Posted originally on Oct 18, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
The European Union is beginning to change its stance on its open border policy. Over 1.14 million sought asylum in the EU last year, a completely unsustainable population spike. European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has faced harsh criticism from member states throughout the bloc who are calling upon Brussels to address the situation. Von der Leyen has now expressed interest in creating “return hubs” to house and deport migrants whose applications are denied.
I reported that Italy saw a 64% reduction in illegal migration under President Giorgia Meloni, who promised to curb immigration once elected. Instead of building shelters to house migrants with taxpayer funds, Meloni sought to build detention centers. Centri di Permanenza per il Rimpatrio (CPRs) or Repatriation Centers were extremely controversial but effective. Thousands of migrants were detained and deported if their application for asylum was denied. Word traveled that conditions in these centers were less desirable, making Italy less desirable for would-be intruders.
Ursula von der Leyen supported Meloni once she realized migrants were spilling into the rest of the bloc from Italy and has pointed to Meloni’s “out of the box thinking” to stop the inflow of newcomers. Specifically, the European Commission president stated that the Italy-Albania protocol proved effective whereby both nations signed a treaty that permitted Italy to send asylum seekers found in international waters back to Albania where they are then held in detention centers. “We should also continue to explore possible ways forward as regards the idea of developing return hubs outside the EU, especially in view of a new legislative proposal on return,” von der Leyen writes. “With the start of operations of the Italy-Albania protocol, we will also be able to draw lessons from this experience in practice.”
Now, 17 members of the EU sent a document to Brussels earlier in the month demanding border reform. “People without the right to stay must be held accountable. A new legal basis must clearly define their obligations and duties,” the members said. “Non-cooperation must have consequences and be sanctioned.” Suddenly, leaders of European nations realized that they were beneath Brussels in terms of power and had lost the ability to secure their own borders.
The 17 member nations are demanding that Brussels implements rules to detain and deport migrants who could be a threat to national security. Furthermore, they want to non-EU nations to accept their own citizens back once they are deported. As with everything, money rules all and these nations are willing to use trade and monetary gifts or aid as leverage, as Italy did with numerous African nations under the Mattei Plan.
Countless EU nations are attempting to control their borders, and in doing so, Brussels is relinquishing its power. Poland even attempted to announce a temporary suspension of asylum seekers the same week that Ursula voiced concern over the migrant crisis. The forced cohesion of the European Union is coming undone.
We must do everything possible to avoid this war as it has the strong potential to go nuclear. If so, if we can’t stop it, the best scenario we could et would be a limited use of nuclear missiles that take out some of the major cities in the EU, North America and China.
However, depending how many, this could result in a collapse of the various governments therein taking us back to the technology levels of the last quarter of the 19th century. The reason being that there will be little to no electricity generation or transmission and gasoline will be very hard to get. Further, the fallout of radioactive particles and the lack of food or water will probably kill a billion people. But worse is the lack of the internet and cell phones. Without the web how can we communicate? or know wht is going on So, why would any politicians. in his/her right mind. let this happen, since the potential is so devastating?
The answer can be found in The World Economic Forum (WEF) created by Klaus Schwab in 1972 and the US neocons who have wanted to destroy Russia after the USSR dissolved in 1991.We also have Bill Gates who desperately wants to reduce the world’s population and George Soros who developed the open border concept and President Biden authored it on day one of his 2021 four year term. The WEF is run by Klaus Schwab and he is the master mind of the redo of Western Society into a one world government. He sells it as “The Great Reset & Build Back better” assuming that there is not a nuclear war The result of this change will probably be a world much like George Orwell’s 1984. If you want to know what is coming read that book
.
The core of the problem is uncontrolled human nature. Which manifests itself mostly in some men that have the mistaken idea that they can rule the world? That tendency was restrained by Christianity, the Ten Commandments and the US constitution but starting in the late 1940’s a movement was started to eliminate religion from our country and by the end of the 20th century that has been accomplished. Now for all practical [purposes there are no checks on the power being concentrated in Washing DC. The administrative state and the neocons now rule the country. However, those that want the power the most are have come from the training of the World Economics Form training program and here is a partial listing of the players.
Currently we have the following: Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, George Soros and the us neocons (for example: Dick Cheney, Liz Cheney, John Bolton, Kimberly Kegan, Lindsey Graham, Robert Kagan, Vitoria Nuland, Hillary Clinton, Anthony Blinken) to name a few. These dozen people along with many others like Anthony Fauci that do what that power and they want are seeking to rule us. By starting a war between Ukraine and Russia.There are trying to egg on Russia to make to first move and then they will destroy Russia.
