Category Civil Society

Aug 7 2020

Biden the Ultimate Risk – Are Votes Tools in the Hands of the Free, or Weapons in the Hands of Haters?


Isn’t calling Joe Biden to the presidency of these United States like asking the devil to rule over us?

Rev. Michael Bresciani image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—August 6, 2020

Biden the Ultimate Risk

The attacks on statues, people, policemen and conservatives by Antifa activists, are proof that the fine line that exists between ideologues and idiots, has been egregiously breached.

But rioting has the effect of keeping crowds in the mindless mode and while they think they are woke, they have been lulled to sleep by a false unifying purpose.

The ranting and destruction are the products of the walking dead, mindlessly trying to get their pound of flesh. But, no amount of nutrients from the living, can keep any dead person, purpose, or cause alive.

When your cause hurts others – winning is always losing.

Black lives matter is more than a slogan, it is a fact, but, not because it is now so popular to say it, but it is a fact based on this – wait for it – because all lives matter.

No, I will not pick up my marbles and run home because you can’t have one without the other.

If all lives don’t matter, then black lives don’t matter.

Conversely, if only black lives matter, we have entered a nascent realm, that can only be called – the new racism.

Since we can’t expect the walking dead to wake up or shut up long enough to listen, we will have to go to others to ask the most important question. It is here that you will see the truth in the adage – “It depends on who you ask.”

Ask Planned Parenthood

If you ask Planned Parenthood if black lives matter the answer is an unequivocal – no!

“Abortion is the number one killer of black lives in the United States.  According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, abortion kills more black people than HIV, homicide, diabetes, accident, cancer, and heart disease … combined.” (grrtl.org)

Ask the Democratic Party

If you ask the Democratic Party if black lives matter the answer is – “Only at election time.”

In fact, it would be best to ask that of a democrat, namely former presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren who reminds us that black lives only matter to Democrats during elections.

Ask Joe Biden

If you ask Joe Biden if black lives matter, he will answer, “If you don’t vote for me – you ain’t black.”

Is America really buying this?

Not everyone is buying this tripe and when Manhattan Institute scholar Heather Mac Donald rebuts the black lives matter narrative, it is dissolved in less than 40 minutes by use of sound empirical evidence, not philosophy, semantic wrangling or the rhetoric of anti-policing advocates.

Other Questions for Joe Biden

The biggest question here is, will we get to ask any questions at all. Biden is entertaining the idea of not debating President Trump at all before the elections.

Michael Cantrell’s piece on the Flag and Cross website declares, “One of the major benefits of having all of this coronavirus hoopla going on in our nation is that the Democratic Party’s presidential nominee, Joe Biden, has an excuse to avoid public appearances and making a bigger fool of himself than he already has over the last 12 months.”

The next question is, if Joe can’t face one single opponent in the race for president; how will he face all America’s enemies, problems, and economic challenges for the next 4/8 years?

Perhaps the most poignant question of all for Joe, is, – are you willing to look like a coward to the entire country because you will not debate the man you insist is a dunce? If you are so classy and he is so crappy – whence cometh the fear?

The Next Question is for Us Alone

The ultimate question is not whether Biden can win the election, but rather, can we win if he does.

Joe is a dusty democrat from the tutelage of Senator, Robert Byrd and a classmate of the Manchurian, Barack Obama. He is followed by a less than stellar record that can only produce yawning and a need to take a nap.

The final question is would we place America’s security, her history and her entire future in the hands of a man who may not know where he is when he wakes up from his nap?

Which King Will our King Submit To

The Bible declares that God rules in the kingdoms of men. The affairs of all men are in his purview and the very hearts of kings and rulers are his alone to guide. To wit:

“The king’s heart is in the hand of the Lord, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will.” (Proverbs 21:1)

Having reached the age of accountability means that all men are submitted to one authority or another even if they don’t clearly see which one, they are subject to.

They are either under the authority of the God of all creation or the god of this world. (2 Corinthians 4:4)

From which source would Joe Biden get his power to rule?

According to the bible someone who believes that babies are up for the killing, men can marry men and being gay is as normal as apple pie – is not getting his inspiration or orders from the God who gave us his son to die for those specific kinds of sins and gross immorality.

Isn’t calling Joe Biden to the presidency of these United States like asking the devil to rule over us?

Don’t let the future answer this question because by then, it will be far too late.

Related

A Biden Presidency Would be Bad – His VP ‘Picks’ as President Would be Worse

Law and Order Will Win Election

Racism Cannot Drive Out Racism

Aug 7 2020

Some Have Had Ten Years To Think About Their Answer…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on August 6, 2020 by 

Ten years ago I asked this question: Where would you choose to live…

….safe or free?

