Even the Wall Street Journal has admitted that the vaccines carry a greater risk than the politicians are saying. Will Twitter now ban the WSJ from ever posting along with BigTech? There have been reports of teenagers dying from heart attacks after being vaccinated. The CDC quietly said it will look into the heart problems emerging in teenagers after vaccination. The CDC has now admitted that there is a likely connection between heart problems and vaccines among teenagers. I suppose Twitter and YouTube will have to ban the CDC now.
Already there are 1200 teenagers with heart problems from the vaccines. Everyone is vaccinated and there are massive deaths among them, what will Biden say? Oh sorry, we didn’t know? This is my problem. That will cross the line and I do see an armed insurrection against politicians in such an event since they exaggerated the January 6th event they might as well bring guns this time. Politicians are taking untested experimental drugs and forcing them on everyone without any guidance that there may be serious interactions with other medicine or some people may be predisposed to such dangers. What about the people dead or injured from these vaccines. They are just “collateral damage” like killing countless babies, more than those kill in Hiroshima, by invading Iraq? The callousness of how politicians look down upon us, the great unwashed, is beyond description.
There no excuse for this behavior. They are blind by all the bribes and rhetoric manufacture like the Build Back Better slogan created by the World Economic Forum. There should be someone standing between the drug companies and the people but all we have is Fauci who is compromised and Babylon Bee did a piece of 17 versions of Fauci debating himself because he changes his statement routinely.
The World Health Organization (WHO) put out the truth that anyone with an objective mind could have obtained by simply reading uncensored information. The WHO is saying not to vaccinate children.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed the narrative yet again by stating that children should not receive COVID-19 vaccinations. “There is not yet enough evidence on the use of vaccines against COVID-19 in children to make recommendations for children to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Children and adolescents tend to have a milder disease compared to adults,” the agency admitted. Their advice is in direct contrast with countless governments that are encouraging parents to vaccinate their children. Who would have thought that injecting children with an experimental mRNA concoction was a bad idea? I suppose Big Pharma forgot to include the WHO in their weekly payroll.
UPDATE: The WHO quietly removed the portion on not vaccinating children from their website on June 23 with no mention as to why. Check the website’s web archive (or the screenshot above), and it will show that the WHO was in fact warning parents and guardians not to vaccinate children. There have been no major studies over the past few days, and there is no valid reason for the agency removing the previous guideline. I guess they are back on the Big Pharma payroll.
The WHO likely got flack for that because their previously updated guideline went against what the politicians were saying. John Hopkins is telling people to get their children vaccinated. The CDC recommendseveryone 12 years and older should get a COVID-19 vaccination to help protect against COVID-19. Worse still, the Biden Administration wants to go down to infants and newborns in 2022.
The WHO has advised that even if you get vaccinated:
Keep at least 1 metre from others
Wear a mask, especially in crowded, closed and poorly ventilated settings.
Clean your hands frequently
Cover any cough or sneeze in your bent elbow
When indoors with others, ensure good ventilation, such as by opening a window
Doing it all protects us all.
Meanwhile, a reader, HA, sent this in:
COMMENT: Good afternoon, Mr. Armstrong. I’ve been following your work for more than a decade and can’t tell you how appreciative I am of the information you are sharing and disseminating. Given the forecasted uptick in disease for 2022 and the potential for the vaccines to be related, I wanted to share this article with you. This is exactly what many scientists are predicting. Here is a quote:
“The virus will effectively outsmart the highly specific antigen-based vaccines being used and tweaked, depending on the circulating variants. All of this could lead to a hockey stick-like increase in serious and potentially lethal cases — in effect, an out-of-control pandemic.” Please disseminate as you see fit.
We just do not know what is really going on. Who is right and who is wrong. If the US could send 500 million vaccines to needy countries, then why did they have such excess when there are only 300 million people in the USA? Pfizer is charging the U.S. $19.50 per dose. They intend to up the charge to $150 per shot. That is a ton of money and where there is that much money, there is ALWAYS kickbacks and bribes. Giving away 500 million doses is worth $9,750,000,000. That is more than enough to spread the wealth in Washington.
This has emerged as a life & death issue and politics should not be involved or compromised. Biden’s push for 70% of Americans to be vaccinated for a disease that has a 99.5% survival rate is just dumbfounding. It makes no sense. They took the bait of Bill Gates and cannot now admit that they were wrong.
