Posted originally on CTH on May 20, 2025 | Sundance
… And Director Gabbard may not know they exist.
If you have followed the construct of the Trump-Russia collusion story, you are likely outraged that accountability has not followed. There’s a very frustrating reason for that and I will explain how two distinctly different issues are being conflated. Separating them is the key.
The first issue is the FBI’s illegal surveillance of presidential candidates’, including candidate Donald Trump. The second issue is the Clinton campaign inspired Russia-Collusion story, that led to Crossfire Hurricane, colloquially known as “Russiagate.” All investigative emphasis, including John Durham, has been on the latter which takes you into a DC silo construct where all tentacles lead to dead ends and inaction.
Russiagate was a Clinton-inspired political smear campaign that was given the patina of credibility by the FBI opening the investigation called “Crossfire Hurricane.” If you focus on that storyline, you end up with zero accountability and endless talk that goes nowhere.
However, if President Trump and DNI Tulsi Gabbard reveal the first element, the FBI’s illegal surveillance of candidate Donald Trump, that path has a physical trail and documents that cannot be deflected by political obfuscation.
♦THE FBI SURVEILLANCE – The original agreement between Clinton and Obama going back to 2008 was for Obama to take the nomination, the presidency and then eventually support Hillary Clinton’s 2016 election bid.
Obama would be President. Obama would appoint Clinton to Secretary of State, Hillary would then use her office to build wealth for herself and her family, and then HRC would exit the Dept of State to begin her presidential run.
John Podesta would enter the Obama administration as Hillary left (post Benghazi mess) in 2013. Podesta would look out for Hillary’s interests from his position inside the Obama White House. The Clintons and Obamas never fully trusted each other.
Barack Obama would put all the mechanisms into place that would transition his administration into Hillary Clintons’. That was always the plan running in the background.
In 2015 Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had a check-in meeting; just touching base to firm up the goals and objectives as Hillary began her campaign launch. Podesta then left the White House to take up position inside the campaign, and Obama would maintain Clinton’s interests as planned without a monitor.
All of President Obama’s appointments in/after 2015, were essentially through the prism of assisting Hillary Clinton to win in 2016. Attorney General Loretta Lynch (tarmac meeting), Deputy AG Sally Yates, Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe and FBI Director James Comey were all part of that.
This is a key point missed by many. In the last two years of Obama, the cabinet and top-tier members of the administration would align their institutional interests to that of Hillary Clinton.
Technically Hillary had eyes and ears all over the White House at the time, and with Hillary Clinton being a foregone conclusion per the expectations of Washington DC, everyone would fall in line during the transition from Obama to Clinton.
Again, this was the general plan. Obama would show up in 2016 to campaign for Hillary and all would be seamless.
The FBI was aware of the plan for transition from Obama to Clinton. Hence, the FBI role in eliminating the threat later presented by the Hillary Clinton laptop scandal, private servers and the subsequent issues of her receiving and transmitting classified information.
Remember, Clinton’s motive as Secretary of State was to sell her position for material wealth. That’s why she used a personal email, maintained her own servers, and generally controlled how her activity could be monitored and tracked. [Also, she didn’t fully trust Obama]
The FBI activity was to support, defend and facilitate the Clinton effort. This is again a key to understanding “Russiagate.”
After March 2016 (Super Tuesday) it became obvious Donald Trump was going to win the Republican nomination. Trump would be Clinton’s opponent.
♦The surveillance – Using access to the NSA database, the U.S. Govt., specifically “FBI Contractors”, began doing political surveillance of Donald Trump’s campaign. This intel was then sent to the Clinton team. Clinton would benefit from knowing the communication inside the Trump campaign. All of that intel was in the metadata captured by the NSA and searched by the FBI contractors.
All of this activity was political surveillance, using govt resources to feed the Clinton team the info.
♦”RUSSIAGATE” – When the Clinton campaign launched the Russia Collusion dirty trick move against her opponent Donald Trump, originally using Fusion GPS and Glenn Simpson, the role of the Obama administration was to facilitate the political hit, and at the very least not impede it. Hence, former CIA Director John Brennan briefing Barack Obama on the status of the Russia collusion hoax as it spread in 2016 via the Clinton campaign.
However, as a result of the circle of information, Obama had a problem. The sourcing of the intel could trace to the illegal FBI surveillance of the NSA database. That’s why they needed a plausible shift within the surveillance. That’s where the Carter Page FISA comes in.
