Category World Economic Form
Sunday Talks – Secretary Mike Pompeo Discusses Expanded Israeli Peace Agreements in Mideast…
September 20, 2020
U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo appears with Maria Bartiromo to discuss the expanding peace agreements in the middle-east between Israel and Arab nations.
The administration approach toward the assembly of a peace alliance has been an incredible result of the Trump Doctrine. By changing the originating dynamic away from discussions of conflict; and focusing attention on the economic opportunities to improve the life of everyone in the region based on a prosperity model; the Trump administration has found a synergy, a common alignment, between all regional interests.
The assembly of the alliance, and the specific expectations from the original 2017 strategy toward confronting extremism, has yielded a result that can now be duplicated in the 2020 Abraham Accords. The same regional peer pressure from the Gulf Cooperation Council, that resulted in the cessation of promoted extremism, is now being applied toward gathering ‘prosperity partnerships’. President Trump changed the paradigm completely.
.
As the Palestinian Authority recognizes their Arab support base is now partnering with Israel for stability, peace and prosperity, the PA will eventually have to drop their hostile posture and return to the negotiating table with far less support. This result is part of the bigger background picture; and once again President Trump is achieving this objective by working around the conflict itself.
♦President Trump’s foreign policy approach brought North and South Korea together away from the table of conflict. ♦President Trump’s foreign policy approach brought Serbia and Kosovo together away from the table of conflict. ♦President Trump’s foreign policy rallied the Gulf Cooperation Council to stop Qatar’s support for Islamic extremists via the Muslim Brotherhood. ♦President Trump’s foreign policy brought Turkey and the Kurdish forces together away from war and conflict. ♦President Trump’s foreign policy created a ceasefire to stop the bloodshed in Syria. President Trump mediated a cessation of hostilities between India & Pakistan in the Kashmir region. ♦President Trump’s foreign policy brought Israel and the UAE together… and there will be more.
Why and How did COVID-19 Appear?
Sometime around the turn of the century Bill Gates got involved with Al Gore and the Climate Change movement. Gates took this very seriously and decided to try and stop the destruction of the planet; not realizing that it wasn’t a real threat. The Reason I can say that is I have been studying the “climate” problem for well over 20 years now and although the climate does change, it always has so there is nothing new here. I can say this because of my college courses in Geography and climate so I have a basic understanding of the physical world we live in. The perceived problem relates to the time frames that these changes of a few degrees up or down take to happen. Obviously the temperature of the planet is directly related to the out put of our sun. But the sun’s output is not a constant it is a variable of a decades long movement driven by the 11 year solar cycle of our sun. That cycle combined with orbital variations and the distribution of the continents creates weather patterns in the oceans and the atmosphere that can give the “illusion” of major changes. If the reader is interested in that subject check out my monthly climate update posted here in MY Climate research.
Gates lacking a college education doesn’t have the proper background in economics, math, statistics, physics and Climate so he was unduly influenced by others that had a different agenda then climate. The group I am referring to is those that have embraced a version of Marxism that has morphed into a version of Marxism where the leaders of the government are the very educated ones in society. Those are the ones that have graduated from the best schools like Harvard, MIT Sanford, Yale, etc. etc. Read the book Technology Rising written by Patrick M. Wood for all the details. These are the “Best and the Brightest” and they want to change the system of government in the United States so that they can save us from ourselves. After all they are our “betters!”
Bill Gates became a member of this group of Technologists when they got into the Green movement in the early 90’s after the collapse of the old U.S.S.R. Simultaneously the Green movement was infiltrated by the Progressives wing of the Democrat party (just another name for a Marxist) in the country and this is a very toxic combination. This collision comprised of Bill Gates almost unlimited money, the Technologists, the Environmentalists, the Marxists and the Democrat Party is now the group that is orchestrating what is going on in the country today i.e. demonstrations, mob violence, looting, arson and mayhem. The bottom line is that the following groups and organizations are all in bed together and they are being controlled by Bill Gates!
Because of his almost unlimited money Gates runs the movement along with his side kick George Soros and Anthony Fauci. The plan developed by Gates was to save the planet for reducing the population and while doing that why not make it a better superior race by eliminating the weak, the sick and those of lets say lessor ability using eugenics. I think Hitler tried that almost 90 years ago and it didn’t go all that well and probably will not this time either.
