Eugenics is now Climate Change but Still Racist


COMMENT: Good morning,

I remember reading back in the day that global warming was the greatest threat to the world. I also saw old articles where before that it was global cooling. Since they couldn’t seem to get it straight and global warming had started to get a bad name among some scientists and some of the people, they decided to switch the terminology to climate change, which you well know. And like you said, they are using this platform for population reduction.

Well, the same thing can be said about eugenics and bioethics. Once eugenics got a bad name, they renamed the study and agenda to bioethics, to advance their eugenic goals and desires under the guise of “ethical” decision making on who lives and who dies, even coming down to who gets to reproduce and who doesn’t in the near future. I’m taking a wild guess here, but I think the likes of Gates will have that “privilege” but not the likes of the poor or what they define as the “unfit”. After all, being allowed to live and reproduce will be a privilege and not a right.

It’s funny how a common theme and agenda, of all these different branches or roots of this huge tree, is population reduction. It’s the common thread that runs through planned parenthood, global warming, climate change, eugenics, bioethics, vaccinations, Agenda 21, earth worship, communism, Marxism, socialism, food production control….

No matter what government is in control, this has persisted through the years. Through ups and downs and slow bumps, it still persists.

Best,
E

Error
This video doesn’t exist
REPLY: This is the biggest plot against civilization ever to hatch. They are the Marxists coming back and Klaus Schwab and his World Economic Forum of Davos have taken a front-row seat in trying to use its influence to compel governments to install their agenda without any democratic process. Schwab has declared Bill Gates the man of two centuries — 20th & 21st. Al Gore is a trustee of the World Economic Forum and they ushered in Greta Thurnberg for their 50th-anniversary film. The World Economic Forum is all about socialism. They reject that a corporation is for shareholders. Schwab believes its first duty is to the world, with investors second. The World Economic Forum is taking a lead role in trying to destroy the world economy, and in the typical arrogant academic manner, they think they can rebuild it in their own image precisely as did Karl Marx. This will be the source of great bloodshed and its arrogant philosophy will, at last, be exposed.

Police Infiltrating Protests


In the Hague protests, here is a video showing that the police are pretending to be protesters and aggravating the protest to increase its violence. This clearly shows that the police are not there for the people, but still to protect the state against the people. Here, they dragged a boy; the crowd began to chase them, and they ran back to their police van. Some believe they are doing this to justify further lockdowns using police to make things appear more violent

Gates’ Dream of Controlling the World is Hitting a Brick Wall


Bill Gates and Microsoft have been banned in Russia. This is seriously preventing Bill Gates’ dream of vaccinating the entire world so he can track everyone. Russia is going to add Bill Gates to the blacklist along with George Soros and Jacob Rothschild.

The entire scheme of Microsoft and the others is to take everything that we do, create profiles, and then sell that to companies to endlessly market stuff to us. If I am paying for a program like Windows, I do not want endless updates that are really phishing for everything I do. They are not satisfied with paying for a product. They much destroy all privacy for a buck.

It is ironic that perhaps the only free countries will be China and Russia since the West has chosen to run into the arms of Gates and his consortium. Russia and China collapsed under Marxism in 1989. We are now faced with the second wave of Marxists determined to create a Marxist world despite the fact it has never worked. Guess what — they are right on time. The collapse of Communism was 1989.95; add 31.4 years, and we arrive at 2021.35 perfectly as we head into the Monetary Crisis Cycle.

Putin is at least protecting the Russian people against the manufactured pandemic. There are far about 9.5 million people who die every year from cancer compared to Bill Gates’ virus of fewer than 500,000 deaths worldwide. About 645,000 die of heart attacks annually. There are about 15.2 milliondeaths annually from various diseases. We do not hear about that every night on CNN delivering a daily death count. If they did, it would probably also change behavior. In comparison, Gates’ virus is overly exaggerated for the sole purpose of terrorizing people into complying with his agenda.

NEC Chairman Larry Kudlow Discusses U.S-China Trade and Status of Economic Recovery…


In the economic balancing act toward China Larry Kudlow represents the good cop, Peter Navarro represents the bad cop and President Trump navigates the market responses.  Neither person is factually in conflict with the other; the nuance is in the expression and each person has a role to play.  Sometimes teeth, sometimes not. It depends on need.

Last night trade advisor Peter Navarro noted the U.S. position with China and trade is still in a state of serious conflict.  This is accurate, and a more confrontational posture has been expressed by President Trump.  Today Larry Kudlow moderates the Navarro position to lessen the Wall St. concern over a looming decoupling.  It’s all a dance.

