Category Blogger Martin Armstrong

Apr 23 2025

WHO Finalizes Pandemic Treaty


Posted originally on Apr 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

WHO logo

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been scheming to finalize the Pandemic Treaty to ensure global cohesion during the next pandemic. Over 190 member nations have agreed to surrender sovereignty in the name of public health, permitting an unelected organization of individuals to detail how they will respond to the next round of government imposed biological warfare.

WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is not a medical doctor but a Klaus Schwab appointee, declared this as a global victory. Interestingly, Schwab resigned as soon as the treaty was finalized. “The nations of the world made history in Geneva today,” Tedros declared. “In reaching consensus on the Pandemic Agreement, not only did they put in place a generational accord to make the world safer, they have also demonstrated that multilateralism is alive and well, and that in our divided world, nations can still work together to find common ground, and a shared response to shared threats.

Schwab and Tedros WHO

The One Health approach defines this treaty, which vaguely recognizes that all life on this planet is connected and therefore, under their rationale, requires a unified approach to problems. The WHO cooperates with the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) to form the “Quadripartite” partnership that aims to promote the One Health agenda. The One Health High-Level Expert Panel (OHHLEP), controlled by the WHO, provides “the science” to guide all mandates.

This treaty provides a group of unelected officials with immense power. There are new financial terms outlined under the new treaty. Manufacturers producing pandemic-related products now must allocate 10% of production to the WHO at no cost, and they must deduce costs by 10% for the WHO as well. Members already pay annual fees to the WHO, but they will now be required to pool funding into a centralized financial mechanism (CFM).

Covid Conspiracy R

Governments and international organizations will be expected to pay into the CFM. Developed nations will be forced to pay for others as each member has “common but differentiated responsibilities” based on GDP. However, there are discussions that private entities may also be forced to pay to ensure financial preparedness. The funds will be allocated at the direction of the unelected officials at the Quadripartite.

The WHO ensured that there was no transparency during COVID-19. The organization continually protected China at the direction of the Chinese Communist Party, despite the United States being the top donor to the organization. The White House has finally dispelled the COVID narrative perpetuated by “the science” and unelected organizations. They can and will do this again.

As noted by the White House:

Social Distancing: The “6 feet apart” social distancing recommendation — which shut down schools and small business across the country — was arbitrary and not based on science. During closed door testimony, Dr. Fauci testified that the guidance “sort of just appeared.”

Mask Mandates: There was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19. Public health officials flipped-flopped on the efficacy of masks without providing Americans scientific data — causing a massive uptick in public distrust.

Lockdowns: Prolonged lockdowns caused immeasurable harm to not only the American economy, but also to the mental and physical health of Americans, with a particularly negative effect on younger citizens. Rather than prioritizing the protection of the most vulnerable populations, federal and state government policies forced millions of Americans to forgo crucial elements of a healthy and financially sound life.

The World Health Organization: The WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic was an abject failure because it caved to pressure from the Chinese Communist Party and placed China’s political interests ahead of its international duties. Further, the WHO’s newest effort to solve the problems exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic — via a “Pandemic Treaty” — may harm the United States.

COVID-19 Misinformation: Public health officials often mislead the American people through conflicting messaging, knee-jerk reactions, and a lack of transparency.  Most egregiously,  the federal government demonized alternative treatments and disfavored narratives, such as the lab leak theory,  in a shameful effort to coerce and control the American people’s health decisions.

When those efforts failed, the Biden Administration resorted to “outright censorship—coercing and colluding with the world’s largest social media companies to censor all COVID-19-related dissent.”

Not a single person has been held responsible for one of the worst humanitarian crises in history. The now former chair of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, repeatedly stated that the pandemic would provide an opportunity for a Great Reset where one global entity will reign supreme. The WEF partnered with Bill Gates to co-host EVENT 201—a mock trial for the COVID-19 pandemic, one year before it began. The world is a stage, and we are the puppets that they control. The WHO was not directly involved in Event 201; however, Bill Gates is now the WHO’s primary donor, following the US’s departure.

The WHO requires a 12-month waiting period before a country can formally be removed from the alliance under the WHO Constitution. Donald Trump withdrew on January 20, 2025, with WHO membership officially ending on January 23, 2026. The disease cycle has honed in on 2026 as a major event. I am not saying that Disease X, the next pandemic outlined by the WHO, will occur before that timeframe, but the correlations are undeniable.

