is in full below. You only need to watch 20 seconds to get the context of the interview. The uptalking millennial is the epitome of a Kamala Harris supporter. Liz Plank is like many millennials, an adult child. Unfortunately, Plank is also what people currently call an “influencer.”
Posted originally on Oct 11, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
J.D. Vance brought up the topic of the CB One application during his debate with Tim Walz. The majority of Americans were largely unaware that the federal government has been operating a special app to fast-track asylum status to migrants throughout the world.
The app was first launched in October 2020, designated as a single portal to Customer and Border Protection (CBP). However, in January 2023, the Biden-Harris administration repurposed the app to streamline the process of permitting migrants into the country. “So there’s an application called the CBP One app where you can go on as an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status at the wave of a Kamala Harris open border wand. That is not a person coming in applying for a green card and waiting for 10 years. That is the facilitation of illegal immigration,” Vance said on the debate stage.
Between June 2023 and June 2024, over 170,000 migrants accessed CBP One to quickly enter the United States. Haitians, Mexicans, and Venezuelans have been the primary users of this app. The app saw 1,450 appointments per day in June, a 50% uptick from the month prior. Anyone from any nation can simply sign up, enter America, and receive their free taxpayer-subsidized life.
The truth is that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have no budget when it comes to the migrants as they will spend everything and then some to flood America with illegal migrants. Then they turn around and say they’ve run out of funds for their own citizens who have been paying into the system their entire lives. CBP One is like an Open Table reservation app that lets absolutely anyone come to America to leech off our resources.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America