According to the National Center for Health Statistics date as of September 9, 2020 the following is true. 179,927 people have died since January 1, 2020 that had the virus in their system. almost all of them had a comorbidity as well meaning that almost no people in good health dies from the virus. look at these numbers and then continue.
| Category | Total | 0-24 | 25-34 | 35-44 | 45-54 | 55-64 | 65-74 | 75-84 | over 85 |
| COVID | 179,927 | 394 | 1,397 | 3,635 | 9,573 | 22,845 | 38,635 | 47,546 | 55,894 |
Why is this important? well based on the testimony of a Dr. Yan and her assertion that this virus was created in the Wuhan Lab. She fled Hong Kong to the United States in April and says she will never be allowed home. Martin Armstrong has stated from the beginning that this pandemic did not fit with his models as being natural. He has also reported that Dr. Fauci was the one experimenting with this type of virus and was told to stop. He then sent this program off to Wuhan China (maybe being asked to by Bill gates). Every source Armstrong looked at confirms it was made in a lab but was not a bio-weapon because of the “very” low death rate. However, based on the evidence of those who suddenly sold stock and bond positions in December & January, and inside sources who stated a “virus” was coming, Armstrong does not believe that China deliberately leaked this virus.
But maybe bill Gates did? The reason I can say that is Gates’s Father and he both believed in Eugenics and the crazy idea of creating a super race. Gates’s work on over population and virus’s especially the COVID series makes perfect sense as he wanted to reduce the worlds population. So who does he want to get ride of? How about all the old people especially with comorbidity’s for a start, in other words the weak. Now this fits with someone that wants to create a supper race and it also fits with a virus that apparently only kills people with comorbidity’s. Since there as never been a virus like this its only common sense that it was created in a lab and the only person in the world that has the desire and the money to do this is Bill Gates.
Secretary Wilbur Ross Discusses Tech and Structural Confrontation with Beijing -WeChat and TikTok…
September 18, 2020
When Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross appears… PAY ATTENTION. In this interview Secretary Ross outlines an announcement today [LINK HERE] about the U.S. will block Chinese owned WeChat, and additional security measures against TikTok.
COMMERCE – […] While the threats posed by WeChat and TikTok are not identical, they are similar. Each collects vast swaths of data from users, including network activity, location data, and browsing and search histories. Each is an active participant in China’s civil-military fusion and is subject to mandatory cooperation with the intelligence services of the CCP. This combination results in the use of WeChat and TikTok creating unacceptable risks to our national security. (more)
Additionally, Secretary Ross discusses sector-specific relief for the airline industry and U.S. farmers. On the farmer side we should all remember any confrontation with Beijing could lead to China pulling back from purchase agreements. China cannot feed itself and is dependent on imported food products, so the scale of any pull-back is not known.
DETAILS – In response to President Trump’s Executive Orders signed August 6, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) today announced prohibitions on transactions relating to mobile applications (apps) WeChat and TikTok to safeguard the national security of the United States.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has demonstrated the means and motives to use these apps to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and the economy of the U.S. Today’s announced prohibitions, when combined, protect users in the U.S. by eliminating access to these applications and significantly reducing their functionality.
“Today’s actions prove once again that President Trump will do everything in his power to guarantee our national security and protect Americans from the threats of the Chinese Communist Party,” said U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross. “At the President’s direction, we have taken significant action to combat China’s malicious collection of American citizens’ personal data, while promoting our national values, democratic rules-based norms, and aggressive enforcement of U.S. laws and regulations.”
While the threats posed by WeChat and TikTok are not identical, they are similar. Each collects vast swaths of data from users, including network activity, location data, and browsing and search histories. Each is an active participant in China’s civil-military fusion and is subject to mandatory cooperation with the intelligence services of the CCP. This combination results in the use of WeChat and TikTok creating unacceptable risks to our national security.
As of September 20, 2020, the following transactions are prohibited:
- Any provision of service to distribute or maintain the WeChat or TikTok mobile applications, constituent code, or application updates through an online mobile application store in the U.S.;
- Any provision of services through the WeChat mobile application for the purpose of transferring funds or processing payments within the U.S.
