Nike Reports Profit Loss of $790 Million in Q4 and a Year-Over-Year Sales Decline of 38% (46% in U.S.)…


There is a lot of weird financial data in/around Nike that is coming to a head.  For those who track issues closely, Nike is using the COVID-19 issues to hide the Kaepernick effect.

Everyone remembers Nike went all-in on their social justice model and made a corporate decision to make Black Lives Matter activist Colin Kaepernick the image of their brand.

In their latest financial results Nike is reporting a net quarterly loss of $790 million…. That’s a big deal. However, given the defensive excuses over the COVID-19 shutdown, that loss alone isn’t the big story.  Their year-over-year sales are down 38%, which tells us the downward spiral has been happening for a lot longer than a quarter.

How bad were their results?  To give you some perspective most financial analysts in the industry were looking for a profit target around seven cents per share.  The result Nike reported was a loss of 51 cents per share.  That is a massive disparity.

In my opinion, having tracked MAGA and Anti-MAGA companies and effects, what Nike was doing in much of last year was hiding and deferring income losses due to sales declines.  They did this because the larger goal was to hide the impact of their branding shift. Nike didn’t want people to know how much backlash they faced, so they used every mechanism possible including inventory manipulation to avoid showing losses.

However, as with all revenue and profit hiding schemes inside large corporations (and there are many that can be used) eventually you run out of ways to hide profit losses as a result of top-line collapses.  Eventually inventories are trued up; eventually supplies need to be replenished; eventually extended -and or renegotiated- vendor payments need to be made; eventually it’s going to catch up to you.  In my opinion, this is what’s happened.

Total revenue was down 38% to $6.31 billion from $10.18 billion a year ago. Sales in North America were down 46% (link)

Nike saw the COVID-19 economic contraction as a way to hide a top-line and bottom-line  collapse that has very little to do with the coronavirus.

COVID-19 is their cover, not the principal cause.

Evidence to support my review found in the action that Nike takes after releasing their $790 million profit loss.  Remember, this bottom line loss is the direct result of the top line collapse.  The raw material doesn’t cost more (it’s actually less); inflation didn’t chew up their import pricing (it’s actually less); they are buying in dollars which are actually stronger; energy costs are not higher (they are actually less) and Nike has not been hurt by tariffs because Chinese devaluation of currency (beyond the tariff cost) has actually helped raise the profit equation for many importers.  This loss is all about the top line.

Nike immediately responds by saying (emphasis mine):

Nike CEO John Donahoe announced in a company-wide email on Thursday that the brand will soon be “forced to make some difficult choices” that will “likely result in a net reduction of jobs.

The email, viewed by Complex, comes after Nike posted a net loss of $790 million in its latest quarterly earnings report on the same day. The company attributed the loss in part to the strain COVID-19 placed on its business globally.

[…] Donahoe ensured that the reductions in staff would “not be done for cost reasons.” The CEO also said they were not a response to the coronavirus pandemic.

Instead, he wrote, the restructuring is a remedy to the “overburdened matrix” the company has become. He said the planned cuts are meant to simplify how Nike works and increase speed and responsiveness.

The email offers few details with respect to who among the brand’s thousands of employees will be affected.

It mentions that workers at Nike’s retail stores, distribution centers, and manufacturing facilities are not expected to be cut. But Donahoe also wrote in it that Nike does “not yet know how many jobs will be reduced, nor who will be specifically impacted.”

The layoffs are scheduled to happen in phases, the first one concluding in late July and the last one in the fall. (more)

Notice how everything in those statements seems to contradict itself and provides no clarity as to why such a stunning loss would be recorded?   Again, my hunch is that Nike has been playing ‘hide the loss’ ever since their stupid business decision to rebrand as apparel only for social justice warriors.

Nike purposefully cut-out half the population of their largest market in order to virtue signal to their leftist peers and retain cocktail party invitations.  Consequences from those painfully stupid -and brutally political- mistakes cannot be avoided forever.  That’s the larger background.

Here’s an example of a company that will not put themselves in the same position of vulnerability; and it is not coincidental their announcement comes out immediately following the Nike report.  Unilever is backing away from digital advertising:

UNILEVER – The complexities of the current cultural landscape have placed a renewed responsibility on brands to learn, respond and act to drive a trusted and safe digital ecosystem.

