$30M Advance to WE Charity Still Outstanding?


WHERE’S THE MONEY?

Ken Grafton image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 17, 2020

We Scandal, Justin Trudeau

For reasons not disclosed, WE Charity received a $30M advance payment from Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) in connection with the contribution agreement to administer the Canada Student Service Grant (CSSG) program.

The government has not confirmed repayment.

Questions regarding the program began almost immediately following the announcement on April 22nd by Prime Minister Trudeau of a $9-billion student aid package, which contained CSSG.

WE received payment(s) from the government amounting to $30M (for yet unspecified purposes)

While the contribution agreement with WE was not approved until June 23rd, WE started work on May 5th. According to testimony from Trudeau Chief of Staff Katie Telford before the Finance Committee, an unnamed official in the PMO spoke with WE on May 5th (in what must have been an interesting call), following approval of WE by the COVID-19 Cabinet Committee (on the basis of a recommendation from Youth Minister Bardish Chagger).

The PM testified however that he didn’t hear about WE in connection with CSSG until May 8th.

Cabinet approval was given on May 22nd, and the public service began negotiating an agreement with WE the following day…eighteen days after WE started work.

It was reported that although the contract was signed on June 23rd, it came into effect on May 5th (before the PM heard about it). If this sounds like complete nonsense, the “backdating” of contracts is generally permissible under Canadian Law…but not however for the purpose of misleading third parties (such as the public) or to circumvent Rules or Legislation (such as the requirement for Cabinet approval).

In the wake of growing controversy regarding conflict of interest and another investigation by Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion, cancellation of the WE agreement was announced on July 3rd.
Public confusion is forgivable here. The timeline is convoluted, but critical.

Somewhere between May 5th and July 3rd – and we can only assume that both the Ethics Committee and the Finance Committee will investigate transaction dates in order to determine whether any payments were made prior to signing the contract on June 3rd – WE received payment(s) from the government amounting to $30M (for yet unspecified purposes).

Where is the money now?

Appearing before the Ethics Committee Aug 11thChagger could not say how much of the $30M has been repaid by WE since the contract was finalized; “We can share that … $30 million has been released to the organization through the contribution agreement. I was not aware of how much money has been returned,” As Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Youth, Chagger was responsible for CSSG.

Non-Liberal committee members, and many Canadians, were surprised to learn that Chagger didn’t know how much money had been recouped…and that it wasn’t a higher priority.

Conservative MP Michael Barrett asked, “Why hasn’t the money been returned at this point? That seems odd. It’s been quite some time since the program was cancelled or that WE withdrew…” Chagger responded, “We want to ensure that all processes are being followed. So, I can assure you that the public service is working with the organization to ensure that it is returned.”

According to a Global News article on Aug 11th, WE issued a statement saying that they have repaid $22M of the $30M handed out when the contract was signed, and have been waiting on the government to accept the remaining $8M…whatever that means. A WE spokesperson said, “WE Charity has repeatedly communicated to ESDC the desire to return the remaining funds as soon as the government is able to accept the transfer.” They did not elaborate as to why they hadn’t returned the full amount immediately, or why the government was having difficulty accepting the outstanding balance.

Due diligence has been one of many glaring anomalies with respect to WE-Gate, with questions regarding WE’s financial health.

In testimony before the Finance Committee, Kate Bahen of watchdog Charity Intelligence Canada, outlined how she used easy-to-access financial data to report that WE Charity had financial stress, “At August 2019 year-end, WE Charity had cash and investments (gross funding reserves) of $11.5m compared with $14.0m at year-end August 2018. WE Charity’s bank loans increased to $13.7m in 2019 compared with $11.1m in 2018. This creates a negative funding reserve of $2.2m. For the second year, WE Charity is in breach of its financial covenants on its bank debt. Its bank has waived these conditions for the current period.”

With the $1 trillion debt that the Liberals have incurred, Canada has already emptied the national piggy-bank…and every penny counts

This would be the point where the loans officer at your local bank branch stops returning your calls.

A cursory review of WE’s 2018 Audited Financial Statement should have raised red flags.