Specifically because President Obama was, by extension, now a participant in the Clinton created “Russia Collusion hoax,” and specifically because his administration officials were participants in the process (DOJ, FBI), when President Trump won the 2016 election President Barack Obama was now exposed by the threat the operation represented. This context is the impetus for the January 5, 2017, meeting and subsequent Susan Rice memo.
Following the surprising result in the 2016 election, the team around Obama was constructing plausible deniability.
President Obama did not orchestrate the Russia Collusion hoax; he facilitated it by not interfering with his administration officials who were assisting Hillary Clinton. This is a key distinction.
President Obama knew what was going on and he was willfully blind as it was carried out. However, the mess and fallout from the effort his FBI and DOJ officials put into assisting Hillary Clinton eventually represented a threat to President Obama.
With an assist from pressuring allies in the legislative branch, Robert Mueller and all 19 of his Clinton-aligned Lawfare operatives were put into place to cover-up the mess created within the Russia Collusion operation. Mueller +19 Lawfare embeds continued the Crossfire Hurricane operation, while the extreme Lawfare strategy was deployed against the Trump administration.
That’s the short, encapsulated version.
The Russia Collusion hoax was created by Hillary Clinton, spread to media through Fusion GPS and given the patina of credibility by the DOJ and FBI. President Obama facilitated the operation by not interfering in it, until it became a threat to him personally.
Both the Obama and Clinton political teams supported and organized the Robert Mueller cover-up. All of this activity is because Hillary Clinton was supposed to win.
♦ Awakening the public. Among the information President Donald Trump has requested for declassification, there are two important document sets being overlooked.
#1 is the 2017 99-page opinion of FISA Court presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer covering 2016 FBI Contractor abuse of the NSA database. Tulsi Gabbard needs to get the unredacted version, read it and declassify it. [Yes, revealing the names of the actual FBI contractors]
#2 are the NSA “audit logs” which were preserved by NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers, as outlined in his testimony. Where does NSA store their audit logs?
Both document trails outline the FBI conducting political surveillance of the 2016 Republican Presidental nominee, Donald Trump.
This is the originating data that follows a parallel path in the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation.
Both paths, (1) the FBI illegal political surveillance, and (2) the Clinton campaign Russia Collusion/Crossfire Hurricane investigation, intersect at the Carter Page FISA warrant, and merge together. However,it is important to see them as two distinctly different paths.
The illegal surveillance path was made legal retroactively by the FISA Warrant against Carter Page.
Investigating ‘Russiagate‘, as dirty and unseemly as it was, takes you to a place where politics infected the DOJ/FBI and every participant carries plausible deniability. However, investigate the 2016 illegal surveillance of Donald Trump’s campaign via the NSA database and all of that activity cannot be justified.
Focus on the FBI surveillance of the GOP in 2016, by focusing on how they exploited the NSA database.
As to the Audit Logs preserved by Director Rogers, there are two strong likelihoods:
#1) I suspect one of the workstations involved in the database searches will be identified as an FBI workstation in the DC Law Office of Perkins Coie.
#2) I suspect one of the workstations involved in the database searches will be located in the office of Samantha Power at the State Department; with a user id login designated to Power (but she may not have physically logged in).
Both #1 and #2 above are directly connected to Hillary Clinton. #1 was her campaign law firm, and #2 was her former office.
Bottom line. The FBI was conducting illegal political surveillance and funneling the results to the Clinton campaign. There is a document trail directly to this activity, and audit logs showing exactly who was doing it.
Posted originally on CTH on May 18, 2025 | Sundance
Nicușor Dan was the pro-EU, pro-war and pro-NATO Romanian presidential candidate supported by Brussels.
When Nicușor Dan came in second place in the first round of elections, CTH noted he was very likely to succeed because the stakes are just too high for the European Union. The largest NATO military base in Europe is being built in Romania.
There was simply no way the collective assembly of the Intelligence Community, the military industrial complex, the pro-Ukraine elements, the anti-Russia NATO/EU alliance were going to allow defeat. As expected, Dan won.
BUCHAREST — Romania elected a centrist president in a major surprise after an intense campaign in which voters looked likely to propel another hard-right populist to lead a large European country.
Despite coming a distant second in the first round two weeks ago, the moderate mayor of Bucharest, Nicușor Dan, won by a decisive 8-point majority over his radical rival, George Simion, who conceded defeat early Monday after initially declaring himself the winner.