As we live today it is remarkable how this image encapsulates the world around us.  Those who demand control over liberty are doing their best to remove the foundation of our freedom.  We each have a choice to make…. I choose to live; and there is no time of consequence so important for all of us – than to make a decision right now.

I will grind the bones in my hand to make Lady Liberty a rib.  No cost is too great at this moment.

St. Crispin’s Day ~ Henry V

[…] If we are mark’d to die, we are enough
To do our country loss; and if to live,
The fewer men, the greater share of honour.
God’s will! I pray thee, wish not one man more.
By Jove, I am not covetous for gold,
Nor care I who doth feed upon my cost;
It yearns me not if men my garments wear;
Such outward things dwell not in my desires.
But if it be a sin to covet honour,
I am the most offending soul alive.
No, faith, my coz, wish not a man from England.
God’s peace! I would not lose so great an honour
As one man more methinks would share from me
For the best hope I have. O, do not wish one more!
Rather proclaim it, Westmorland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made,
And crowns for convoy put into his purse;
We would not die in that man’s company
That fears his fellowship to die with us.
This day is call’d the feast of Crispian.
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when this day is nam’d,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbours,
And say “To-morrow is Saint Crispian.”
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars,
And say “These wounds I had on Crispin’s day.”
Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
But he’ll remember, with advantages,
What feats he did that day. Then shall our names,
Familiar in his mouth as household words—
Harry the King, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester—
Be in their flowing cups freshly rememb’red.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispin Crispian shall ne’er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be rememberèd—
We few, we happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother; be he ne’er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And gentlemen in England now a-bed
Shall think themselves accurs’d they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s day.

Aug 6 2020

The Coming National Crisis


Unless Democrats and their henchmen come to the unlikely understanding they also must preserve our laws and traditions, the country will be heading for a bloody disaster, and civil war will be upon us

Jeff Lukens image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By —— Bio and Archives—August 5, 2020

The Coming National Crisis

With the 2020 election only months away, it is reasonable to wonder whether the election could spark widespread violence nationwide.  With a probable hung election and accusations flying left and right, we may be approaching the time in 1860 when the election became a choice of whether a divided country could stay united.  This election could trigger full-scale violence beyond anything we have seen so far.  No, this won’t be just another election.  It may be our Fort Sumter.

Both left and right detest each other, and with no resolution in sight, things could get ugly.  With China on the march, COVID in the air, and racial unrest in the streets, the mix could not be worse and may finally boil over.  What has been a cold civil war up until now could very well go hot.

Black Lives Matter (BLM), Antifa thugs, and their deep-state supporters

Worse still, the election will probably not be resolved on November 3.  As the vote goes into overtime with counting and recounting ballots, many of them fraudulent, the far-left anarchists will take to the streets, burn down buildings, and reach deeper into suburban strongholds of republicanism.  The police may or may not side with the mobs as private citizens try as best they can to protect their property, often armed with a gun.

As we approach the November elections, the probability is increasing of the current low-intensity battle between the left and traditional Americans boiling over into full-scale insurgency.  If Donald Trump wins the election, the left will probably double down on the violent “resistance” they have been pushing since 2016.  If Joe Biden wins, the left will undoubtedly enact legislation that would destroy the republic and enslave the citizenry touching off a revolt by the right.  Conservative patriots will fight to save the republic and the future of the nation.  Either way, violence looms.

It is not inevitable, but all true patriots need to be ready to stand firm for our American heritage.  The costs of blood could be high.  This could be war.  And unlike other wars in our past that respected innocent civilian lives, it would likely become an ugly guerilla war on the streets of our cities doing irreparable harm to innocent bystanders.

The battle on the left will be waged by Black Lives Matter (BLM), Antifa thugs, and their deep-state supporters.  For them, innocent victims and killings are not atrocities, but a piece of their broader scheme to remake America into their utopian socialist ideal.  Their goal is to topple our constitutional system and deprive us of our liberties, property, and way of life.

Much of the rioting centers on the belief America is a racist nation.  Many people righteously march to give the black community their support.  However, the BLM organization isn’t concerned with black lives.  BLM has raked in millions in funding from corporations and people just trying to do the right thing.  In reality, these supporters are being played as chumps to funnel money to ActBlue who in turn finance Democrat candidates and the most liberal subversive groups in America today.

Democrats and their friends in the mainstream media broadcast that the gangs causing the destruction and violence are non-violent

Democrats and their friends in the mainstream media broadcast that the gangs causing the destruction and violence are non-violent as they are looting and lighting fires to a police station.  They justify it as an unfortunate response by downtrodden victims of a debased and immoral nation.  Yet, at the same time, they seek to deprive the public at large of their First Amendment rights to speak and worship freely, and Second Amendment rights to defend themselves with firearms.  Do not be deceived.  Vast numbers of Americans will protect those rights with their lives if need be.