The need for nuance becomes clear as we watch Stuart Varney pushing the Wall Street concern angle on behalf of U.S. multinationals. The administration does not want to spook the stock market while they deal with a China confrontation. WATCH:

.

Kudlow represents the panda mask. Navarro represents the eagles claw. President Trump advances or retracts each position as he controls the market response.  The objective is a slow, steady, smiling decoupling that doesn’t unnerve anyone… but the direction is always toward the decoupling.

President Trump is delivering the proverbial economic death by a thousand paper cuts.

Because China sees their strategic panda mask approach being used against their own interests; and because Beijing now sees their economy contracting due to the long-term strategy being deployed by President Trump; China is getting a little more desperate:

BEIJING/HONG KONG (Reuters) – The Chinese government’s top diplomat Wang Yi on Tuesday proposed a “fast track” arrangement for the movement of people and goods with India and Russia.

Ministers from China, Russia and India should together discuss trade, energy, transport, education and health, Wang said in a statement on the foreign ministry’s website. (link)

President Trump smiling while slowly and methodically cutting down the economy of China and simultaneously holding them to account for prior purchase agreements.  This relentless approach has to be making Beijing quite angry.

The Chinese saying: “if you plant your trees in another man’s orchard don’t be surprised when you pay for your own apples”, is very appropriate for these times.  However, China has always been the one charging…. they did not expect to be the one paying.

Sad panda.

2010 Arab Spring Common Connections to the 2020 Black Lives Matter Movement…


It’s an interesting comparison to note.  The ideological interests behind the 2010 “Arab Spring” uprising are the exact same ideological interests behind the 2020 “Black Lives Matter” protests/uprising.  Not merely similar people, but the exact same people.

The exact same group of U.S. people who were promoting the mid-east Arab Spring in 2010 are the same people now promoting the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests.   The same politicians; the same media voices; the same newspapers; the same social media activists. Almost every participant, and their support for the uprising ’10 -vs- ’20 is identical.

In the background of the Arab Spring, the root control organization was The Muslim Brotherhood.  Considering all of the connective similarities; and considering the U.S. advocates for the brotherhood are the same voices advocating for BLM; does it not stand to reason the BLM movement is an extension of the same overarching ideology.

It is not an esoteric intellectual exercise to compare the two movements because we’re not only talking about a similar level of protest, we’re seeing an identical set of actions in both groups.  Not only are the advocates the same voices; but their purposeful action, the behavior to remove and destroy common cultural connection/heritage is the same.

The Brotherhood is essentially the umbrella organization for a multitude of Islamic factions.  In essence, the Muslim Brotherhood represents political Islam. Similarly if you look at the structure of Black Lives Matter they too represent an umbrella-type structure for a network of individual political grievance groups.  Both groups represent a cultural revolution by the results of their activity.

In 2010 the Brotherhood had al-Qaeda and militant factions within ISIS.  In 2020 BLM has New Black Panthers and militant factions within Antifa.

In 2010 the Brotherhood tore down statues and symbols they identified as culturally oppressive to their political views.  In 2020 BLM tears down statues and symbols they identify as oppressive to their political views.

In 2010 the Brotherhood burned books, destroyed history and removed their cultural opposition by force.  In 2020 BLM promotes burning books, destroying history and cancelling their cultural opposition by force.

In 2010 the Brotherhood used social media to organize their political activity and Big Tech facilitated even by setting up local networks for protest.  In 2020 BLM uses social media to organize their political media and Big Tech facilitates by deploying all local networks to assist.

In 2010 the Brotherhood attacked the police and framed their Islamist movement as oppressed by law enforcement.  In 2020 BLM attacks the police and frames their movement as oppressed by law enforcement.

In 2010 the Brotherhood destroyed the notions of secularism and viciously attacked any form of Christianity.  In 2020 BLM advocates against secularism and viciously attacks Christianity, while conspicuously never criticizing any element of Islam.

In 2010 the Brotherhood was very strategic as they hoodwinked moderate Islamic supporters into voting them into power.  Once in power they removed all of the institutional systems, government offices, judges, constitutional balances, local elections, and anything that would impede their ultimate stranglehold on power.  Sharia Law replaced common legislative law.   As a result, the ordinary population was brutalized, property was taken by force; businesses were taken by force and the Islamic regime now controlled every element of their lives.

