How Dr. Fauci Deliberately Distorts the Truth: “The data needs to be further analyzed”


Posted originally on TrialSite News by Dr-Ron-BrownDecember 31, 20214 Comments

How Dr. Fauci Deliberately Distorts the Truth: “The data needs to be further analyzed”

Note that views expressed in this opinion article are the writer’s personal views and not necessarily those of TrialSite.

Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial

December 31, 2021

The public has been a constant target of Dr. Fauci’s distortion of the truth. Whether misleading U.S. Congress with claims that the coronavirus is ten times more deadly than influenza, Public Health Lessons Learned From Biases in Coronavirus Mortality Overestimation – PubMed (nih.gov), denying that his organization, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was involved in funding gain of function research, or promoting the ridiculously misleading 95% efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, Outcome Reporting Bias in COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trials – PubMed (nih.gov), Dr. Fauci consistently manages to pull the wool over the public’s eyes. Fauci’s distortions often do not appear to be unintentional. Evidence in this editorial will demonstrate one of Dr. Fauci’s methods which he uses to deliberately distort the truth when reporting clinical research findings.

Fauci and AZT Relative Risk Reduction 

Click on the link below first then read the rest of this post

“Fauci’s First Fraud”

The video excerpts from “Fauci’s First Fraud” show a 2020 interview with Dr. Fauci, seated next to Dr. Deborah Birx of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. Fauci is reminiscing about HIV research during the clinical trials of AZT (Retrovir) in the 1980s.

Video – 23:57

Fauci suggests that the researchers at the time had all the clinical trial data necessary to achieve their objective and approve AZT.

Fauci: “Whenever you have clear-cut evidence that a drug works, you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people who are in the placebo group know so that they can have access…and all of the other trials that are taking place now have a new standard of care. So we would have normally waited several days until the data gets further—dot the i’s and cross the t’s. But the data are not going to change. Some of the numbers may change a little, but the conclusion will not change.” 

Video – 25:14

Fauci: “The mortality rate trended towards being better in the sense of less deaths in the Remdesivir group,…” [Fauci probably meant the Retrovir group,] 

“…8%, versus 11% in the placebo group.”

[These data probably refer to the adverse effects of anorexia, which were 8% in the Retrovir group and 11% in the placebo group. The Retrovir absolute risk reduction was 3%, calculated by subtracting the 8% event rate in the Retrovir group from the 11% event rate in the placebo group]. 

“It has not yet reached statistical significance,…” 

[Fauci appears to imply that the absolute risk reduction of 3% is too small to be a clinically significant outcome].

“…but the data needs to be further analyzed.”

[Fauci implies that the relative risk reduction needs to be calculated by dividing the absolute risk reduction of 3% by the placebo event rate of 11%. The relative risk reduction of the Retrovir group is just over 27%. However, this is the relative risk reduction of anorexia, not mortality, because Fauci appeared to misuse anorexia data in his example].

Dr. Fauci might respond to this editorial by claiming he did nothing wrong by further analyzing the data, because this is the usual method used, but that doesn’t make the distortion of the clinical results any less deceptive. 

Only absolute numbers should be used in clinical trials that measure a causative and controlled experimental effect. Relative numbers should only be used in observational studies that measure relative and uncontrolled associations, not absolute causes. Converting the absolute risk reduction to the relative risk reduction usually makes the risk reduction in the trial appear much larger than it actually is.

Dr-Ron-BrownRonald B. Brown, PhD has authored over a dozen peer-reviewed articles in the U.S. National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health; as well as a chapter on breakthrough knowledge synthesis in Contemporary Natural Philosophy and Philosophies. In addition to his epidemiologic and public health research on infectious disease and vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, his current areas of research include prevention of cancer, cardiovascular disease, dementia, and other chronic diseases.

Using your Internet Searching for your Credit Score


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Dec 31, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: Sir,

I cannot thank you enough for your tireless efforts in keeping us informed.

The insanity just keeps ramping up. An article today about Rebel News being denied a bank loan because they oppose Trudeau. Headline & link to the article:

Royal Bank of Canada rejected our mortgage because we’re conservative

DS

REPLY: There are serious proposals in the United States that they should follow China and make your browser searching part of the credit score. I have had serious off-the-record conversations that this proposal is being promoted behind the curtain and it appears to be coming from the Biden Administration.

I also spoke with a school psychologist who is very upset over what is taking place in identifying students. If they are anti-COVID VAX, they are immediately being associated with anti-all Vaccines and are considered to be White Supremacists. Well I have two black girls working for me and both are anti-COVID Vax so I do not see how this makes them a White Supremacist. Our staff covers ALL races and both Christain and Muslim. They are all anti-COVID Vax, not anti-vaccines, but have the intelligence to QUESTION what governments are pushing.