The conversion process of our Republic into a tyranny is now in the final stages. But it was a long road that started with Darwin and his The Origin of the Species in 1859 then Karl Marx and his Das Kapital Volume I in 1867, and then with the creation of the Income Tax in 1913 with the 16th amendment to the Constitution. FDR continued the work starting social programs like Social security. Just for the record, the collected payroll funds initially went into a government fund so it was like putting the money into a govermet bank. But that didn’t last long as President Johnson wanted to spend that money so he took it and put an IOU in its place. That means that if current payroll taxes do not cover current payout then the IOUs in the fund need to be cashed in to cover payments.
All the countries in western society are now trapped, by the social welfare programs they created, as they will no longer be able to support current payments and no one will buy any more government bonds. When that happens and we are, right on the edge now, so when the governments can’t make any payments they disappear. Much like what happened to Rome.
What the WEF is trying to do is to start a major war, not nuclear, and then cancel all they debt. Ideally, they will switch to all digital money, no cash, or coins that will give them total control of the population; just like China.
There is one more issue to address and that is free speech. China has already solved that problem with tracking everything a person does or says, especially on line. The reason we have 5g is to handle that volume of the business traffic from the cell phones (no cash). Then if the AL software sees anything that you have done or said and if what you said or did was not permitted you are given a black mark in your social score and if your social score passes a target amount you can be blocked from traveling or lose your job and worse you would be put in jail. This is as if you are living in the world of the book 1984 except it would be 2025 if Kamala becomes president.
There is a quick summary, of my background, which can be found at the end of this paper, In four paragraphs. It’s there only to show I have the background necessary to make the claims in this post. Now continuing the discusion we have a short summary of a paper I wrote on this subject about a month ago. It’s long with a lot of detail, so rather than copy it here there is a link to it at the end of this blog post you are reading.
Prior to Darwin it was generally accepted that there was a God who had created the earth and humans. In particular in christianity and explained in the Ten Commandments. Believing in God and the hereafter put a partial brake on power and it was a key element in writing the US Constitution with the Bill of Rights. The combination and Bill of rights made it difficult to create a powerful central government but they did work at it especially after the civil war.
Dwain’s theory was that random changes can explain how we evolved from the simple first bit of life that developed millions of years ago. Darwin’s theory was wrong but that wouldn’t be proved until the next century. There is another link at the end of this paper to a post here where I prove the existence of God.
Continuing, next we had Karl Marx and his theories which were also wrong but that was not to be proved until later. Marx also did not belie there was a God. His theories are false and do not work but again that is a discussion for another time. However from that late 19th century through present times the politicians that love and crave power bought into Darwin and Marx theories since the combination (if believed) was that there were no limits to power as there were no consequences since there was no GOD and no after life. Adolf Hitler Josef Stalin and Mao Zedong are prime examples of what that unlimited power will bring. They killed somewhere between 136 million to 167 million; including military, civilians and the conversion to Marxism from 1918 to 1991 when the USSR collapsed.
While that was going on there was also a similar movement going on in America to convert to Marxism. During President Wilson presidency, he started the process by supporting the 16th Amendment allowing the federal government to tax the people which was not allowed in the Constitution, for good reason. There was one other Amendment that was also bad and it was the 17th Amendment. This changed that a senator was no longer appointed by the state government but elected by the people, This was also a bad idea as it took power away from the states and created unlimited terms for the senator which also proved to be very bad.
One must also keep in mind that prior to the US civil war there was one large political unit and other small ones. The large one was the Democratic Republican party. Slavery in the South had always been a problem and the Democratic Republican party split in two which was mostly the North and the South. The Republican North believed in the Constitution and small central government. And they were against Slavery. The South believed in big government and was for slavery. They were diametrically opposed to te republicans. After the South lost the war they never gave up there need for power and did what they could to hold down the former slaves with The Ku Klux Clan, Jim Crow, poll taxes and separate facilities for the former slaves.