With 99.8 percent of polling stations counted by 1:50 a.m. local time Monday, Dan had won 53.8 percent to 46.2 percent for Simion. Turnout was 65 percent, the highest since 1996.(more)
Posted originally on CTH on May 18, 2025 | Sundance
As we have outlined extensively, the stakes for Europe are high on many fronts. The totalitarian leftists who control the European Union from Brussels have designated allies in key countries like Germany and France in their effort to retain control. President Trump is only one threat to their collective assembly; President Putin represents another.
It is their underlying dependency that creates the symbiotic relationship between the EU, NATO, the United Kingdom, the CIA and the intelligence apparatus they deploy. Ukraine is an example of their unified interests; the pending election in Romania is another.
Pavel Durov is the founder and creator of Telegram, a communication platform that fights to keep the global intelligence apparatus out of the speech dynamic. Durov’s goals and objectives are solid and the political systems who control the intelligence apparatus do not like him at all.
Durov notes today that France (represented by the Baguette) has asked the platform to restrict the reach of conservative voices in Romania. This is a similar pattern to how the U.S government (under Obama then Biden) did the same thing with Facebook, Instagram, Google and Twitter in the U.S. elections. However, Durov tells France to get lost.
Canada’s Ostrich Cull Scandal: Are Big Pharma and Globalist Interests Pulling the Strings? When I first heard about the ostrich farm in Edgewood, British Columbia, facing a forced cull of 400 ostriches, something immediately felt off. Sure, authorities claim they’re responding to an avian flu outbreak—but the deeper I dig into this, the more it smells of something else entirely. Let’s get right into it, because this isn’t just about bird flu—this is about science, censorship, profits, and powerful global interests that seem determined to control the narrative and crush alternatives.
The Edgewood Ostrich Outrage: How We Got Here
Picture a remote, idyllic farm in British Columbia’s Kootenay region, home to about 400 ostriches on 65 acres. On December 31, 2024, two ostriches tragically die of H5N1 avian flu, reportedly brought by wild migratory birds. This leads to a swift quarantine by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)—but that’s just the beginning.
Incredibly, after the initial outbreak, only about 40 birds (roughly 10% of the flock, mainly younger ostriches) succumb to the virus. Within just days, something remarkable occurs: the flock stabilizes, and the remaining 90% of the birds are thriving. Farm owner Karen Espersen observes that these ostriches seem to develop immunity, something clearly special and scientifically fascinating.
Yet despite the farm’s desperate pleas for additional testing and careful scientific study, the CFIA orders all ostriches culled—every last healthy bird—to supposedly “prevent the spread.” The family fights back, but on May 13, 2025, the Canadian Federal Court sides with the CFIA, leaving no room for appeal. The ostriches, despite clear evidence of recovery and possible immunity, are condemned to death.
Why the rush to destroy animals that might be holding keys to groundbreaking treatments? Why no interest in studying them further?
Ostrich Eggs and Antibodies: A Game-Changing Threat to Big Pharma? Here’s where it gets interesting. Ostriches aren’t just giant flightless birds—they are potent biological factories. Their eggs contain powerful antibodies that have already demonstrated incredible therapeutic potential. Each ostrich egg can yield as many antibodies as 100 chicken eggs or 800 rabbits. That’s not just impressive, it’s potentially disruptive to the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr. Yasuhiro Tsukamoto (nicknamed “Dr. Ostrich”), a prominent Japanese veterinary immunologist, has been leading pioneering research using ostrich antibodies. His work, in collaboration with the Edgewood farm, produced breakthrough products during the COVID-19 crisis, including masks and nasal sprays coated with ostrich antibodies that neutralize viruses effectively. Hospitals in Japan even ran successful clinical trials using ostrich antibody nasal sprays for virus prevention.
Now, apply this logic to avian flu—a virus global health authorities (including the WHO and World Economic Forum) are increasingly hyping as “the next COVID,” predicting global outbreaks and calling for new mass vaccination programs. If ostrich antibodies could provide effective natural immunity or treatment against bird flu, that could render new vaccines—particularly expensive, patented mRNA vaccines—unnecessary or less profitable.
It’s not a stretch to see why pharmaceutical giants might perceive ostrich antibodies as a direct threat: cheap, natural, effective, and impossible to monopolize like lab-engineered vaccines.
The Pharma Connection: Is Big Money Silencing Alternative Solutions? As I researched deeper, disturbing questions arose. According to the ostrich farm owners, CFIA officials bizarrely grilled them about their proprietary antibody research during quarantine meetings—unusual questioning, to say the least, for an agency supposedly just concerned with containment. Why was a regulatory agency suddenly so interested in proprietary intellectual property?
