Is 666 also the Number of the Universe?


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

666

QUESTION: Hi Martin,

I am unsure if I have informed you of a little thing I noticed about the ECM a while back that I was recently reminded of and you may find interesting. I’ll keep it simple. The square root of 666 is 25.8069….. / 3 = 8.6023…. coincidence or relation?

I Know it is fractal but are we not in the 6th wave of the 6th wave of the 6th Wave most applicable to us and our time?

It is clear to me rather it is the symptom or the disease that we are trapped in a negative cycle and getting nowhere like a hamster wheel.

The cycle must be broken, perhaps we can at least change the frequency, but how?

Best Regards,

MP

Nero Bust

ANSWER: Very interesting calculation. I know that the number of his name is supposed to be based on the Greek alphabet, in which each letter represents a number. There has been some debate that it was translated in Arabic numerals as 616 (χιϛ), not 666. The Novum Testamentum Graece, a Greek translation, read χιϛ/616 as a variation. Nevertheless, many had interpreted that the number of the beast referred to the Roman Emperor Nero. In several editions of the Bible in Greek, the number is represented by the final three words, ἑξακόσιοι ἑξήκοντα ἕξhexakósioi hexēkonta héx, which does translate to “six hundred [and] sixty-six.”

PrecessionEquiinoxes

The one thing that is fundamental in this universe of ours is that everything is fractal. It is always the same structure throughout all time scales. Therefore, if a cycle is VALID, it must be fractal and appear on all levels of time. The 8.6 times 3 is 25.8. The Precession of the equinox is 25,800 years. Not only is 8.6 years equal to the perfect number of Pi * 1,000 days, but every level of time must also conform. Therefore, a super-cycle measured in thousands of years must be a fractal of the lowest level to be valid. Your calculation of the square root of 666 being 25.8069 is fascinating. Does this imply that it should be 666 rather than 616?

Evolution 1

Recorded history began with the invention of writing around the 4th millennium BC, with the earliest verifiable records attributed to the Sumerians in Mesopotamia around 2900 BC. This period marks the transition from prehistory, where no written records exist, to documented historical accounts. Human evolution began approximately six million years ago when our ancestors started to diverge from the common ancestors shared with great apes. The emergence of anatomically modern humans, Homo sapiens, occurred around 300,000 years ago. Darwin’s theory of evolution does not discredit the Biblical account, for there is nothing to say that God did not take an ape and reshape it. The missing link has never been discovered, but there are undoubtedly different species of humanoids, such as Neanderthals.

Great Flood

The story of the Great Flood and Noah’s Ark has survived with variations in many cultures. We even have Babylonian accounts and reliefs depicting the people dying in the Great Flood. We also know that Abraham came from that region where he lived in the city of Ur.

Septimus Severus 193 211AD AE8 Assaria os Apameis Phrygia Story of Noah

The story of Noah’s Ark landing in what is a region of Turkey known in ancient times as Phrygia is even celebrated on Roman coins. The Ark depicted on this coin from the 2nd century AD even has the name inscribed “NOAH” on the vessel in Greek. This confirms that the story of the great flood was not confined to the Bible. It is entirely possible that this story dates back to the 10,000 BC era and represents the previous civilization.

Egypt Sphix Pyramid

What we do know is that the ancients had often built upon the ruins of the previous. The ancient city of Troy has several layers. Some argue that the Sphinx was originally a lion that was created about 10,000 BC facing the constellation Leo and was recarved with the human head by the Egyptians.

World_map_indicating_tropics_and_subtropics 1024x572
Sahara Cave Paintins

People fail to understand that our planet’s entire weather system is extremely dynamic. Research has traced the north-south shifts of the northernmost edge of the tropics back 800 years, conducted by the University of Arizona-led international team. They have mapped out that the Tropic Belt is also subject to cyclical movement. I have reported that in ancient times, the region we call the Sahara Desert was lush and green, and cave drawings showed herds of animals in the area. The research has revealed that, indeed, the Tropic Belt has moved upward and downward over the centuries, and the study has documented where it has moved for the last 800 years.

The University of Arizona wrote: “From 1568 to 1634, the tropics expanded to the north, the team found. That time period coincides with severe droughts and other disruptions of human societies, including the collapse of the Ottoman empire in Turkey, the end of the Ming Dynasty in China and near abandonment of the Jamestown Colony in Virginia…”

The Tropic Belt has been gradually moving northward since 1970. There is debate over what is even causing that. Again, this only confirms that the climate change theories caused by fossil fuels are just absurd.

Cycle of Evolution

The real unanswered question is whether there is also an evolutionary cycle like Noah’s where most of civilization is wiped out, and we have to start all over again. Is that cycle every 8,600 years? This is the 64 million dollar question.

