Silent Prayer Prohibited in the UK


Posted originally on Nov 27, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Marx Religion Opium of Masses

Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Keir Starmer’s reign is akin to how America would have looked under a Kamala Harris presidency. The people have lost their ability to speak freely, and citizens are facing legal charges for speaking against Starmer’s regime. The New World Order is beginning right before our eyes.

A British Army veteran was convicted of expressing “disapproval of abortion.” This man spent 20 years proudly serving his nation. Yet, the Public Spaces Protection Order has deemed him a criminal for silently praying outside an abortion facility. He has been conditionally discharged and forced to pay a $12,000 (9,000 pound) fine for daring to pray in public.

The above video shows how disillusioned the authorities have become. “What is the nature of your prayer?” the police asked, to which the man replied he was praying for his deceased son. He was then told that he was praying in a “censorship zone,” where even your THOUGHTS can be criminalized.

Praying

Censorship zones were enacted in England and Wales on October 31, 2024. The zones are deemed “safe access zones” or “buffer zones,” and often span 150 meters around abortion clinics and hospitals. Protesting in any manner, handing out abortion alternative pamphlets, and any form of prayer – including silent prayer – is strictly prohibited. Scotland and Northern Ireland also implemented similar zones this October.

Another woman by the name of Isabel Vaughan-Spruce was arrested twice in Birmingham for silently praying in a buffer zone. Father Sean Gough has his day in court for the same crime. Both individuals were acquitted but now the government is no longer issuing slaps on the wrist.

The public is absolutely outraged. The army officer has received a petition with 60,000 signatures in his favor. Keir Starmer has failed to make a direct comment about the public outcry. People are understandably concerned over the government’s increasingly authoritarian policies. The Labour government has done away with the Freedom of Speech Act (2003) that was intended to protect free speech on university campuses. Starmer is looking for new methods to crack down on how people communicate online, and is not considering an amendment to the Online Safety Act that would punish people for speaking out against the government’s agenda online. Starmer has deemed any speech that goes against his wishes “misinformation” that must be criminalized.

Why are all the Build Back Better nations racing to eliminate free speech? The World Economic Forum (WEF) listed misinformation and disinformation as the most severe short-term global risk in its 2024 Global Risks Report. Schwab’s alliance demands international cooperation to stifle free speech. It calls for a “multi-sectoral approach” to ensure all media and tech companies carry out the government’s plan to defend the people against themselves.

Regulating Crypto Under Premise of Climate Change


Posted originally on Nov 27, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Cryptocurrency bitcoin basket

Governments are enacting subtle regulations over crypto. Texas has come out to demand that crypto miners report their power usage to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT). The state claims they need this information to regulate its volatile power grid.

Public Utilities Commission of Texas (PUCT) Chairman Thomas Gleeson stated that miners must provide all information from location, ownership, to energy output. “This is another example of the PUCT and ERCOT adapting to support a rapidly changing industrial landscape,” he said. ERCOT believes there will be a new load of 152 GW by 2030.

“The rule approved today will give the PUCT and ERCOT better awareness of virtual currency mining operations around the state, which have unique power consumption characteristics,” the commission said. “The information provided in the registration will help ERCOT manage the grid reliably as more virtual currency mining facilities connect to the grid.” Failure to register will result in a $25,000 DAILY penalty PER VIOLATION.

ERCOT already has access to energy usage meters. It is quite peculiar that they are expecting individuals to begin self-reporting. This is part of a broader trend to regulate crypto. New York, not reliant on a grid of any sort, wants 70% of its electricity to be renewable by 2030, but only about 29% of energy comes from a renewable source. The state has enacted a two-year moratorium on certain types of crypto mining, stating that they need to study the impacts that energy consumption will have on the climate. The days of having an unregulated crypto market are numbered.

GREAT NEWS: Thanksgiving Dinner for Ten People is only $58 This Year


Posted originally on the CTH on November 25, 2024 | Sundance 

Ignore the prices you see on the supermarket shelves and listen to the Farm Bureau folks.  The price of a Thanksgiving dinner for ten people is five percent lower this year.  You can feed a family gathering of ten people for a mere $58.08, cool.

[Farm Bureau – SEE DETAILS HERE]

Farm Bureau: “Americans stocking up for this year’s Thanksgiving dinner will see a dip in their grocery bills for the second year in a row. The 39th annual American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) Thanksgiving dinner survey finds that the classic feast for 10 will run you $58.08, down 5% from last year. However, this is still 19% higher than five years ago.” (link)

I mean, seriously?  A Thanksgiving dinner for ten people for around $58?

Does anyone else find this a little challenging to believe?

Suspicious Cat has gone from, well, suspicious to shocked!

Dr. Robert Malone Breaks Down If The NIH Should Be On The Chopping Block


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on Nov 25, 2024 at 7:20 pm EST

U.K and France in Discussions to Send NATO Troops Into Ukraine


Posted originally on the CTH on November 25, 2024 | Sundance 

With around 50 days remaining to stir up as much trouble as possible, and with around 50 days of strategic activity left in order to Trump-proof the UE coalition of the NATO alliance, the U.K and France are in “classified” discussions about sending their troops into Ukraine before President Trump takes office.

