The Socer/Football player Othman Coulibaly suffered a heart attack during the Al Wakra Club match against Al Rayyan. , per statement of the football club. The number of athletes having heart attacks is now well beyond 300 with about one-third dying. I have warned that once politicians got involved, they will NEVER admit a mistake and they are far too deep in this crisis and nobody cares. Mandating vaccines for young healthy athletes is outrageous. Qatar is due to host the World Cup later this year. These mandates may c create a sports crisis by that time.
If you listen carefully, Health Secretary Sajid Javid of the NHS in the UK shows that he is not willing to listen to real doctors. He has made up[ his mind claiming to take advice from vaccine experts who are the very people lobbying for the drug companies. But behind the facade is the fact that this is all being used for control. If 1 to 2% of the population die from vaccines, that is acceptable provided the governments get to control the population and restrict the freedom of speech and movement.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 8, 2022 | Sundance | 280 Comments
Well, butter my buns and call me a biscuit… if this ain’t the biggest revealing tell in years.
Apparently Big Tech and big propaganda media, Reuters and the Associated Press, have joined together to refute the concept of “Mass Formation Psychosis”, and pushed their collective narrative into the narrative engineering system:
The Associated Press – SEE HERE and Reuters – SEE HERE, quickly rush to the “fact check” typeset to stop people from recognizing what is most likely the cause of their own psychosis. In a world where things are no longer shocking, this is, well, a little shocking, in a weird and seemingly Orwellian kind of way.
Yes Alice, the same “experts” and media who are credibly accused of creating/enabling the mass formation psychosis would like to assure us that no such reality exists. This is almost too funny.
(AP) – […] “The concept has no academic credibility,” Stephen Reicher, a social psychology professor at the University of St Andrews in the U.K., wrote in an email to The Associated Press. The term also does not appear in the American Psychological Association’s Dictionary of Psychology.
“Psychosis” is a term that refers to conditions that involve some disconnect from reality. According to a National Institutes of Health estimate, about 3% of people experience some form of psychosis at some time in their lives.
[…] The description of “mass formation psychosis” offered by Malone resembles discredited concepts, such as “mob mentality” and “group mind,” according to John Drury, a social psychologist at the University of Sussex in the U.K. who studies collective behavior. The ideas suggest that “when people form part of a psychological crowd they lose their identities and their self-control; they become suggestible, and primitive instinctive impulses predominate,” he said in an email.
That notion has been discredited by decades of research on crowd behavior, Drury said. “No respectable psychologist agrees with these ideas now,” he said.
Multiple experts told the AP that while there is evidence that groups can shape or influence one’s behaviors — and that people can and do believe falsehoods that are put forward by the leader of a group — those concepts do not involve the masses experiencing “psychosis” or “hypnosis.” (read more)
Reuters offers this simultaneous rebuttal:
(Reuters) – “Mass formation psychosis” is not an academic term recognized in the field of psychology, nor is there evidence of any such phenomenon occurring during the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple experts in crowd psychology have told Reuters.
[…] There is no evidence to suggest a “mass formation psychosis” has occurred during the pandemic, experts told Reuters. The term itself is not recognised among academics, and modern research into crowd psychology has shown that crowds do not behave in mindless or non-individualistic ways. (more)
Once a collective group creates an alternate reality of itself, in this case a totalitarian reality based on government needing to create an irrational illusion of fear that becomes part of the accepted national identity, how can anyone call attention to the outcomes without finding themselves in front of the board of inquisition who organizes the collective?
Put another way… if the pod under your bed malfunctioned, but the pods under all the other beds in the city worked, what happens when you awaken and realize you are not one of them, but you must engage in the world of them while looking for others -like yourself- whose pods hopefully malfunctioned? That is the current challenge for anyone trying to communicate on contrary evidence and yet avoid the ire from the collective board of COVID compliance who have successfully brainwashed the audience.
As a rather prescient Lewis Carroll shared so brilliantly in his novel of Alice, Through The Looking Glass:
“If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isn’t. And contrary wise, what is, it wouldn’t be. And what it wouldn’t be, it would. You see?”
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 8, 2022 | Sundance | 353 Comments
As the pharmaceutical companies make these statements, it does make you wonder what the impact is on all the people who trusted the vaccine officials implicitly and now face being told their vaccine status is no longer of value.
