COMMENT #1: Re Institutionalizing of Real Estate Market Hi Marty Thank you for this post, I see your point that it is better that hedge funds buy real assets then plunge the world into a financial crisis with a pump and dump scam based on securitizing mortgages into packages calling them A rated when they were not… but it is very very very bad for the american people. In my lifetime corporations have taken over many areas where small businesses flourished – mom and pop cafes are now Starbucks, small neighborhood hardware stores and general stores are now Home Depot and Walmart… We cannot let hedge funds strip americans of home ownership. In italy, I looked at purchasing a property in Rome many years ago as I have family there. I thought perhaps I could rent it out most of the time and use it occasionally. Nope. The Italian government requires foreign buyers to rent out their properties for 8 years. They have put in to place laws to dissuade foreigners and large monied interests from purchasing homes out from under italian families and thereby kept the housing market away from Vancouver like phenomenas or like what is happening in Florida right now. I am sorry but I disagree that it is good hedge funds are buying homes, the middle class is taking one more knife in their backs on this trend. Please look out for the little guy, we need laws in place that restrict the monopolization of residential housing by financial titans. Thanks for the blog Alice
COMMENT #2: You may not admit who you advise, but it is clear that despite your low key, you are the only one big-money listens to. You say jump and they jump. Even China said they are using capital flow analysis and that was invented by you. All we have to do is read you and it’s easy to see what comes next. You were the only one saying this shift from government bonds to real estate and stocks. As you said, Barron’s did not believe you in 2010. Big-money did. The press may not cover you, and that is what big-money likes – exclusivity.
PA
REPLY: I am not arguing that hedge funds buying homes is a good thing. It is better than the way they pulled it off in 2007-2010 and it is “institutionalizing” real estate that means it will provide more stability to the entire housing market while also shrinking the availability until they need money.
The real issue boils down to the fact that those in government are simply TOTALLY INCOMPETENT when it comes to anything to do with manipulating the economy. They look at a single issue and have no understanding that everything is connected. When they lowered interest rates to negative at the ECB, there was a conflict with other CBs. I warned that if they followed the ECB, they would destroy the bonds market. Europe has done so and we now see that pushing that domino only sets off a string of events.
The reason they are buying real estate is simply that they cannot earn income from government bonds anymore. I am so tired of trying to help with talking to politicians because they ONLY act in their own self-interest. I can tell you that Mario Draghi, which is responsible for this debt crisis the world has been hurled into, would sit in trading rooms to try to understand the markets. He had NO experience as a trader for if he did, he would understand you cannot move rates negative for there is no way out. I know traders who would see him sitting in the corner of the room quietly observing.
As far as advice, there is a choice. I have opened up Socrates to the world. Big and small get to use it. Do not confuse the fact that I have a 40-year track record and the press will not cover me because they are only interested in opinions – not real analysis. The implication of the forecasts goes beyond merely the next trade. They reveal how the world really works. I managed money. I even ran a hedge fund for Deutsche Bank. Unless you do actual global trading, you will not see the connections. I had the lowest drawdowns and caught all the major moves since 1980.
You can claim to have made one great call. You can claim to have created a flawless model. But governments and big-money will NEVER commit to a hypothetical model. For it fails, and those who recommended it lose their jobs. That is reality. So, yes I have the longest track record. That counts for everything. I am trying to open the eyes of the world to see reality and to stop these types of shallow decisions that set in motion a sequence of events that they never anticipated.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 16, 2021 | sundance | 197 Comments
Last night and tonight, Fox News host Tucker Carlson led off the show with discussion of the “January 6th Insurrection” narrative.
On Tuesday night Carlson and Darren Beattie suggested some form of senate Church Committee 2.0 should be initiated in order to investigate the U.S. intelligence community, and specifically the FBI for their role in coordinating or facilitating the January 6th events. On Wednesday night Carlson again recommended the U.S. congress should start investigating.
Last night and tonight, Fox News host Tucker Carlson led off the show with discussion of the “January 6th Insurrection” narrative.
On Tuesday night Carlson and Darren Beattie suggested some form of senate Church Committee 2.0 should be initiated in order to investigate the U.S. intelligence community, and specifically the FBI for their role in coordinating or facilitating the January 6th events. On Wednesday night Carlson again recommended the U.S. congress should start investigating.