Global Warming Cavemen Climate

Biden’s Pardons are Unconstitutional


Posted originally on Jan 27, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Pardon Get Our of Jail Free Card

COMMENT: Dear Marty

I read your article about Fauci’s pardon being unconstitutional, but I have something to add.

The basis for pre-emptive pardons being unlawful can be found in ancient English constitutional law, see the Prince of Orange’s 1688 Declaration of Reason that preceded England’s 1688 Bill of Rights. This carries over to USA via the 9th Amendment “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” A pre-emptive pardon also violates due process of law, see 5th & 14th Amendment and can therefore only be done after conviction, see this passage from the Prince of Orange’s (Future King William IIIs) Declaration of Reason.”For though the King may pardon the Punishment that a Transgressor has incurred, and to which he is condemned; as in Cases of Treason or Felony; yet it cannot be, with any Colour of Reason, inferred from thence, that the King can intirely suspend the Execution of those Laws relating to Treason or Felony, unless it is pretended, that he is cloathed with a despotick and arbitrary Power, and that the Lives, Liberties, Honours, and Estates of the Subjects, depend wholly on his goodwill and Pleasure, and are intirely subject to him; which must infallibly follow on the King’s having a Power to suspend the Execution of Laws, and to dispense with them.”
Prince of Orange’s Declaration: 19 December 1688 | British History Online

This leads to Art.1 of the 1688 Bill of Rights:
“That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regall Authority without Consent of Parlyament is illegall.” King/President may pardon after conviction but only Parliament/Congress may suspend the law.”

This has similar meaning as Article II of the US Constitution that requires the President to ensure “that the Laws be faithfully executed”

This all goes back to due process of law, the President cannot interfere with due process through the prerogative of pardon or mercy.

Going back to the old world, citing Sir Edward Coke, The US Supreme Court stated in 1855 that The words, “due process of law” (in the 5th & 14th Amendments), were undoubtedly intended to convey the same meaning as the words, “by the law of the land”, in Art.29 Magna Carta 1297. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/59/272.html

The Scottish 1689 Claim of Rights states the same thing in different language in Art.1, “That all Proclamationes asserting ane absolute power to Cass annull and Dissable lawes… are Contrair to Law”” and it states in the pre-amble, “Wheras King James the Seventh… Did By the advyce of wicked and evill Counsellers (Secretaries of State) Invade the fundamentall Constitution of this Kingdome And altered it from a legall limited monarchy to ane Arbitrary Despotick power and in a publick proclamation asserted ane absolute power to cass annull and dissable all the lawes particularly arraigning the lawes Establishing the protestant religion and did Exerce that power to the subversion of the protestant Religion and to the violation of the lawes and liberties of the Kingdome”

Claim of Right Act 1689
legislation.gov.uk
apple-touch-icon.png

REPLY: Excellent research. The Common Law is supposed to apply in the USA.  I hope Trump’s team reads this. As the outgoing president, Joe Biden gave pardons to five family members literally minutes before Donald Trump was sworn into office. This was not just an abuse of power; it was to confirm the ultimate corruption of the Biden Crime Family. They have pocketed untold amounts of money laundered through Ukraine, and this leaves a stain on his reputation for all of history, even though they were unconstitutional. Assuming Trump criminally charges these people, it would still be decided by a jury of the people – not by Trump.

Biden’s Parting Words


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Divide & Conquer


Posted originally on Jan 26, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Trump Interview – Zelenskyy is ‘no angel’


Posted Jan 25, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 
Trump_says_Zelenskyy_is_no_angel_Fox_News_Video

China’s Crisis in MicroChip Production


Posted Jan 25, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Trump Outlaws CBDC – Telling Schwab and the WEF to Stuff it!


Posted originally on Jan 24, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Trump signs execitive orders

President Trump Signs Executive Order To Ban Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC). As I have been warning and appeared in the movie CBDC, the End of Money, that it would have been unconstitutional for the Federal Reserve to create a CBDC, and my sources had confirmed that the Fed would not make a CBDC. This is important that chalks one up for the people – retaining our freedom.

Electronic Dollar Digital

This means that there will be no digital dollar and the end of Kaus Schwab’s dream of you will own nothing and be happy. A CBDC was to be programmable where the government would decide what you could buy or sell.

Here is  Christine Lagarde on digital currency. She states this object is to “control” everything you do. Europe is a Marxist Paradise. As of January 1st, passports are no longer important, they want everything digitally so they can track your every movement.

Washington Post_Trump_Hateful

The Washington Post can’t seem to find a single executive order that was remotely positive. Bezos should shut down the Washington Post; it has become just a mouthpiece for Marxists and NECONS, and it seems to be constantly against the people. They no longer seem to care about reporting events fairly or unbiasedly.