Alarmingly, clerk of the Privy Council Ian Shugart admitted that federal officials did not probe WE Charity’s financial situation or governance structure when doing homework on the $912-million deal.

It has also come out that the WE agreement was actually made with the WE Charity Foundation, a private company owned by WE founders Marc and Craig Kielburger, not WE Charity. The foundation has no employees or assets, other than WE Charity. Since the payment was made to what is effectively a holding company, recovery of the funds could prove problematic.

It is incumbent upon the Government to inform Canadians what the status of the $30M is exactly, and when it will be fully repaid. If $22M has indeed been repaid, the government needs to say so, and recover the remainder owed.

With the $1 trillion debt that the Liberals have incurred, Canada has already emptied the national piggy-bank…and every penny counts.

Where’s the money?

Dr. Sebastian Gorka: How the Far-Left Radicalized America’s Institutions | American Thought Leaders


How is the ideological basis of the far-left fundamentally at odds with traditional values? What is the war for America’s soul, as told in Dr. Sebastian Gorka’s new book? And in the eyes of Dr. Gorka, how did we get to this point? How were American institutions radicalized and America’s youth indoctrinated into sympathizing with socialist …

 

Kimberley Strassel: “How Trump Haters Are Breaking America” | American Thought Leaders


Who exactly are the “Resistance,” as explored in Kim Strassel’s new book “Resistance (At All Costs): How Trump Haters are Breaking America”? How are “Trump haters” different from “Trump critics?” How is the Resistance different from past political movements? What are the long-term implications of its activities? And how are …

Biden Will Be Speaking From Under The Bus Where Obama Threw Him At DNCC


The repressed giggles never heard will be coming from the direction of Senator (President in her own mind) Kamala Harris

Judi McLeod image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 16, 2020

Biden Will Be Speaking From Under The Bus Where Obama Threw Him At DNCC

Shades of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s controversial former pastor, who once complained that the president “threw me under the bus”.

“Barack Obama is sharing doubts about the ability of his former Vice President Joe Biden to win the 2020 election, according to a new report.” (Daily Mail, Aug. 15, 2020)

“Tensions linger between the camps with the VP determined to prove the naysayers wrong after Obama backed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as his successor in 2016, Politico states.

‘Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up’

“While the former President has publicly backed Biden – albeit late in the day – he is said to be warning his inner circle that he may not be fit for office.

‘Don’t underestimate Joe’s ability to f**k things up,’ Obama has cautioned, according to one Democrat who spoke to Politico.”

Don’t underestimate Joe’ ability to f**k (his words, not ours) things up”.

In other words Obama is greasing his former VP’s back for an easy slide under the bus, before he can even deliver his acceptance speech at the DNCC on Thursday night.

Could it be that Obama is paving the way for the presidency run of Senator Kamala Harris which is who Democrat elites really want as president?

Up to now, Obama and Biden have come across as BFFs.

“On the social media-generated #BestFriendsDay, the campaign posted a picture of “Joe” and “Barack” friendship bracelets. Biden relabeled himself an “Obama-Biden Democrat.” (Politico, Aug. 14, 2020)

Throw out your Obama-Biden friendship bracelet, Joe.  It was only a juvenile joke from the get-go.

Fifty-two percent of Democrats/Leaners wish someone else were their nominee (Gallup, Aug 14, 2020)

Obama is now specific about Biden in his 11th-hour complaints about him

Long before Obama’s pointed critiques, Biden was already out there shooting himself in the foot by not seeming to know what day or place it was, to the point where some were demanding he take a professional cognitive test.

“Obama is said to have bemoaned Biden’s lack of understanding for much of the Democratic electorate. (Dailymail)

Because of his multiple trademark gaffes, Dems have treated Biden like the tipsy uncle in early stage dementia some folk hide in the attic when unexpected visitors come to call.

In Biden’s case, the attic is his Delaware basement.

Interesting how the usually non-specific Obama, who performed like the Artful Dodger during his 8 years in the Oval Office, is now specific about Biden in his 11th-hour complaints about him.