The claims that four British Airways (BA) pilots died within days of each other after being vaccinated have been a hot topic. BA was then said to have been in crisis talks. They denied that publicly to Reuters. Of course, they would NEVER admit such a thing anyhow. Even Snopes runs out and says it’s all fake that there is no proof the deaths are related, but offers no explanation for any of the deaths. Snopes is just another fake fact-checker that preaches the narrative and will never land on any side other than the Great Reset. To them, COVID threatens the entire world so even vaccinate your dog.
Even without COVID, pilots have an increased risk of blood clots from flying. COVID-19 vaccine recipients have an increased risk of blood clots that is greater than normal. BA will not say there are any crisis talks, but flight cancelations are up over 500%. The rumors persist that pilots who have been vaccinated are at a far greater risk of blood clots, which is turning into another contagion — flight cancelations. Delta Airways mandated pilot vaccinations, whereas American Airlines made it voluntary. Nobody will tell the truth, so we do not know who to believe about anything anymore.
Meanwhile, the University of Western Australia, which has also been funded by Gates and insisted that COVID was a major threat, has NO record of COVID isolation or purification by anyone, anywhere! Simply calling everything a conspiracy theory, so nobody investigates or responds to real questions is convenient for people at Snopes and others to lead humanity off the cliff. None of these people are doing their job and have thrown the fate of humanity into high-risk mode. They do not look in the mirror and ask, “What if I am wrong?” They are endangering their own families by refusing to provide proof and answers.
New York State Chief Judge Sol Wachtler was famously quoted by Tom Wolfe in “The Bonfire of the Vanities” that “a grand jury could ‘indict a ham sandwich,’ if that’s what you wanted.” When will someone actually investigate Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates? A prosecutor could indict them for crimes against humanity right now, and a jury would find them guilty. There is more than enough to prosecute them for a conspiracy in a court of law. So why the cover-up? Judas got 30 pieces of silver which were a month’s salary back then. What have these people got in return?
QUESTION: I believe as professors have taught Keynesian Economics, so too will we one day have Armstrongian Economic theory. My question to you sir is this, “Have you ever seen Socrates react to a singular event that made your computer model actually do a complete 180? Thanks for all you do! Your blog is the single most important source we have in the world today, BAR NONE!
RB
ANSWER: No, I have never seen that. Even when you look at the famous Buffett Silver Manipulation, note how gold did not follow. That was showing the market was manipulated and it was simply being pushed to the Monthly Reversals, all for a quick buck. Everything is connected. It is impossible to have one market that moves completely opposite, changing its trend, and nothing else happens. You can push a market between the Reversals. That I have seen. But you cannot change the trend.
The dollar, stocks market, gold, real estate, and commodities are all in sync. They are playing out a dance, and you need to step back to look at the whole rather than a single market. Only then will you see the connections.
From the attached report on climate change for May 2021Data we have the two charts showing how much the global temperature has actually gone up since we started to measure CO2 in the atmosphere in 1958? To show this graphically Chart 8a was constructed by plotting CO2 as a percent increase from when it was first measured in 1958, the Black plot, the scale is on the left and it shows CO2 going up by about 32.0% from 1958 to May of 2021. That is a very large change as anyone would have to agree. Now how about temperature, well when we look at the percentage change in temperature from 1958, using Kelvin (which does measure the change in heat), we find that the changes in global temperature (heat) is almost un-measurable at only .4%. As you see the increase in energy, heat, is not visually observably in this chart hence the need for another Chart 8 to show the minuscule increase in thermal energy shown by NASA in relationship to the change in CO2 Shown in the next Chart using a different scale.
The next chart is Chart 8 which is the same as Chart 8a except for the scales. The scale on the right side had to be expanded 10 times (the range is 50 % on the left and 5% on the right) to be able to see the plot in the same chart in any detail. The red plot, starting in 1958, shows that the thermal energy in the earth’s atmosphere increased by .40%; while CO2 has increased by 32.0% which is 80 times that of the increase in temperature. So is there really a meaningful link between them that would give as a major problem?