Putting aside the background motives of Tucker Carlson; and accepting he is making these recommendations in good faith; there is a fatal flaw in his suggestion – and the support from anyone else who would suggest the same or similar approach. The fatal flaw is an obvious one that unfortunately too many people just will not, and cannot, accept….
The Legislative Branch of the federal government is part of the Intelligence Community corruption. The oversight “gang of eight” (pictured above), are enablers and participants in the corrupt endeavors that Carlson wants them to investigate.
The House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) led by Chairman Adam Schiff, and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) led by Chairman Mark Warner, are part of the institutional corruption. This is the problem, the core issue in the background, that too few people are recognizing as they begin to see the corruption within the intelligence community. The legislative branch and the executive branch are working together; there is NO functioning oversight. {CLIFF NOTES}
The American people cannot currently expect congress to investigate the Intelligence Community (Church Committee 2.0) in the same way as historical reference may suggest, because the Senate (SSCI) is working in coordination with the exact corrupt intel system they are supposed to oversee. In essence, the *check* in the system is facilitating the intel corruption.
I can give you examples, actual empirical examples, of how this is currently constructed. We have recent references, several of them, to prove the Senate Intel Committee (SSCI) is working hand-in-glove with the agencies they are supposed to oversee. However, CTH is not alone in this depth of understanding; the executive branch of the United States government also knows this, and their behavior actually highlights their intent to cover up this issue.
That exact issue is why the U.S. Dept of Justice, Attorney General Merrick Garland, recently announced they will not permit any investigation of members of the intel committee for leaks (ie. compromises in national security). “Garland on Monday also met with news media executives about restricting the ability of leak hunters, after the disclosure that the Trump Justice Department secretly seized phone records of reporters. A New York Times lawyer called the meeting positive.” [LINK]
The presented narrative for justification of the DOJ blocking any leak investigations surrounds a false image of press freedom and points to prior action by the Trump era DOJ to “hunt” leaks that come from inside the legislative branch intel committees (HPSCI and SSCI). However, that justification is a ruse. AG Garland and Deputy AG Lisa Monaco are not stupid. They know Adam Schiff (HPSCI) and Mark Warner (SSCI) are facilitating corruption that exists within the intel agencies. As a result “leak hunters” in the Biden administration are forbidden from exposing the corrupt legislative coordination.
This is what I have been highlighting for two years, including when I wrote THIS long before Garland made that protective announcement. Sources inside the DC apparatus gave me specific information about how the legislative branch (intel committees), judicial branch (FISA and federal courts) and executive branch (FBI, DOJ-NSD, DNI, DIA, CIA etc) work together to continue allowing the intelligence apparatus to avoid any oversight.
Congressional oversight has been compromised. The intel system is self-aware and they have structured the current system (through the legislative branch) to protect themselves. Quite simply, they are working together. This is why the proposal (Church Committee) by @DarrenJBeattie unfortunately cannot work. The SSCI and HPSCI are part of the intel corruption. Put another way, the oversight “gang of eight”, is in on it.
The system they created is now self-protecting, self-aware, and every member in both the executive agencies and legislative oversight committees are dependent on it. An example is the “advise and consent” process within the Senate confirmation process for Intel leaders.
The SSCI will not allow any (non corrupt) intel nominee who might disrupt the controlled system. This is why Trump nominees to ODNI (example) were blocked by the SSCI *even though* Republicans held the chair (Richard Burr). Preservation of a corrupt system is not a party specific issue.
This is also why the SSCI facilitated the installation of Michael Atkinson as Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG). Atkinson was the DOJ-NSD chief legal counsel to John Carlin and later Mary McCord; both were at the center of the Carter Page FISA issues.
Michael Atkinson had a vested interest in keeping the corrupt system protected (including the FISA Court). When Atkinson left the DOJ-NSD he was nominated to the ICIG position (earworm Pence recommendation), confirmed by the SSCI and then Atkinson immediately went to work to facilitate changing the rules of the Office of The Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to modify what was allowed for whistleblower complaints. Those changes facilitated the first impeachment effort from an anonymous person inside the CIA. {Go Deep}
Simultaneously, the former head of the DOJ-NSD, Mary McCord [a Lawfare ally], had left the DOJ and assumed a position as the lead lawyer on Chairman Jerry Nadler’s judiciary committee where the articles of impeachment were created. McCord was awaiting the complaint that Atkinson facilitated. It was a coordinated effort.