Apr 23 2025

Hungary Creates “Population First” Economy


Posted originally on Apr 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Family

Hungary’s Viktor Orban is fighting declining birth rates with a “population first” agenda that will make parenthood more affordable. “We are building the world’s first family-centered economy,” Orban proclaimed. One of the first steps will be eliminating taxes for mothers.

Mothers with one child will be exempt from paying income tax until they turn 30, while women with two or more children will be exempt from the tax indefinitely. Around 600,000 mothers will currently benefit from the one-child exemption, with another 250,000 expected to benefit from the two or more exemption criteria.

“This is not just a reform; it’s the dawn of a new era for Hungary’s economy,” the prime minister stated.

Hungary reported its lowest birth rate since 1949 last year, with only 77,500 births or a 9.1% YoY decline, according to the Hungarian Central Statistical Office. Anyafalva Maternity Application conducted a study to ask potential parents why they planned to have no or fewer children. Around 52.9% stated that economic struggles were preventing them from having or expanding their family, and 43.8% noted work-related issues. Childcare and inflation, food inflation in particular, were also cited as causes.

Yet, Hungary’s population has been on the decline since the 1980s. At the current rate, the nation will be short 1 million citizens by 2050. The fertility rate remains around 1.34-1.59 children per woman. Another issue is that 7% of Hungarians, or 700,000 people, live abroad. This is especially prevalent with young professionals and skilled laborers, fueling the decline of the economy. Hungary’s private sector is currently short 60,000 workers, with shortages prevalent in health, education, and IT. Hungary’s per capita income is low amongst EU member nations, with 20% of the population at risk of poverty.

Birthing Person

Orban has plans to attract Hungarians back home. Housing loan interest rates will now be capped at 5%. There are discussions of capping food prices as well, providing loans to expecting parents, housing subsidies, and even monthly cash payouts.

Eliminating taxes on mothers should be a no-brainer, but Orban is teetering on socialism by attempting to provide government subsidies to the population. Price controls DO NOT WORK. The government should not be permitted to invade the private sector.

Let’s take a look at Venezuela. Hugo Chávez implemented price controls to combat inflation, but it backfired and caused the nation to experience one of the highest rates of inflation in the world. The government arbitrarily set prices without taking note of demand, supply, or the cost taken on by the private sector. Business was no longer profitable, and small mom-and-pop stores disappeared. Those that remained could barely operate and experienced severe shortages of basic goods like food. The people panicked and began to hoard what they could, as they did not know when the goods would be available again. The same disaster occurred in the Soviet Union under Gosplan. Whether it is communism or socialism, any method that decimates the free market ends in an economic collapse.

Hungary also has a massive pension problem and an aging population. The government allocated between HUF 7,200 billion and HUF 7,700 billion in 2025, an increase of 655 billion from 2024. This year, Hungary’s overall budget deficit is expected to reach 4% of GDP. Then add the fact that they are an EU member nation, and despite Orban’s protests, they are forced by Brussels to continue aiding Ukraine indefinitely. Then you have Ukraine infringing on Hungary’s agriculture and energy sectors. Simply put, the government does not have the resources to hand out big payouts or expand its social programs.

“This will be a huge expense, but the reviving economy, the measures to support businesses, and full employment combined are capable of paying for this in a way that the budget deficit and public debt both decline,” he said. Government spending must be reformed before anything can be assessed. Inflation will persist, and capping prices ensures absolute failure. I have never agreed with the income tax in general, so the aspect of eliminating that burden for mothers is perhaps the only solid part of the plan.

Apr 23 2025

Business to Consumer Supply Constraints


Posted originally on Apr 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

World Trade 2

Supply chain constraints have begun as a result of companies wishing to avoid US-implemented tariffs. Germany-based DHL has suspended all business-to-consumer (B2C) shipments exceeding $800. The logistics company cited “multi-day transit delays” as its main reason for ceasing services. Business-to-business shipments are expected to experience delays, and packages valued below $800 will remain unaffected.