Actually, slavery was going to disappear anyway as we were now in the industrial revolution and picking cotton was now done by machines. We studied that in my econ courses. President Eisenhower started the process of breaking up the discrimination of the former slaves by outlawing segregation in the schools in the south with the Civil Rights act of 1967. He sent the army to Little Rock to enforce that act. He also started the interstate highway system and warned us of the military industrial complex. That is a major problem today,
During this period of time, from the Great depression the Democrats never gave up their lust for power and now with the ability to Tax the people they did so in incresing levels until today. The problem with the taxes being used for benefits (Freebees) is it also takes away from the economy growing by the people buying things. If you take money away for the people then have to spend less. The government is actually a drag on the economy. Margaret Thatcher told us in November 3 2023 “The Problem with Socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money” and you can’t Brower any more from anyone.
The New Green Deal passed in the Biden administration is a massive amount of spending with Bowered money estimated at 93 trillion over 10 years. No government program as ever cost les and many times a lot more. The US debt is presently over $35 trillion and it was about $25 trillion four years ago. The spending problem starts in 2008 when it was only 5 Trillion.
The Treasury Department reported that the U.S. government, for the first time, has spent more than $1 trillion this year on interest payments for its $35.3 trillion national debt.
The chart below is for 2023 showing income funds and outlays. 2024 will be worse
If kamala becomes President on January 20, 2025 it will be a very short period until the country runs out of money and collapses as no one will buy government bonds and we would be forced to default on what we owe. many countries are see that and already getting rid of the US Bonds they own They can do this by using the bonds to buying land and companies in the US.
In my opinion there is only one person in the county that can mitigate what the Biden admiration has done to the country. And I do have the education and experience to make that statement.
What follows Next are some related posts and videos
This one give a way for the US Government to blame Russia for the bridge destruction and allows them to declare war against Russia when is what the neocons want.
There is a lot more I could add here but most of it is also in the above posts. The bottom line here is we will be at war very soon and we need to be prepared for what is coming. I hope tp God the aTrump wins and gets into office as even if he can’t stop what already started it should be able to midagate what was already started. He is our only Hope!
My Related Background
How can I say what I put in the title of this post? Well for starters, I have a undergrad in Business Administration and I had a major in Economics taking every course they had at OU and got an A in all of them except one in history. As I thought what did those old guys know. Much, later I realized that I was very wrong and the new system that just came out at the beginning of WW II in a book written by John Maynard Keynes ” The Greneral Theory of Enployment, interest, and money” which would decades later be one of the downfalls of the country.
After collage, I joined the Army in the summer of 1965 and became an officer and then a Green Beret which gave me another set of skills which back then was how to undermine a government. In this, case Russia, by learning how to take over a country with guerrilla warfare. The focus was Russia that had turned to Marxism after the end of WW I. The Green Berets were sent Vietnam in 1962 on a counter guerrilla mission. I got there in September 1967, as a first Lieutenant, and was wounded in December 1967. I did stay in the army for a total of 4 years and made Captain before I completed my enlistment.
After the Army I worked mostly as an engineer as almost all the men on both sides of my family were either degreed engineers or in the skilled trades. In my dad’s case he taught himself electrical engineering mostly in electronics and he taught me how to design and build things one of which was a Radio controlled robot that won 1st place in the Cleveland Science fair in 1959.
In the early 1980’s, I started a tech company by raising almost a million dollars and as part of that, I went to CASE and got a master’s degree in tech marketing in 1986. I was also put in the Beta Gamma Sigma honor society. The company was on the path to a product, in what would be the commuter/phone industry, to support that market (That did not yet exist) I wrote up some patens which were issued. However, some of the investors didn’t think that would ever be and so they wanted to drop that line to work on other items. I knew they were wrong and so I sold my shares and went on my own until I retired a few years after 9/11. I was right and the market ended up being a multibillion dollar one making other companies that bought the tech from my company.very rich
As an aside during the 90’s and into the 00’s and because of my background I started to see patterns that seemed to be what “we” would do in Special forces to take over a government and create a different political system. For us back then it was to get rid of Communism.
From the early 1990 until around 2005 I started to read every book I could find on forms of government, warfare, phycology, Climate, Religion, and anything I could find on current events. In total I acquired several hundred books that I added to the hundreds of books I had going back to college. And in addition, what my mom and dad had as they were both gone by the 90’s. Now I haveclose to a thousand books on all kind of subjects.
One of the most interesting was a book titled The Fourth Turning written by Strauss and Howe in 1997 which showed that there was a cycle to war and society that was around 80 years. The book indicated that the time we are in now would be a major war. By 2005 I could see that there predictions were very accurate.