I share that specific example as evidence of how the corruption between multiple agencies in the intel establishment are coordinated. The legislative branch, executive branch & judicial branch all worked at the behest of the larger control forces with the Intelligence Community. A unified ideology was the motive, remove Trump.
[SIDE NOTE. Notice where Mary McCord is now in 2021. McCord, the person who went with former DAG Sally Yates to confront White House Counsel Don McGahn about Michael Flynn, is still working inside the system to keep the intelligence corruption activity monitored, hidden and protected {Go Deep}].
This is how the system protects itself. There is no possibility for a Church Committee oversight approach to work because the House (HPSCI) and Senate (SSCI) are part of the intelligence corruption. This was done (over years) by design. The oversight is part of the problem. They are participating; actively participating. The senate is not going to investigate or expose intelligence corruption they themselves are a part of.
While I don’t know the exact solution to this specific problem, because we are not at the point where solutions can even be debated, I do know what it will take to solve the first part of the issue….
THE ISSUE? The American people don’t know the scale of the problem yet, as evidenced by Carlson’s suggestion.
We live in this bizarro world where people debate the hypocrisy of a “dual justice system”, without ever accepting that it is not hypocrisy – it is by design. The double standards are a feature, not a flaw. Remember, actual, real-life, Domestic Violent Extremists called Black Lives Matter & Antifa, tried to burn Washington DC in the summer of 2020. Not a single arrest. Not one. Not a single FBI tweet about “help us find those arsonists who attempted to burn St. John’s church”. Nothing.
The DOJ and FBI willfully and purposefully turn a blind eye to literal acts of domestic violence, shootings, beatings, arson, murder, riots and chaos -even attacks on federal buildings- and do nothing. There will be NO HELP from federal law enforcement in the confrontation of corruption. There will be NO HELP from legislative oversight in the confrontation of corruption. We The People are the people we have been waiting for; it’s up to us.
In the background I have been giving advice to some solid patriots about how to structure the baseline of information distribution that will be needed to break through the media firewall. However, the key is to accept we are insurgents now. We cannot expect federal law enforcement to support ANY endeavor to push sunlight to the surface.
If you know the police are actively supporting the drug dealers, perhaps even facilitating the distribution itself, it does you no good to take your information about drugs being sold in your neighborhood to those same police. This is the issue with information about the 2020 election fraud. There is a way to do it, but it requires outside the box thinking…. The ‘truth-tellers’ need to think and, more importantly, operate like insurgents; accepting that federal law enforcement views the truth as adverse to their interests.
Until then, it is futile to expect the legislative branch to investigate the FBI or intelligence community, because the legislative branch oversight committees are helping the FBI and intelligence community carry out their corrupt activity. Meanwhile the DOJ (Garland and Monaco) are coordinating to keep the corruption from being exposed {Go Deep}.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 16, 2021 | sundance | 433 Comments
Russian President Vladimir Putin embarrassed a visibly cognitively impaired Joe Biden today in Geneva, Switzerland. To be fair, Putin didn’t have to do much other than stand there and let the world see a mumbling fool with note cards try to remember his rehearsed lines on the international stage.
However, it was likely the international embarrassment and the frustrated feedback from his handlers; in combination with his own internal admissions of inadequacy; that triggered the inappropriate angry outburst toward the traveling press corps:
One of Biden’s ongoing issues is the press corps wants and likes ‘their girl‘ Kamala Harris more than the installed Biden. Even the ideological press corps laughs at just how hard they need to work to keep up appearances. Pre-approved journalists asking pre-scripted questions to get rehearsed mumbling responses, must get a little boring after a while…. Move away from that control element, and you get what is highlighted above. More below:
“As usual they gave me the pre-approved list”…
Mumbles incoherently about nothingness on China policy…
Joe Biden put in a fumbling, mumbling, bumbling performance at the G-7 Summit. He’s a clown who does as he’s told and what he does is carry out the globalists’ desire for Agendas 21 and 30. It’s always the same—the climate change bunk is pushed while more government tyranny is urged.
Whatever glimmer of hope I once harbored toward Britain’s Boris Johnson was obliterated when he talked about ‘gender neutral’ governance. He said it needed to be more feminine, but being female is not neutral. Maybe Boris means men should become more like women, but at the end Johnson comes across as a loony. BOJO is aligned with Biden and pushes the dangerous vaccinations. Great Britain has the highest rate of the poisonous injections. Despite this, Boris also wants to keep his country on lockdown. Pathetic.