Given our Responsibility Framework and the polarized atmosphere in the U.S., we have decided that starting now through at least the end of the year, we will not run brand advertising in social media newsfeed platforms Facebook, Instagram and Twitter in the U.S. Continuing to advertise on these platforms at this time would not add value to people and society. We will be monitoring ongoing and will revisit our current position if necessary. (read more)

Democrats Attempt DC Statehood – House Passes Bill 232-180 Vote


Washington DC was not established as a state for the exact reason why Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats are trying to gain statehood for Washington DC; absolute corruption and power, it’s a self-fulfilling proposition. Pelosi is now trying to cloud the latest effort under the false pretense of civil rights; but civil rights has nothing to do with it.

Washington DC was established to be a geographic centralized zone to house the offices of very limited federal government.  DC is now a zone of political corruption intentionally isolated from the rest of the nation; and built into a system of internal benefit, scheme, graft and power. The exact opposite of its purpose.

WASHINGTON DC – The House on Friday approved landmark legislation granting statehood to Washington, D.C., in a 232-180 vote.

The vote was historic, marking the first time either chamber has passed legislation to elevate the District to the 51st state — and empower its residents with long-sought voting representation within the halls of Congress.

Calls for Washington, D.C., to gain statehood have gained steam amid the national calls for racial justice that have followed the police killing of George Floyd last month.

…[J]ust months before November’s elections, Democrats are hoping to highlight their legislative priorities for voters to see. And Floyd’s death in the custody of Minneapolis police on May 25 — which unloosed a flood of pressure on Congress to tackle racism across broad facets of American culture — has given new life to a host of years-old proposals designed, at least in part, to empower African Americans and other minorities. (more)

 

Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross: “Consumer Spending and Savings Rate Strong”…


Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross appears on Fox News with Stuart Varney to discuss a change in federal hiring policy.  However, within the interview Ross notes some key economic data that has a very solid predictor value for economic growth.

Both the spending rates and the savings rates for Americans are at all time highs.  The COVID-19 lockdown has limited purchase options, leading to less initial spending; however, consumers have a lot of recent cash reserve as shown in their rate of savings.

Ross is right, within this dynamic, as soon as economic limits are removed, the spending will boost the economy very quickly.

The Magic Ring


“When I was a child, I spoke and thought and reasoned as a child. But when I grew up, I put away childish things.”

Bob Burdick image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesJune 24, 2020

The Magic Ring

I was ten when I first heard about the magic ring.  Mom and I were spending the afternoon at Grand Mum’s.  She’s my mom’s mom.  They were talking, and I was playing with Stephanie.  She’s my Barbie, and she had just gotten home from work.  I removed her business suit and dressed her in black jeans and a bright-yellow blouse.  I was barefoot, so I let Stephanie be barefoot too.  While I brushed her hair, she told me about her rotten day at the office.

“You wouldn’t believe what Mr. Davidson did today,” she said.

I bobbed my head in time with her words and made sympathetic noises as she told me about her boss.  When she’d poured it all out, I told her my day had been no picnic.  I patted her head and started to fix her a drink like Mom does for Dad when he comes home from work.  It was then I heard the hushed tones grownups use when they don’t wish to be overheard by children.

“What ring?” I said.

They exchanged looks.  “When you’re older,” Mom said.

I’d heard that line all my life.  I looked at Grand Mum.  She shook her head, smiled, and repeated Mom’s words.  I could have whined, as I usually did to get my way, but I didn’t.  There was something in Grand Mum’s eyes.  Something that told me I was a party to their secret, but it was a secret I couldn’t yet understand.  So, Stephanie dropped into her recliner, and I fixed her a bourbon on the rocks.

Time, and the aspects of growing up, dimmed all thought of the ring until the evening of my sixteenth birthday.  That night Mom came to my bedroom carrying a small metal box.  She closed the door before crossing to my bed and sitting at my side.  Mom and I had       always hugged, but that night she hugged me for an eternity—or so it seemed at the time.

I knew the best presents were always opened last, but in my opinion, Mom was pushing it.  My birthday party had ended hours earlier.  No matter.  I grinned and said, “Another present?”

Mom wiped her eyes.  “Yes.  A very special one.”

Special?  I loved presents—-special or otherwise.  I asked to see it.

“In a moment,” she said.  “First, I must tell you the story that goes with it.”