From my perspective, this screams of corporate influence—exactly the type of “public-private partnership” favored by groups like the World Economic Forum, where regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical interests often blend seamlessly.
Indeed, ostrich antibodies represent precisely the kind of “inconvenient science” that Big Pharma—and powerful globalist institutions like the WHO and WEF—would rather not let flourish. After all, if a farmer in British Columbia could produce inexpensive antibody-based solutions to avian flu, COVID, or other pandemics, why would governments invest billions in patented mRNA technologies championed by the pharmaceutical establishment?
This dynamic mirrors precisely what we’ve seen throughout COVID: affordable, natural solutions systematically sidelined in favor of profitable, patent-protected vaccines and treatments. And let’s be honest—the upcoming bird flu “crisis” narrative feels suspiciously similar to the lead-up to the COVID pandemic: a hyped-up global threat, new vaccines in the pipeline, and massive profits at stake.
A Pattern of Suppression: “Trust the Science”…or Else? Critically, the CFIA’s rigid refusal to even consider alternative solutions or studies of these potentially immune birds exposes a deeper pattern of institutional inflexibility—or intentional suppression. Despite the farm’s strict quarantine, remote location, and documented immunity of surviving birds, authorities refused any meaningful investigation or testing, stubbornly adhering to blanket policies that conveniently shut down independent science.
Even respected veterinarians like Dr. Scott Weese from the University of Guelph have pointed out the irrationality: “We’re not eradicating H5N1 by culling these ostriches,” he said plainly. Premier David Eby of British Columbia even questioned why there’s no “case-by-case” flexibility, expressing frustration at the CFIA’s blanket policy.
Yet the authorities wouldn’t budge an inch. The message is clear: “Trust our science, no questions allowed.”
Public Outrage and the Fight for Truth The outrage from the farm, community, and global observers has been intense. Activists and animal advocates descended on Edgewood, physically trying to block the cull and livestreaming desperate pleas for help. Even Robert F. Kennedy Jr., known for challenging the COVID vaccine narrative, weighed in, calling the planned ostrich cull “horrifying.”
The farm’s supporters—and I count myself among them—see this cull as part of a larger pattern: global health authorities and big-money pharmaceutical interests systematically suppressing any inexpensive, natural, and non-patentable solutions. The ostrich antibodies represent exactly the kind of disruptive innovation that global elites, aligned with pharma profits and pandemic narratives, want silenced.
Coincidence or Conspiracy? The Bigger Picture Emerges Is it mere coincidence that, just as ostrich antibodies were demonstrating real promise as inexpensive, natural antiviral solutions, Canadian authorities swiftly moved to destroy the birds producing them?
While no court case or official inquiry directly proves Big Pharma influence on CFIA’s decision, context matters greatly. The aggressive stance of global health organizations promoting the avian flu as “the next big threat,” coupled with heavy investment in mRNA vaccine technology, makes ostrich-derived natural immunity research deeply inconvenient. Powerful financial interests would clearly benefit from removing such competition.
Even Canadian MLAs and animal-rights advocates are questioning whether something darker lies behind this incident. It may not be outright conspiracy—though that can’t be ruled out—but rather the structural, systemic alignment between big-money pharmaceutical interests, compliant government agencies, and international globalist institutions promoting centralized pandemic responses.
Looking Ahead: Fighting for Transparency and Real Science This ostrich farm incident isn’t just another animal culling. It’s a symptom of a broader struggle—science versus profit, freedom versus control, transparency versus censorship.
We have an opportunity to push back, demanding full transparency from government and health authorities. We must insist on fair, unbiased scientific inquiry into promising alternatives, no matter how disruptive they may be to established financial or political interests.
Imagine if Canadian authorities had paused to thoroughly investigate these ostriches’ apparent immunity. Imagine a world where inexpensive, effective ostrich antibodies became a mainstream, natural alternative to costly pharmaceutical vaccines. Unfortunately, this scenario directly threatens too many entrenched interests to be allowed to develop without resistance.
We can’t allow powerful actors to squash independent innovation under the guise of “public health.” The Edgewood ostrich cull should be a wake-up call: it’s about far more than birds—it’s about the future of medical freedom, scientific transparency, and resisting the weaponization of fear-based pandemic narratives for profit and control.
Posted originally on May 17, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
I always liked this song. Some people see the world for what it is, and others are consumed by propaganda. Many of us have lost a friend to politics, war, or it was just their time. They may be unable to see, so they will never understand this song.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 