DHL is one of many carriers that are refusing to accept higher export costs. Hong Kong Post suspended all sea freight shipments to the US. Air freight shipments will halt on April 27, excluding documents. “The US is unreasonable, bullying and imposing tariffs abusively,” the Hong Kong government said in the statement. “The public in Hong Kong should be prepared to pay exorbitant and unreasonable fees due to the US’s unreasonable and bullying acts.” Businesses must now use private couriers to deliver packages, ensuring a rise in costs for consumers.

FedEx Logo

FedEx told CNN it’s “business as usual” and will continue its international courier service. FedEx experienced a significant revenue decline in FY2024, with a decline of $87.69 billion, with the cost of revenue dropping $68.74 billion.  FedEx announced a 5.9% rate hike for US package and freight services in January before tariffs were announced.

UPS will also continue services, but again, expect shipping costs to rise. The company has provided numerous resources to businesses that wish to reroute their shipments or adjust inventory to avoid tariffs. The company stated it will aim to minimize disruptions during this trade war, but anyone who has dealt with customs knows that the government is in no rush to assist businesses expediting shipments.

The US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), beginning on May 2, will require all shipments from China to undergo full entry documentation and duty payments regardless of value. Postal shipments will cost a $25 to $50 fee per parcel or 30% tariff if duties are not pre-paid. Customs will review the original country of origin documentation to ensure that transshipped goods through third nations are taxed. Goods coming from Foreign Trade Zones (FTZs) will be able to avoid these fees. This is not an option for many small businesses or drop shipping companies seeking to sell to Americans. Nearshoring is also rising in popularity with sellers aiming to lower shipping costs by going through Mexico.

Expect documentation bottlenecks at customs as everyone adjusts to new regulations. There was a customs gridlock during the February de minimis pause this year, with millions of parcels overwhelming the system. Many expect this to happen once more as there will be a rush of orders before May 2.

Apr 23 2025

112 Year Cycle of Progressivism In Canada As Well


Posted Apr 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Canada future-lives-social-mobility-en

The fragmentation of Canada is bubbling beneath the surface, as we see in the United States as well as in Europe. There is a huge divide between LEFT and RIGHT politics, and never since the late 19th Century to the 1920 period has there ever been such a stark political divide.

Progressive Party

There was such a rise in Progressive Socialism that Teddy Roosevelt abandoned the Republican Party, splitting off to create the Progressive Party, also known as the Bull Moose Party, in 1912 following a split within the Republican Party.

There was an ideological split with President William Howard Taft, and these ideas led to the Income Tax in 1913. Roosevelt, a progressive Republican, grew disillusioned with Taft’s conservative policies, such as his support for the Payne-Aldrich Tariff (which raised rates and angered progressives) and his handling of the Ballinger-Pinchot Affair (a dispute over conservation that portrayed Taft as anti-environmental). Roosevelt believed Taft had abandoned progressive reforms

Roosevelt sought the Republican presidential nomination in 1912 but lost to Taft at a contentious convention. Alleging corruption and delegate theft, Roosevelt and his supporters walked out, forming the Progressive Party to continue his Marxist-style agenda. His Progressive Platform was called the “New Nationalism” platform, advocating for:

    • Strong federal regulation of corporations and monopolies.
    • Women’s suffrage.
    • Workers’ rights (minimum wage, workers’ compensation).
    • Direct election of senators.
    • Primary elections to reduce political corruption, with candidates selected as in Parliamentary systems.
    • Social welfare programs (e.g., pensions, child labor laws).
1912 Progressive Convention R

The party aimed to unify reformers and address growing public demand for economic fairness and government accountability during the Progressive Era. It was launched in August 1912 at the Chicago convention, where Roosevelt was nominated for president. The split in Republican votes between Roosevelt (27%) and Taft (23%) handed victory to Democrat Woodrow Wilson, who signed the income tax into law in 1913. Despite losing, the Progressive Party’s ideas influenced later reforms, such as the New Deal and Progressive Era amendments (e.g., direct Senate elections, income tax).

The party dissolved by 1916, but its platform left a lasting mark on U.S. progressive politics. Roosevelt’s campaign highlighted the power of third-party movements to shift national discourse, even in defeat.