Conservatives did not agree with Barack Obama while he was in office, but they accepted him as president because they realized he was the people’s choice and was duly elected.  The left has never given and will never give Trump the same courtesy.  Donald Trump was duly elected as president, but there has been nonstop treasonous resistance against him since the day he was elected.  We can only expect more of the same if he is reelected.

Blaming an open civil war on Donald Trump will be like blaming the American Civil War on Abraham Lincoln.  In both cases, the forces had been on a collision path for years before the conflict, and it reached its culmination during the time these two great men were in office.

The warning lights of a collapse of civil order have been coming for a long time and could be fully triggered this November.  If elected officials at all levels are incapable of gathering the will to protect our most essential ways of life from thuggery and incendiary accusations of racism, then they have abandoned their official duties to the mob.  Trump understands his obligation to keep order and the rule of law.  Unless Democrats and their henchmen come to the unlikely understanding they also must preserve our laws and traditions, the country will be heading for a bloody disaster, and civil war will be upon us.

 

Aug 6 2020

How Many Times? That Is The Question


Finance Committee Hearing or Liberal Campaign Ad?

Ken Grafton image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—August 4, 2020

How Many Times? That Is The Question

Prime Minister Trudeau testified before the Parliamentary Finance Committee on July 30th in connection with the WE Charity scandal, currently under investigation by Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion.

Canadians can be forgiven for wondering why.

Amping up the Trudeau charm, well lit and smiling directly into a high-resolution camera, coiffed hair blacker than beard; the relaxed PM was clearly focused upon communicating directly with voters, rather than answering questions from committee members.

The Trudeau brand was under attack, and the message for Canadians was that his Liberal government is doing a great job. The narrative ran that they would in fact be doing even more for Canadians, if it weren’t for Conservatives bringing up this nettlesome conflict of interest thing. Sure, he should have recused himself from approving the sole-source WE contract, but that wouldn’t have happened if it weren’t for COVID-19…and his long-standing interest in youth-affairs. The Liberals’ commitment to providing financial assistance to students during COVID-19 led to an accelerated implementation of the CSSG Program…which caused the PM to slow down the approval process because of the increased scrutiny and appearance of conflict of interest that his family affiliation with WE would bring…before then failing to recuse himself from the process. The Civil Service made all the decisions anyway, not the PM. If the logic is difficult to grasp here…well….

Although it is impossible to disconnect the damming, feculent bright-red Liberal dots leading from WE to the Prime Minister, distraught Liberal spin doctors had obviously been billing some overtime on damage control.

The central pivot from conflict of interest and Liberal corruption seems to be good intentions and the tremendous benefit to young Canadians that could have been…if only the unfortunate scandal hadn’t blown up (read, if they hadn’t been caught).

Canadians should blame the Conservatives and Bloc Quebecoise, for making a mountain out of a mole-hill, really…when you think about it…from a Liberal prospective…

The questioning began:

MP Pierre Poilievre – “What is the total dollar value of all expenses reimbursed and fees paid and any other consideration provided by the WE group to you, your mother, your spouse, your brother and any other member of your family? Just the total please.”

PM Trudeau – “Uh…I don’t have that exact figure…uh…reimbursing expenses is something done by an organization…uh…for example…so I don’t have…uh…those totals.”

Liberal MP Julie Dzerowicz (trying) – “Mister Speaker…uh…Point of Order…Mister Chair, sorry…not Mister Speaker. My Point of Order is what’s the relevance of these questions…uh…of ancillary…uh…fees paid to family members to the official motion…?”

Chairman Wayne Easter – “I don’t think that is a Point of Order Miss Dzerowicz, back to Mister Poilievre.”
Poilievre – “So you are telling me that you don’t know how much immediate family members have been paid in expense reimbursements by this organization.”
Trudeau – “Uh…my mother and my brother are professionals in their own right who…uh…have…uh engagements…uh…and have for many, many years with organizations across the country…”
Poilievre – “Do you know?”
Trudeau – “…uh…and I…uh…don’t have the details of their…uh…work…uh…work experiences of their…uh…expenses.”
Poilievre – “What about your spouse? What is the dollar figure?”
Trudeau – “Uh…WE…uh…I think WE Charity has been able to share those figures with you.”
Poilievre – “When was the last time that she had an expense reimbursed by WE Charity?”
Trudeau – “Uh…I…uh…believe it would have been to uh…”

As one can gather from this short excerpt, the Prime Minister was less than forthcoming. It’s a fine line between pivoting and refusing to answer. In Court, it may well have led to a charge of Contempt. Perhaps a Contempt of Parliament charge would be appropriate here.