In 2020 the approach of the BLM movement appears very strategic as they hoodwink a multitude of supporters by defining their victim class and role.  Much like the 2010 Brotherhood approach grievances are made personal.   Bonds between families and friends are severed by force and demands to adhere to the movement’s ideology.

It will be interesting to see if BLM supporters recognize the deception in 2020; because the Brotherhood supporters in 2010 did not recognize it until it was too late.

There are many similarities.

(Pictured) one other thing they have in common

PART SIX: Bill Gates is the man what wants to be the ruler of the world and being the evil man that he is he will go to no ends to achieve his goal of world domination no matter how many Billions he has to kill!


Sometime around the turn of the century Bill Gates got involved with Al Gore and the Climate Change movement. Gates took this very seriously and decided to try and stop the destruction of the planet; not realizing that it wasn’t a real threat.  The Reason I can say that is I have been studying the problem for well over 20 years now and although the climate does change, it always has so there is nothing new here.  The problem is that some of the changes that are in the range of a few degrees up or down are related to decade long movements driven primarily by the 11 year solar cycle.  If the reader is interested in that subject check out my monthly climate update posted here in MY Climate research.

Gates lacking a college education doesn’t have the proper background in economics, math, statistics, physics and Climate so he was unduly influenced by others that had a different agenda.  The group I am referring to is those that have embraced a version of Marxism that has morphed into a version of Marxism where the leaders of the government are the very educated ones in society.  Those are the ones that have graduated from the best schools like Harvard, MIT Sanford, Yale, etc. etc.  Read the book Technology Rising written by Patrick M. Wood for all the details. These are the “Best and the Brightest” and they want to change the system of government in the United States so that they can save us from ourselves. After all they are our “betters!”

This group of Technologists was infiltrated by the Progressives (just another name for a Marxist) in the country in the early 90’s after the collapse of the old U.S.S.R. and then they got into the Green movement.  This collision comprised of the Technologists, the Environmentalists, and the Marxists is now the group that is orchestrating what is going on in the country today i.e. demonstrations, mob violence, looting, arson and mayhem.  The bottom line is that the following groups and organizations are all in bed together and they are being controlled by Bill Gates through his web of global investments using his almost unlimited money!

The Democrat party

The Green movement

The Major news organizations

The Open Boarders movement

The Social Justice Movement

The Bill and Missal Gates Foundation

In 20010 Bill Gates did a TED presentation that started the ball rolling. Here are a couple of samples.

Roger More we need more carbon not less. Roger More is the credible counter to the insane Gates!

Bill Gates a good Summary

 

 

New Interview: The Mid-March Bottom and Rising Civil Unrest


Click here to listen to “The Mid-March Bottom and Rising Civil Unrest” interview with Cris Sheridan from Financial Sense (June 16, 2020)

This interview confers Socrates forecasting the mid-March bottom followed by a strong rally. Only an advanced computer system capable of viewing every market simultaneously while comparing past patterns, timing, and pricing could make such a forecast. Additionally, the interview discusses how our models pinpointed the beginning of the rising civil unrest that we are currently witnessing on a global scale. This is an organized attempt to reconstruct the world economy. Stay informed.

To view all of Martin’s latest interviews, visit the “Media” tab on the homepage of our website.

Bolton Pro War Anti Anti Trump!


Another Tell All Book By a Deep State Hack

John Bolton, the neocon warhawk, has written a tell-all book that may tell too much. He may be releasing classified information illegally and the Trump administration wants it blocked.

I was dismayed when Trump made Bolton his National Security Advisor, but thankfully the president didn’t listen to his suggestions of aggression. Thus we may have avoided a war with Iran, Syria, and perhaps Venezuela. Bolton never met a war he didn’t like—including the Vietnam War, which he endorsed but avoided personally. Bolton was a big cheerleader for George W. Bush’s Iraq war, which was based on lies. Both Bolton and Bush are war criminals.

In an interview Bolton stated that it was OK for the government agencies to lie to the American people if national security is at stake. And it always seems to be at stake for dominant men who want secrecy and power. Bolton is a dangerous liar and his anti-Trump screed cannot be trusted.

It’s time to slam the book shut on Bolton.