Around 2012 I created a blog where I reposted and/or wrote on the subject of where the US was gonging. The more I read and found on the web the more I could see that we were not headed in the right direction. An example in 2020 when COVID was let lose by Fauci and Trump created a team so they could help stop it. During the period there were many doctors that were treating COVID with Hydoxychloroquine and/or Ivermectin and Fauci went nuts claming it was a poison and neither one didn’t work with COVID. Well as a Vietnam vet who took Hydoxychloroquine to prevent malaria, so it wasn’t harmfull. And it was used all over the world for that purpose. So I knew Fauci was a criminal as millions died by not taking it ealy when the siymptoms first came out. The reason Fauci did this was that when a new treatment comes out it can’t be used without permission if there are other treatment avilable. Fauci made a lot of money by forcing doctors to only use the mRNA experimental gene treatment. They even changed the definision of a vacine since it is not a conventional vacine. As a consequence the US had one of the worse results from the COVID pandemic.
Lasrly, somewhere in this period, I found “sondance CTH” who has incredable sources and another blogger Martin Armstrong that had created an AI program in the 1970’s that is increasable accurate in prediction the future. I have followed him ever since. And his AI program is never wrong.
Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance
Mark Halprin gives his prediction about what will happen when President Trump wins the election. Tucker Carlson plays along, with both pretending not to remember what happened in 2016.
What Mark Halprin predicts, is exactly what happened in 2016. WATCH:
Every single thing in this response is exactly what happened in 2016. The silly part is both Tucker Carlson and Mark Halprin pretending not to remember what happened. Some reminder pictures from 2016 below.
In 2016 the Democrats: ~ organized a refusal to certify the election ~ boycotted the inauguration ~ claimed Russia hacked the election ~ broke out in violent protests, including arson, on inauguration day ~ put their genitals on their heads ~ conducted violent protests ~ began the Trump-Russia campaign for the next two years; then tried impeachments.
Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance
In this interview Tucker Carlson talks with Mark Halprin, a well-connected journalist that Tucker Carlson cites as the epicenter of all political power and journalistic knowledge since the mid-1980’s. Accordingly, the magnanimous and enlightened Mark Halprin knows more about the institutions of electoral influence, political power structures, people and organizations of political influence than most journalists, so sayeth Carlson. And so, their discussion follows along.
If you are nostalgic for the time before you saw the strings on the political marionettes, and/or you like to remind yourself how you viewed politics in the era long before elections were decided by ballots instead of voters, you will enjoy this satiating conversation of how things used to be.
Both Halprin and Carlson pretend things are just like they were, while they apply 1998 political insight to the 2024 election year, and -for some reason- people discuss it.
However, if you have stopped pretending and you understand that modern political outcomes are determined by ballot systems, local ballot printing, fraudulent voter rolls to give the illusion of attribution to the locally printed ballots, and tabulation centers that conduct the necessary scanning of unattributed ballots to a number needed to generate the outcome, then this food-filled discussion about political sides between Halprin and Carlson ends up leaving you somewhat hungry.
Here’s an example. Within the interview Mark Halprin notes that Kamala Harris campaign has raised over a billion dollars, and that’s just the money from inside the campaign; there’s much more from “outside groups and interests.” With jaw-agape Carlson curiously asks where that money came from? Halprin replies, “I have no idea,” and they simply move along.
Yes, the conversation is about various subsets of voters, black men who don’t support Harris as much, and a multitude of other various popular narratives that surround the 2024 election as written in various media. Let me cut to the proverbial chase, none of that stuff matters.
Yes, along the same approach expressed by the Halprin’s and Carlson’s of the world, Barack Obama might be calling out the “brothers” who do not intend to vote for Kamala Harris. However, in the real world of 2024 a very non-pretending James Clyburn might just as well say, “yes they are, they just don’t know it.” Why, because Clyburn controls the ballots of “the brothers”; their voting intent is irrelevant.
Thus, we highlight once again the distinction between voters and ballots that seems intentionally lost amid a constructed interview between the very enlightened Halprin and the curiously incurious Carlson.
What exactly is the value of the conversation when the subject matter surrounding it is as useful to the 2024 election as vinyl records to modern rap music. You decide.
To answer the question about Kamala Harris’ extraordinary fundraising, let’s just revisit demonstrable history.
First, James Clyburn’s operation was constructed during the Obama era through the financing of something called the Pigford Settlement. Yes, Pigford-I was the payment mechanism behind taxpayer funds being shifted from govt to the very specifically black community. The Clyburn team, along with legal powerhouses like Morgan & Morgan, were part of the payment distribution architecture.
