President Trump Delivers Remarks on CA Water Access – 5:30pm Livestream


Today President Trump will deliver remarks on water access in Bakersfield, California. The president was in the valley earlier today for a fundraiser hosted by Oracle CEO Larry Ellison and will deliver remarks from Bakersfield at approximately 5:30pm ET.

White House Livestream – Fox Business Livestream – Alternate Livestream

.

.

Prayers Answered – Ryan Newman Walks Out of Hospital…


Very good news today as NASCAR driver Ryan Newman walks out of the hospital with his two daughters only a few days after a horrific crash at the Daytona 500.

[Fox News Article]

NBC Sports

@NBCSports

True to his jovial self, @RyanJNewman is walking and joking around with his daughters. ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

View image on Twitter
2,561 people are talking about this

Krissie Newman

@NewmanKrissie

Best sight ever!!! https://twitter.com/roushfenway/status/1230201168091078656 

Embedded video

Roush Fenway

@roushfenway

Ryan Newman has been treated and released from Halifax Medical Center

View image on Twitter
12.2K people are talking about this

Bloomberg’s Big Swamp Gulp!


BELLY UP TO THE SWAMP 

Multi-billionaire and former New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg once tried to ban “Big Gulp” sodas in his city. He also wanted saltshakers removed from restaurant tables and stricter rules about smoking and so forth. Most of his bans were unconstitutional, but that didn’t seem to matter much to a statist control freak such as Bloomberg.

Now he wants to buy the presidency and control our nation. Unfortunately for him, he can’t buy charisma.

Bloomberg, like Biden and Bernie, is in his late 70s. Mike is even more mean spirited than either Biden or Bernie. He has insulted minorities, women, and most recently farmers. Sure he’s short in stature, but his vision for America is not only shortsighted, it’s downright repulsive. He’s a ‘government force’ kind of guy. He wants you to turn in your guns and take your mandatory vaccines. He wants open borders. He wants the de-industrialization that his climate change laws will bring. He is in league with globalists and big corporations as well as the entrenched Deep State Swamp. Why else would he suggest Hillary for his running mate?

The only thing Bloomberg has going for him is cornucopia of cash. Even with his profligate spending, I doubt he can influence a great many American voters to swallow the swill he’s offering them because his toxic swamp policies are simply too hard to swallow.

—Ben Garrison

Michael Egnor Demolishes the Myth of Materialism (Science Uprising EP1)


48.9K subscribers

Has science proven we are all just matter? Or does reality extend beyond what we can see and touch? Be sure to visit https://scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books. This episode of Science Uprising investigates claims by scientists and professors like Neil deGrasse Tyson, Carl Sagan, and Daniel Dennett, who try to hijack science to promote materialism—the idea that physical reality is all there is. Hear from experts who challenge this view of science, and learn about scientists who have to hide behind a mask because they face intimidation and censorship from dissenting from materialism. People featured in this episode include Jay Richards, PhD, Assistant Professor at The Catholic University of America, filmmaker, and author or co-author of books such as The Human Advantage, The Privileged Planet, The Hobbit Party, Infiltrated, and Money, Greed, and God; and Michael Egnor, MD (from Columbia University), neurosurgeon and professor of neurological surgery at Stony Brook University. Dr. Egnor is renowned for his work in pediatric neurosurgery. See https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2516312….

Michael Egnor Shows You’re Not A Meat Robot (Science Uprising EP2)


48.9K subscribers

Are we simply robots made out of meat? Or is there an inescapable “I” who makes real choices that can change our lives? This episode of Science Uprising (Mind: The Inescapable I) challenges claims by materialists like Steven Pinker, Sam Harris, and Daniel Dennett that humans are simply robots without free will. Be sure to visit https://scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books. People featured in this episode include Michael Egnor, MD, a Professor of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics at Stony Brook University; and Jeffrey Schwartz, MD, a Research Psychiatrist at UCLA and author many books such as The Mind and the Brain, Brain Lock, and You Are Not Your Brain. Dr. Jeffrey M. Schwartz is a research psychiatrist at the School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles and one of the world’s leading experts in neuroplasticity. Decades ago, he began to study the philosophy of conscious awareness, the idea that the actions of the mind have an effect on the workings of the brain. Jeff’s breakthrough work in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) provided the hard evidence that the mind can control the brain’s chemistry. He has lectured extensively to both professional and lay audiences in the US, Europe, and Asia. Jeff’s books include The Mind and the Brain: Neuroplasticity and the Power of Mental Force and the bestseller Brain Lock: Free Yourself from Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, the seminal book on OCD. Learn more about his research and writing on the brain and neuroplasticity at https://jeffreymschwartz.com/about/ Michael Egnor, MD (from Columbia University), neurosurgeon and professor of neurological surgery at Stony Brook University. Dr. Egnor is renowned for his work in pediatric neurosurgery. His practice includes patients diagnosed with Arnold Chiari deformity, hydrocephalus, cranio-synostosis, brain tumors, and spina bifida, as well as children with severe head trauma. He has an international reputation for research on hydrocephalus, and he is on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Hydrocephalus Association in the United States. See https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2516312….