Trudeau’s repetitive and vexatious use of the word “uh”

Also telling was Trudeau’s repetitive and vexatious use of the word “uh”. In linguistics, “uh” is known as a “hesitation form”, or “filler word”. Filler words are often a red flag for deception. In Psychology Today, Professor Jack Schafer of Western Illinois University, a behavioral analyst for the FBI, explains. “Little words, often ignored in normal speech, can signal deception. Words such as um and uh indicate cognitive load. Liars experience increased cognitive load. Um and uh signal impending delays is speech. Liars need time to evaluate their answers to ensure their lie will be believed. Liars also need additional time to choose the right words to camouflage the truth. Truthful people do not need extra time to convey information.”

The Prime Minister wouldn’t lie though, would he?

So, what are the issues with WE-Gate exactly?

The growing Hydra-like list may keep Commissioner Dion up at night:

  • Was CSSG designed specifically for WE to administer?
  • Why the Canada Service Corps was not tasked with CSSG?
  • Why a sole-source contract?
  • Details of due diligence done, due to the fact that WE appeared to be in financial trouble and in violation of bank covenants. WE Board Members had resigned and mass layoffs of staff had occurred. WE had also never delivered a similar program previously.
  • Why was WE paid $30M upfront, and how will it repay taxpayers?
  • Why was a WE real estate shell company used, instead of WE Charity?
  • Why was a $30M upfront payment made on contract award?
  • WE claimed initially that the PMO had called, asking if they wanted the CSSG contract.
  • Who authorized WE, and why, to begin spending money on May 5th, prior to June 23rd approval?
  • Failure to recuse/Conflict of Interest –
    • PM has spoken for WE in past
    • WE has paid for Trudeau campaign ads/gave Trudeau a platform to connect with hundreds of thousands of young voters
    • WE has paid Margaret and Alexander Trudeau
    • WE has paid Sophie Trudeau
    • WE relationship with Katie Telford
    • WE paid Bill Morneau $42K expenses
    • WE employs two Morneau daughters.

Beyond the blatant corruption

Beyond the blatant corruption issues however, the CSSG model may have also been fatally flawed from birth. The very real possibility exists that CSSG could violate Minimum Wage laws. CSSG would pay a student up to $10 per hour, which is less than the minimum wages in all of Canada’s provinces and territories. If the concept of paid volunteers seems counter-intuitive, the law actually recognizes two classes of volunteers. According to Labour Law firm Goldblatt Partners, “Volunteers are not covered by the Employment Standards Act in Ontario, and need not be paid the minimum wage. But that does not mean that an employer can evade its obligations under the Act by classifying anyone as a volunteer. Only a ‘true volunteer’ is excluded from the protections of the Act…if a participating student views the program as a means to make a livelihood during a time that fewer summer jobs are available, they may be able to argue that they are not a ‘true volunteer.’” A class action lawsuit waiting to happen then.

But, back to the show.

Poilievre (translation) – “I have a simple question for you. How many times does a Minister in your Government need to break the Ethics Act before being sacked? How many times?”
Trudeau (translation) – “We…uh…take it very seriously, every time there are Ethics issues…
Poilievre – “How many times?”
Trudeau – “…and…”
Poilievre – “How many times?”
Chair – “The Prime Minister has the floor…and he has the right to answer. Mister Prime Minister”

He had the right to answer, but apparently not the ability.

How many times? That is the question…for all Canadians.

Great campaign slogan for Conservatives next election cycle…

Aug 6 2020

COVID case numbers are far lower than claimed


The lockdowns and shutdowns have nothing to do with disease. Also—case numbers sell vaccines, and selling vaccines is the CDC’s main business activity

Jon Rappoport image

Re-posted from The Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—August 3, 2020

COVID case numbers far lower than claimed

Casablanca (1942):
“I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here.”
“Your winnings, sir.”
“Oh, thank you very much.”

“We’ve checked your equipment, and we believe you’ll be safe, even though you’re stepping into an alien environment.  Remember, the denizens you’ll encounter are congenital tricksters.  They live on lies.  They eat them.  They broadcast them.  They worship them in their Hades.” (My notes for “The Underground”)

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

So once again, we don hazmat suits and enter the mad, mad world of basic COVID lies.  For purposes of argument only, we assume a new coronavirus was actually discovered, the diagnostic test is meaningful, and case numbers are also meaningful.

Within that mad world, the amount of fraud is still immense.

As I’ve documented, all sorts of case-number cons are running loose. Little, medium, and large cons.  Entering “COVID” on all test results from labs.  Oops.  Computer error.  The PCR test itself spits out false-positives because it lights up like a Christmas tree when it encounters various irrelevant germs.  And so forth and so on.