“The former president allegedly told one former Democratic candidate that he was struggling to understand voters in the likes of Iowa.  (Daily Mail)

‘And you know who really doesn’t have it? Joe Biden,’ they said he added.

“Yet, Biden has pushed ahead despite knowing that Obama may feel he is not the right person for the job and disagrees with his governing style.

Obama didn’t ‘lift a finger’

“ ‘He was loyal, I think, to Obama in every way in terms of defending and standing by him, even probably when he disagreed with what Obama was doing,’ said Leon Panetta, Obama’s secretary of Defense.

‘To some extent, [he] oftentimes felt that that loyalty was not being rewarded.’

“Biden is said to have hit out of the fact that Obama didn’t ‘lift a finger’ to help him take the primary in South Carolina and that he had won the support of black voters in the state on his own merit.

“The tension comes after Obama lined up Clinton instead of his own VP to be his successor, talking Biden out of a run in 2016.

“While the move was linked to Biden’s recent loss of his son Beau and it being too soon after the death for him to begin a grueling presidential campaign, insiders have said that Obama simply viewed Clinton as a better person to take over.

‘In the Situation Room, Biden could be something of an unguided missile’

“…Obama heaped praise on Clinton early after his own 2012 reelection.

‘I was a big admirer of Hillary’s before our primary battles and the general election,’ Obama once said.

‘You know, her discipline, her stamina, her thoughtfulness, her ability to project, I think, and make clear issues that are important to the American people, I thought made her an extraordinary talent. … [P]art of our bond is we’ve been through a lot of the same stuff.’

“Obama is said to have viewed himself and Clinton as the ones that do ‘the reading’.

‘In Situation Room meetings, she had the thickest binder and had read it three times,’ one Clinton aide told Politico.

“While in office, young Obama aides are reported to have dismissed Biden, even ‘eye-rolling’ when the VP would begin speaking, while former members of the administration have also treated Biden dismissively in their memoirs.

‘In the Situation Room, Biden could be something of an unguided missile,’ Ben Rhodes, Obama’s former deputy national security adviser, wrote.

Obama on Clinton: ‘I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office’

“Former FBI Director James Comey also said that ‘Obama would have a series of exchanges heading a conversation very clearly and crisply in Direction A. Then, at some point, Biden would jump in with, ‘Can I ask something, Mr. President?’

‘Obama would politely agree, but something in his expression suggested he knew full well that for the next five or 10 minutes we would all be heading in Direction Z,’ Comey added.
‘After listening and patiently waiting, President Obama would then bring the conversation back on course.

“The tension becomes more clear when looking back at Obama’s endorsement of Clinton in 2016.

‘I don’t think there’s ever been someone so qualified to hold this office,’ Obama said of the former New York Senator.

In contrast he said of Biden this year: ‘I believe Joe has all of the qualities we need in a president right now … and I know he will surround himself with good people.’

“Obama’s dismissal of Biden comes despite Republicans recalling how they preferred to negotiate with the Vice President over the President, referring to Obama’s know-it-all attitude which they felt spoke down to them.

Meanwhile, when Biden makes his acceptance speech on Thursday night, he’ll be making it from under the bus where Obama already threw him.

The repressed giggles never heard will be coming from the direction of Senator (President in her own mind) Kamala Harris.

I Strongly Urge Readers to Leave California, New Jersey, Illinois, Connecticut, & New York


California is looking to impose a Wealth Tax as Elizabeth Waren had proposed which is Piketty’s idea which is supported by Schwab’s World Economic Forum in Davos. This will be on worldwide property – not income. The tax rate annually will be 0.4%. Even if you lose the money you will be taxed every year in addition to income taxes which are already the highest in the United States.

The problem here is not just worldwide income, California went after people who retired and left the state. They argued that their retirement income was previously earned in California so you had to pay California income taxes on your retirement funds even if you left California. This is the ultimate tyranny. You are paying taxes as a slave owned by California. You are NOT paying your fair share because you are not using the state’s resources or benefits. This is once again – taxation without representation. You will have no right to vote in California because you are not a resident. Nevertheless, this is the TRUE view of socialists – you are the property of the state. Socialists do not tolerate classes. Their core belief is everything belongs to them. My family fought in even the American Revolution. This is precisely what they fought against.

