German Diesel Summit Moved for Security Reasons


The German Diesel Summit was moved because of protests in the Federal Ministry of the Interior from the Ministry of Transport for security reasons. Greenpeace’s environmental activists were present with a huge banner that read: “Welcome to Fort NOx” they put on the roof of the building. The Summit was moved effective to a backroom setup with closed doors. What has come out is that diesel causes more nitrogen oxides than gasoline, yet the emission of the carbon dioxide is significantly lower. There is clearly a major threat to the German auto industry. A CDU party politician appeared on the TV at ZDF shortly before the Berlin Diesel Summit stating that the manufacturers had to pay for their vehicles to meet the stipulated pollutant limit values. Of course, that is a court order rather than political will. But the problem is much more comprehensive. The meeting of politics and corporations is trying to save the diesel only because diesel produces less CO2. Of course, if the whole Global Warming argument is wrong and CO2 does not alter the climate whereas diesel buses use to make the air unbreathable in London, we have a lot of fake research leading to even more economic decision making.

Is the Federal Government a Sovereign or a Corporation?


QUESTION:  Is it true that the Federal Government is nothing more than a corporation? I have read that the “organic act of 1871” replaced our government with a corporation. I have to believe that with your knowledge of history you are aware of this. Does that mean all laws passed since that time are nothing more than corporate rules? Could elections that bypass the corporation actually be held? Granted that anyone running for office would be a marked person. Please share what are your thoughts? You are my hero Marty.

BH

 

ANSWER: No, The federal government is not a corporation. It is not even the “sovereign” for that is declared in the Constitution that “we the people” are sovereign over and above that of government. As such, the government only has the authority to have those specific powers that have been delegated to it through the Constitution. As the Supreme Court stated in LEGAL TENDER CASES, 110 U.S. 421 (1884) (also refered to as Julliard v Greenman);

But be that as it may, there is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States. It is a government of delegated powers, supreme within its prescribed sphere, but powerless outside of it. In this country, sovereignty resides in the people, and congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their constitution, entrusted to it; all else is withheld.

These people take one kernel of truth and the extrapolate that twisting them into giant conspiracy theories that mean nothing at the end of the day but gibberish. The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 was an Act of Congress that repealed the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and established a new territorial government for the whole District of Columbia. Organic Act of 1871, revoked the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and combined them with Washington County to create a unified territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. This had nothing to do with the federal government, only the municipality of Washington DC and the territory, since it was not a state.

Municipal governments are generally corporations. A municipal corporation is the legal term for a local governing body, including (but not necessarily limited to) cities, counties, towns, townships, charter townships, villages, and boroughs. Municipal incorporation occurs when such municipalities become self-governing entities under the laws of the state. They are NOT a sovereign government as is a state or the federal government.

Corporations date back to Roman law. Historically, such corporate charters allowed groups of people to act as one and that the operation would survive an individual person. Charters historically protected directors and stockholders from liability for debts and harms caused by their corporations. American legislators explicitly rejected this corporate shield. The penalty for abuse or misuse of the charter was not a plea bargain and a fine, but dissolution of the corporation.

In 1819 the U.S. Supreme Court tried to strip states of this sovereign right of creating charters (corporations) by overruling a lower court’s decision that allowed New Hampshire to revoke a charter granted to Dartmouth College by King George III. The Court claimed that since the charter contained no revocation clause, it could not be withdrawn even thought there had been a revolution and the King was replaced. The Supreme Court’s attack on state sovereignty became a major issue. Laws were then written and new state constitutional amendments were enacted all to circumvent the (Dartmouth College v Woodward) ruling. Over several decades thereafter beginning in 1844, nineteen states amended their constitutions to make corporate charters subject to alteration or revocation by their legislatures who created them. Finally, in 1855 the Supreme Court reversed itself in Dodge v. Woolsey where it then reaffirmed state’s powers over “artificial bodies” we call corporations.

These conspiracy theories are really made up by people who are clueless about the rule of law and throw together assumptions to reach outrageous predetermined conclusions

Our European Tour – Part II – Seizing All Bank Accounts Throughout EU


 

Many financial firms in London claim to be looking to move to Frankfurt or Paris with BREXIT. They are going to have a very rude awakening. The proposition to demand all euro clearing takes place inside the EU will be the death of Europe – not the rebirth. The dominating position in Brussels among the majority is control the financial markets to prevent and free market movement against the designs of the EU Commission. Additionally, this position to draconian absolute dictatorial control over European markets includes a pan-European freezing of all bank accounts in the event of an impending banking crisis. The EU Commission is deeply concerned what happens when the EU stops its life-support for Eurozone government debt. They are actually considering the way in which multi-day cash disbursements can be practically implemented in order to resolve emergency measures for banks. Their plan is looking at a prolonged banking and financial crisis that would be 20 to 30 days in duration. If government debt crashes with rising rates, then the reserves of banks will decline and this could result in a banking crisis unleashed when the EU stops its life-support program.

