Jesus the Never-Trumper: Mayor Pete Declares God’s Political Preference


Published on May 10, 2019

SUBSCRIBED 127K
Mayor Pete Buttigieg, a leading Democratic candidate for president and professing Christian, usually declares: “God has no political party.” Yet recently he told NBC News that God’s political preference would NOT be the Republican Party in the Trump era. He also had harsh innuendo about Vice President Mike Pence’s Christian faith. What does this say about Mayor Pete’s character, his theology and his prospects as a 2020 presidential candidate? The breaking news of the day fills the air with frantic babble, but people of principle remain calm, stand firm. If you’re one of those, may be you should be one of us — the Members at BillWhittle.com who make this show. It’s a growing movement of conservatives and other liberty lovers who seek to make a difference by engaging the lies of the Progressive Left in ways that win people to the cause of pursuing happiness. When you become a Member, you’ll enjoy 44 news shows each month, a deep archive of classic conservative content, and a private Members-only blog you can read…and write! Renew the commitment to your convictions today at https://BillWhittle.com/register/

The Rising Anti-EU Sentiment Ahead of the EU Elections


In Hungary, the anti-EU movement runs intense and links Soros and his funding behind the curtain as the number one problem. There have been protests in Hungary implicating the fact that Soros has been behind everything. The anti-EU sentiment is rising ahead of the May 23rd elections. The main issue that has torn Europe apart is the Refugee Crisis.

1 Free Market Economics: Charity vs. Taxation – What is the Difference? Extended Cut – Learn Liberty


Published on Jul 30, 2015

SUBSCRIBE 188K
Free Market Economics: What is the difference between paying a tax and donating to a charity? Many Americans support charities ranging from the American Red Cross to PETA, but is it moral to make others donate to a charity of your choice? Learn more at: http://www.learnliberty.org/ Rob Gressis, a professor of philosophy, went on campus at California State University – Northridge, to ask students two questions on philosophy: Is it moral to force others to give to the cause of your choice? Is it moral for the government to force others to give to the cause of your choice? Do you think it is ethical for individuals or the government to force you to donate to a charity? Watch the video and let us know your thoughts on the relationship between free will, philanthropy, and taxes in the comments below. ►Learn More The Morality of Taxation (video): Eamonn Butler discusses the morality of taxation, which he wrote about for the Taxpayers’ Alliance’s report, The Single Income Tax. http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/tax-spe… The Interactive Great American Taxing Game: Intro (video): Play the interactive game with your host, Professor Art Carden, and answer the age old question: Who Should Be Taxed? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHr-m… Is Fixing Inequality A Matter of Justice? (video):This Learn Liberty-sponsored debate presents arguments for and against more government assistance to help the poor in the United States. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTVhg… What Can Adam Smith Teach Us About Tax Policy (article): Evaluate our current tax system against the famous economist’s four maxims of taxation for public funding. http://www.libertarianism.org/publica… ► http://LearnLiberty.org ► http://youtube.com/user/LearnLiberty ► http://twitter.com/LearnLiberty ► http://google.com/+LearnLiberty ► http://facebook.com/LearnLiberty

SHOW MORE

Public Choice Theory: Why Government Often Fails


Published on Oct 9, 2017

SUBSCRIBE 188K
Governments don’t work the way most people think they do. Public choice theory explores how voters, politicians, and bureaucrats actually make decisions. Prof. Antony Davies explains.

Jason Riley On “False Black Power?”


Published on Mar 18, 2019

SUBSCRIBE 125K
Recorded on February 21, 2019. What is “false black power?” According to Jason Riley, author of False Black Power?, it is political clout, whereas true black power is human capital and culture. Riley and Peter Robinson dive into the arguments in Riley’s new book, the history of African Americans in the United States, and welfare inequality in black communities. Riley discusses the Moynihan report of 1965, which documented the rise of black families headed by single women in inner cities and how this report was something black sociologists had already been writing about for several years. He argues that there was clearly a breakdown of the nuclear family and that this is a result of the “Great Society” welfare programs of the 1960s rather than the legacy of slavery or Jim Crow laws. In the 1960s, Riley posits that the black activist community’s shift towards political engagement was misguided. He argues that the idea of black political clout leading to black economic advancement was misplaced. Other impoverished communities (i.e. Irish, Jewish, and Italian immigrant communities) at various times in American history focused on economic advancement first before trying to achieve political clout, and they were successful. Instead, the black community focused first on electing black politicians, which ended up doing very little for the economic advancement of the community as politicians typically put their own interests first, above their communities’. Riley points out that the economic data shows that black communities became more impoverished under black leadership. Riley proposes a solution of advocating for more school-choice vouchers, which allow black parents to take better control of their children’s futures and place them in the best schools for them. He also argues for reducing social safety nets, making them a more temporary form of welfare rather than the multigenerational welfare system currently in place. Other resources https://www.amazon.com/Please-Stop-He… Please Stop Helping Us, by Jason Riley https://www.hoover.org/research/discr… – Discrimination and Disparities, with Thomas Sowell https://californiaglobe.com/fr/stanfo… Stanford Hoover Institution economist targets socialism, fears ‘we may not make it’ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUvQx… – Sowell: Politicians using race as their ticket to whatever racket they’re running Interested in exclusive Uncommon Knowledge content? Check out Uncommon Knowledge on social media! Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/UncKnowledge/ Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/UncKnowledge/ Instagram: https://instagram.com/uncommon_knowle…

SHOW MORE

 

QE & Its Failure


QUESTION: Dear Martin,
During WEC in Rome I came to understand that the issue with QE is that it did not create any inflation in the USA. On the other hand, as you mentioned the inflation is being calculated in a different way that it used to be in the future. How come then the US does not just change the way of calculating the inflation in a way which would show it’s there? Wouldn’t that be an easier way than to do more QEs?
Thank you,

MK

ANSWER: The primary reason QE fails is because the economy is global. Central banks can no longer manage the economy, for the money does not remain in isolation. Additionally, as I pointed out in Rome, they may have negative interest rates, but that does not pass through. You cannot borrow money from a bank at negative rates.