They are looking at the very same scheme to continue to tax you on the worldwide property even if you leave. I strongly advise you to move to a Red State ASAP. Florida has a lot of retired people so the politicians are more constrained. It may be your last chance. California Dreaming is now all about them and how they dream of new ways to exploit you even more.

States have lost income because of their stupid COVID lockdowns. Of course, they never reduce their expenses and after wiping out people’s jobs, they are looking to make up their losses in revenue with new creative ideas. As I warned, people simply began walking away from their property in Rome because of such corruption. Those in power only see their own power and self-interest. This is why we need so desperately to eliminate career politicians. Until that happens, there will never be a government of “We the People” no matter what.

Let’s be honest here. There is NO way any state government will ever STOP raising taxes. They are incapable of ever seeing themselves as the source of the problem. The audacity to try to continue to tax people forever because they once worked in California is the ultimate tyranny. They reduce everyone to just their economic slaves to be exploited with no connection to paying for common infrastructure or expenses since you use nothing when you leave.

A Plea from Australia For Help


COMMENT: Hi Marty,
Was hoping you could put this on your blog in case there are any lawyers in your readership. Surely we are being denied the right to allow our immune system to deal with this naturally.

I live in the very next state to Victoria Australia and I am increasingly becoming fearful our state government is going to follow suit.

What really pisses me off is that people like my own father accept the bullshit they are being told and want the police to act the way they do. So it is not just the police and the government, but all those sheep who give these authorities the motivation to do it. I can assure you that my father and those like him would have been cheering the police officer on, not the woman who was not wearing the mask. My father even told my daughter (when she asked him how he was through messenger) that he was ok but very angry at the people not obeying the law. In other words, here is my father talking to my daughter long distance and his whole focus is on this f%^&*ing virus and his disdain towards others who don’t fear this disease as he does. People like my father do not read or listen to anyone else (like me or you) who speaks opposite to their own fears and beliefs. So waking up the people is pointless and will never happen.

So to my question. I believe I am being denied the right to get this disease naturally and to allow my body to naturally deal with it. My health is being compromised because I am being denied the right to build my own immune system naturally. By denying me the right to naturally get this disease, I am putting my own ability to work and provide for my family at risk. Surely there must be some legal precedent that says that no one can prevent me from contracting a disease naturally.

Obviously there is an agenda here, but surely the people out there with common sense (and legal ability to see this through) can force the government to simply tell those that fear this disease to stay at home, in other words, aim their lockdowns at those who fear the disease and let the rest of us go out and work and produce.

D

 

REPLY: This really makes no sense why politicians are becoming so evil. You would think that they made a mistake because of Neil Ferguson’s bogus mode and they would quickly reverse course. The whole thing was we needed lockdowns to preserve bed space in hospitals. But that never became a problem. So you would think that any honest politicians would back off. Instead, they are turning the screws even harder which makes no sense unless they are now deliberately trying to destroy the economy for the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset.

Are Gates & Soros All-Powerful?


QUESTION: Since Soros Gates and their friends are so powerful and since they control a lot of things, do you think they could manipulate the world stock markets too?

MG

London Financial Times – June 27, 1998

ANSWER: No. Keep in mind that Socrates has been forecasting the trend without knowing who are the players. They have simply appeared on schedule, but they have not reversed the course of the trend which was in motion. I have explained the main times that Socrates has been able to forecast wars are the collapse of governments. It does not use fundamental analysis. It simply tracks the capital flows. It picks up that people start to move their money if they obviously anticipate starting a war.

This has been the very same outcome. I have direct information that some players began to sell all government bonds and shares at the peak just before the virus was the major issue. They knew what was coming for their orchestrated this event. They apparently used our Economic Confidence Model turning point of January 18, 2020, for their timing. They were able to at best increase the magnitude of the decline, but they did not “manipulate” in the sense of taking a bull market and transforming it into a cycle inversion bear market. At the WEC in Orlando in 2019, we laid out that there would be a crash in January and that it should have been at least 20%. That was done much before any word of a virus.