Carville_Maybe_We_Need_to_Have_a_Schism_in_the_Democratic_Party

We have reached the critical 112-year half-cycle of FAR-LEFT Progressiveness. It is going crazy everywhere. Now, the famous Democratic Advisor James Carville has come out and said the Democratic Party should split. They lost as Teddy Roosevelt lost, and they are taking the Democratic Party with them. We see the same in Canada with Carney. Europe has also gone extreme to the left, censoring free speech to maintain its ideas.

Throughout History – it is ALWAYS the Left that Destroys Civilization

Apr 22 2025

Americans Delay Major Purchases Over Tariff Fears


Posted originally on Apr 22, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Roll Cash

Consumer confidence has tanked due to tariff fears. A Redfin survey conducted from April 10 to 14 found that nearly a quarter (24%) of American respondents have canceled major purchases, such as homes, due to tariffs, with an additional 32% stating they plan to delay any major purchases until they regain confidence in the economy.

Fifty-five percent of respondents said they are less likely to make a major purchase in 2025, with 39% saying they are “much less likely” to do so. On the other hand, one in 10 respondents stated that they plan to make a major purchase immediately, expecting prices to continue rising. Unsurprisingly, Republicans have more confidence in the current economic plan, with 19% saying they are “much less likely” to make a purchase this year compared to 60% of Democrats.

The US real estate market remains in a buyer’s market. Housing prices have been on the rise for the past five years, inventory in high-demand areas remains low, and mortgage rates have not waned in a meaningful way. Existing home sales fell 1.3% in March on a monthly basis, marking a six-month low of 4.15 million units. Pending sales declined 5.2% in major metro areas, with homes spending an average of 53 days on the market. Around 17.5% of sellers cut their existing home sale prices, a high not seen since 2016.

While we are not seeing this trend with real estate, Americans are rushing to purchase autos before prices rise. Auto sales in March were the strongest on record since January 2023 as consumers rush to secure pre-tariff pricing. Auto sales in March were up 17.3% YoY for retail, with fleet sales increasing 5% on an annual basis. No one expects auto prices to decline in the near future, and people who need a vehicle are rushing to finalize purchases before costs begin to rise.

German Cars

Cox Automotive found that new retail sales increased nearly every week since the tariffs were announced, with “a strong surge at month-end with the import tariff announcement creating urgency in the final five days of the month.” J.D. Power announced that automakers have been offering higher discounts and incentives worth an average of $3,059 to attract potential buyers.

Now, Trump has hinted that he may delay certain auto tariffs on foreign vehicles due to the backlash. American consumers are still rushing into the market to purchase cars at “pre-tariff prices,” as everyone expects prices to rise. The real estate boom post-pandemic has ended, and the majority are not looking to purchase a home at this time. Our computer models indicate that we will see a reversal in trend back to a seller’s market by August 2028.  The 2007 high on the Shiller Index was the precise day of the Economic Confidence Model. So far, all the indicators have confirmed that we should have a recessionary trend into 2028 with this turn in the model on this wave.

It is never a good sign when consumers lose confidence in the economy. This will become one of the reasons for declining GDP, as consumer spending is absolutely critical to America’s overall economy.

Apr 22 2025

Anti-Deportation – the Democrats’ New Platform


Posted originally on Apr 22, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

ICEmigrants

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs has attempted to paint herself as a moderate in recent years. This has become an increasingly popular trend among Democrats as their party’s popularity plunges. But do not be fooled as these “moderates” still promote “progressive” policies. Hobbs has vetoed Senate Bill 1164, the Arizona ICE Act, which will make it increasingly difficult for federal agencies to deport illegal migrants.

The Arizona ICE Act would have banned state and local governments from interfering with federal immigration policies. We are seeing this happen throughout the nation, from Maryland to California to New York, as governors and senators have taken it upon themselves to prevent the Trump Administration from deporting people who entered the US illegally. Instead of focusing on the economic drain that migrants have caused legal, law-abiding citizens, these leftist lawmakers are spending resources and time to ensure that migrants, all within their voter base, remain in the US.

“You and I both disagreed with the previous administration’s immigration policies, and we may both disagree with the next administration’s immigration policies,” Hobbs wrote in a letter to Republican Senate President Warren Petersen. This is another instance of the Democrats not having a firm footing on policy. Do you support illegal migration? It should be a yes or no answer.