The New Norm is seeking to characterize everyone and the end goal here is to isolate and ostracize anyone who is anti-government/Republican/Libertarian. Today, they would be canceling Patrick Henry for daring to say “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” or Thomas Jefferson for his obvious terrorist statement in this cancel culture: “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”

ANYONE who disagrees with the left is now being called far-right extremists. This is all about suppression and altering our free societies into a new Schwab/Marxist Wonderland.

Biden Administration Claims of California Port Improvement Not Reflected in Port Operations for November


Posted originally on the conservative tree house December 31, 2021 | Sundance | 140 Comments

You might remember on October 13, 2021, Joe Biden delivered widely carried remarks about specific actions his administration was taking to increase operations at the Port of Los Angeles (POLA) and the Port of Long Beach (POLB).

Here we take a closer look at the claims since the original announcement, and then highlight the actual results from the ports.  The port operations are actually doing worse today than they were in October. They are less efficient, less productive and have offloaded less freight in November than they did in October.  The factual results are exactly the opposite of the administration claims.

The October 13, 2021, White House fact sheet is HERE, “announcing a series of public and private commitments to move more goods faster, and strengthen the resiliency of our supply chains, by moving towards 24/7 operations at the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.”  On November 17, 2021, the White House gave an update, “Recent Progress at Our Ports: Moving Cargo and Filling Shelves” and claiming the increased hours of operations were delivering on the White House expectations of increased productivity and offloading capacity.

Throughout these past 11 weeks, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Transportation secretary Pete Buttigieg have been claiming their supply chain task force has been successful in generating exceptional results and removing the backlog at the ports, specifically the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach.  However, if we look at the actual records from both ports, we find exactly the opposite:

Ports record their data in 20-foot equivalent units, or TEU’s.  The Port of Los Angeles data shows they handled 468,713 import containers in October, and 405,309 in November.  That’s a decrease of 63,404 import containers from the prior month. [DATA LINK]

The Port of Los Angeles is the largest port of the two.  The POLA also showed a decrease in Total TEU’s handled (import and export).  As you can see above, the total TEU’s handled in October was 902,643.  The total TEU’s handled in November was 811,459.

That’s a decrease of 91,184 total containers handled.  This is the exact opposite of what Biden, Harris and Buttigieg are claiming.

Next, we look at the Port of Long Beach (POLB).  [DATA HERE]

Again, we note the Total Loaded containers (carrying cargo) in October 2020, the month of the White House announcement, was 507, 214.   In the full month of November 2020, the total of loaded containers handled was 472,215.   That’s a decrease of 34,999 containers.

.

There is a disconnect between what the White House, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg are saying, and the actual results of what is taking place at the Port of Long Beach and Port of Los Angeles.

Perhaps the administration did not expect anyone to check when they claimed on November 29th:

“The Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach—which handle 40 percent of the country’s containerized imports—continue to show improvement in moving containers out of the docks and into warehouses.”  [White House link]

Despite what the White House Supply Chain Disruption Taskforce is claiming, the actual records from the ports do not concur.  Someone is clearly lying, and/or not expecting anyone to check.

There’s a strong possibility they did not expect anyone to notice, because part of their logistical scheme involved telling the ship operators to wait further offshore so that it would give the illusion of less congestion near port:

CALIFORNIA – […] “Starting Nov. 16, ships waiting to anchor at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach will have to wait for a green light about 150 miles from the coast, the Pacific Merchant Shipping Assn., the Pacific Maritime Assn. and the Marine Exchange of Southern California said in a statement Thursday. That compares with 20 nautical miles (23 miles) now. North- and southbound vessels must remain more than 50 miles from the state’s coastline.” (read more)

Apparently, what the White House taskforce did was to move the line of awaiting cargo ships further offshore to make them less visible.  Then, it appears, the White House just started making up talking points about productivity at the ports increasing and capacities expanding; neither claim is based on facts that surface in the actual operations of the ports.

The outcomes speak for themselves.  Both the Port of Los Angeles and Port of Long Beach handled less cargo in the first full month of the “new expanded operations” than they did in the previous month when the expanded operations were announced.

In order to remind ourselves how big an issue this was for the White House, watch the Biden announcement from October 13, 2020, again.

It looks like the media need to start asking questions….

Oh wait, never mind.

Dr. Robert Malone Discusses The Absence of Informed Consent and The Silencing of Vaccine Query


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on December 31, 2021 | Sundance | 215 Comments

Dr. Robert Malone was recently removed from the Twitter platform for providing raw scientific information and his interpretation surrounding SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, variants and vaccines.  Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of the nine original mRNA vaccine patents, which were originally filed in 1989 (including both the idea of mRNA vaccines and the original proof of principle experiments) and RNA transfection. Dr. Malone has close to 100 peer-reviewed publications which have been cited over 12,000 times.

Since January 2020, Dr. Malone has been leading a large team focused on clinical research design, drug development, computer modeling and mechanisms of action of repurposed drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. Dr. Malone is, in essence, one of the most prominent experts in the use of vaccines to advance public health.