The CEO from Moderna is now openly telling everyone that booster shots wear off over time. As a result, the direct admission seems to be that a never-ending cycle of booster shots will be needed in order to remain vaccine compliant.
The longer-term consequences of this process to create artificial immunity are remarkably unquestioned by a seemingly incurious media.
(Via NBC) – Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel on Thursday said the efficacy of boosters against Covid-19 will likely decline over time, and people may need a fourth shot in the fall to increase their protection.
Bancel said people who received their boosters last fall will likely have enough protection to get them through the winter, when new infections surge as people gather indoors to escape the cold.
However, Bancel said the efficacy of boosters will probably decline over the course of several months, similar to what happened with the first two doses. The Moderna chief was interviewed by Goldman Sachs during the investment bank’s health-care CEO conference.
“I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great,” Bancel said, referring to the strength of the booster shots. (read more)
It seems that once you get on the Rx Ronacoaster, you cannot get off until the ride’s over…. and the ride will never be over.
Additionally, it will be curious to see what the actual compliance rate is for these never-ending boosters. How many people will just keep showing up to vaccine clinics and keep dosing themselves with the product? Will people eventually start to ask questions, or just keep “boosting” themselves?
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 2, 2022 | Sundance | 178 Comments
Despite the predictability and transparency of the propaganda effort, the media and democrats are going all-in. All the broadcast Sunday Talk shows were filled with the “democracy in danger” talking points using the January 6, 2021, Capitol Hill protests to drive the agenda.
We can likely expect an entire week of building apoplexy culminating in some form of DC release. The Lawfare crew and the J6 committee members have been producing this pantomime for almost a year, and it kicks off the 2022 Democrat mid-year election effort.
Along with the traditional democrat pearl-clutchers the republican wing of the UniParty is putting forth the insufferables: Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Pete Meijer and the one-eyed Cheney, Dan Crenshaw. Additionally, the collapse of the ‘winter of death’ narrative combined with the inability of a new canine in the White House to rebrand the occupant, means even more emphasis will be placed on the J6 nonsense this week.
You might have heard that congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green (MTG) was permanently removed from Twitter today under the auspices of breaking the approved speech rules for the Rona. However, it seems more likely -or at least more convenient- that her voice was removed due to the forward operational needs of the J6 engineering team.
It’s not going out on a limb to say the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico most likely have their J6 supportive articles written and in the queue for sequentially planned distribution all week. Certainly, they will launch the first round of articles, based on J6 committee leaks, starting tomorrow.
ABC kicked out a J6 poll today pushing the storyline that most republicans agree the events of January 6th were an attack against democracy. {LINK} And of course, President Trump is to blame for everything that took place. Democrats are using this opportunity to try and get rid of the outsider threat once and for all.
Not to be outdone, the entire editorial board of the New York Times also claimed today, “the survival of the American republic depends on looking backward to that day.” {LINK} A little dramatic flair from the professional couch fainters.
The democrats must distract to something, must point to something, because there’s literally not a single positive accomplishment for them to refer to on anything. Gas prices have doubled, energy prices have skyrocketed, home heating costs have doubled, inflation at the grocery store is crushing every worker and, if you believe their fearmongering, COVID is worse than ever despite all the triple-vaxxed, boosted, double-maskers running around shouting at everyone to hide in the bunkers.
Think about it. They really need the J6 narrative, because there’s literally not a good outcome the leftists can talk about. The day after the J6 anniversary, on Friday January 7th, a new batch of December employment and economic statistics will be released.
Absent the FBI pulling the trigger on a mass casualty event they have in the queue, and absent a domestic terror event the FBI have prepared for political deployment, they really need the J6 narrative to suck up the oxygen and launch them into the 2022 mid-terms. Watch out for whatever the DOJ/FBI and J6 committee have in mind.
Do not underestimate how the ‘six ways to Sunday‘ Fourth Branch of Government will coordinate inside government, and externally with partners like Lawfare, in an effort to protect itself. An intercepted kidnapping plot of Nancy Pelosi or Kamala Harris would not surprise me in the least. Nor would some kind of FBI-created death threat toward a high-profile Democrat government official.
If the J6 momentum stalls, the DOJ/FBI/Fourth Branch will need some big headline grabbing operation for everyone to focus on. As the New York Times stated, “The survival of the American republic” depends on it.