Everything they have done is in accordance with Socrates’ forecast as we head into 2032. They will fail to create this new green world order. However, they have turned politics into a toxic arena from which they are dividing nations and even families. So they are not all-powerful. They will lose this battle.

Today’s Rioters are the Evil Spawn of the Rioters from the 1960’s


The Typical American city in the Summer of 2020, WHY?

Starting in the mid 60’s and running though most of the 70’s a large contingent of the babies born between 1944 and 1964 known as the “me generation” or the “boomer generation” started to rebel against the existing political system and society in general.  The trigger for the rebellion was the Vietnam war and the draft of young men to be sent to war. However,  it quickly spread to encompass many other issues like race, gender and sexuality, leading to the culture wars in the 80’s. It was a very turbulent time as society was totally changed by the boomers. If you care to read about it I recommend the book The Fourth Turning An American Prophecy  by Strauss and Howe. The amassing thing about this book is that they predicted what we are going though right now back in 1997.

Back then 1970’s

That was the background that we grew up in and most of us turned out just fine; however there was another groups of mostly rich kids that turned out to be very bad. Their parents were the first of the Progressives who believed in the principles of Marxism; not so much in the open as the cloaked themselves in terms like socialism. and social justice and well today we have BLM and Antifa to name just a few, which are direct extensions of the movements in the late 60’s and early 70’s. To many today, who were not alive back then, they wonder where these movements came from.

Today 2020

The answer is found in their writing and more specifically in a book/pamphlet they published on May 9, 1974.  The authors are: Bernadine Dohrn, Billy Ayers, Jeff Jones and Celia Sojourn. These were hard core radicals following the teaching of Saul D. Alinsky in his Book Rules for Radicals in which he taught how to make social change meaning a way to get to Marxism. This group and others goal was to fundamentally change America into a Communist country. If you read that book you will have no doubt about their wanting a Marxism system in the Unite Sates.

The book they published in 1974 will give them today what they desired when they first published Prairie Fire, The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Americanism. Rather than write about it here just download it and read it yourself. The copy I have is a copy of the pages in that book and so some of the quality is poor but it is readable. In private they discussed the cost to make the change they wanted and it was that 25% of the US population would need to die. Before you dismiss  that remember that both the Russian and Chinese conversion to Marxism cost each of those countries a much high percentage of their population.

PrairieFire-reprint

The movement today is a combination of Marxism and Environmentalism and is a very dangerous combination, the code words for it are The Great Rest also known as the New Future and a New Green Deal. There are other posts on my blog that explain what this is.

 

Radical Left Tactics to Divide America, Rewrite History—Rep. Ken Buck | American Thought Leaders


00:00 Intro
1:30 TikTok ban
5:14 Touring the Capitol
8:00 America isn’t a democracy
9:36 Antifa violence
18:01 The “anti-fascists” are the most fascist of all?
22:22 Inside Statuary Hall
31:28 Challenges in education
Violence and calls for “revolution” have engulfed Portland, Oregon and other major U.S. cities. Rioters have attacked police officers with rocks, bottles, bricks, and fireworks. Authorities have responded with tear gas, rubber bullets, pepper balls, and arrests. How did we get here? And what is really at stake? In this episode, we sit down with Colorado Congressman Ken Buck to discuss his new book “Capitol of Freedom: Restoring American Greatness,” which takes readers on a journey through the halls of the U.S. Capitol to understand the principles that make America exceptional and that are now under siege. We also explore foreign threats to America, and Congressman Buck’s push to ban government employees from using the Chinese-owned TikTok app on their phones. This is American Thought Leaders 🇺🇸, and I’m Jan Jekielek. Note: This interview was filmed on July 27, 2020.