Politico Fake News Hunter Laptop

It was Politico that ran that headline: 51 intelligence agents, or former intelligence agents, say that the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation. It has come out that they KNEW the laptop was real and that it was NOT some Russian propaganda. They said the word came from up high to lie to the people.

Fake News

These journalists are not protected by the First Amendment any more than someone yelling fire in a movie theater for fun, which leads to a stampede and people dying. They should be prosecuted for intentional election interference, for this is the ONLY way to clean up the Fake News. These people are destroying our country, taking us into World War III, and wiping out Western Civilization. It is time for the Trump Administration to start prosecuting these fake journalists.

55_15_52_U.S._Code_20511_Criminal_penalties Election Interference
18_U.S._Code_603_election interfference

Tariffs to End the War?


Posted originally on Jan 24, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Putin Trump Meeeting G20 2017

Donald Trump has warned Russian President Vladamir Putin to end the war effort in Ukraine or face US sanctions. “If we don’t make a ‘deal,’ and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of Taxes, Tariffs, and Sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries,” Trump said pm Truth Social. Are tariffs enough to force Putin to withdraw from Ukraine?

Russia exported $2.9 billion in goods from January to November 2024, down from the $4.3 billion the year prior. Russia’s main exports to the US is refined petroleum, platinum, and nitrogenous fertilizers. Refined petroleum in particular is a key Russian import. Does the US have an alternative source for this crucial good, or will they be forced to pay for it at a markup from a third-party nation? The entire concept of tariffs always unintentionally punishes people on both sides of trade relationships, not just the targeted government.

Russia has already begun operating its economy independent of the West. Removing Russia from SWIFT was the lethal blow that ensured Russia needed to immediately reorganize its trade plan. The BRICS alliance has been strong and Russia has secured strong partners outside of the West. Trade with China accounts for over one-third of trade with Russia and has ben the nation’s top trading partner for over 14 years. Russia is China’s fifth largest trading partner in comparison. Total trade volume between the two exceeded $244.8 billion in 2024, marking a 1.9% YoY increase.

Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov remained undisturbed by the threat of tariffs. “We do not see any particularly new elements,” Peskov said in a drastic understatement. Peskov commented that the Kremlin knows Trump “likes” sanctions and has been prepared. Things have simply escalated too far for Russia to bow out of the war. The reparations would nuke Russia’s economy, and the neocons do not want to see Russia standing as a nation.

Russia no longer needs the US or Europe to support its economy. Politicians have already shunned Russia from global trade with the West, and this threat is baseless. This threat will backfire if implemented and create an inflationary environment for US consumers.

Could the US Drop Canada as a Trade Partner? Trump Threatens FREE Trade


Posted originally on Jan 24, 2025 by Martin Armstrong

Donald Trump is prepared to drop Canada as a trade partner based on his recent comments in Davos at the World Economic Forum. “We don’t need them to make our cars, and they make a lot of them. We don’t need their lumber because we have our own forests,” he continued. “We don’t need their oil and gas, we have more than anybody.”

World Trade US China

The numbers tell a different story, with $3.6 billion worth of goods crossing the US-Canada border daily. The Canadian Chamber of Commerce said that the trade route accounts for 3.7 million jobs for Canadians and Americans. Trump may have lifted Biden-era restrictions on oil and gas, but the adjustment will not be automatic. America DOES depend on Canada for energy. In 2023, 60% of all crude imports to the US came from Canada. More significant, Canada provided 99% of America’s natural gas that same year.

Look what happened when tariffs on Canadian lumber were raised this past August from 8.05% to 14.54%. Looking a few years back to the COVID era, lumber prices in the US were astronomical when Canada’s supply chain came to a standstill. That spilled into real estate and construction. Absolutely irresponsible to put a tariff on lumber amid this housing crisis. Some Canadian companies like Canfor and West Fraser moved to the US to avoid duties but most are simply raising prices.

Capital Flows

The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement that Trump initially signed to replace NAFTA will come to an end. “Upon taking office, I will formally notify Mexico and Canada of my intention to invoke the six-year renegotiation provision of the USMCA that I put in,” Trump said last week during a speech at the Detroit Economic Club. His main reasoning is to strengthen American auto manufacturing. The current rules state that 75% of a vehicle must be manufactured in one of the three nations, up from the previous requirement of 62.5%. This was bipartisan as Kamala Harris also voiced support for reforming USMCA and did not vote for the initial proposal. Auto sales are already significantly down and the industry cannot afford another blow.