It should be remembered that President Barack Obama did not want to intervene in Libya, circa 2011.  That was a decision made by The U.S. State Department and CIA, pushed by Hillary Clinton, Samantha Power and Director Leon Panetta, and ultimately, militarily, executed by NATO Commander Admiral James Stavridis.  And yes, Libya was not a threat to NATO…. but it happened anyway.

The U.K recently signed a mutual defense agreement with Moldova, promising to come to their aid if conflict with Russia escalated into the country.  Now we see reports of the U.K traveling to France to create a two-party coalition within the larger NATO assembly, intended to send military troops into Ukraine.

Is an attack against allied troops analogous with an attack against a NATO member?  Before you answer that question, remind yourself of the justification for the reference Libya intervention, the infamous “Responsibility To Protect” or R2P.  Now, using that framework, revisit the question.  I digress.

Le Monde – […] As the conflict in Ukraine enters a new phase of escalation, discussions over sending Western troops and private defense companies to Ukraine have been revived, Le Monde has learned from corroborating sources. These are sensitive discussions, most of which are classified – relaunched in light of a potential American withdrawal of support for Kyiv once Donald Trump takes office on January 20, 2025.

The debate about sending troops to Ukraine, which French President Emmanuel Macron initiated at a meeting between Kyiv’s allies in Paris in February, was strongly opposed by some European countries, led by Germany. However, it was relaunched in recent weeks thanks to the visit to France of the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, for the November 11th commemorations. “Discussions are underway between the UK and France on defense cooperation, particularly with a view to creating a hard core of allies in Europe, focused on Ukraine and wider European security,” confided a British military source to Le Monde. (read more)

Almost all modern “western” wars are bankers’ wars.  To understand the activity, it is worth paying attention to who is the benefactor and who is the beneficiary in the Corporate/Government relationship.

History does not always repeat; however, it is almost guaranteed to rhyme.

DEA Suspended from Robbing Airline Passengers


Posted originally on Nov 25, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been criminalizing airline passengers since the Patriot Act gave them the permission to treat everyone as a suspected terrorist. The Justice Department has finally suspended the DEA from most passenger searches after an investigation revealed that the DEA was perhaps violating the Constitution with illegal and warrantless searches.

A Justice Department Office of Inspector General (OIG) memorandum outlined a DECADE worth of “significant concerns” about how DEA agents have been fabricating the criteria necessary to search passengers. In fact, the OIG found that one airline employee was paid tens of thousands of dollars as a kickback for seizing cash from unsuspecting passengers on behalf of the DEA.

The majority of searches and seizures at airports never find an actual crime. That does not prevent DEA agents from coercing passengers into forfeiting their assets. There are countless stories of innocent passengers losing everything for carrying an amount greater than $5,000 on board.

The DEA attempted to steal the life savings of a retired railroad engineer who had $82,373 in cash. The agency was forced to return he funds when the case went public. In another instance, a woman had over $40,000 confiscated without valid reason. Yet again, the DEA had to return the money when the story hit the news. This happens extremely frequently, but it is rare for the agency to return funds once they have been confiscated.

According to the Justice Department Office of Inspector General, the DEA seized $4 billion in cash from potential drug smugglers from 2007 to 2017, but only $3.2 billion was found to be connected to criminal activity. The report concluded: “”When seizure and administrative forfeitures do not ultimately advance an investigation or prosecution, law enforcement creates the appearance, and risks the reality, that it is more interested in seizing and forfeiting cash than advancing an investigation or prosecution.”

What is considered suspicious activity? “When you buy a last-minute ticket, we get alerts,” one DEA officer explained. “We come out, and we talk to those people, which I’ve tried to do to you, but you wouldn’t allow me to do it.” Purchasing a flight with an immediate return could set off the alarm, as could purchasing a ticket within 24 hours of travel. The DEA considers it suspicious if you travel without checked luggage.

Once, I flew back to the States from Europe during the July Fourth holiday. My ticket was originally booked for JFK in New York. I then remembered the traffic would be horrific so I switched to Philadelphia. When I landed, I was met by two IRS agents. Apparently, there was sting they set up at JFK looking for Americans coming home for holidays who do not pay taxes here. I said, “You can check. I pay my taxes here and do not live overseas.” That was not good enough. They thought I was tipped off to their sting in NYC, so they sent two agents to intercept me in Philadelphia simply because I switched planes.

How do we permit government agencies to seize assets on the premise of suspicion? Then, we allow these agencies to split the proceeds they illegally seized even if no crime was committed. Does the Constitution not apply at the airport?

The Election 2024 – Will there Be One in 2028?