Based to these trends, determined by excel not me, in 2028 CO2 will be 428 ppm and temperatures will be a bit over 15.0o Celsius and in 2038 CO2 will be 458 ppm and temperatures will be 15.6O Celsius. This is what the data shows no matter what the reasons are, so I have no idea how the IPCC gets to predict that the world will end in ten or even twenty years.
Carbon Dioxide CO2 is not making “ANY” dangerous changes to the global temperature!
The numbers tell us no there isn’t a problem!
The full 40 page report explains how these charts were developed and why using NASA and NOAA data that are used without change to prove that The New Green Deal is not required and any attempt to complete that plan will be a worldwide disaster.
Click on the link below for the full report that you can download.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 20, 2021 | Sundance | 240 Comments
The Chinese Academy of Science is rewarding the Wuhan Institute of Virology for an outstanding contribution toward scientific achievement due to their cutting edge bio-research in the creation of SARS-CoV-2. The Chinese Communist Party wishes to celebrate the stunning success of Wuhan team for creating the COVID-19 global panic that has led to trillions in global wealth redistribution.
Pictured above: BlackRock Investment Institute Chairman Tom Donilon (former National Security Advisor to President Obama), celebrating an international collaboration with China’s Chairman Xi Jinping
CHINA – The Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), under the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), has been listed as one of the candidates for the 2021 Outstanding Science and Technology Achievement Prize of CAS for its achievement in identifying the COVID-19 pathogeny.
China’s “bat woman” Shi Zhengli, and Yuan Zhiming, director of the WIV’s Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory were selected as the outstanding contributors of the WIV group candidates.
CAS published the candidate list on its official website on Friday. The award is mainly given to individuals or research groups who have made or demonstrated significant achievements in the past five years. (read more)
We now know that U.S. government officials and the intelligence community have been less than honest, and in some cases downright lying, surrounding the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
When when we overlay the political motives in the background of mass narrative deflection about the origin of the virus from media and other institutions; and when we consider the known lengths that people inside the U.S. government were willing to go in their efforts to eliminate President Trump; discovering that President Obama’s administration technically authorized the restart of “gain of function” research (biological weaponization of SARS virus) just days before President Trump took office… is way more than alarming.
My hunch is this link might even disappear [SEE HERE]
January 9, 2017 – “lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).” (link)
An even larger backstory. Eleven Days before leaving office President Obama’s administration re-authorized funding for the creation of biological weapons using SARS viruses. However, essentially this re-authorization was only kickstarting funding within the U.S. because the funding of weaponization of SARS-CoV-2 never actually stopped in 2014. The media reporting on this is misleading, if not downright false.
In the original pdf guidance for the 2014 research pause of into weaponization of SARS viruses there was a footnote that everyone seems to have missed [LINK]:
[U.S. Government Gain-of-Function Deliberative Process and Research Funding Pause on Selected Gain-of-Function Research Involving Influenza, MERS, and SARS Viruses – pdf, page 2 – October 17, 2014]
This exception essentially permitted the Pentagon to continue funding the creation of SARS as a biological weapon in Wuhan, China, under the auspices of national security. Which is exactly what the defense department did: “Grants from the Pentagon included $6,491,025 from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) from 2017 to 2020” (link).
Timeline:
♦ October 17, 2014 – U.S. funding of SARS to create a biological weapon was paused due to the extreme risk of a pandemic. However, the pause allowed agencies within the U.S. government to continue funding if they determined “the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”
♦ 2014 through 2020 the Pentagon continued funding research in Wuhan, China. Fear of discovery would explain why many top officials in the U.S. Defense Department were against the Trump administration [with increased severity after the COVID pandemic began].
♦ May 2016 – [An Election Year] “after thorough deliberation and extensive input from domestic and international stakeholders, the NSABB [National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity] issued its recommendations. NSABB’s central finding was that studies that are expected to enhance PPP have potential benefits to public health but also entail significant risks. NSABB recommended that such studies warranted additional scrutiny prior to being funded.” Anthony Fauci is on the NSABB.
♦ January 9, 2017 – [Four Days after the Susan Rice oval office meeting with Obama, Biden, Comey, et al] The Obama Administration re-authorizes funding for the creation of SARS biological weapons. “Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).“
Given the workarounds, exceptions and plausible deniability for the consequences, built into the original moratorium guidance in 2014, the defense department was operationally permitted to keep funding the biological weapons research in Wuhan, China. The 2014 ban was a funding moratorium in name only; however, it appears the funding for U.S. research in North Carolina was stopped.