As of September 20, 2020, for WeChat and as of November 12, 2020, for TikTok, the following transactions are prohibited:
- Any provision of internet hosting services enabling the functioning or optimization of the mobile application in the U.S.;
- Any provision of content delivery network services enabling the functioning or optimization of the mobile application in the U.S.;
- Any provision directly contracted or arranged internet transit or peering services enabling the function or optimization of the mobile application within the U.S.;
- Any utilization of the mobile application’s constituent code, functions, or services in the functioning of software or services developed and/or accessible within the U.S.
Any other prohibitive transaction relating to WeChat or TikTok may be identified at a future date. Should the U.S. Government determine that WeChat’s or TikTok’s illicit behavior is being replicated by another app somehow outside the scope of these executive orders, the President has the authority to consider whether additional orders may be appropriate to address such activities. The President has provided until November 12 for the national security concerns posed by TikTok to be resolved. If they are, the prohibitions in this order may be lifted.
The notices for these actions will be posted on the Federal Register at approximately 8:45AM EDT on Friday, September 18, 2020.
Background:
On August 6, 2020, President Trump signed Executive Orders (E.O.) 13942, Addressing the Threat Posed by TikTok, and E.O. 13943, Addressing the Threat Posed by WeChat. In the E.O.s, the President determined that the apps capture vast swaths of information from U.S. users, leaving the data vulnerable to CCP access for nefarious purposes.
Commerce, at the Direction of the President, was required to identify transactions within 45 days to protect national security and the private data of millions of people across the country. Today’s announced prohibitions fulfill the President’s direction and mitigate national security risks. (link)
The New Norm – OMG
Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease
Re-Posted Sep 18, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
The Economist just ran a story that summarized the change in work that “people particularly fond of their pyjamas have for decades been arguing that a lot of work done in large shared offices could better be done at home. With covid-19 their ideas were put to the test in a huge if not randomised trial. The preliminary results are now in: yes, a lot of work can be done at home; and what is more, many people seem to prefer doing it there.”
The collapse in security in major cities such as New York have led to only 54% of companies expecting to return to New York City. In fact, only 8% of employees have returned to the office as of mid-August. Based upon a very RELIABLE source, the violence in the cities has been encouraged by Democrats for more than just trying to overthrow Trump. This has also been part of the agenda to end commuting by car to reduce CO2. They have deliberately sought to end commuting to save the planet. The problem has been that these Democratic mayors are ignorant of the real objective and think they are helping to just overthrow Trump. What they have failed to see is the bigger picture. People are fleeing the big cities and moving out to the suburbs. Real estate in the suburbs has risen in price while city properties are collapsing with no-bid.
According to the FT, Covid19 has given the world 3 years more oil supply.
The Editor of the London Financial Times sent out this letter:
It has been just over six months since London went into lockdown and the FT newsroom changed overnight from a bustling, crowded office to a dispersed, digital workplace. The Covid-19 pandemic has been an unparalleled test for organisations and governments around the world — and to all of us as parents, colleagues and friends. I hope the FT has passed this test by delivering the news, insight, analysis and intellectual stimulation you need to navigate this fast-changing world.
…
Looking ahead to the coming months, the FT aims to be your trusted guide to the new normal. We have passed through the first wave of the global crisis. Now, we face the new reality of living with the virus. Local and national outbreaks will continue to disrupt the fragile economic recovery. Crucial policy decisions on travel, employment support and stimulus occur with dizzying speed.
Indeed, the New Norm is intended to bring in the Great Reset whereby offices vanish, commuting comes to an end, and travel will be forever restricted. However, vital to pulling this off will remain social-distancing and masks. Why? This is being employed to combat civil unrest. It is also intended to separate the mindless sheep which obey whatever the government says which complies with Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience to Authority.
The Germans put on trial after World War II said they were just following orders. This inspired Milgram to investigate because many argued that the Germans were just different and could kill the Jews without remorse. At the Nuremberg Trials, those Germans simply said they were just following orders.
Stanley was perhaps the most important psychologists of all time as far as I am concerned. Instead of coming up with a theory, Stanley actually investigates and arrived at a conclusion nobody suspected was even possible. He hired actors to pretend to be shocked by a person whenever they lied. Stanley took random people off the street in the United States and elsewhere to see if the Germans were really a different species. Why he discovered was that people would shock others in a torture setting as long as they were told that was what they had to do.