Macron got slapped by a fellow Frenchman who hated the direction the globalist banker-led leader was taking the country.
Justin Trudeau is another joke of a leader, but the tyranny he has inflicted on Canada is no laughing matter.
QUESTION #1: It has become impossible to buy houses between $300-$500,000 in the Orlando area. From a realtor, he said that Blackrock is buying everything and they rely on a famous forecaster who said real estate is the only way to earn income. He said he heard it was someone in Florida. Is that you?
HP
QUESTION #2: Is Vanguard and Blackrock part of the great reset fraud?
SB
QUESTION #3: With the revelation of Blackrock buying up single family homes and making homeownership and rentals unaffordable, what is the average person to do? My son and his family and my husband and I were getting ready to purchase homes to settle down in but have now been priced out of most markets and rentals are also hard to come by that we can afford. We live in California but are wanting to get out of Dodge. Sharon
ANSWER: I am not a liberty to say who is and who is not our client. What I can confirm is that Blackrock has bought more than 20,000 homes in Florida under $500K. They are buying for cash and this is the result of artificially low interest rates. Central banks have created a disincentive for buying government bonds. This is going to come to a head and we will see interest rates rise because big money is looking at the return on renting out homes rather than investing in bonds.
This is not part of the Great Reset in saying you will own nothing. This is the shift from Public to Private. You cannot artificially lower interest rates to absurd levels under real risk and then expect them to remain there indefinitely when these pension and investment funds need higher returns. The good news to this trend is that it is resulting in the institutionalizing of the real estate market which is far better than the last attempt by creating mortgage-backed securities.
Socrates covers real estate around the world which has been part of our Institutional services. We have made this available to all levels of subscribers. We do have this broken down per state in the USA. We will be adding that to the general system because of the impact of this shifting from Public to Private in capital investment.
QUESTION: Good Morning, If we take the statement “History repeats because human nature never changes” it would suggest that the human nature cycle will never reverse. That in itself does not track. If everything is like a pendulum, shouldn’t it swing back around to where human nature can and will change? And a lesser 2nd question to that end, if human nature did change how would that affect Socrates’ forecasts 🙂 ?
GM
ANSWER: Human nature will never change insofar as we all have personal feelings — we can love or hate. That said, we are also influenced by mob behavior. The experiments of Stanley Milgram show that people would torture another if ordered to do so. He called his discovery, Obedience to Authority.
That said, society swings back and further between public & private confidence. People canceling anyone who has ever said anything, even 30 years ago, is the swing of the pendulum excessively to the left. The swing is based upon the “sheep” who can be herded and they will move back and forth depending upon their influence. That does not negate that we still have within human nature the battle between good and evil. Therefore, every government in history has collapsed because human nature swings back and forth.
Socrates is NOT HARD-CODED to follow some specific predetermined outcome. It adapts to the changes in trends. It is truly Artificial Intelligence, not some neural net or expert system that looks up the predetermined answer. All I did was teach it how TO ANALYZE and then set it loose on the world. This is a very important point. I was interested in discovering how the world functions. I did not create a program to merely report what I wanted it to say — I am not the government!
This is the real deal. It has taught me a lot in life.
Houston Methodist Hospital is telling employees that if they refuse to take the vaccine, they will be fired. Now 117 employees have joined a lawsuit against the hospital, and they are saying that the hospital is trying to force people to take an experimental vaccine. Instead, the dictatorial hospital management is comparing it to the flu vaccine and refuses to acknowledge that there is even a difference. Quite frankly, this does not look like a hospital you should allow a family member to even enter. They obviously have no respect for human rights. How can the protests against restrictions against abortions be covered under the right of privacy but not this experimental vaccine?
Roe vWade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. Understanding the foundation of Roe v Wade and why it cannot be overturned without jeopardizing our right to privacy in the face of this contrived pandemic is critical. In 1965, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law banning the distribution of birth control to married couples, ruling that the law violated their implied right to privacy under the U.S. Constitution, GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965). How do you enforce that a married couple illegally used a condom during sex? Does an FBI agency have to watch? And in 1972, the Supreme Court struck down a law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried adults. Again, there is no way to enforce such laws without a government agent observing every sexual act.