With the capital to start the mechanics of the AME ballot scanning operation now financed, along comes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, set up by Elizabeth Warren, to funnel fines and pressure payments from the USA banking and finance sector to a host of progressive networks, ie community organizing groups.
There you go. That’s the ‘elevator speech’ answer behind the odd “I don’t know” retort of Mark Halprin.
What was the intent of this interview? I have no idea. However, what they discuss seems like a conversation that might have been pertinent to elections many cycles ago, but not now.
In the modern era facilitated by the rise of Teh One Lightbringer of all political truth, what many might remember as our promised “fundamental change,” voters are irrelevant to the outcome.
That said, there are very serious efforts underway to apply tactical civics in this new battleground. In that contest based on reality we destroy local ballot printing operations, block the use of fraudulent voter rolls and find industrious ways to stop the secret scanning operations within the AME network of 17 county tabulation centers.
If tactical civics are successful, and we are about to discover that “if” answer, then the conversation that Halprin and Carlson are currently having might reapply in the next election. However, until then, talking about what voters intend to happen while ignoring the irrelevance therein, seems to miss the proverbial point of where we are in the modern era of ‘ballot collection’ elections.
Chapters: 0:00 Become a Member at TuckerCarlson.com 1:23 The State of the Presidential Race 6:37 Does Kamala Harris Stand For Anything? 12:23 What Is Harris’s Relationship Like With Joe Biden? 14:34 Harris Can’t Answer This Simple Question 16:01 What Do Harris’s Donors Think? 17:26 Mark Halperin’s Reporting That Biden Would Give up the Nomination 28:45 The Worst Scandal in American Journalism 31:09 Was the Biden/Trump Debate a Setup? 40:17 Covering the Trump Campaign 51:54 How Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama Took Out Biden 1:02:19 Corporate Media’s Self-Destruction and the Future of News 1:10:43 Black Men Are Voting for Trump 1:16:32 Why Is Our Voting System So Complicated? 1:18:58 Who’s Winning the Swing States? 1:19:54 Who’s Winning Nevada? 1:21:40 Who’s Winning Arizona? 1:25:55 Who’s Winning Georgia? 1:27:36 Who’s Winning North Carolina? 1:28:54 Who’s Winning Wisconsin? 1:29:39 Who’s Winning Michigan? 1:30:32 Who’s Winning Pennsylvania? 1:34:00 Here Is What the Private Polls Are Saying 1:39:21 War and NATO 1:50:15 RFK Jr. Being Anti-Establishment 1:53:48 Who Is Running the Country Right Now? 1:55:11 Trump Derangement Syndrome Will Be the Biggest Mental Health Crisis in American History 1:58:49 What Happens If Trump Loses?
NARCISSISM: […] If Trump wins, Obama might be seen as the aberration in the history of American politics, rather than Trump and his nativist authoritarianism. Obama acolytes have spent the last eight years rationalizing Trump as the last gasp backlash to the Democrat and his presidency. (link)
Posted originally on Oct 16, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
QUESTION: What do you think of this independent journalist _____ who claims Trump is not what people think and is pointing to people in his first cabinet?
FLA
ANSWER: Pure propaganda. I question what her motive is or if she is just ignorant of what is taking place in the Biden Administration. There is a serious lack of any inside knowledge of how things truly work behind the curtain. I strongly urge you to watch the new documentary of General Mike Flynn. Trump did not pick his own cabinet in 2016. The Deep State did and stuffed in people like John Bolton. Obama warned Trump not to give General Flynn a position because Obama was all about protecting the Deep State. Even Flynn states in his documentary that Trump was unaware of the dark corridors of Washington.
As I said before, I was part of the vetting process for people who wanted to be president. They would send me in to advise on how the world economy really worked. I was in Tokyo and asked to go to Texas on my way back to meet with Ross Perot that weekend when he suddenly withdrew, claiming nonsense over his daughter’s wedding.
Perot later blamed Bush for threatening him. But Ross did not know how the Deep State really controlled the country. They took out JFK and RFK both because they were a threat to the intelligence community. Like Trump, Ross was an outsider, which would not be allowed. Ross pulled out of the race, and the TRUE reason was they threatened to indict him and shut down his industrial airport under claims that drugs were being flown into that facility. Perot Field Fort Worth Alliance Airport is about 14 miles north of Fort Worth, Texas. The airport is mainly focused on cargo operations. It provides no major commercial passenger airline service. It was the world’s first purely industrial airport. That was at stake.