Stanley concluded his studies which shocked the world. They were published in his book – Obedience to Authority. I bring this up now BECAUSE this is precisely what is being carried out today. We have people wearing masks when there is no serious pandemic and yelling at others who do not and some violently attacking people who do not have a mask.
What is being carried out is a well-defined psychological tactic because they instill fear in the mass herd of human sheep and then they count on the obedience of authority to control society. I have stated before, a friend of mine grew up behind the Berlin Wall. When the wall fell, his father went an got his Stasi file. He was shocked to discover everyone he thought was a friend was telling the government everything he had to say against the government. When he came home, my friend thought his father went mad. He began punching holes in the walls and ripping out microphones. Until his death, he refused to ever speak to anyone outside his immediate family.
This is the reasoning being the social-distancing and wearing masks. This (1) provides justification to arrest people who try to gather together to resist, and (2) as in France, they can put you in prison for 6 months for not wearing a mask or in Melbourne, Australia, attacking even women on the street who do not have a mask on. This is raw tyranny and how they are deliberately seeking to breakdown society to make the population controllable as was the case under Communism.
Field Marshall Hermann Wilhelm Göring (1893–1946)
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood.
“But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.”
With respect to a Democracy they argued, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States, only Congress can declare wars.
Göring replied: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
Gates has been feeding into this agenda and seeks to push for digital currency so the Tech Companies will get a piece of every transaction in the world. He then is involved in food production and vaccines under the pretend of helping people when he is afraid of over-population.
The NEW NORM is less freedom if any remains. It will be more likely that you will need a permit to have a child as was the case with the one-child rule in China that failed.
COVID HOAX More & More People Are Coming Out Around the World
Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease
Re-Posted Sep 18, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
COVID Fraud – HCQ uitgewerkt NL
This is a report from the Netherlands on the COVID HOAX. The report is entitled: “THE BIGGEST THREAT TO THE HUMAN SOCIETY IS THE DISCLAIMER OF HCQ”
There is something seriously wrong. This lockdown has been applied worldwide with far more devastating effects in their world countries. Take Peru for example. More than 40% of households in Peru do not have a refrigerator, according to a 2020 government survey. The vast majority of households do not even have the capacity that would allow them to stock up on food for many days. Add to that, Peru’s workforce in the informal/cash sector stands at about 70%, which is one of the highest rates in Latin America. One of the reasons why Bill Gates is doomed with his grand plan, only about 38% of Peruvian adults have a bank account, making digital payments largely impossible.
The Peruvian government did allocate up to 12% of its GDP to help people who lost their jobs and companies that lost income because of the lockdown measures. While the government’s economic package was widely praised, based on sources there as of yesterday, they are only allowed out of their homes for food or a medical emergency. In Peru, police blockaded a highway and launched tear gas into crowds attempting to flee Lima during the lockdown (see Guardian). The government even banned family gatherings (see US News & World Report.)
The question becomes: how will politicians respond as there is a rising wealth of evidence that this is nowhere near as serious to warrant what has been done? We really need to know if politicians took bribes to pull this off for the Great Reset, or were they acting out of stupidity because everyone else was locking down. We are preparing a report on this subject. The diverse world economy certainly does not make this a one-solution-for-all fit very well.
UN Secretary General Speaks to the Press Before 75th UNGA Meeting
Sadly, the United Nations, under Mr. Guterres’ leadership, is legitimizing the Palestinian leaders’ deceptions and exploitation
Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Joseph A. Klein, CFP United Nations Columnist —— Bio and Archives—September 16, 2020
The member states of the United Nations plan to adopt a declaration next week marking the 75th anniversary of the United Nations and committing to a reinvigorated multilateralism, according to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres. They will also invite the Secretary General “to report on our common agenda for the future,” Mr. Guterres told reporters at a press conference in which reporters participated both in person and virtually. “This will be an important process of reflection and I will report back with analysis and recommendations.”