But here is a superhighway version of fake number counting.  By definition.  Written in stone.  Institutionalized.  From the twinkle-toe mavens at the CDC, home of numbers, house of cards.  Read on.

The revelatory reference is: Children’s Health Defense, July 24, “If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?”  By H. Ealy, M. McEvoy, M. Sava, S. Gupta, D. Chong, D. White, J. Nowicki, P. Anderson.

“Had the CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting Revision 2003, as it has for all other causes of death for the last 17 years, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2% lower than it currently is.”

The article is somewhat complex.  It should be studied carefully.  Here is my main takeaway:

The special CDC guidelines for labeling patients “COVID” are absurd.  These rules open the door to falsely inflating case and death numbers.  This is more than fiddling with statistics.  It’s an institutional and official invitation to create fake cases.  Gigantic numbers of them.

The Children’s Health Defense article presents the April 2020 CDC guidelines for diagnosing COVID.  There are five sets of criteria presented.  Grit your teeth and study this CDC web of deceit:

~~~“April 14th, 2020 – CDC Adopts CSTE Interim-20-ID-01

Title: Standardized surveillance case definition and national notification for 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19)

VII. Case Definition for Case Classification

1. Narrative: Description of criteria to determine how a case should be classified.

A1. Clinical Criteria At least two of the following symptoms:

* fever (measured or subjective), chills, rigors, myalgia, headache, sore throat, new olfactory and taste disorder(s) OR
* At least one of the following symptoms: cough, shortness of breath, or difficulty breathing OR
* Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following:
* * Clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, or
* * Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). AND
* * No alternative more likely diagnosis

A2. Laboratory Criteria Laboratory evidence using a method approved or authorized by the FDA or designated authority:

Confirmatory laboratory evidence:

* Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a clinical specimen using a molecular amplification detection test

Presumptive laboratory evidence:

* Detection of specific antigen in a clinical specimen
* Detection of specific antibody in serum, plasma, or whole blood indicative of a new or recent infection (note1)

(note1) serologic methods for diagnosis are currently being defined

A3. Epidemiologic Linkage One or more of the following exposures in the 14 days before onset of symptoms:

* Close contact (note2) with a confirmed or probable case of COVID-19 disease; or
* Close contact (note2) with a person with:
* * clinically compatible illness AND
* * linkage to a confirmed case of COVID-19 disease.
* Travel to or residence in an area with sustained, ongoing community transmission of SARS-CoV2.
* Member of a risk cohort as defined by public health authorities during an outbreak.

(note2) Close contact is defined as being within 6 feet for at least a period of 10 minutes to 30 minutes or more depending upon the exposure. In healthcare settings, this may be defined as exposures of greater than a few minutes or more. Data are insufficient to precisely define the duration of exposure that constitutes prolonged exposure and thus a close contact.

A4. Vital Records Criteria A death certificate that lists COVID-19 disease or SARS-CoV-2 as a cause of death or a significant condition contributing to death.

A5. Case Classifications

Confirmed:

* Meets confirmatory laboratory evidence.

Probable:

* Meets clinical criteria AND epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID-19.
* Meets presumptive laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence.
* Meets vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for COVID19.

1. Criteria to distinguish a new case of this disease or condition from reports or notifications which should not be enumerated as a new case for surveillance

* N/A until more virologic data are available”

~~~

If you waded through that CDC ball of fraud, you see how easy it is to work a deception in COVID case-counting and death-number counting.

For example: chills and fever, or cough, are sufficient to label a patient a probable case of “COVID, if he was also in contact with a “risk cohort,” as defined by public health authorities.

This means an elderly person living in a nursing home—-the whole home would be a “risk cohort”—-who coughs, or who has chills and fever, could be diagnosed, with no test, as a probable case of COVID.

The reason for the hoax is obvious.  Medical dictators must squeeze out every possible number they can, by any means, to justify their rampant economic and, thus, human destruction.

The lockdowns and shutdowns have nothing to do with disease.

Also—-case numbers sell vaccines, and selling vaccines is the CDC’s main business activity.

SOURCE:
If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?

Aug 5 2020

Why is Fauci Not in Prison?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Conspiracy

Re-Posted Aug 5, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

There is no question that Anthony Fauci has a major conflict of interest with Bill Gates. Fauci’s deliberate attack on hydroxychloroquine is relegating people to die. Banning the drug and directing pharmacies to intervene and deny doctors from prescribing it is unbelievable. Politics has NEVER interfered with the doctor-patient relationships — EVER!