I know I was flying back from Tokyo for an urgent meeting with Ross, but it was canceled because he was threatened by force his withdrawal. This is the same MO they did to Flynn and eventually to me. Mark Pitman of Bloomberg News had just written a story about our operations. I was NOT managing money for the Japanese but buying their portfolios. I met Mark at the Hyatt Hotel by Grand Central Station. He vowed we are mot going to allow them to do this to you. Bloomberg pulled him off my case and would not allow him to write anything. They handed to David Glovin, who always supported the government. Bloomberg followed the order of the Justice Department and was by no means reporting the facts.
People make up conspiracy theories based on clips they might read. Unless you have actually been behind the curtain – you do not have any idea of what is really running this country.
A vote for Kamala is not for her. She will run nothing. The real president in the Biden Administration is Antony Bliken, just as Dick Cheney was the real President in Bush Jr.’s administration. And BTW, I was asked to be Chief Economic Adviser in that Administration and turned it down. So I know who even picks the cabinets.
I know for a fact that Bush Jr. did NOT pick Cheney – they picked Cheney. I was told that they needed qualified people to fill the cabinet because Bush Jr. was “stupid,” and you really do not see him out and about giving statements or speeches. This is not BS, nor is it speculation – I was there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted originally on Oct 11, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
J.D. Vance brought up the topic of the CB One application during his debate with Tim Walz. The majority of Americans were largely unaware that the federal government has been operating a special app to fast-track asylum status to migrants throughout the world.
The app was first launched in October 2020, designated as a single portal to Customer and Border Protection (CBP). However, in January 2023, the Biden-Harris administration repurposed the app to streamline the process of permitting migrants into the country. “So there’s an application called the CBP One app where you can go on as an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status at the wave of a Kamala Harris open border wand. That is not a person coming in applying for a green card and waiting for 10 years. That is the facilitation of illegal immigration,” Vance said on the debate stage.
Between June 2023 and June 2024, over 170,000 migrants accessed CBP One to quickly enter the United States. Haitians, Mexicans, and Venezuelans have been the primary users of this app. The app saw 1,450 appointments per day in June, a 50% uptick from the month prior. Anyone from any nation can simply sign up, enter America, and receive their free taxpayer-subsidized life.
The truth is that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have no budget when it comes to the migrants as they will spend everything and then some to flood America with illegal migrants. Then they turn around and say they’ve run out of funds for their own citizens who have been paying into the system their entire lives. CBP One is like an Open Table reservation app that lets absolutely anyone come to America to leech off our resources.
Posted originally on Oct 11, 2024 By Martin Armstrong
The Department of Homeland Security released a report to gauge the number of asylum seekers who entered the US in 2023. On the low side, the department believes 945,370 people from throughout the world managed to infiltrate America in a one-year period, breaking past all previous records.
“Affirmative asylum case filings with USCIS nearly doubled from 241,280 applications in 2022 to 456,750 in 2023, the highest number on record (and covering 636,380 individuals),” the report notes. Venezuelans composed 22% of all applications, followed by Cuba at 17%, and Colombia at 8.3%. Venezuelans in particular flooded into America over 2023, with 173,190 seeking asylum in the last year compared to 15,000 in 2021. Around 2.6% of asylum seekers were unaccompanied children, thousands of whom are unaccounted for today.
California took on the most affirmative sylum seekers at 23%, followed by Texas (12%), and Virginia (10%). These three states alone saw a 37% uptick in migrants since 2022. As for those granted asylum defensively, California took in 28% on them, followed by New York (27%), and Maryland (4.4%).
About 79% of applicants illegally crossed into America before applying for asylum. They were provided that option under the Biden-Harris open border policy. The CHNV program launched by Biden-Harris in January 2023 helped to streamline these crossings, as did the CBP One app. Around 88% of migrants who applied for Lawful Permanent Residence have been approved. Now these figures are simply those who applied. Border patrol agents reported over 7 million encounters with migrants at the southern border.
Kamala Harris recently confirmed to the American public that she would not have done a single thing differently during her time in the White House, which we can only hope will be limited. She has no intention of curbing the flow migrants or protecting our borders. A vote for Harris is a vote for the deliberate invasion of America.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 