After his voice was removed from Twitter, Dr. Malone appeared with Joe Rogan to discuss the issues and events surrounding the silencing of vaccine inquiry, and the lack of informed consent {Direct Rumble Link Segment}.  The full 3-hour interview with Joe Rogan is available on Spotify – LINK HERE.

.

Dr. Robert Malone’s Substack sign-up is: AVAILABLE HERE

Substack is absolutely the best way to see my writings. I appreciate everyone’s support in signing up for my newsletter. It truly matters to me.

Other social media links are:

https://gab.com/RobertMaloneMD
https://gettr.com/user/rwmalonemd
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rwmalonemd/

My website is:
http://www.rwmalonemd.com

• Dr. Robert Malone, MD, MS

Never Ending Fear Cycle, Marxist Public Teachers Group Wants to Lock Down Schools Again


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on December 31, 2021 | Sundance | 185 Comments

The National Educators United group, the epicenter of the indoctrination machine, wants to lock-out school students again because they are worried about Omicron. [Tweet Link] The “teachers” are organizing their Marxist tribe to send protest petitions to various education officials in an effort to avoid returning to school after the holiday break [petition link here]

It’s a tough call on which institutions have lost the most credibility over the past 18 months between the medical institutions, the education institutions or the institutions of the justice system (courts, FBI and DOJ).

To the ordinary American citizen and family, the scale of the ideological corruption amid a multitude of institutions is perhaps the biggest revelation of the past year.

Institutional Hoaxing – Brilliant Video Shows How Media, Joe Biden and Govt Health Officials Drove the Omicron Fear Narrative


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on December 31, 2021 | Sundance | 241 Comments

The already low credibility of media and the political health establishment has collapsed more in the final week of this year than most months preceding it.   Why?

The main cause of this specific moment, an inflection point in the arc of COVID history, was the Omicron “winter of death” narrative pushed by Joe Biden, the COVID taskforce, government health officials, left-wing politicians and media.   The Omicron doom and fear narrative became a parody of itself.   One brilliant videographer has put together a mashup showing what took place in the past ten days.

It all started with ultra-progressive Harris County, Texas, Judge Lina Hidalgo holding a dramatic press conference to report that an unvaccinated man in Houston, who was in his 50s, had died from the omicron variant (pictured left).

However, only one journalist actually called the hospital to check the claim and discovered what progressive Judge Lina Hildago claimed was actually false.  There was no unvaccinated 50-year-old man who died from Omicron in the hospital.  It was all made up by the judicial version of AOC.

Unfortunately, once the media, medical establishment and politicians had that press conference soundbite, FROM A JUDGE – not a doctor, they were off to the races.  This video brilliantly shows what happened next.  WATCH:

Illinois Holocaust Museum Begins Requiring Visitors to Show Approved Travel and Vaccination Papers


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on December 31, 2021 | Sundance | 278 Comments

As we exit the year 2021, the gravitational irony created by Omicron has become so strong the fabric of space and time have begun folding upon themselves.

The Illinois Holocaust Museum is targeting to remove the unclean visitors.

[Tweet source – Story Link]

As soon as tomorrow’s leaders reach yesterday, they will find us.

Until then comrades, we continue the checkpoint resistance.

A physician describes how the fear of COVID is affecting health and wellbeing


Originally Published on Rumble By The Post Millennial Clips  December 30, 2021 

Rumble — A physician describes how the fear of COVID is affecting health and wellbeing: “I think the fear can be more paralyzing.”

Deadly Ingredient In Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Home Test Kit


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Dec 31, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Even the test kits for the coronavirus could be potentially dangerous. The Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Home Test Kit received emergency use authorization, but the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning the kit contains a “solution in the tube contains a hazardous ingredient.”

That deadly ingredient is called sodium azide, and it could be deadly if ingested. A 1990 study studied the component after two college students fell ill following accidental ingestion after a physiology experiment. The student who consumed only a few sips survived, but their classmate died after consuming over 700 ml. “Sodium azide is an uncommon but potent poison which can cause serious illness and death,” the study concluded.

While the COVID test kits likely do not contain a lethal amount of the ingredient, it seems careless to distribute millions of kits across the country with an “uncommon but potent poison.” “If the solution contacts the skin or eye, flush with plenty of water. If irritation persists, seek medical advice,” the kit states.

The at-home test also contains a warning list of “potential risks” that include “possible discomfort during sample collection” and “possible incorrect test results.” Incorrect results! If that is a potential hazard, then why did the US government spend $3 billion in taxpayer funds to purchase 500 million kits? Are they attempting to inflate numbers, provide a false sense of security, or both?

The Media’s Top Fairy Tales of 2021


Armstrong Economics Blog/Humor Re-Posted Dec 31, 2021 by Martin Armstrong