Fauci’s attack on a drug that has been approved for decades and is over the counter even in Iran and available to their people fighting COVID is unimaginable. Many people are coming out against Fauci and his deliberate campaign against this drug to support Bill Gates’ vaccines. The drug was first used in France with 3,100 people with great success. Something is seriously wrong! There should be a class-action lawsuit filed against Fauci to expose all of his conflicts of interest and taking over $100 million from Bill Gates for his agencies. He has rejected prior NIH studies of previous decades with no explanation. Something is just not right about how political this drug has become, and the benefactor of refusing this drug is to maintain the lockdowns, destroy the economy further, and line the pockets of Bill Gates and his vaccines.

Aug 4 2020

The Media’s Conspiracy Against the People


Armstrongs Economics Blog/Press

Posted Aug 4, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

YouTube moderators, with no medical background to even determine if what is being said is true, are censoring doctors who contradict the WHO and Bill Gates. It is totally outrageous how these social media companies are conspiring against the people to censor things they have no expertise in reviewing. This is purely a “policy” decision, which would be hate speech if they promoted that everyone within some race was evil. They removed even Trump’s retweet of the doctors who staged a press conference in front of the Supreme Court. Since this involves the health and welfare of all people, they claim they have a right to impose their own political views. If someone dies because they were refused hydroxychloroquine because of the media, the media should be held responsible.

The media has grossly misrepresented the threat of COVID-19, which clearly shows they are trying desperately to spark a political coup, whereas if the Russians did this, they would demand investigations if not war. On average, Democrats appear to be deeply biased and live in fear of COVID-19, while people aged 55 and older account for 92% of all deaths. Those people aged 44 and younger account for only 2.7% of all deaths. Democrats have been seriously misinformed and overestimate the risk of death from COVID-19 for people under the age of 24, assuming it is a 50/50 chance, when the real risk remains people aged 65 and older. Never in the history of the United States has such a misinformation/propaganda campaign been waged against the people by the media.

I reported that my cousin was a front line-nurse in New Jersey. She caught COVID-19 and it passed in a couple of days. But she gave it to her husband who was overweight and had diabetes. He had to go to the hospital with lung problems. They gave him hydroxychloroquine and zinc, and he was home in two days. The only reason there is this war against hydroxychloroquine is that it negates Bill Gates’ vaccine. The media will not report how much Gates and his vaccine partners stand to make from this agenda. Why? By also denying that hydroxychloroquine works, it allows them to take even more draconian steps to impose lockdowns and imprison people for violating their decrees. This certainly seems to have a political undertone.

 

The retaliation anyone who stands up against the left and their agenda is vicious. The lead doctor in that press conference before the Supreme Court that YouTube took down was fired, and then they had their website shut down. Welcome to the real America where freedom of speech is nothing more than a bedtime story.

There is a whole other agenda here, and it is far worse than what they accused Russia of doing (interfering in the 2016 US elections). The US, under the guidance of the Clintons, allowed the bankers to try to take over Russia TRANSFORMING IT INTO A VESSEL STATE by blackmailing Yeltsin. It was this clandestine operation from the Money Plane supporting “the Club” which forced Yeltsin to turn to Putin. This is perhaps why Goldman Sachs demanded their staff could not donate to Trump — only Hillary.

This is clearly an all-out war to take over the government and force a Socialistic agenda to raise taxes dramatically and impose this Great Reset agenda upon everyone by eliminating all freedom under the pretense of public health. Never in the history of the world has any other government used public health as the excuse to destroy what people have worked for, alter the economy, and strip all of us of our right to be free of such tyranny. Never has anyone ever been quarantined for thousands of years unless they were sick. You do not quarantine the entire population. Lepers were sent to colonies, but they did not lock down the entire population.

There are many in the media who have simply become the new enemy within against the people.

Aug 3 2020

The Frontline Doctors will not be silenced!


From the CDC website we find this chart showing the deaths per age group for 2020 related to the Wuhan Virus. From this screen capture you can see that the deaths have dropped to a point they are only slightly above normal for respiratory illnesses. Left unsaid by the media is that COVID-19 kills primarily the same ages groups as many of the other versions and as COVID-19 kills an older person it means they will not be killed by another version so what really needs to be looked at are the total deaths from all respiratory deaths not just COVID to get the true picture.  And keep in mind that there is a financial incentive to “code” all respiratory deaths as COVID related to get federal money so its a reasonable assumption that COVID deaths are overstated.

Next we have a video of a press conference that took place in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, July 28, 2020, held by the group America’s Front line Doctors and organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots Foundation. The press conference featured front line doctors sharing their views and opinions on the novel coronavirus, the medical response to the pandemic, and the censorship they have experienced from Big Tech.