Look out for something akin to the FBI operation using Cesar Syoc and his October 2018 ACME pipe bombs filled with “energetic material that may become combustible when subjected to heat or friction,” something like that.
Once you see the strings on the marionettes, it’s impossible to return to that moment when you did not see them.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 2, 2022 | Sundance | 256 Comments
An interesting question surfaces as the vaccine mandate is enforced. Is it the Omicron variant creating the labor shortages leading to “societal disruption,” or is it the absence of the unvaccinated workers who have been removed from many companies?
In this segment, Dana Bash asks the chief White House political scientist if the nation should prepare for major societal disruption under the guise of Omicron. As we have previously noted, the absence of a small number of highly efficient and productive employees, the vital few, can have a major impact on business operations (Pareto’s principle). Is that what we are really seeing, and they don’t want to admit it?
It does not seem coincidental the specific areas cited by Fauci, police, fire and first responders, are the exact jobs where the vaccination mandate was the most controversial. Additionally, the percentages he cites are very similar to the unvaccinated percentage previously reported in those work groups.
A data driven Suspicious Cat remains, well, increasingly suspicious.
You decide…
Airline cancellations today, again exceeding 4,000 [FlightAware Link]
It may be an uncomfortable or politically incorrect thing to say in modern times; however, twenty percent of the workers in your system of employment deliver eighty percent of the productivity. Yes, 20% of the workforce around you delivers 80% of the result. This natural truth has been consistent for decades, and within that truism is the nature of man – found in the Pareto Law.
What you need to remember is… if you are reading this, YOU are almost certain to be part of that twenty percentile that your employer or system operator depends on. You are a doer.
You are likely one of the top performers at your job.
You are the person they rely upon.
YOU are the most critical worker in a system that is mostly comprised of less productive people – and that fundamental truth is the important part to remember when you consider the impact of noncompliance with the vaccine mandate.
If doers do not perform their function, it is not the same as the generic Sally Smith not showing up to work. The twenty percent of the workforce that are doers produce eighty percent of the result. Ask any leader within any large organization or operation, and they will affirm this basic truth.
Doers are smart, they are beyond average in intelligence, and once they understand the mission objective, they will solve problems independently. Doers are not sheep. They are smart enough to do independent research and become well skilled and knowledgeable on any issue that is elevated in importance.
Doers don’t just dive into a project without thinking. They control their enthusiasm long enough to formulate wise objectives and figure out a production plan in order to succeed in whatever they’re set to do. Doers give themselves enough time to think and plan, but they don’t stand around debating, they SOLVE.
Doers challenge the status quo looking for ways to improve their task efficiency. Doers do not skimp on quality despite their drive to accomplish tasks. Though they thrive on increased productivity, and enjoy seeing improvements quantified, doers make sure to retain and improve standards for quality.
Doers are self-motivated. They look forward to working hard, and they keep an internal score on their own accomplishments. Doers are proficient at their tasks, and they have an exceptional work ethic. They fuel their internal drive by setting more and more challenging goals for themselves and seek continuous improvement.
Doers don’t sit around waiting for someone to tell them what to do. Doers accomplish goals and objectives with a speed and efficiency that is often annoying for those who do need to be told what to do. Doers tend to move on quickly to the next task at hand right after they finish their last one. However, doers also appreciate pausing to review their success, and they enjoy watching reasonable celebration for achievement – but they don’t dwell on it, they self-motivate to the next goal.
These traits likely sound familiar to you because YOU are a doer. YOU are part of the critical 20 percent of the larger group who accomplish 80 percent of the work. So, when you contemplate that only 20% of the workforce may stand resolute in their independent thoughts for not accepting a forced medical intervention as a condition for employment; remember, that twenty percent are the most critical of critical workers.
That 20% of independent, self-motivated, exceptionally productive – perhaps to a fault at times, workforce is the backbone of any operation, institution, system or workplace. Those who own or manage the workplace know exactly who that 20% are, and they will not want to lose the doers.
The employers and managers will not want to lose the doers, because they know the doers are the ones who can keep hundreds of plates spinning on sticks without being told which plate is wobbling, and which plate needs attention. Those who are in charge of keeping the plates spinning know the system will collapse if they are only left with plate spinners who need to be told which stick needs attention. The bosses know they will exhaust themselves having to give constant direction to the non-doers.
You are not crazy.
You are a doer.
YOU are critical.