Oh, Boy!  I just knew Mom was building up to one of her birds-and-bees lectures.  Without a doubt the box contained a diaphragm, a prescription for the pill, and a lifetime supply of condoms.  “Mom, I’m sixteen.  I’m not a baby.  I know all about, you know, boys and stuff.”

She gave me another hug.  “I want to talk to you about that too,” she said, “but this is different.”

Different?  I scooted closer to her side.

“This box belonged to a great grandmother of ours.  Her name was Danica.”  Mom cradled the box on her lap and brushed her fingertips over its hammered-bronze finish.  She appeared to be wrestling with an invisible force when she continued.  “This grandmother from our past was not an American, she was a Romani born near Bucharest in 1855.”

Romanies were nomadic, non-Christian, and their lifestyle was looked down upon as unorthodox by the Christian Church.  I knew that much from taking world history in high school.  On the other hand, Mom, Grand Mum, and I were Christian and often attended church together.  Was it this contrast between our faith and Great Grandmother Danica’s lack of it that was now troubling Mom?  To the chance that it was, I said, “Mom, children have no say in where they are born.”

“Yes, but her place of birth was only a part of a larger problem.”

“I don’t understand.”

Mom shifted the bronze box on her lap.  “It’s that she was raised in a culture far different than what we deal with today.”

“Like what?  No TV?  No Internet or email?”

Mom ignored my attempt at humor as she continued.  “Much of the Romani lifestyle and culture in Danica’s time still persists today.  One aspect of it was that any female not married by her fifteenth birthday was shunned by society and even her own family.  Danica reached fifteen with no man in her life.”

I thought of the dorky boys at South Central High School.  There wasn’t one I could name who could talk with a girl without staring at her boobs.  “Lucky girl.”

“Lucky for you,” Mom said, “but not so lucky for Danica.  She needed immediate help, and to get it she went to a gypsy.”

“A real gypsy?”

“Very real.  The gypsy placed a ring on the third finger of Danica’s right hand.  She was told not to remove the ring or to tell anyone where it came from.  If she obeyed, a man would ask for her hand before the next new moon.  She would marry him, but on her wedding night she must remove the ring and place it into this box.  Her first born would be a daughter.”

Mom paused and stared at the box.

“Then what?”

“Then,” she said, “when that daughter became a young woman, Danica was to explain the power of the ring and pass it on to her.”

“You’re putting me on, Mom.”

“Wait until I’m finished before you make up your mind.”

“So, what happened?”

“Before the next new moon, a Norseman, Vestar Sutherland, asked for her hand.  That Danica had not married among her own by age fifteen was incredible.  That she would marry someone outside her own was unthinkable.”

“So, she married the guy?”

“Oh, yes.  They had several children, but their first born was Ericka.”

Mom opened the box.  I saw a small, leather-bound book and a wide-band ring.  The ring looked heavy and crudely made.  It did not look magical.  “What’s in the book?”

Mom placed it on my lap.  “This was Danica’s diary,” she said.

I opened it.  The handwriting was flowing loops and swirls and elegant to a fault, but I couldn’t read a word of it.  “What language is this?”

“Romanian, but as you’ll see, Erika’s daughter, Denise, came to the United States around the turn of the century.  Her entries, and all entries thereafter, are in English.”

I flipped through the pages.  “Grand Mum’s name is in here!  And so is . . . yours?”  I paused and looked at Mom.  “You wore the ring?”

Her face drained and her eyes began to water.  In a whisper she said, “Yes, and the decision to do so has troubled me in the years since.”

I sat quietly alongside Mom and tried to imagine the discomfort she’d felt.  What would I have done?

She brushed the backs of her hands over her eyes and gave me a weak smile.  “I had dated and fallen in love with your father two years before he proposed marriage.  During that time I prayed again and again that he felt as I did.  But, in a moment of weakness, instead of standing on faith and the power of prayer, I wore the ring.”

Again, I wondered, what would I have done?  With this unanswered question still in mind, I looked back at the diary and turned another page.  “Oh, no!  My name’s here too.”

“You’re my first born.  But you also now know the history of Danica’s ring.”

I kept the box under my pillow for several nights before putting it in my hope chest alongside Stephanie.  I figured she had as much use for the magic ring as I did.

That evening was eight years ago, and a few things have changed.