Secretary General presented a false choice between “global solidarity” through globalist institutions like the United Nations versus “go-it-alone nationalist approaches”
One wonders why the Secretary General is not already prepared to offer his concrete analysis and specific recommendations for keeping the UN relevant in the years ahead. It’s not as if he is new to the job. Secretary General Guterres is in his fourth year of a five-year term and presumably has already been thinking ahead to a possible second term. However, the Secretary General was short on specifics in his opening remarks to reporters. He fell back instead on his usual platitudes, calling for global solidarity to deal with climate change, the coronavirus, a global ceasefire, eradicating poverty and the like. Secretary General Guterres said nothing about trying to fix the UN’s own problems of trust caused by its lack of accountability for misdeeds by UN personnel and its lack of transparency.
“People are thinking big – about transforming the global economy, accelerating the transition to zero carbon, ensuring universal health coverage, moving towards a universal basic income and making decision-making more open and inclusive,” Secretary General Guterres said. “They are also expressing an intense yearning for global solidarity – and rejecting go-it-alone nationalist approaches and divisive populist appeals. Now is the time to respond to these aspirations and realize these aims. In this 75th anniversary year, we face our own 1945 moment.”
The Secretary General presented a false choice between “global solidarity” through globalist institutions like the United Nations versus “go-it-alone nationalist approaches.” There is a responsible third choice that is most consistent with the UN Charter – smart, targeted multilateralism to address manageable transnational problems without giving up each nation’s sovereignty in the process.
United Nations does not have the authority “to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state”
The Charter of the United Nations, as designed by the victors of World War II who created the UN seventy-five years ago, does not compel the UN’s member states to forfeit their sovereignty to a global governance body. Quite the opposite. The United Nations was founded to bring sovereign nations together for the purpose of cooperating to solve common problems while taking collective action where warranted against threats to international peace and security. In fact, the United Nations Charter specifically recognizes the sovereign status of the member states. It stipulates that the United Nations does not have the authority “to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state.”
Only the Security Council has enforcement powers under Chapter VII of the Charter to impose sanctions and authorize the use of collective military force to maintain or restore international peace and security, subject to the veto power of its five permanent members. Everything else about United Nations governance outside of paying assessed dues is voluntary.
As President Trump said in his remarks to the UN General Assembly last year, “The future does not belong to globalists. The future belongs to sovereign and independent nations who protect their citizens, respect their neighbors, and honor the differences that make each country special and unique.” At the same time, President Trump stressed that the United States “is ready to embrace friendship with all who genuinely seek peace and respect. America knows that while anyone can make war, only the most courageous can choose peace.”
While Secretary General Guterres speaks in abstract about a “collective push for peace,” President Trump has worked with other nations in a multilateral fashion to achieve real results in the pursuit of peace.
UN’s myopic obsession on the Palestinian cause
Most notably, on September 15th at the White House, peace agreements were signed between Israel and the United Arab Emirates and between Israel and Bahrain. Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain will establish embassies, exchange ambassadors, and embark on a cooperative relationship involving such matters as trade, healthcare, and security.
Inexplicably, Secretary General Guterres neglected to mention these historic agreements in his opening remarks. In response to a question about the agreements, Secretary General Guterres claimed they “managed one very important result, and that was the suspension of the annexation of occupied territory.” Typical of the UN’s myopic obsession on the Palestinian cause, the Secretary General downplayed the importance of two Arab countries reaching peace accords with Israel for the first time since Israel and Jordan signed their Treaty of Peace 26 years ago. The only other peace agreement signed by Israel with an Arab country was the Camp David Accords with Egypt in 1979.
As commentators in the Arab world are increasingly recognizing, Middle East peace is not all about satisfying the Palestinian leadership’s maximalist demands. The commentators were disgusted with the Palestinian leaders’ reflexive denunciations of normalizing relations between Israel and the two Arab Gulf countries. They are beginning to see through the Palestinians’ lies and self-dealing at the expense of the Palestinian people and genuine peace.
A Saudi writer, for example, wrote the following, as transcribed by MEMRI:
The UN is continuing its decades-old role as the enabler of Palestinian rejectionists
“The situation of our Palestinian brothers is regrettable. For over 60 years, their politicians have cashed in on their cause, and persisted in not reaching an arrangement, in destroying the negotiations, and in opposing every peace initiative, whether proposed by the Israelis or by the other international elements. The Palestinian politician has inflicted this on his cause and his people in order to profit from leaving things as they are, since the way he has chosen for decades was the only way to guarantee that he would remain in the picture and [benefit from the] influx of funds, donations and aid flowing from all directions, particularly from the Arab and Islamic world, into his coffers and his European bank accounts. Today, the situation is different, because the peoples who once identified with the Palestinian cause are completely aware of this manipulation and the way it is done.”