The EU Commission will freeze al bank accounts for one week and up to one month if the crisis continues. When Banco Popular went into crisis in Spain, there was a Bankrun which unfolded as a contagion against other banks in Spain. In Greece, accounts were frozen and cash withdrawals were limited for extended periods. This is an ongoing proposition since not all EU members agree. Some countries already have legislation allowing for a total bank freeze such as Germany. Instead of bailouts, we have now move even beyond bail-ins, and into the realm of just total seizure. It is more likely that such a freeze will not preserve banks, but will result in more bank failures.

Clearly, people should be fully aware of the thinking process in government. They will become authoritarian when the free markets rain on their parade. I strongly recommend that everyone should keep 30 days worth of cash to cover your basic needs

Erdogan moving Turkey Closer to Dictatorship


Germany is now pushing the EU towards a much more tougher policy in its relations with Turkey as Erdogan moves the country ever closer to a full-blown dictatorship. Erdogan has rejected democracy and the rule of law and since the strike of the Putsch, which is characterized by the dismissal of thousands of government officials, mass arrests without legal procedures, and the prosecution of independent media and critics, it is clear that he is not tolerating opposition. This implies a departure from the European model of democratic values ​​and principles of the rule of law and the actions of Turkey are at odds with the fundamental principles of membership in the EU and NATO.

North Korea Prepares for World War III


The risk of war with truly a madman at the head of North Korea continues to escalate. North Korea fired its second intercontinental ballistic missile last week in an attempt to demonstrate its long range capabilities proving it can now reach the continental United States, not just Alaska as previously thought. Despite strong international condemnation, the United States and its allies are being pushed into a response to North Korea’s game changing provocation. Congress has not helped by imposing absurd sanctions on Russia at a time when we should be building stronger ties with Russia instead of demonizing them and fueling yet another confrontation all because Hillary lost the election.

As President Trump has indicated that even a military response is not out of the question. However, since that intercontinental ballistic missile last week, the US military has detected “highly unusual and unprecedented levels” of North Korean submarine activity. It now appears that they have been also engaged in an “ejection test” which examines a missile’s “cold-launch system.” In other words, this is a test for a launch of a missile from a submarine. The system uses high pressure steam to propel a missile out of the launch canister into the air before its engines ignite. This is really a game changer if he establishes nuclear submarines. Then he can sail right off the coast of California.

The irresponsible sanctions against Russia are so stupid in a time like this. If they really keep trying to totally isolate Russia, the logical response will be to support Kim and use him as a proxy. Welcome to World War III with nukes all because Hillary lost?

Secretary Wilbur Ross: “Free Trade is a Two-Way Street”…


“The Trump administration believes in free and fair trade and will use every available tool to counter the protectionism of those who pledge allegiance to free trade while violating its core principles. The U.S. is working to restore a level playing field, and under President Trump’s leadership, we will do so. This is a true free-trade agenda.”

[Free-Trade is a Two-Way Street – By Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross – Wall Street Journal, August 1, 2017]

The Trump administration last week celebrated the workers and businesses that make this country great. The purpose of “Made in America Week” was to recognize that, when given a fair chance to compete, Americans can make and sell some of the best, most innovative products in the world.

Unfortunately, many governments across the globe have pursued policies that put American workers and businesses at a disadvantage. For these governments, President Trump and his administration have a clear message: It is time to rebalance your trade policies so that they are fair, free and reciprocal.

Many nations express commitment to free markets while criticizing the U.S. for what they characterize as a protectionist stance. Yet these very nations engage in unfair trading practices, erect barriers to American exports, and maintain significant trade surpluses with us. They argue that our $752.5 billion trade deficit in goods last year was simply a natural and inevitable consequence of free trade. So, they contend, America should have no complaints.

Our major trading partners issue frequent statements regarding their own free-trade bona fides, but do they practice what they preach? Or are they protectionists dressed in free-market clothing?

In addition to tariffs, both China and Europe enforce formidable nontariff trade barriers against imports. Examples include onerous and opaque procedures for registering and gaining certification for imports; unscientific sanitary rules, especially with regard to agricultural goods; requirements that companies build local factories; and forced technology transfers. The list goes on.

Both China and Europe also bankroll their exports through grants, low-cost loans, energy subsidies, special value-added tax refunds, and below-market real-estate sales and leases, among other means. Comparable levels of government support do not exist in the U.S. If these countries really are free traders, why do they have such formidable tariff and nontariff barriers?

Until we make better deals with our trading partners, we will never know precisely how much of our deficit in goods is due to such trickery. But there can be no question that these barriers are responsible for a significant portion of our current trade imbalance.

The Trump administration believes in free and fair trade and will use every available tool to counter the protectionism of those who pledge allegiance to free trade while violating its core principles. The U.S. is working to restore a level playing field, and under President Trump’s leadership, we will do so.

This is a true free-trade agenda.

Read the full op-ed here. [<– Paywall]

Secretary T-Rex Responds To Criticism From Inside State Department…


Secretary of State Rex Tillerson responds to criticism from inside the U.S. State Department –EXAMPLE HERE– stemming from the professional career bureaucrats who cannot accept a change in objectives within the Depart of State.