Hobbs goes on to say that she has worked to stop fentanyl from entering ports of entry, another casualty of open border policies. She noted cartel concerns and maintaining safe communities, but still believes that ICE should not have the ability to deport migrants residing in Arizona. “I will continue to work with the federal government on true border security, but we should not force state and local officials to take marching orders from Washington, D.C.,” she added.

Gavin_Newsom_Bans_California_From_Requiring_ID_to_Vote_Newsweek

Hobbs is not the only one halting deporation efforts. Governor Gavin Newsom of California claims to be “pro-immigration,” confusing true immigration with illegal entry. He signed a law to remove the word “alien” from legal documents, citing xenophobia. Newsom recently allocated $50 million to prevent federal separation efforts, including $25 million for “deportation defense” and $25 million to cover California’s legal battles with the federal government. Then he turned around and begged Washington for funding to help with California’s wildfires, as his state faces the worst deficit in the nation. Again, he is prioritizing illegal migrants over his own constituents and misallocating public funds to fuel his agenda.

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey plans to rebel against deporation efforts. “The key here is that every tool in the toolbox has got to be used to protect our citizens, to protect our residents and protect our states, and certainly to hold the line on democracy and the rule of law,” she told reporters. Governor Tony Evers of Wisconsin stated that migrants are needed to maintain American agriculture, which is precisely what the Democrats said regarding the slaves during the Civil War. New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy declared that Democrats are prepared to “fight to the death” to keep illegal migrants in the US. Imagine if they worked this hard to fight for actual American citizens?

TransnationalGangs

I am all for small government and permitting local governments to handle matters, but migration falls under national security. Biden’s open border policies created such a crisis that the federal government needed to step in to remove the millions of people who are living here illegally, largely living off US taxpayers. We cannot have certain states harboring fugitives, and yes, illegally entering and claiming residence in a foreign country is a crime, while other states work tirelessly to expel them.

The American people voted for a closed border and immigration control. The Democrats have made good on their promise to fight Trump at every turn, even if that entails ignoring democracy. They created the entire migration crisis by telling the world to come to America to seek shelter, and allowing anyone and everyone to enter without regard for American citizens or the American economy. Yet, they are portraying the Trump Administration as evil for attempting to undo the damage they created. The Democrats are eager for Trump to send out the National Guard to expel invaders. Deportation efforts have become the highlight of the “Trump is a dictator” narrative and the Democrats’ primary focus. The battle has only just begun.

Apr 22 2025

Poland Prosecutes 45 Doctors for COVID Vaccine Misinformation


Posted originally on Apr 22, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 
Vaccines 1

A group of Polish physicians attempted to warn the public that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccinations were not “safe and effective.” Countless evidence and studies have proven that the vaccination did more harm than good. Yet, Poland has placed 45 doctors on trial for spreading anti-vaccine misinformation during the pandemic. If found guilty, these men and women will lose their medical licenses.

These 45 physicians are part of the Polish Association of Independent Physicians and Scientists (PSNLiN), a group that actively sought to warn the public about the harmful side effects of the mRNA vaccine. Their mission as stated on their website: “Freeing the medical profession and scientists from enslavement and restoring professional and scientific freedom. Promoting prevention and treatment according to the doctor’s and patient’s choice.” Why should the government force vaccines upon the population and have the ability to override trained medical professionals?

Pfizer_CEO_Vaccines Limited

Dr. Peter Kotlár, physician and member of the Slovak Parliament, firmly believes that the “vaccine” was not a true vaccination but an attempt at genetic modification. As we know, the COVID-19 injections were only labeled as a vaccine when the CDC changed the definition.

"I will tell you one thing that please publish in your media. This is the result of the analysis of Slovak vaccines. On average, Moderna, mRNA content 10e9 - 10e10. DNA in Moderna 10e7 - 10e9. As for contamination after the production process. We talked about the amount of 10 to 2.3 at most. This is such a huge amount of genetic information that it can be safely, officially called gene therapy. This is not a vaccine. Now I am not talking about the pathological effect of protein S, which is a product of mRNA. This goes a different way. But the incorporation of DNA into human DNA will make you a genetically modified organism and can permanently produce protein S, which is toxic. This issue can be inherited and can cause other serious disorders and diseases." - Dr. Peter Kotlar.