—Ben Garrison

Hypocritical UN Human Rights Council Members Exploit George Floyd Killing


The United States certainly does not need the advice of UN bureaucrats, unaccountable globalist forums or mouthpieces representing psychotic dictatorships

Joseph A. Klein, CFP United Nations Columnist image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesJune 19, 2020

Hypocritical UN Human Rights Council Members Exploit George Floyd Killing

The dysfunctional United Nations Human Rights Council, which the United States exited for good reason two years ago, is exploiting the tragic killing of George Floyd. The Council decided to hold a U.S. bashing fest entitled “Urgent debate on systemic racism and police brutality in the United States.” The debate, which concluded on June 18th, followed on the heels of a harsh anti-American statement issued by the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. That statement denounced the United States for alleged “systemic and structural discrimination” which “disproportionately promotes racial disparities against African Americans.” It called for the United States to make what would amount to a public confession of the alleged “existence of structural racial discrimination” in American society.

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet

United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said, after referencing George Floyd’s killing specifically, that it was “necessary to make amends for centuries of violence and discrimination, including through formal apologies, truth-telling processes, and reparations in various forms.”

UN Special Rapporteur E. Tendayi Achiume urged the Human Rights Council to create a UN Commission of Inquiry on Systemic Racism and Law Enforcement in the United States, which was also advocated by the UN Working Group of Experts on People of African Descent and anti-American so-called human rights groups.

The UN Human Right Council’s “urgent debate” was requested by Burkina Faso on behalf of over 50 African countries. “The tragic events of 25 May in Minneapolis in the US which led to the death of George Floyd led to protests throughout the world against injustice and police brutality that persons of African descent face on a daily basis in many regions of the world,” Dieudonné W. Désiré Sougouri, Permanent Representative of Burkina Faso, said in a statement. Why, Mr. Sougouri, were you and the world silent about police brutality in your own country when Burkina Faso’s security forces allegedly executed 31 unarmed detainees on April 9, 2020 in the northern town of Djibo?

George Floyd’s brother, Philonise Floyd, asked the Council members for their help to “get justice for my brother George Floyd.” He told them via video, “You in the United Nations are your brothers and sisters’ keepers in America, and you have the power to help us.” If George Floyd’s brother is seeking justice for his brother from the UN Human Rights Council, he will be sorely disappointed. Members of the Human Rights Council who are the most vociferous in railing against the United States are among the world’s worst serial human rights abusers. Current non-member dictatorships Iran, North Korea, and China, equipped with plenty of experience in killing, torturing and imprisoning their own citizens at will, added their voices to the Council’s open debate targeting the United States.

In a statement delivered to the United Nations Human Rights Council on June 16, 2020 by Hillel Neuer, the executive director of the Geneva-based independent human rights group UN Watch, Mr. Neuer cited several examples of African members of the Council with horrendous records of racism and oppression. Yet these countries dare to sit in judgment of the United States.

Yet these countries dare to sit in judgment of the United States

Mauritania, Mr. Neuer pointed out, has “an estimated 500,000 black slaves, with CNN referring to Mauritania as ‘slavery’s last stronghold.’”

Libya, Mr. Neuer said, “subjects up to a million African migrants to virtual slavery—trapped in a terrifying cycle of extortion, imprisonment, forced labor and prostitution,” while Cameroon “crushes protests by the English-speaking population, and has committed atrocities, including massacring civilians, rape, and burning villages.” The Democratic Republic of Congo’s “police just 2 months ago killed 55 people, in a coordinated crackdown on a religious sect,” Mr. Neuer added.

Farhan Haq, Deputy Spokesman for the Secretary-General, was asked at a press briefing on June 17th how the opinions on police brutality in the United States by the likes of Venezuela and other Council members with atrocious human rights records can be taken seriously. Haq replied with the moral obtuseness of the typical UN bureaucrat that “there’s no rule that says that, in order to take issues seriously, we must ourselves be perfect.” He added, “In order to deal with these issues, we ourselves have to take a critical look and a hard look at what each country does.”

The United States does not claim to be perfect. No human being is perfect. However, the direction of U.S. history is towards creating a more inclusive society with equal opportunity and the equal protection of the law for all. The United States is dealing directly and openly with its past and present shortcomings. It is directly addressing race relations and police misconduct today, with remedial steps being taken at the federal, state and local levels. “We call upon all governments to demonstrate the same level of transparency and accountability that the U.S. and our democratic partners practice,” said the U.S. ambassador in Geneva, Andrew Bremberg.

The United States certainly does not need the advice of UN bureaucrats, unaccountable globalist forums or mouthpieces representing psychotic dictatorships.

Bill Gates – The Agenda