Paul Ryan and “Big Club” Begin Positioning Comprehensive Immigration Platform Narrative…


Almost no-one has watched Paul Ryan, Kevin McCarthy, Eric Cantor, John Boehner AND republican leadership of the House Freedom Caucus admit they intentionally hide their support for amnesty and immigration reform because they know the electorate doesn’t support it.  Yet it’s right there on camera: video showing exactly that. –SEE HERE

The video is highly controlled by PBS and Frontline (legal), and in my opinion tightly controlled because PBS fully understands what would happen if the story of republicans in that video reached the larger awareness of U.S. voters. –The Last Hour is Critical

There is only one political party in Washington DC.  There are two wings, but only one political and ideological apparatus.  An accurate frame of reference for watching this border wall video released today from Paul Ryan is only possible with the understanding from that FrontLine video in 2014.  What you see below is 100% political manipulation:

.

House Speaker Paul Ryan is attempting to pull off the Alex Castellanos strategy through the utilization of political policy; it’s a strategy the UniParty uses effectively.

Trump & Chaos


US President Donald Trump may be a good businessman, but in politics, he just does not get it. Politics is all about ego and back-stabbing. It is not about logic and the art of the deal. After just ten days in the office, Trump’s communications chief, Anthony Scaramucci has been forced to resign. The Chief of Staff John Kelly demanded a clean new start and and that meant the dismissal of Scaramucci. This last week had caused a lot of trouble, when Scaramucci attacked the now dismissed Reince Priebus and Trumps chiefs Steve Bannon with vulgar words. Trump is under pressure, because he has not implemented many announced projects so far. He is kept spinning around in circles fighting things like gays in the military creating so many new wars and hatred alienating support for projects he promised like tax reform. So far, Trump is a man who does listen, but he is also a man who is very much his own. He is out of his league in politics. This is not about the best deal for the country. This is indeed more than a swamp – it is an entire ocean of corruption and self-interest. Negotiating a business deal is a one on one arrangement. This is a multiheaded beast with no possible way of confronting on so many levels simultaneously. He has to STOP creating so many new wars and stop the personal tweeting to get even. Just get on with the tax reform before it is too late or he will find himself losing support from the people in 201

Volkswagen & the Risk Behind the Euro


The scandal at Volkswagen AG over the diesel which began on September 18th, 2015, when the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a notice of violation of the Clean Air Act to German automaker Volkswagen Group. The agency had found that Volkswagen had intentionally programmed turbocharged direct injection diesel engines to activate some emissions controls only during laboratory emissions testing. The programming caused the vehicles to meet US standards during regulatory testing, However, they were actually emitting up to 40 times more pollution than they proclaimed.  Volkswagen included this programming scheme in about eleven million cars worldwide, and 500,000 were in the United States during model years 2009 through 2015.

Volkswagen Group sells passenger cars under the Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Porsche, SEAT, Škoda and Volkswagen marques; motorcycles under the Ducati brand; and commercial vehicles under the marques MAN, Scania, and Volkswagen Commercial Vehicles. It is divided into two primary divisions, the Automotive Division and the Financial Services Division, and has approximately 340 subsidiary companies. VW also has two major joint-ventures in China (FAW-Volkswagen and SAIC Volkswagen). The company has operations in approximately 150 countries and operates 100 production facilities across 27 countries.

Volkswagen Group agreed to plead guilty to a major conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government and obstructing a federal investigation into its violation of emissions standards. The U.S. prosecutors also charged six individual German VW executives for their alleged roles in the scheme. The company agreed to pay a $2.8 billion criminal fine and $1.5 billion in civil penalties for rigging more than half a million vehicles with software to cheat pollution laws and lying to U.S. investigators about the nature of the conspiracy. In January 2017, the FBI arrested Oliver Schmidt, a German who is the former top emissions compliance manager for Volkswagen in the United States while on vacation in Florida on a charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Many top German businessmen from the auto industry cannot travel to the USA or through the USA even on a stop-over for fear of being arrested.

German prosecutors have also widened a criminal investigation into Volkswagen’s Audi unit after authorities accused the luxury car maker of installing a system designed to evade emissions rules in cars in Europe, a major shift for an inquiry that has previously concentrated on the United States. Volkswagen Chief Executive Martin Winterkorn resigned back in 2015 over the scandal. The criminal investigation is now looking at the entire German auto industry much closer.

This is the serious issue that could undermine the entire German economy if it continues to spread throughout the industry. Beware, that the rally in the Euro is clearly a reactionary one and is by no means sustainable long-term. This could be the very issue the expands in 2018, so keep this in the back of your mindset. There are other bombshells yet to fall. While Audi must recall 24,000 vehicles it sold with the pollution software manipulation, there are studies said to exist in the US which the lawyers may unleash claiming that there is a clear correlation between a increase of lung cancer connected to the introduction of diesel trucks, buses, and cars. Even in Britain, the government encouraged people to buy diesel for the environment. It was the German auto industry who asked government to come up with tax cuts on diesel to further support sales. Politicians are turning against the German auto industry in a very major way for their careers always depend on getting the bad guy. If a barrage of lawsuits come flying out over pollution as was the case with asbestos, the future of Europe may appear much darker than many suspect.