 

Stephen Meyer Unmasks The Coding Of Human DNA (Science Uprising EP3)


48.9K subscribers

Is the software that runs life the result of accumulated copying errors? Or does it require a programmer? This episode of Science Uprising examines how Microsoft founder Bill Gates, geneticist and entrepreneur Craig Venter, and even evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins all acknowledge that DNA is like software. But how was that software created? Be sure to visit https://scienceuprising.com/ to find more videos and explore related articles and books. People featured in this episode include Stephen Meyer, PhD, Director of the Center for Science and Culture at Discovery Institute and author of Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design; and Douglas Axe, Maxwell Visiting Professor of Molecular Biology at Biola University and author of Undeniable: How Biology Confirms Our Intuition that Life Is Designed. Check out our other videos: Information Enigma: Where does information come from? Information drives the development of life. But what is the source of that information? https://youtu.be/aA-FcnLsF1g

Students Demand University Dis-invest in Fossil Fuel Related Companies – School Offers to Turn off the Heat


Students at St John’s College at Oxford University were protesting that the university now disinvestfrom anything related to fossil fuel. Professor Andrew Parker  replied, “I am not able to arrange any divestment at short notice. But I can arrange for the gas central heating in college to be switched off with immediate effect. Please let me know if you support this proposal.” The protesters responded, “This is an inappropriate and flippant response by the bursar to what we were hoping would be a mature discussion. It’s January and it would be borderline dangerous to switch off the central heating.”

Seems like they want it both ways.

Next Financial Crisis – Stocks, Currency or Bonds?


QUESTION: Hi Martin! Would you please clarify the difference between an economic collapse and the currency crisis? Are they one and the same?
In one of the pro-private blogs you mentioned a collapse in government debt before the slingshot move. Would that mean that my pension investment plan may disappear before the currency crisis and the slingshot move you have been talking about?

I just would like to know while I have time to pay off my home.
Thank you for all you do for us common folk.

Thank you

B

ANSWER: The volatility that surrounds a financial crisis depends upon the origin of the sector. When there is a crisis in confidence in the private sector, corporations or banks, the capital shifts and sells private assets and runs into government securities (bonds/notes), which we call the “Flight to Quality” that typically is used only in this context.

However, when capital realizes that the risk is on the government side, the Flight to Quality reverses and capital seeks the safety of the private sector. The decline in confidence in government will manifest in two primary manners. First, because capital responds in anticipation, we can find that markets move first based upon the perceived risk.

The spread between AAA Corporate bonds and those of the United States, initially rose in premium over the government when the perception was confined to the stock market crash. That dipped slightly in 1931 as all the foreign debt was going into default. It turned back up going into the final low in 1932. The Dow did drop nearly 50% at that time. The Dow closed 1931 at 77.90 and then fell to 40.56 in July 1932 for the low. Percentage-wise, that was a substantial decline in 7 months.

There were numerous foreign bonds that were trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When the Sovereign Debt Default of 1931 took place, the perception shifted to the point that it was then expected that the United States would default in some way because everyone else did. Then you see the spread between AAA corporate debt in the USA declined sharply against the federal debt levels.

Now enters the nonsense of creating the euro. The promise was that creating the euro would make companies more competitive because there would be no more currency risk and they would all pay the same interest rates pointing to the dollar as a misrepresentation. The Observer in London, England, wrote on June 7th, 1998 (id/Page 51), “Within the euro-zone, exchange rates will be a thing of the past. Participating countries will also share the same interest rates. Euro interest rates will probably be lower than the UK’s – the base rate in Germany is 3.3 per cent; the UK’s is 7.5 per cent…”

The fallacy of the entire euro project was the intentional lies that were spun just to sell the euro. Creating the euro was in effect a means of fixing the exchange rate as if they had returned to the days of Bretton Woods. However, even under Bretton Woods, despite the fact that the currencies were fixed, the volatility simply transferred to the debt market.

Under the Eurozone, Greece and others began to issue debt like it was going out of style because they were taking advantage of the stupidity of investors willing to buy debt believing that everyone would pay the same interest rates simply because they used the same currency.

There are many states that peg their currency to the US dollar. That does NOTmean that they will pay the same interest rates as the US government. That was NEVER true under Bretton Woods and within the United States, each of the 50 states pays according to its own credit risk.

Hence, the crisis we face will be felt in the debt markets FIRST, which is why we have the Repo Crisisthat people are not paying attention to anymore. Therefore, your question of a collapse in government debt before the slingshot move means that “my pension investment plan may disappear before the currency crisis and the slingshot move you have been talking about.” It all depends upon the country you live in.

If you are in the United States, the debt crisis begins OUTSIDE the United States so the US market is the last to go into a bond crisis.

WaPo Report: AG Bill Barr Threatens to Quit…


First, the “report” comes from the pathetic beltway crowd of journolist narrative engineers; so there’s likely little-to-no substance to the construct.  However, that said, if Bill Barr is so weak, pathetic and incapable of doing his job, that he needs to threaten to resign if President Trump tweets his opinion, then Barr is in the wrong profession.