"My main task is to uphold the constitution, and as a doctor I have the duty and right to protect the health of Slovak citizens. Yesterday I also informed the US Minister of Health and Human Services, Mr. Robert Kennedy Jr., by letter, who confirmed receipt of the information. In addition, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Kash Patel, and Pamela Bondi, the US Attorney General, were also informed.

"So far, 34 batches from Pfizer and Moderna have been analyzed, which were stored in accordance with the proper cold chain and only those that were used for the Slovak population during the C19 epidemic. Today I will present the most important result of the analysis."

"The results of the analysis of all, I repeat, all tested batches showed that in each individual vial there is an extremely large amount of DNA, a vector encoding a cassette for the synthesis of the S protein, if not other proteins. Almost in the same amount as mRNA, DNA is also present there. In three cases, the DNA content is even higher than the mRNA. It can no longer even be considered an mRNA vaccine. This genetic code for the synthesis of the S protein, this information stored in DNA, is stable compared to mRNA, it can integrate with human nuclear DNA, and then such a human organism becomes - I am not afraid to say officially - a genetically modified organism," said Dr. Peter Kotlár

There are countless studies proving that the COVID vaccination had significant, life-altering, if not life-ending, side effects that were not presented to the public. Yet, the Polish government wants to dismiss every doctor who disobeyed their orders.

“They signed a letter which falsely presented both the results of research on vaccines and the entire strategy to combat the pandemic,” Paweł Wróblewski, president of the Lower Silesian Medical Chamber, which is overseeing the case, told broadcaster TVN. “The doctors are accused of promoting anti-health attitudes and publicly disseminating information that is inconsistent with current medical knowledge, thereby acting to the detriment of patients and the entire society,” he added.

The vaccine did not prevent infection or transmission. “The entire strategy” had nothing to do with public health. Poland has already stripped various physicians of their medical licenses for warning the public about the dangers of vaccinations. Although there are 45 physicians on trial currently, over 100 are facing charges. These men and women tried to protect the public at a time when the government was refusing to attempt that the vaccination was experimental and untested. They likely saved lives, but at what cost? It is an absurd case of cognitive dissonance that the world is continuing to push the false COVID-19 narrative, but governments refuse to admit what truly happened in 2020.

Apr 22 2025

Saint Malachy Prophesy – The Last Pope?


Posted originally on Apr 22, 2025 by Martin Armstrong

Malachy Saint

QUESTION #1: Okay, you forecast that Pope Francis would last 12 to 13 years into 2025 and that he would not be the last Pope under the prophecy of Saint Malachy, who was said to have forecasted that there would be only 112 more popes before the Last Judgment. Some said he was the 112th pope, but you said you saw a change in 2025. Could you elaborate on your comments since you also targeted May of 2025 for a shift? Also, didn’t the “Third Secret” of Fatima, revealed by the Vatican in 2000, describe a vision of a pope and clergy being martyred amid ruins? With Europe pushing for war against Russia, it certainly seems that these prophecies are at least possible.

FV

QUESTION #2: Just looking at current betting odds for the next Pope, and knowing that he must encompass that “Peter the Roman” moniker, the likeliest candidates there would be Pietro Parilon, Peter Erdo, or Peter Turkson. Does Socrates have an official forecast based upon all available historical data herein?

KW

QUESTION #3: In 2020, you wrote that there was a cycle in religion and that the subsequent major upheaval would be in 2033. Now that Pope Francis is dead, will the last pope complete that cycle by 2033?

DD

QUESTION #4:  You have been promising to report on what you said was the convergence of three religions, all of which point to a major upheaval by 2032. Will you publish that report one day?

Jay

RomulusAug-AU2

REPLY: Yes, I wrote “The Decline & Fall of Religion” back on January 7th, 2020, with that target. From a cyclical analytical viewpoint, I have always found it curious that the last Roman Emperor in the West took the name Romulus Augustus, which was the name of the first king of Rome and the first emperor. So, from a cyclical viewpoint, saying that the last pope will be named “Peter the Roman” would be cyclically balanced – you end where you begin. Some have said, “St. Malachy’s prophecy is nonsense.” I cannot verify that one way or the other. I find it curious, as we do see significant political and religious changes post-2032.