I have added, to this post the video from the same groups that was taken down from Monday July 27, 2020. This one will not be taken down. This one is twice as long and goes into depth of the use of Hydroxychloroquine which DOES IN FACT WORK especially as a prophylactic. The front line doctors talk a lot about that and that is why the video was remove from the web.

Hydroxychloroquine is both safe and effective!

Lastly we have another chart from the CDC website which shows the deaths per week including all other medical related deaths. Here we can see that the COVID-19 deaths have created a spike but the current rate of deaths is barely above normal now.

Which means the shut down must end now!

 

Aug 3 2020

Democrat-Run KKK Burnt Crosses, Democrat-Run BLM Burn Bibles


Bottom line: Democrats don’t just condone violence by continuing to look the other way, they are an active part of it

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted on the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—August 2, 2020

Democrat-Run KKK Burnt Crosses, Democrat-Run BLM Burn Bibles

The mayhem in Portland where leftist rioters have been trying to destroy the federal courthouse for more than 65 days running,  inadvertently gives us the biggest clue about who Black Lives Matter and Antifa members really are.

They are the George Soros bought-and- paid-for search and destroy arm of a Democrat Party well on its way to steal the 2020 Election with a universal MAIL-IN Vote. (CFP: More Frightening Than Covid-19: Dems Stealing 2020 Election Through Mail-In Vote)

Proof of who BLM and their anarchist sidekicks are came last night when they burned Bibles in downtown Portland.

‘How long has hatred of religion burned in the heart of the Democrat Party?

The Democrat-run KKK burnt crosses.  The Democrat-run BLM burn Bibles, and American flags.

Folk should be asking ‘How long has hatred of religion burned in the heart of the Democrat Party?

Where is the Democrat outrage about the burning of Bibles and American flags on this, the morning after?

Anybody?

“Leftists are showing their contempt for America and her virtue by burning Bibles and American flags outside the federal courthouse in Portland. The rioters have been attempting to destroy the federal courthouse on a nightly basis. But ever since federal law enforcement officers arrived to stop rioters from burning down the courthouse, the rioters have been starting smaller fires in order to burn other symbols of their derision. On Friday night, that included Bibles and the American flag. (Town Hall, Aug. 1, 2020)

“The night before, rioters severed a pig’s head, put a police hat on it, placed the pig’s head on top of an American flag and then lit it all on fire.

“Portland police found an abandoned pig back in the early days of the riots. Police believe protesters planned to kill the animal and similarly use its body to make some sort of disgusting political message about hating cops.

Black Lives Matter doesn’t care about Black Lives or any other Human Lives, including aborted babies

“Deputies with the U.S. Marshals and officers with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security Investigations, and the Federal Protective Service have been working hard to protect the Hatfield Federal Courthouse in downtown Portland on a nightly basis.

“Oregon Democratic Gov. Kate Brown struck a deal with the Trump administration earlier this week, whereby federal officers will begin to withdrawal from downtown Portland as state agencies attempt to provide enforcement on their own. But Democratic leaders have consistently sided with the protestors, ignoring the violence and the threat and safety the riots pose to members of the community.

Did Democrats supply the rioters with Bibles to burn, or did the rioters steal them from their Grannies?

Did Democrats supply the rioters with a live pig to decapitate?

Is this really 2020, or some other uncivilized dark time from ancient history?

Black Lives Matter doesn’t care about Black Lives or any other Human Lives, including aborted babies.

BLM is not true to its cause—justice for the death of George Floyd, who by the way, identified as a Christian.

School teachers are said to be the driving force behind Antifa

CLAIM: “Teachers are the number one occupation of the antifa terrorist organization according to the FBI.” (AP, July 9, 2020)

“AP’S ASSESSMENT: False. There is no evidence that teachers make up an outsized portion of antifa, a shorthand term for “anti-fascists.” The FBI told The Associated Press it “has not made any such statements about the occupations of people who are attracted to particular ideologies.”

THE FACTS: As early as November 2019, posts online have alleged that the FBI says the most common profession for an antifa activist to have is schoolteacher.”

Videos here show that some school teachers while out rioting have been charged with felonies.

Democrats don’t just condone violence by continuing to look the other way, they are an active part of it

Could this be why teachers don’t want children returned to school in September during the run of the Coronavirus threat?

Would Antifa teachers rather be rioting than teaching in the classroom, but getting paid all the same?

Bottom line: Democrats don’t just condone violence by continuing to look the other way, they are an active part of it.

Related:

Eric Clanton takes 3-year probation deal in Berkeley rally bike lock assault case
A college professor charged with four counts of felony assault with a deadly weapon has taken a deal resulting in three years of probation, court records reveal.