What was reauthorized in 2017 was the need to use “national security” as an excuse to continue the research. It also appears funding of SARS as a biological weapon inside the U.S. (North Carolina) was now permitted again.
SUMMARY: President Obama (not Trump) started the reauthorization of SARS-CoV-2 Virus experimentation in 2017. The funding of the Wuhan Lab for the creation of SARS-CoV-2 was originated during the Obama administration and continued during the Trump administration. The scientific community, the Obama White House and National Security Team, and the Pentagon knew the dangers of funding the weaponization of a biological weapon from SARS. The COVID-19 pandemic was an outcome of these originating decisions.
…. and yes, there are political and ideological benefits from the perspective of Obama’s ideological group for unleashing the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic as an opportunistic “crisis” to create totalitarian government solutions regardless of who was in office. However, the timing of the subsequent biological release is very suspicious in relation to the 2020 presidential election and the downstream benefits of manipulating the election via mail-in ballots.
Perhaps not a smoking gun of intent, but definitely bloody footprints walking out the door – in Obama’s size. Note the date:
A month after the people behind Joe Biden sent that tweet, scientists and workers in the Wuhan Lab started experiencing respiratory medical symptoms and were rushed to the hospital. A month later the Wuhan region was locked-down, the following month the virus was known to be in the U.S.
It turns out that not only do they engage in FAKE NEWS, but they employ the internet in every possible way to falsely deprive the people of the truth. Wikipedia is such a joke that students are not allowed to use it as a source in school. They protect whoever writes their entries with anonymity. Now what has surfaced is that the pretend independent fact-checker website FactCheck.org is one major fraud. If this had anything to do with stocks, the SEC would storm their gates, and everyone involved would go to prison for 20 years.
Anyone who has had a family member harmed by a vaccine should ban together and file a class-action lawsuit, for these people are NOT immune. This FactCheck.org is funded by the same $1.9 billion vaccine lobby group that it is supposedly independently checking. This is a MAJOR FRAUD, and on top of that, this site is a Facebook partner whose articles are used to censor critical voices on the social media platform. They are instrumental in having people canceled on Facebook.
In any other regulated field, FactCheck.org is a criminal organization deliberately pushing vaccines and is instrumental in shutting down any opposition. This criminal organization under TRICO statutes is headed by a former CDC director, which is once again a conflict of interest. He is being paid by the drug lobby indirectly. Facebook partnered COVID fact-checker is an outrageous fraud. FactCheck.org was funded by the same $1.9 billion vaccine lobby. A US congressman Thomas Massie has pointed out a fact that a COVID-19 vaccination “fact-checking” project conducted by a Facebook-partnered website was actually funded by a group that holds $1.9 billion in Johnson & Johnson stock.
The degree of corruption here is unbelievable. There is NOBODY defending the people. Companies like Facebook have crossed the line and now put people’s lives at risk — for what? Money or power?
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a federal law designed to combat organized crime in the United States. It allows prosecution and civil penalties for racketeering activity performed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise. Such activity may include illegal gambling, bribery, kidnapping, murder, money laundering, counterfeiting, embezzlement, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other questionable business practices that FactCheck.ORG falls under.
To convict a defendant under RICO, the government must prove that the defendant engaged in two or more instances of racketeering activity and that the defendant directly invested in, maintained an interest in, or participated in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. The law has been used to prosecute members of the mafia, the Hells Angels motorcycle gang, and Operation Rescue, an anti-abortion group, among many others.
This is a focus report on the three hot spots where we have the greatest conflicts – Taiwan, Crimea, and the Middle East. This report goes into great detail to explore these risks for each region as we head into these turbulent times ahead. We must respect that the Biden Administration is probably the weakest in American history because it has been a focus on climate change.
It is hard to imagine that Biden actually claimed that his military said the greatest threat is climate change. If that statement were even true, then why do we need a military if there are no longer military threats? This is not going to go down well.. Here is a report we have assembled on these hot spots that need to be considered for the all impact international capital flows and therefore the direction of the currencies and the financial markets.
DarkHorse Podcast Clips173K subscribersSUBSCRIBEWhy we should welcome the lab leak hypothesis. Is the lab origin a good thing? Clip with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America