Posted originally on Nov 24, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Election 2024 r

This is a special report on the political models forecasting Trump’s victory against all the polls, looking at the future, including the forecasts for the 2028 election, if there is even one. This report also dives into the fact that political parties often split and even vanish into the history books like the Federalists. Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party split into the Democrats vs. Republicans. Then, there was a takeover of parties like FDR during the 1930s, as Trump did in the Republican Party. There is always resistance, and today, Trump faces the RINOs in addition to the Democrats.

This report is unique and provides insight into the political chaos ahead.

Special Report … $9.95

Info on Dnipro


Posted originally on Nov 24, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

Sources from Ukraine confirm that Dnipro (Dnipropetrovsk) Ukraine was a major facility for Ukraine to manufacture missiles from Western components and relabel them “made in Ukraine” to shelter the Western suppliers in the NATO war against Russia. The Russian ICBM attack utterly destroyed the Yuzhmash manufacturing, which was an industrial giant even from the days of the USSR. It made rockets during the former USSR and intercontinental missiles for the USSR. According to sources, the Yuzhmash plant no longer exists.

Most of the facility was underground. Ukraine was manufacturing drones and rocket engines. This is where they assembled their weapons. There were three floors underground, each 6 meters high. Zelensky never thought Russia could possibly destroy this operation—but it has.

While this was just a conventional weapon, the impact was so powerful that buildings for several kilometers from the plant shook and suffered damage. Because this facility was underground, all the pipes for the water supply in the city have been destroyed. Messages have gotten out, and the resident commented that it felt like an earthquake.n Keep in mind this was devastating yet it was still just conventional. They could also deploy six nuclear warheads. Those hiding in bunkers are no longer safe during nuclear war,

Despite the Western Press still preaching the Neocon propaganda, emergency meetings reflect that this is a very serious development for warfare. Putin could have easily taken out Europe and American nuclear capability if he really wanted to conquer Europe, but he has been against turning this into World War III.

The Mel K Show


Posted originally on Nov 24, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

The Fools on the Hill


Posted originally on Nov 23, 2024 by Martin Armstrong 

The end

COMMENT FROM EUROPE: Hello, Mr. Armstrong; I hope you are having a good Saturday so far ? reading today your latest post ,it seems to me the world is approaching the day when it will turn into a massive graveyard .
Most European leaders are intentionally ignoring Putin warnings ,and the vast majority of people are just regurgitating what they read and watch in their local news. We need to stop this insanity before it is not turning back ,unfortunately I’m afraid what you are proposing getting Biden and company removed from office it won’t happen the real people behind this nuclear Armageddon have been planing this moment to arrive for decades .
Today more than ever every day is precious every moment of mirth we get to enjoy it is to be taken with gratitude for it could be our last .
All the best .?

G

1 2024_11_23_17_08_47_Putin_s_unmoving_hands_spark_speculation_amid_missile_attack_and_49_more_pages_

REPLY: I have been screaming as loud as I can today. No, they will not drag the four of them out. I was shooting for turning up the heat on the four of them. We have such an idiotic press that they have been so brainwashed that their readers are sent off into oblivion that they have ZERO understanding of what is taking place. Here is an article commenting on Putin’s hands not moving with the subtle inference that he is somehow scared and we can take them with no retaliation.

1 Mystery_drones_spotted_over_nuclear_weapon_airbase_after_Putin_threatens_UK_and_

Sources are saying that a wave of drones flew over three nuclear sites in the UK but did not attack. This was warning #2 that they would try to put out disinformation so the people are not scared that Russia just flew drones over the UK’s sites, and they were unaware that they were even coming.

1 2024_11_23_17_29_14_Ignore_Putin_At_Your_Own_Peril_He_Isn_t_Bluffing_Serbia_President_Serves_Hot

ALL of my sources from Eastern Europe are saying the same thing. Ignore Putin, and the West is finished.

1 2024_11_23_17_40_58_Putin_orders_Ukraine_s_removal_from_Kursk_by_Jan._20_deadline_The_New_Voice_of

Putin has ordered Zelensky to withdraw from Russia by January 20th. His display of his new weapon scared the hell of pf DOD and NATO to the point that even the head of NATO called Donald Trump. Every idiot who thinks this is a bluff not only does not understand Putin, but they are clueless about Russia. If he does not get aggressive, there could be a coup by the Russian version of our NEOCONs, and they are NOT interested in peace.

1 2024_11_23_17_33_43_Putin_s_scary_moves_aren_t_the_start_of_WWIII_they_re_acts_of_desperation_befo

I am very disappointed in the NY Post. I thought they were better than this. Putin’s acts were not desperation. He was holding his secret weapon development that the West did not know about, confirmed by the emergency meetings. The Western Press laughed at Putin when he warned that this could lead to World War III. Blinken in the White House thought he could force Putin to attack desperately to blame him for World War III. But this new weapon, the people that really do know behind the curtain the truth, was an effort to warn them this is checkmate.

It has been those controlling the Biden Administration who have acted in a desperate manner, fearing Trump will come in and they have to force Putin to act so they can declare World War III. The first two years of this Trump Administration are going to be high risk for what these people have been doing in the last few weeks of their power.