There’s also the possibility that the prophecy was misinterpreted, looking at the list of popes since 1143. Some sources say that Benedict XVI was the 111th, so that Francis would be the 112th. However, the motto for 112 is Petrus Romanus, which makes no sense. So does that mean the prophecy considers Francis as the 111th, and the next pope will be the 112th? But that doesn’t fit with the previous count. Maybe the resignation of Benedict XVI complicates things because popes usually serve until death, but he chose to resign. So perhaps the numbering skips or something. Alternatively, maybe the prophecy counts all popes, including those who reigned for a very short time.

Some have said, “St. Malachy’s prophecy is nonsense.” What I found curious was that his last Pope in the prophecy concludes with “Peter the Roman”, whose pontificate will allegedly precede the destruction of the city of Rome, since Peter is considered the first Pope. As far as the Fatima reported “Third Secret” is concerned, it does describe a vision of a pope and clergy being martyred amid ruins. The Vatican emphasized that the secret was symbolic, not a literal geopolitical prediction.

Pope Francis, who some have identified as the 112th pope in the Prophecy of Saint Malachy, corresponding to the final motto “Petrus Romanus” (Peter the Roman). However, this association is highly debated and controversial. The prophecy lists 112 mottos, starting with Pope Celestine II, who was elected in 1143. Each subsequent pope is assigned a motto in sequence. Benedict XVI, Francis’s predecessor, is linked to the 111th motto, “Gloria Olivae” (The Glory of the Olive), often tied to the Benedictine Order. By this count, Francis would be the 112th.

However, the final motto, “Petrus Romanus” describes a pope named Peter (or symbolically tied to Peter) from Rome. Pope Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Argentina, chose the name Francis and has no direct connection to the name Peter or Roman heritage. This discrepancy leads many to question the prophecy’s validity or suggest it may refer to a future pope.  Some scholars widely regard the prophecy as a 16th-century forgery, not authentically written by Saint Malachy. Its vague, post-hoc interpretations and lack of historical evidence before 1595 further undermine its credibility. While Pope Francis is numerically the 112th pope in Malachy’s list, the expected attributes of “Petrus Romanus” do not align with him. The prophecy remains a topic of speculation rather than an accepted fact. It all hinges on the retirement of Pope Benedict XVI. Since he did not die in office, does that make Francis still the 111th pope, rather than the 112th?

Anti Christ 2025

I will try to get this report out next month. This review examines all the religious revolutions since ancient times and looks at the cyclical timing when religions change. Like everything else in life, there are cycles to religion from the rise of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, with each also undergoing splits and revolutions, just as we see in politics. This is not a prophecy of religious dogma, but an analysis of when significant changes occur. In all honesty, they are also inspired by the business cycle and economic changes.

Henry VIII Debased Groats

Henry VIII was broke and rejected the Catholic Church, declaring the Church of England instead. This allowed him to confiscate the property of the Catholic Church to fund his reign. Napoleon confiscated Church assets and even imprisoned the pope. Constantine faced the Christian army and declared he had seen a vision in the sky to paint a cross on the shields, so the opposing forces did not want to kill fellow Christians. He declared Christianity the state religion and confiscated all the assets of the Pagan Temples. Religion has been abused for centuries and has also been driven by economics. It was King Philip IV of France who seized the Vatican, moved it to France, installed a French pope, and stole its assets.  There are countless examples of upheavals in religion throughout the centuries.

Apr 21 2025

NATO Member Nation Deploys Troops to Ukraine to “Learn”


Posted originally on Apr 21, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Zelensky Playing Soldier

Denmark, a NATO member nation, plans to deploy troops to Ukraine. “They are not going there to actively participate in the war,” Maj. Gen. Peter Boysen, Denmark’s commander in chief, told reporters. Rather, Denmark claims they are sending military personnel to “learn” about war.

You cannot send troops to an active warzone and expect them not to have an active role in the fighting. Russia immediately commented that any military personnel in Ukraine will be considered a “legitimate target.” Yet, Denmark wants to send unarmed troops to the battlefield, perhaps to create the false flag event needed to officially enter the war.