To overturn Roe v Wade would also mean that the government can order you to take vaccines that violate your religion and even alter your DNA. We must be very careful about overruling Roe v Wade for to do so that would result in the termination of the right to privacy would sweep through everything, and we all could then be subject to tyrannical decrees in the name of public health. Do you really want to give people like Fauci supreme power to imprison you or accept whatever he declares is in the public interest?
Bill Gates wanted to know Melinda’s IQ before he married her. Under Gates, the government could just as easily impose an IQ test and determine you are not qualified to have children — in the public interest, of course. Gates has already funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. He is obsessed with population control.
I am not making up wild conspiracy theories here. The U.S. Supreme Court actually upheld the eugenics views in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., that actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927). This case has not been overturned, but if it were challenged, then the same right to privacy from which Roe v Wade stands would come into play. Overturn that case, and a lot more tyranny will follow. The only possible way to overturn Roe v Wade must involve the due process right to life and liberty without somehow overturning the right to privacy. That can be a real Pandora’s Box.
The old saying, “Be careful what you wish for!” comes to mind. I would NOT be in favor of overturning Roe v Wade by the Supreme Court for fear that somehow we lose the right to privacy. Those that want to eliminate abortion based on their religious views are not that dissimilar to those who wanted to end slavery on the same human rights platform. Perhaps we need a Constitutional Amendment that guarantees the Right to Privacy in explicit terms, for this is a much bigger issue than just abortion. These vaccines are showing the same argument — IF IT’S NOT YOUR BODY, IT’S NOT YOUR CHOICE.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 16, 2021 | Sundance | 104 Comments
Tucker Carlson did an extensive monologue and interview last night as a review of the January 6th DC protest while contrast against the likelihood of FBI organization and coordination. Many are calling this a brave outline because Carlson will likely face backlash for the overview. As CTH has noted often, the politicization of the U.S. intelligence apparatus is the biggest threat to our constitutional republic. In this segment Carlson arrives at the same conclusion.
Carlson used a Revolver article (SEE HERE) by Darren Beattie as the framework for the discussion. The additional examples Carlson uses are familiar to CTH readers as we have used them before to highlight how politically corrupt the FBI has become. For those who missed the segment it is in the first 15 minutes of the video below (likely will not last long).
Unfortunately, and completely understandably, due to the content being outlined both Carlson and Beattie need to couch their words carefully. However, CTH does not.
Often when discussion of these types of issues takes place, so much time is exhausted presenting material in order to defend yourself from attacks by those who wish to block the discussion. CTH has taken a position that our library of evidence is enough to stand alone, as a consequence we have long passed the point of needing to present endless examples to backstop the analysis. Quite simply it makes the research articles repetitive and too lengthy.
Avoiding the pitfalls of exhaustive repetition for points that are, by now, brutally obvious; and considering the urgency in the matters being discussed, it’s worth just accepting a few baselines as we move forward.
In the bigger picture anyone with intellectual honesty would admit it is impossible for Antifa to exist if the DOJ and FBI were functioning as a healthy part of the national law enforcement system. A few dozen arrests for transparently obvious violence, combined with a few RICO cases against the financial systems that support Antifa and the entire violent group essentially disappears. Therefore, it is worth just accepting the obvious…. The DOJ and FBI are part of the support structure that allows political violence to exist.
I would personally take it (confidently) a step further and say: Antifa simply could not exist without the explicit support of the DOJ/FBI. Sometimes that support comes in the way of willful blindness or ignoring their activity. Regardless of each granular example, the fact remains – both the DOJ and FBI do absolutely nothing to eliminate a threat to the domestic tranquility, even when specific individuals carry out extreme violent acts with public visibility and reckless abandon.
Another brutally obvious issue was the transparency of the 2020 election fraud in seven key regions. Do you really think the DNC and political operative in/around those corrupt cities and regions would carry out such transparently obvious fraud if they didn’t feel confident the DOJ/FBI would look the other way?
We live in this bizarro world where people debate the hypocrisy of a “dual justice system”, without ever accepting that it is not hypocrisy – it is by design. The standards are a feature, not a flaw.
Actual, real-life, Domestic Violent Extremists called Black Lives Matter and Antifa, tried to burn Washington DC in the summer of 2020. Not a single arrest. Not one. Not a single public tweet about “help us find those arsonists who attempted to burn St. John’s church”. Nothing.