A Saudi Member of Parliament wrote, as transcribed by MEMRI:
“The Palestinians must understand… that today’s Arabs and Muslims are different than the past [generations], for the young generation has gained awareness and can no longer be deceived or exploited. The Palestinians have kept their cause exclusively under their own control, traded in it, and missed opportunities one by one, until their rights evaporated.”
Sadly, the United Nations, under Mr. Guterres’ leadership, is legitimizing the Palestinian leaders’ deceptions and exploitation. The UN is continuing its decades-old role as the enabler of Palestinian rejectionists who still insist on a Palestinian state stretching from “the river to the sea.” This is not the way to move forward successfully with Mr. Guterres’ desired “collective push for peace.”
Is A Cover Up over Clinton’s 2000 Interference in Russia’s elections still Going On?
Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics
Re-Posted Sep 17, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: Marty; You said that not even Fox News will report the story that the US interfered in the 2000 Russian election. Do you have any idea why?
EK
ANSWER: No not really. Perhaps it would admit things that the US government does not want to admit that even under the Clinton Administration which let the bankers do whatever they wanted from exempting student loans from bankruptcy to repealing Glass Stegall which enabled the bankers to see the mortgaged back security time bombs. I do not know. The movie Forecaster has been banned in the USA. Netflix wanted it but then the last minute the board said no. They seem to have gotten a phone call. Amazon will stream it but only outside the USA. Why?
Here is Hillary here in 2020 still claiming the Russians interfered when that has been totally been unsupported and the entire Steele dossier was paid for by Hillary. She then erased all her emails. A Trump victory will mean the Democrats will still claim only because of Russia when it was the Clintons who allowed the bankers to blackmail Yeltsin, forced him to step down, but he turned to Putin. Look at Bill’s expression. He trashed her book and that became public. Hillary will never admit people did not trust her. In her mind, it was Putin BECAUSE she stood by while the bankers tried to take over all the resources of Russia – gold, diamonds, and oil.
Safra, head of Republic National Bank, was assassinated by Russians (see Vanity Fair). But they tried to cover that up blaming his nurse, who was then released simply saying he never received a fair trial. The guy the bankers were trying to install as president was Berezovsky, which fled to Britain but later hanged himself.
So I have no idea why Fox News will not report this issue, especially when the Democrats are already claiming Trump can’t win without Russian interference. I do not know. It seems there is a coverup still in play.
Melbourne Australia – the Example of the Worst Police States in a Pretend Free Society
Armstrong Economics Blog/Australia & Oceania
Re-Posted Sep 17, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
The Melbourne police have turned into a ruthless anti-Human Rights group of thugs. They are enjoying the ability to simply beat up people arrest them for nonsense. They are setting people up, using checkpoints, and pulling over cars and dragging people from their cars. This is a real live example of how there is no democratic process and you have no rights; whenever the government decides in the name of protecting you, they get to abuse you to maintain their power.
This is why revolutions take place, and I have warned unless the police support the people, they are the face of government and they will all become targets. This is how revolutions have unfolded. There is no freedom left in Victoria, Australia. How will Andrews win an election in the future? The risk is that there will be no election, and under the pretense of civil unrest, elections will be suspended. Unfortunately, the next Victorian state election is scheduled to be held on November 26, 2022. If that does not take place, then the revolution becomes the only alternative. This is how NOT to run a government.
Generally, at the federal level, an election can be called as early as August 7, 2021, and as late as May 21, 2022. However, the House of Representatives can go as late as September 3, 2022. We should expect political turmoil in 2022. With respect to Victoria, it is highly debatable whether Andrews can make it to 2022 without blood in the streets.
Canada More Lockdowns?
Armstrong Economics Blog/Canada
Re-Posted Sep 16, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
There are rumors now running around that more lockdowns are coming in Canada. I cannot verify that this is correct, but this twitter that is going viral does put it correctly, this is now becoming the people v the establishment which seems to be controlled by the Oligarchs. We will see if Canada goes in this direction.
Centinel2012 