“We’re sending some teams down to see what experiences the Ukrainians have had — first-hand,” Boysen said, noting that the number of troops to be deployed has not been determined. Unconcerned with the safety of the troops, Boysen commented that Ukraine has sufficient air raid warning systems in place and shelters. “We can learn a lot from the combat experience they have gained in Ukraine,” Boysen said. “It is clear that we are relying on their experience to become better in combat.”

Russia’s ambassador to Denmark, Vladimir Barbin, said that all facilities, including headquarters, training and education centers, as well as locations of military personnel and military equipment, both deep inside Ukrainian territory and on the front line, are a legitimate target.” Moscow will also strike any arms manufacturers operating in Ukraine, such as the German company Rheinmetall.

Over 70% of Ukraine’s fighting has been conducted using drone warfare, with 96% of the 1.5 million drones purchased in 2024 manufactured domestically. Ukraine’s Commander-in-Chief, Oleksandr Syrskyi, believes that troops will better understand modern warfare witnessing it first-hand. Training will allegedly take place for a few weeks, but nothing is confirmed.

Denmark has already send over 8.5 billion euros to Ukraine since the war began through the Danish Ukraine Fund. Aside from Germany, no European nation has sent more to Ukraine than Denmark. Denmark established the “Danish Model,” whereby it purchases weapons and military supplies directly from Ukrainian manufacturers and circulates it back into the war. Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said he is “open-minded” about deploying troops to Ukraine for “peacekeeping.”

These troops are not on a faux “peacekeeping” mission. Again, they will be unarmed sitting targets. Their mission is to observe and learn, and potentially, act as the first wave of NATO nation casualties to propel us into World War III.

Apr 21 2025

Canadian Tourism to US Plummets


Posted originally on Apr 21, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Tourism Travel

Numerous nations have issued unofficial travel advisory warnings to deter citizens from traveling to the United States under Donald Trump. The tensions between the US and Canada have been particularly bad for tourism. Statistics Canada reported a 23% decline in trips via car from the US this February, marking the second consecutive monthly decline, while trips to the US by air declined 2.4%. March’s data shows that cross-border travel plummeted by 900,000 YoY, marking the worst year of tourism since the COVID pandemic.

US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data found that 4,105,516 people traveled from Canada into the US this March, down from 4,970,360 visitors in 2024—a 17% decline. Now let’s just say that those 900,000 travelers traveled, say, in families of four, spending $2,500 on their trip. That is $562,500,000 tourism dollars lost in one month alone, and obviously, $2,500 is an extremely low estimate for what one would spend on vacation.

The US Travel Association stated that Canadians spent $20.5 billion in US last year while on holiday, which was believed to support 140,000 jobs in leisure and hospitality. Border towns have been hit the hardest, naturally.

Governor Gavin Newsom has launched a marketing campaign to attract Canadian tourism to California. “You know who’s trying to stir things up back in D.C., but don’t let that ruin your beach plans,” Newsom said. “Here in California, we’ve got plenty of sunshine and a whole lot of love for our neighbors up north.” Newsom is attempting to paint California as an independent state that is not controlled by Washington. Newsom is letting the world know that America is very much a divided nation where our own governors openly do not support the president and are attempting to override him at every step.

Ron deHarte, the mayor of Palm Springs, California, launched a “Palm Springs Loves Canada” campaign to attract tourism. “The Trump administration is sending messages that just don’t feel very American. This is not the way we treat our neighbors and we certainly don’t treat friends like this. It’s hurting people, and it’s causing harm. We understand that this hits close to home to everybody in Canada,” deHarte stated.

Newsom and others fail to see that their messaging is exactly why travelers do not want to visit America. No doubt, the comments regarding turning Canada into a US state deeply offended our northern neighbors. Yet, declining to travel to the US is based on fear-mongering coming from the media and politicians. Dozens of world leaders have issued warnings to their citizens, advising them not to travel to the United States for no valid reason. The checks and balances at the border have not changed for law-abiding individuals. The only difference a few people may encounter is validating their assigned legal gender on their identification.

There has been an ongoing message that it is outright dangerous to travel to the United States under Donald Trump. People genuinely believe that they will wind up imprisoned or in some detention camp since Trump is seen as modern-day Pol Pot, or Hitler, but are we not all exhausted of that headline yet?