Posted originally on the Conservative tree house on May 13, 2021 | Sundance | 471 Comments

Over the past two weeks the questioning of the CDC has become intense.  A larger portion of the American electorate are awakening to the overall fraud perpetrated by the political operatives in control of the institution.  The most recent inflection point was a New York Times article that cited studies showing no evidence, not a single case, of COVID infection came from casual outdoor contact(s).

The leftist audience that reads the NYT responded like a cow had just randomly licked them on the forehead.  It is true that fish do not know they are in water…

“There’s a glaring omission from this discussion about why people “can’t quit” pandemic behaviors: the mental and emotional toll of the last year. After what many have been through—death, grief, isolation, stress, anxiety, unemployment, trauma—people are going to have some feelings around transitioning back to a less cautious way of life.” (link)

However, the reality of the evidence was always there in the results from states like Florida who quickly re-opened their businesses, allowed congregation, and never saw any issue with increased infection rates.  What the NYT published was basically just an affirmation  of what several states had been saying all along.  There was no scientific evidence to support the previous rules and restrictions from the CDC.

Additionally, in the face of growing questioning it was obvious the level of double-speak from the mouths of CDC officials and Anthony Fauci could no longer be reconciled; and is, in fact, running up against the reality of recent scientific evidence reflecting that most -if not all- of the prior CDC guidance was not based on science.

As customary when any general awakening starts to shift the narrative away from the control authority, the manipulators need to get out in front of the groundswell lest they look like the manipulative fools they are.  As a direct consequence the CDC comes out today with new guidance, while still clinging to their vaccine narrative.  CDC:

“If you’ve been fully vaccinated:

• You can resume activities that you did prior to the pandemic.
• You can resume activities without wearing a mask or staying 6 feet apart, except where required by federal, state, local, tribal, or territorial laws, rules, and regulations, including local business and workplace guidance.” (link)

.

The CDC is clinging to the vaccination narrative because if they don’t then people will be even more likely to realize the overall COVID-19 narrative has been one massive fraud perpetrated upon people.

Why was COVID-19 being disproportionately hyped as such a dangerous threat, when the reality of the statistical danger was much less than the intense level of hype?… That is the key question.

The answer is… social, societal and governmental changes, under the guise of COVID-19 mitigation, are the entry point for the goals and aspirations of the political left on a national and global scale. COVID-19 is a virus, but also a very important political weapon, and we finding out now exactly what the purpose of the hype was all about.

What the political operatives inside the systems of government did was weaponize COVID-19 to attain ideological objectives. This is why they hyped the fear within COVID for over a year. Nothing within their plan required the approval or consent of any representative body in Washington DC.  The bureaucratic system was functioning as a totalitarian body controlling the behavior of people.

COVID-19 was always the tool to “fundamentally change” the way the United States exists.  Sometimes a CONSPIRACY THEORY is not a ‘theory’.

Anthony Fauci, a political ideologue and leftist advocate, was the primary government influence agent that led to trillions in economic damage and impacted the lives of all Americans with false assertions and brutally political virus mitigation efforts.

Armstrong Economics Blog/Canada Re-Posted May 13, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

While there are many who fear Biden’s mental capacity, my greatest concern is who is really running the nation? Under Bush, Jr., the president was Dick Cheney, and thank God the Republicans ousted  Liz Cheney. The way politics has evolved, those in charge are never seen. It’s like the European Commission hiding in the shadows but pulling the strings.

Biden is keeping the Canadian border closed while keeping the Mexican border open. The scuttlebutt I get from Washington is to allow the Mexicans to flood the Southern Republican states to further their Socialist takeover of the country and plan to allow illegal aliens to vote, which they assume will be for Democrats.

Additionally, Trudeau is the puppet of the World Economic Forum, and he endorses everything Schwab says. Canada, they hope, will become the poster-child for the Great Reset that the Democrats will point to in 2022. So crushing the Canadian economy may have greater importance than what Trudeau is doing to his own people.

Armstrong Economics Blog/Revolution Re-Posted May 13, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

2021 US Open Letter from Retired Generals and Adm

Indeed, I have been warning that our models have been pointing to tremendous civil unrest which will eventually lead to the break-up of the United States post-2024 and the war this Great Reset unleashes upon the world. People like Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab are as dangerous to humanity as Adolf Hitler, Stalin, or Lenin. They only see their dream and fail to understand that the world is split 50/50 on this idea of Marxism and we are not their toy things to play with.

More than 120 retired U.S. generals and admirals have now signed an open letter warning that the United States is embroiled in a major confrontation between freedom and Marxism. They wrote:

“We are in a fight for our survival as a Constitutional Republic like no other time since our founding in 1776. The conflict is between supporters of Socialism and Marxism vs. supporters of Constitutional freedom and liberty.”

Back in the 1980s, I was requested permission back then to teach the Economic Confidence Model (ECM) at the Citadel military school. It was then was I first realized that people were listening to the cyclical nature of war and how it was linked to the economy. The ECM was being taught in philosophy class. That is when I was compared to Hegel. I had seen myself as a simple trader. I was being summoned by politicians, military theorists, and even Milton Friedman who came to listen to me deliver a speech in Chicago. I supposed that is how most of the greatest discoveries in society take place – by accident. I certainly never aspired to be a military strategist nor an economist. What I ended up being confronted by was how the ECM was being seen by many in different fields.

Indeed, I was listening to a lecture by Sallie Baliunas and what she discovered from the ice core samples obtained from the North Pole. She revealed that there was a 300-year cycle to the energy output of the sun which appeared in the ice core data. When I look at the cycle she revealed, I was stunned. It matched the 309.6-year cycle of the ECM. What I had discovered from the historical record of the rise and fall of nations that followed the ECM, suddenly I was confronted with at least part of the explanation – climate change.

Interestingly it was  October 7th, 1763 when George III issued a British Royal Proclamation of 1763, closing aboriginal lands in North America north and west of Alleghenies to white settlements. This was the start of the confrontation that would eventually lead to the Revolution 13 years later. This also marked the Financial Panic of 1763 which was the collapse in commodity prices. George III had succeeded his grandfather, George II, to the throne of Great Britain on October 25, 1760. The king’s new advisors re-evaluated Britain’s trade policies with the colonies. For over one hundred years, Great Britain had regulated colonial trade with a number
of navigation and trade laws, but they were not really enforced. The substantial increase in the size of the British Navy during the war with France gave the British government the strength to now combat colonial
smuggling and enforce trade laws more effectively after 1760.

To crackdown on smuggling in the American colonies, the British government also increasingly began to use Writs of Assistance. A type of search warrant that inspired the 4th Amendment because these writs authorized government officials to look for contraband, such as smuggled goods, in private homes and businesses at random. The writs also placed no limits on the time, place, or manner of a search. In 1761, sixty-three Boston merchants challenged the legality of the process. James Otis, Jr., an attorney who had formerly represented the royal government, argued the case for the merchants. Though they lost their case, the surrounding publicity fueled anger within the merchant classes of Boston against the British government. John Adams was there listening to the argument of James Otis. He remarked that there and then the revolution was born.

Ironically, our model on the prospects for the rise in a civil war in the United States turned upward in December 2019 when COVID was released. This should erupt within three years of that turning point which will be 2022. That is not to say there will be a civil war at that time, but the confrontation will rise up and start to take shape in 2022. Traditionally, the revolution will erupt 13 years after that turning point which ironically brings us precisely to 2032.