…Unless, of course, President Trump’s pressure on Bill Barr is actually forcing the Attorney General to do something the AG is predisposed not to undertake.  Which, given the background history of Bill Barr, is also entirely possible.

Right around this moment-in-time is where a multitude of mutually aligned beltway quisling pundits will declare that Bill Barr’s delicate sensibilities are being wounded by a President who demands forceful accountability; ie. traditional DC republican pundits [insert Laura Ingraham and Max Boot here].

The bottom line is President Trump is doing absolutely nothing to impede Bill Barr from doing his job; if the U.S. Attorney General is factually intent on doing that job.

Ever since he assumed office the Attorney General has been praising the likes of Rod Rosenstein, Robert Mueller and Christopher Wray.  Given the nature of what is widely available in review, that level of logical disconnect is not representative of an individual who possesses reasonable judgement in the quest for deliberate justice…. just sayin’.

So until Bill Barr actually man’s-up and does something with the authority he has requested, the image of Bondo Barr attempting to cover-up the rot and wrongdoing while surrounded by visible and overwhelming corruption; and pontificating about “constitutional norms”; is a more apt descriptive.

President Trump has been victimized by the same institutions AG Bill Barr is now in charge of.  So forgive me if I don’t impart sympathy upon a person who is in charge of those institutions, whining about background noise, and seemingly incapable of addressing the abuse unless all of the planets are aligned to provide him the quiet atmosphere he requires while thumbing through the final chapters of his indulgent memoirs over a glass of chardonnay.

Suck it up cupcake.

When you get all done with that, there’s still a job to do.

The WaPo: -Attorney General William P. Barr has told people close to President Trump — both inside and outside the White House — that he is considering quitting over Trump’s tweets about Justice Department investigations, three administration officials said, foreshadowing a possible confrontation between the president and his attorney general over the independence of the Justice Department.

So far, Trump has defied Barr’s requests, both public and private, to keep quiet on matters of federal law enforcement. It was not immediately clear Tuesday whether Barr had made his posture known directly to Trump. The administration officials said Barr seemed to be sharing his position with advisers in hopes the president would get the message that he should stop weighing in publicly on the Justice Department’s ongoing criminal investigations.

“He has his limits,” said one person familiar with Barr’s thinking. (read more)

The problem facing Bill Barr is his own inability to deal with the issues within his own authority.

It was not President Trump that caused four underlings to defy Barr’s authority and set-up the attorney general with the image of a rogue DOJ lacking leadership and direction.  That issue was the direct result of Barr’s own inability to cut-out political corruption on his first days, weeks, months and year as the head of the agency.

No doubt several Bush-Republicans will stand quickly in defense of the psychologically wounded soldier sitting in the tent crying he just can’t take the sound of the thunder any longer.  And yes, President Trump is likely to be Pattonesque in removing his helmet, slapping the feeble-minded fool and demanding he get back in the fight…. after all:

TRUMP […] …yeah, I do make his job harder. I do agree with that. I think that’s true. He’s a very straight shooter. We have a great Attorney General, and he’s working very hard. And he’s working against a lot of people that don’t want to see good things happen, in my opinion. That’s my opinion, not his opinion. That’s my opinion. You’ll have to ask what his opinion is.

But I will say this: Social media, for me, has been very important because it gives me a voice, because I don’t get that voice in the press. In the media, I don’t get that voice. So I’m allowed to have a voice…. (more)

Now, go make me a sandwich – and tell the Attorney General to bring me a Diet Coke.

President Trump is an apex predator.  A genuine titan; not a politician.

President Trumps’ frames of reference are far larger than the irrelevant opinion of politicians who have never accomplished anything in their lives beyond self-indulgence.

This is the first time a seemingly larger predator has survived the piranha biting and small-minded scheming amid the swamp; and then stood up to squish them in the aftermath…. What we are seeing now is fear; genuine DC fear.

When Bill Barr said on ABC that President Trump’s tweets were difficult for him, in essence he showcased just how weak, pathetic and politically-minded he is.

Barr’s job is the same with or without President Trump expressing opinion on the visible DOJ and FBI corruption.  The president is simply reflecting outrage felt by a significant portion of the electorate.   It was a mistake for Barr to start whining about the issue, not because of anything Trump, but more specifically because Barr showed weakness within the same fishbowl he is supposed to control.

In the aftermath of a failed coup, powerful interests in DC now understand President Trump is strong; he’s dangerous. And those same voices in DC now see Bill Barr publicly admitting how weak and pathetic he is.

Those who dispatch and coordinate the narrative engineering, the piranhas per se’, know that once they can identify weakness they will exploit it to achieve their beltway objectives.

If the reporting is accurate, Bill Barr is pathetic; and that weakness simply highlights a likelihood his purpose was never to deal with corrupt issues in the first place.  Let us hope the reporting is inaccurate.

PS. Here’s the DOJ journolists writing the simultaneously fired articles:

….. Any questions?