I opened my hope chest and reached for the tiny box.  It was still sitting next to Stephanie.  Both looked well despite their years of confinement.  I carried the box to my desk, removed the diary, and read again through the entries of those who preceded the page bearing my name.  Except for Danica and her daughter, whose entries were in Romanian, the approximate age and the reasoning expressed in each woman’s entry were essentially the same.  That is, by their late teens they had found the love of their life and were hoping the ring’s power would ensure the union they deeply wanted.

These repetitive entries had not fully made sense when first reviewed when I was sixteen.  I’d told mom I already knew about boys and stuff.  In truth, though, my only experience with love had been the immature feeling best known as puppy love.

The items before me on the desk were my King James Bible, the ring Danica had first worn, and her diary now opened to the page bearing my name.  Currently, I was a senior at Florida State University, 24 years of age, home on spring break, and, for the last two years, I’d been dating someone I genuinely cared for. Mom had held place in a similar situation concerning my dad.  When she had told me about this, I wondered what I would have done in her place.

Spring break was now over, and I’d return to campus tomorrow.  Soon thereafter I would graduate with my degree in accounting.  Was marriage in my future?  If so, would I have children of my own?  Or, would I move on and find place in the business world?  Another glance at my desktop gave the clear answer I sought.

I pulled Danica’s diary closer and picked up my pen.

Dearest Danica,

These words will never reach you, yet I feel a duty to append the final entry to your diary.  I harbor no disrespect of you, your use of the ring, or for any of those who followed in your wake.  I admit to desires for my life, but unlike you and those others, my path to all future things will be guided by the supreme power of our Lord as promised in Proverbs 3:6 “In all thy ways acknowledge Him, and He will direct thy paths.”

With understanding love,

Evelina

A divine feeling of comfort embraced me as I returned the ring and Danica’s diary to the small metal box and replaced it in my hope chest alongside Stephanie.  What prompted this special feeling?  I believed 1 Corinthians 13:11 explained it well.

“When I was a child, I spoke and thought and reasoned as a child. But when I grew up, I put away childish things.”

‘Bureaucratic Despotism’: A Scam Perpetuated By Control Freaks


The political process of intrusion has continued, and today’s hysteria seems extreme. Perhaps ending action?

Bob Hoye image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesJune 24, 2020

Bureaucratic Despotism’: A Scam Perpetuated By Control Freaks

“A great civilization is not conquered from without, until it has destroyed itself from within. The essential causes of Rome’s decline lay in her people, her morals, her class struggle, her failing trade, her bureaucratic despotism, her stifling taxes, her consuming wars.”

– Will Durant, The Story Of Civilization III, Epilogue, 1944.

The above quote circulates as such, but it is a synthesis from his Epilogue Why Rome Fell?. Based upon this writer’s independent review of the collapse, it is an accurate summary. And the collapse was due to the bureaucracy intruding and spending money until, literally, it was all gone. As with today’s great experiment in authoritarian government, it began with immense wealth. In Rome’s case accumulated through conquest.

The latest authoritarian banners has included the “Genius of the Fed”

Successful bureaucratic intrusion starts at a relatively low level, only taking enough not to upset the taxpayer and the country’s main businesses. Eventually, civil servants will push taxation to the point of pain to the citizens and then supplement tax revenues with the cheat of inflation through currency depreciation. Thus, all three such great experiments have been accompanied by chronic price inflation.

Rome’s experiment was headed by the inspiring banner the “Genius of the Emperor”. The next such experiment started in 1500 when the banner was the “Infallibility of the Pope”. The Church was corrupted by a bureaucracy that eventually became venal and murderous.

This culminated with the combination of church and state forcing too much in-your-face and in-your-wallet government. In the early 1600s, the costly intrusion inspired a number of popular uprisings that eventually added up to a great reformation.

Pelosi the Puppet

“Genius of the Fed”

The latest authoritarian banners has included the “Genius of the Fed.”

Recently, it seems that the Deep State has been on a roll with a remarkable cluster of fearful issues. These have been promoted such that only big and commanding government can provide solutions. “Global Warming” had morphed into “Climate Change”, before becoming “Climate Hysteria”. And “SARS-CoV-2” has provided the magic incantation to suddenly trash the global economy—one country at a time.