A former East Bay college philosophy professor who was charged with four counts of felony assault with a deadly weapon, causing great bodily injury, has taken a deal resulting in three years of probation for an attack at a Berkeley protest last year, court records reveal.

Eric Clanton had been linked by police to violent assaults with a metal bike lock during a “free speech” rally in Berkeley on April 15, 2017. Before his arrest, Clanton had been “outed” online, on the website 4chan, as someone who used a bike lock to strike a man in the head. The assault was captured in a video clip (below) that drew widespread attention and anger after it was posted on YouTube.

Aug 3 2020

Why Has SCOTUS Chief Roberts Abandoned Conservatism?


Does Judge Roberts Enjoys His Dalliances With the Strumpet Liberalism?

Kelly OConnell image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—August 2, 2020

Why Has SCOTUS Chief Roberts Abandoned Conservatism?

Why can’t Republican presidents count on their Supreme Court picks to be reliably conservative? And, how was previously “conservative” Chief Judge John Roberts bamboozled into switching sides? Or did he just slump into compromise? Is Roberts proud of himself or merely insensate to his devolving circumstances? Maybe Roberts is the Caitlyn Jenner of SCOTUS, proving O’Sullivan’s Law – that all institutions degenerate into liberalism except those founded as strictly conservative.

Recall, during Roberts’ nomination he told the Senate he had no explicit judicial philosophy, adding: “It’s my job to call balls and strikes, and not to pitch or bat.” This is an existential view of judging. Roberts’ main interest is preserving SCOTUS’ reputation and power. 

Obamacare & Nine Unelected People

Roberts chief problem was highlighted in 2012 when President Obama threatened SCOTUS, warning the ‘unelected’ supreme court to not strike down his healthcare law. Why didn’t Chief Roberts bristle at this outrageous manipulation? Instead, Roberts was cowed, realizing Obama had the ability and will to destroy the Courts’s reputation through countless media hit pieces by his enablers. As years pass, in an unsavory example of Stockholm Syndrome, Roberts is now a liberal convert. But Roberts pantomimes anger towards much less Trump provocation as he knows Donald is much less ruthless than Barack.

Roberts Folds in Eye of Storm

Roberts had a chance to teach the left a lesson about bad laws. Rejection might have caused Obama to lose his next election. But, instead of dumping the badly flawed Obamacare, Roberts folded in the eye of the storm arguing a convoluted, nonsensical trick for saving it by turning the insurance mandate penalty into a tax. Justice Scalia wrote Roberts saved the law through “somersaults of statutory interpretation.” Yet, he did save his and the Court’s reputation from an unholy, scorched earth propaganda attack by Obama’s media minions.

Natural Law 

Natural Law claims a “law above the law” exists as a model for human laws. The Natural Law itself became a medieval proximate model for societal instruction, invading every topic of study. The Natural Law then gave birth to Anglo-American Common Law. From this came the crown jewels of Western jurisprudence – the Constitution and Bill of Rights. But inevitably, Natural Law lost favor, stripping the Common Law of it’s cache and majesty.

Positive Law
In it’s place came “Positive Law” or “man-made law.” Consider Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law tasked to eject any superstition or morality. And yet, the challenge of driving morality or religion out of law was doomed to fail. Ronald Dwarkin’s Judge Herculus in Law’s Dominion, brings a kind of Natural Law back by claiming there is always one best answer for a case than all other options.

Roberts & Legal Realism

In telegraphing his fixation with politics and court stability, Roberts reveals his philosophy as Legal Realism, which states law should be composed as how it actually exists. In other words, Roberts can rule however he likes then claim he was pragmatically ruling as should be which then achieves the greatest good. So, Roberts believes SCOTUS is at the center of society and is unafraid to play politics to save his beloved Court. For instance, in rejecting Louisiana’s demand for abortionists to have hospital privileges in case of emergencies, a common sense idea, Roberts prefers court stability over the lives of unborn babies.

Will to Power
So where does this leave us? Roberts has unwittingly accepted Nietzsche’s Will to Power, claiming that whoever has the power can use it without any explanation, as long as claiming it is pragmatic – for the greatest good. Law becomes transactional, not representing any deep truth, but just another tool in the work bench of modern society. And so Roberts waves his wooden hammer and sends countless kids to the grave as being too inconvenient to save.

CONCLUSION
Roberts rules as a Progressive, believing law exists to make society better.  In this view, there is no deeper meaning or ultimate right or wrong. Roberts thinks he is chief judge to protect SCOTUS’ legitimacy. But, if America is to survive even a few more decades, we must find better qualified justices willing to honor the Natural Law which gave rise to the Constitution. And they must believe a firm right and wrong do exist, and great judges take big risks to fight for truth, even when unpopular.