In my opinion, this explains what the corporate executives knew, those who requested the change from the CDC, and why they made their request(s). This fundamental point -and outcome- is an admission the political leftists in government, politics and media need to avoid.
This is why the CDC changes seem irreconcilable when contrast against over a year of false “public health” claims.
Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.
Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial
December 31, 2021
The public has been a constant target of Dr. Fauci’s distortion of the truth. Whether misleading U.S. Congress with claims that the coronavirus is ten times more deadly than influenza, Public Health Lessons Learned From Biases in Coronavirus Mortality Overestimation – PubMed (nih.gov), denying that his organization, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was involved in funding gain of function research, or promoting the ridiculously misleading 95% efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines,Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials – PubMed (nih.gov), Dr. Fauci consistently manages to pull the wool over the public’s eyes. Fauci’s distortions often do not appear to be unintentional. Evidence in this editorial will demonstrate one of Dr. Fauci’s methods which he uses to deliberately distort the truth when reporting clinical research findings.
Fauci and AZT Relative Risk Reduction
Click on the link below first then read the rest of this post
The video excerpts from “Fauci’s First Fraud” show a 2020 interview with Dr. Fauci, seated next to Dr. Deborah Birx of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. Fauci is reminiscing about HIV research during the clinical trials of AZT (Retrovir) in the 1980s.
Video – 23:57
Fauci suggests that the researchers at the time had all the clinical trial data necessary to achieve their objective and approve AZT.
Fauci: “Whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people who are in the placebo group know so that they can have access…and all of the other trials that are taking place now have a new standard of care. So we would have normally waited several days until the data gets further—dot the i’s and cross the t’s. But the data are not going to change. Some of the numbers may change a little, but the conclusion will not change.”
Video – 25:14
Fauci: “The mortality rate trended towards being better in the sense of less deaths in the Remdesivir group,…” [Fauci probably meant the Retrovir group,]
“…8%, versus 11% in the placebo group.”
[These data probably refer to the adverse effects of anorexia, which were 8% in the Retrovir group and 11% in the placebo group. The Retrovir absolute risk reduction was 3%, calculated by subtracting the 8% event rate in the Retrovir group from the 11% event rate in the placebo group].
“It has not yet reached statistical significance,…”
[Fauci appears to imply that the absolute risk reduction of 3% is too small to be a clinically significant outcome].
“…but the data needs to be further analyzed.”
[Fauci implies that the relative risk reduction needs to be calculated by dividing the absolute risk reduction of 3% by the placebo event rate of 11%. The relative risk reduction of the Retrovir group is just over 27%. However, this is the relative risk reduction of anorexia, not mortality, because Fauci appeared to misuse anorexia data in his example].
Dr. Fauci might respond to this editorial by claiming he did nothing wrong by further analyzing the data, because this is the usual method used, but that doesn’t make the distortion of the clinical results any less deceptive.
Only absolute numbers should be used in clinical trials that measure a causative and controlled experimental effect. Relative numbers should only be used in observational studies that measure relative and uncontrolled associations, not absolute causes. Converting the absolute risk reduction to the relative risk reduction usually makes the risk reduction in the trial appear much larger than it actually is.
Dr-Ron-BrownRonald B. Brown, PhD has authored over a dozen peer-reviewed articles in the U.S. National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health; as well as a chapter on breakthrough knowledge synthesis in Contemporary Natural Philosophy and Philosophies. In addition to his epidemiologic and public health research on infectious disease and vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, his current areas of research include prevention of cancer, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and other chronic diseases.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on December 31, 2021 | Sundance | 215 Comments
Dr. Robert Malone was recently removed from the Twitter platform for providing raw scientific information and his interpretation surrounding SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, variants and vaccines. Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of the nine original mRNA vaccine patents, which were originally filed in 1989 (including both the idea of mRNA vaccines and the original proof of principle experiments) and RNA transfection. Dr. Malone has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications which have been cited over 12,000 times.
Since January 2020, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team focused on clinical research design, drug development, computer modeling and mechanisms of action of repurposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Malone is, in essence, one of the most prominent experts in the use of vaccines to advance public health.
After his voice was removed from Twitter, Dr. Malone appeared with Joe Rogan to discuss the issues and events surrounding the silencing of vaccine inquiry, and the lack of informed consent {Direct Rumble Link Segment}. The full 3-hour interview with Joe Rogan is available on Spotify – LINK HERE.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 