The DOJ and FBI willfully and purposefully turn a blind eye to literal acts of domestic violence, shootings, beatings, arson, murder, riots and chaos -even attacks on federal buildings- and do nothing. NOTHING.
Just like how federal contractors were/are purposefully given the keys to NSA/FBI databases to exploit and extract information for political targeting, so too is Antifa essentially operating as a federal contractor for domestic violence.
In essence, the FBI is Antifa…. and before that the FBI was Occupy…. and before that the FBI was supporting the 2007 SEIU/AFSCME political thugs. Go ahead and prove me wrong, but you better bring receipts; because there is a mountain of historical evidence to support my position.
Russia has a state police that CNN, the New York Times and Washington Post likes to talk about all the time as a negative attribute to the former communist bloc. However, The United States has the FBI. Go ahead and tell me the difference between Russian “state police”, and the FBI as U.S. “state police“?
The FBI controls who gets security clearances for key positions in the U.S. government, by controlling the investigations to support the application. Knowing what you know now about how the FBI operates, don’t you think the FBI use that authority as a filtering tool against any entity who would disrupt or dismantle their power structure?
If you start from the framework that the FBI as an institution is a political operation intent on protecting the currently corrupt systems that function as weapons within the United States government, then of course they would organize, coordinate and conduct subversive operations against groups and individuals they perceive as their enemy.
The largest recent example was their operation(s) against presidential candidate Donald Trump. That campaign included 50 FBI agents later assigned to the Weissmann/Mueller operation to create an obstruction case against President Trump in order to remove him from office. That’s FIFTY FBI agents participating in the Mueller operation. Not a single one of those fifty FBI agents ever spoke out EVEN AFTER all evidence surfaced about how the FBI was manipulating the evidence inside the investigation itself. [Example: Chris Steele’s primary sub-source refuting the Steele dossier to the investigative agents, yet they still continued with the Title-1 surveillance warrant, FISA renewals, against Carter Page.]
The FBI is a corrupt ideological institution that targets their political opposition. Of course the FBI planned, organized, assisted and in some ways carried out the January 6th operation to create the exact narrative currently being used to grant them more authority.
Do you really think the FBI would be publicly behaving like this if they were not a politically ideological institution?
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 15, 2021 | Sundance | 172 Comments
In a follow-up to her brave, live, on-air reporting yesterday, Fox26 Journalist Ivory Hecker provides Project Veritas with evidence of Fox News corporate bosses giving instructions about how to frame stories to follow the ideological agenda of the outlet. [Video Below]
[HOUSTON, TX – June 15, 2021] Project Veritas released a new video today featuring a sit-down interview with recently-suspended Fox 26 reporter, Ivory Hecker, who blew the whistle on her own network for what she says are acts of deception. She claims the station’s editorial decisions are an affront to honest journalism.
Hecker, who serves as a dayside reporter primarily for the five and six o’clock news, came forward to Project Veritas with recordings of her colleagues and superiors showing a pattern of “censorship” on COVID-19 and Bitcoin-related stories. She also highlighted a pattern of submission among the local affiliate’s leadership to Fox’s corporate interests, rather than acting in the interest of transparency with its viewers.
“Viewers are being deceived about some of the things that are going on,” Hecker told Veritas. (read more)
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 15, 2021 | Sundance | 75 Comments
Wendy Rogers, State Senator representing Arizona’s 6th legislative district, gives an interview to One America News on the status of the Maricopa County ballot audit and the propaganda that is being launched against their efforts. As Representative Rogers notes the Arizona Senate only has a one vote margin in favor of Republicans, and it is that slim margin that supports the ongoing verification of the election integrity.
OAN reporter Natalie Harp starts the video [Rumble link Here] by outlining the background issues created by the Biden administration’s effort to fight against election audits.
,
Additionally, Bernard Kerik gives a review from his recent visit to the audit facility:
[…] The Democrats aren’t “just” afraid of the outcome – but they’re afraid that the audit results will be irrefutable and unimpeachable. They know that their efforts to discredit the audit process in Arizona will not stand up to scrutiny and here’s why.
The Arizona audit is being run impeccably, utilizing security and surveillance procedures with a longstanding track record of effectiveness. To say that I was impressed after viewing the audit process for myself would be a massive understatement. (read more)
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 