The troubling matter here is that the 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian goods was initially intended as a threat to curb migration and drug flow from the northern and southern border. Now, Trump is stating that he wants Canada to become a US state. The comments were initially made in jest, but now Trump is taking an isolationist approach and believes absolutely everything should be made in America. “My message to  every business in the world is very simple: Come make your product in America, and we will give you among the lowest taxes of any nation on earth,” Trump said at Davos. “But if you don’t make your product in America, which is your prerogative, then very simply you will have to pay a tariff. Differing amounts, but a tariff.”

Trump is also threatening to up tariffs on China to 60% and he told the European Union that they will also be subjected to a tax on trade. I support many of his measures but this is absolute insanity and will cripple the American economy. We cannot take a North Korean “juche” approach to trade where we only rely on ourselves.

No one will want to invest in America under these conditions. Big businesses will not move to America if they can only sell to Americans. He is basically redirecting trade to China at this point as its middle class is continuing to grow and businesses are now lining up to offload goods to the Chinese. There is a reason Chinese President Xi did not bother attending Davos.

Protectionist policies lead to economic instability. Tariffs hurt consumers rather than individual governments. Free trade must remain FREE and permitted to operate with minimal government interference. My entire premise of the Economic Confidence Model shows how deeply interwoven individual economies are, with capital flows and market trends all influencing one another across borders. Whoever is advising Trump is either attempting to sabotage him or they fail to comprehend that the economy must be viewed from a GLOBAL standpoint.

The Laken Riley Act – Does the US Constitution Require Due Process for Migrants?


Posted Jan 24, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

MigrantCrisis

The Laken Riley Act has been approved by the US Senate in a 64-35 bipartisan vote. Named after the nursing student who was brutally murdered by a Venezuelan migrant with a criminal record, the legislation will allow Immigration and Customs Enforcement to deport migrants who found guilty of committing a crime.

Sarah’s Law was also approved in a 75-24 vote that will deport migrants charged with violent crimes that resulted in death or serious bodily injury. Sarah Root was killed in 2016 after a migrant crashed into her car, posted bond, and fled the US. It is shameful that the US needs to pass laws to protect American citizens, as the Democrats were willing to permit a wave of migrant crime over the last four years in a failed attempt to secure elections.

Migrants.BidenLetUsIn

Unlike Sarah’s Law, the Laken Riley Act will permit ICE to detain migrants who commit smaller offenses such as shoplifting. Laken Riley’s murderer was arrested for shoplifting, but migrants in blue states were not held to the same rule of law as US citizens. Those who oppose the act believe it denies migrants due process of law.

“ArtI.S8.C18.8.7.2 Aliens in the United States” was initially intended to protect LEGAL Japanese immigrants who lawfully entered the United States. Nearly a century later in Plyer v Doe (1981), the US Supreme Court expanded the language to state that “aliens, even aliens whose presence in this country is unlawful, have long been recognized as ‘persons’ guaranteed due process of law by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.” Most recently in 2001, the highest court ruled in Zadvydas v Davis that “once an alien enters the country, the legal circumstance changes” because the Constitution provides due process protections to “all ‘persons’ within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent.”

Aliens seeking initial entry into the US have no constitutional rights. These measures were NEVER intended to broadly protect millions of illegals who surged into the nation without any checks or balances. This is why Biden sent secret flights and tore down the existing wall because the goal was simply to get these people on US soil. The courts will likely need to examine whether the premise of national security can override the protections provided under the current language of the Constitution. Unfortunately, the Democrats could have a case for providing due process to migrant criminals, jamming the already mess of a legal system we have here.

ICE.Deportation.Migrant

Leftist judges must be held accountable for their actions against the American public. Why have so many migrants been released back into the population after committing crimes? They have not been required to abide by US law in any form and pose a threat not just to national security but to the nation’s economic future as taxpayers must fund their existence. This is why it is absolutely crucial for the US to boost border security and prevent people from coming here in the first place. Trump has already sent 10,000 troops to the border and deported over 300 illegals on his first day.

It is refreshing to see this bill receive bipartisan support, although the far-left “progressives” are pushing back, and they may actually have legal ground to stand on. Logically, everyone has seen crime spike throughout the nation, and “migrant crime” has turned into a new brutal category that has overwhelmed law enforcement and turned once-safe cities into criminal hot spots. Look at what has happened in Europe, where migrants began pouring in back in 2015. Too many of those major European cities are simply unrecognizable today.

The Laken Riley Act will cost an estimated $27 billion in its first year, and critics believe America does not have the resources to carry out these deportation measures. Yet, America has the resources to secure numerous borders of foreign nations and protect their citizens. Biden and Harris created an absolute disaster through their open border policies that will be felt for generations to come.