This has never happened before and quite soon ordinary folk will see it as yet another scam by control freaks. Forcing people to stay at home and not spend money. So,

Taking Down White Jesus, His European Mother, And Their White Friends”, Not Today Shaun King


Neither Bernie Sanders nor AOC can walk back their support for this radical prominent Black Lives Matter activist

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesJune 23, 2020

Taking Down White Jesus, His European Mother, And Their White Friends”, Not Today Shaun King
Not today Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez-  supporting Shaun King.  Not tomorrow, not the next day, and as far as a majority of humankind is concerned, NOT EVER!

“Black Lives Matter activist Shaun King called Monday for the removal of statues, murals and stained glass windows that depict Jesus as a “white European,” which he claimed “are a form of white supremacy.” (LifeSite,June 22, 2020)

“Yes, I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down,” King, a former surrogate on Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’s 2020 presidential campaign, wrote on Twitter. “They are a form of white supremacy. Always have been.”

“King’s targeting of religious artwork comes as various activist groups have moved beyond tearing down Confederate statues and are now calling for the removal of other historical monuments.

“In the Bible, when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went?” he added. “EGYPT! Not Denmark. Tear them down.”

WHOA! Here’s a latter day Marxist’s attempt trying to rewrite the Holy Bible inferring how The Holy Family tried to blend in in “EGYPT!” not Denmark.

But King’s pathetic attempt to drag our much adored and revered Lord and Savior into his over-the-top “white supremacy” obsession was over before it even began.

It’s because most folk the world over are not having any of his heresy and never will.

King’s bid to remove images of Christ won’t work even with the help of his disciples Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez—who are every bit as whacko as he is.

Most knew before King jumped on his King Herod horse that Karl Marx, and not the Creator,  is the god of the Marxists/Socialists/Communists and all the hatred civil disorder, and pure evil that they bring.

— Shaun King (@shaunking) June 22, 2020
“All murals and stained glass windows of white Jesus, and his European mother, and their white friends should also come down,” King wrote in a second tweet. “They are a gross form of white supremacy.”

A spokesperson for King didn’t immediately return a request for additional comment.

That’s likely because he’s already desperately searching for a way to walk it all back.

“King made his remarks over a series of Twitter posts as historic monuments and statues have become the targets of anger and vandalism during Black Lives Matter protests in the wake of George Floyd’s death while in police custody late last month. (Fox News, June 22, 2020)

Neither Bernie Sanders nor AOC can walk back their support for this radical prominent Black Lives Matter activist.

It was King who introduced Sanders at some of his campaign events. (WaPO, March 10, 2020)

From the get-go publicity hound AOC used King in her bragging rights:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
November 16, 2017 ·
Shaun King, one of the most prominent Progressive figures in the country, just endorsed Ocasio2018.
This is game-changing.
Join the movement: www.ocasio2018.com

Shaun King
March 11, 2019 ·
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s critique of “moderates” is spot on.
Moderates are more naive than the visionaries if they think tinkering around the edges will solve systemic problems in our democracy and economy.
It’s time to rewrite the social contract, not manage decline. — From @justicedemocrats

Meanwhile King’s call to “tear down” “all murals and stained glass windows of white Jesus, and his European mother, and their white friends” is what the electorate is waiting to do to all Democrats—including cunning Justice Democrat ones—on November 3, 2020.

#Bring Them Down!”

Will Germany Follow Austria and Turn Green?


Austria’s first green-tinged government took power, comprising the Austrian People’s Party and the Austrian Green Party at the start of the year. The environmentalist Green Party is now in national government for the first time, and Austria is fully behind the climate change agenda. The real concern will be Germany’s next general election, which is scheduled for 2021. The propaganda over COVID and climate change have many fearing that Germany will have its first Green chancellor in post-war continental Europe. This has many fearful that the great German car production will come to an end.

Reinterpreting History – The Modern Version of Book Burning?


 

They are going to remove the statue of Teddy Roosevelt, who ironically was a socialist, as they claim the statue is now racist because it portrays an American Indian and a black African. Teddy Roosevelt was certainly not a slave owner. The statue reflected the two continents being America (the American Indian), and Africa because Roosevelt had taken a year-long expedition to Africa. Is a statue depicting a black person representing Africa automatically racist?

If you look at the footage of various attacks on statues, you will notice that these are not purely blacks protesting. You will see a lot of whites in these movements. This is reflecting more civil unrest which is also frustration over the lockdown and losing jobs. The job losses have hit the youth very hard for they are often the people in service industries just getting states like waitresses and stock boys. With movies, plays, restaurants, malls, and small shops closed, it has been the youth thrown out of work with no unemployment for they were not full-time employees.

 

These protests are not really thought out. In some cases, this is the equivalent of the Taliban destroying the monumental statues of Gautama Buddha carved into the side of a cliff in the Bamyan valley in the Hazarajat region of central Afghanistan. Then there were the museum raids by ISIS, who destroyed statues they disagreed with. This would be akin to blowing up the Pyramids because the Egyptians were pagans.

 

 

This is the statue in the Capitoline Museum in Rome depicting Romulus and Remus suckling a she-wolf based upon the myth of the founding of Rome. Should this statue now be removed because it represents somehow cruelty to animals?

Here is a Roman coin of Emperor Hadian (117-138 AD) with a reverse depicting Africa as a female with an elephant headdress, holding a scorpion, with a basket of wheat symbolizing the Egyptian food source of grain for the world. It is symbolic like the Teddy Roosevelt statue.

This is a rare coin of the ancient city of Phokaia in Ionia (modern Turkey) struck in a natural alloy of gold and silver (electrum) 560-545 BC. It depicts the head of an African man facing left with the civic badge of Phokaia behind the head.  Some would say this is racist today because it was struck by Greeks. To the Greeks, Africans were called Aethiopians and they appear regularly in Greek art. The Greeks were well acquainted with Africans since they appear often in Greek literature as mythical characters and warriors.

Indeed, Africans were known in the Greek world as early as the Minoan period. They were often mercenary soldiers – not slaves. There are records of them fighting for the Minoans as well as in the army of Memnon at Troy. Even the Persians hired black mercenary soldiers who appeared in the army of Xerxes in the battle of Marathon (see Frazer, J. G., 1913: Pausanias’ Description of Greece, II. Macmillan, London, p 434; and Graindor, P., 1908: Les Vases au Nègre. Musée Belge, p 29).

As time changes, so do attitudes. Rewriting history seems to be just wrong, particularly when we apply our understanding of what symbols mean today and compare them to the past. When they named the city of Philadelphia, they took the Greek meaning of “brotherly love” and saw that in the Christian context. In Greek, it meant that you married your sister — a different kind of brotherly love.

The Swastika symbol has a modern connection to Hitler and the Nazis. However, it has been a symbol found on ancient coins of Europe as well as coins of India. The symbol goes back to the  Indus Saraswati Civilization as early as 1500 BC. Hindu tradition used the Swastika as a favorable symbol that was widely used in festivals, such as marriage rituals.

The Swastika symbolizes lightning bolts which represented the thunder god and the king of the gods in Vedic Hinduism, but to the Greeks, it represented Zeus in their religion. To the Romans, it represented Jupiter, and in Scandinavia/Germany it represented Thor. Here it is displayed over a bull on a coin of Macedonia (430-390 BC). It was discovered also in the excavation of Troy.

Here we find it in a mosaic that was excavated in a Byzantine church in Shavei Tzion (Israel), so we find it even in Christianity. This symbol has been around for thousands of years and it had nothing to do with racism or fascism.

The German archaeologist  Heinrich Schliemann (1822-1890) discovered the Swastika at the site of ancient Troy during his excavation. Schliemann connected it with similar shapes found on pottery in Germany for it was also prevalent as a symbol of Thor. Schliemann speculated that it was a “significant religious symbol of our remote ancestors.” Hitler appears to have adopted it as a reference to the ancient German culture which became the Aryan culture he was promoting and the Nazis then adopted eugenics.

The Swastika is clearly a different symbol to different cultures but was generally religious. Because of Hitler, it tends to be banned in Western modern culture. So should statues like that of Teddy Roosevelt, which has nothing to do with slavery but the representative symbol of two continents, be destroyed? Are we embarking on book burning or blowing up monuments because today they are being reinterpreted as something different from their origin like Philadelphia? We do live in confusing times.

President Trump Town Hall With Sean Hannity – Green Bay, Wisconsin – Video…


During President Trump’s visit to Wisconsin he sat down for a town hall event with Fox News host Sean Hannity.