Trump’s Joe Biden Is ‘Against God’ Is Legitimate


Leftist Secular Religion is Humanity’s Greatest Enemy, But True Faith its Antidote

Kelly OConnell image

Re-posted from The Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesAugust 16, 2020

Trump's Joe Biden Is 'Against God' Is Legitimate

A deafening howl arose from aggrieved Democrats when Donald Trump called Joe Biden’s ideas an “attack against God.” Apoplectic liberals seethed knowing the disadvantage in defending their grim beliefs. Most progressives eschew any divinity. But given how many Americans self-identify Christian, they scrambled to fight back against “godless liberalism.” Biden’s outraged partisans touted his Catholic fidelity. But, Question: If Biden were alive during Christ’s rise, would he have counseled Mary – an unwed pregnant teen—to abort the Messiah?

I. SECULAR RELIGION

AG Barr Opposes Faux Religions

In fact, leftism is not only godless, but suffers angst propelled by unresolved theological issues. This explains why leftism developed into a cult-like ‘political religion.’ In fact, AG William Barr described the postmodern development of BLM and Antifa as a power mad ‘secular religion.’

Barr explained to Mark Levin:

The left has “pulled away from the umbrella of classical liberal values that have undergirded” America and made a “secular religion” out of seeking “complete political victory,” Attorney General William Barr tells “Life, Liberty & Levin” this week. “They’re not interested in compromise,” Barr told host Mark Levin. “They’re not interested in a dialectic exchange of views. They’re interested in total victory…It’s a substitute for religion.

“They view their political opponents as evil because we stand in the way of their progressive utopia that they’re trying to reach, and that’s what gives the intensity to the partisan feelings that people feel today, because for them, this pilgrimage we’re all on is a political pilgrimage. Everything is reduced to politics for people who don’t have that perspective.”

AG Barr calls ANTIFA a ‘new form of urban guerrilla warfare’

Liberal History

Briefly, early leftism grew mushroom-like in the shadow of the 17th century scientific Enlightenment. Then socialism derived from Parisian writers after the French Revolution. Important French author, founder of Sociology, and godless religion – Auguste Comte, went clinically insane. Yet after 3 years of treatment, never fully recovered. But, in the 1840s Comte founded ‘Positivism,’ or society based on “science”, then outlined his Religion of Humanity. This secular religion was dedicated to Comte’s crush, Madame Clotilde de Vaux, as she was high-priestess and Comte its pope.

II. LEFTISM v FAITH

Source of Liberalism v. Christianity Conflict

Why did European politics and Christian theology part ways? Recall Europe itself was a biblical experiment birthing the modern world. As Carl Schmitt wrote,

All significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts not only because of their historical development — in which they were transferred from theology to the theory of the state, whereby, for example, the omnipotent God became the omnipotent lawgiver — but also because of their systematic structure, the recognition of which is necessary for a sociological consideration of these concepts.

So the West was built from Christian theories secularized, but as the Reformation faded in influence, politics reversed history and cannibalized religion.

III. GOVERNMENT SUPPLANTS CHURCH

Battle Over God’s Goodness: Theodicy

Theodicy is belief in a good God in a universe abounding in evil. In The Theology of Liberalism, Political Philosophy and the Justice of God, Eric Nelson states historic debates over whether the biblical God is good and just, waged for centuries. Summarizing, Calvinists believe God alone chooses his followers, whereas Pelagians claim God allows freedom to choose. It’s Predestination versus Free Will.

Good Free Men Prove God Just

Originally, the debate was theological, then invaded philosophy, and is now waged in social and political realms. Nelson explains the Pelagian/ free-will crowd, including eminent men like Milton, Locke, Rousseau and Kant, believed doing good works by choice defended God’s reputation. This allowed mankind to gain divine approval by serving humanity, bringing peace on earth, and founding utopia. So by doing free-will good on earth through liberalism, we establish the justness of God in heaven.

Political Adoption of Church’s Mandate 

Charity developed from Jewish and Christian theology, so support of the underclass emanated from these, later augmented by government. Modern liberalism attempts to commandeer the Church’s role in serving humanity, both on ideological and practical rationale. Nelson explains it’s a fallacy to separate religion from politics in European history. But socialists, like Karl Marx accused capitalists of robbing the poor. They responded with a planned, communal, property-free state. Progressives rejected the church and God, and so by the impetus of transference, government fills the vacuum where God and religion once stood. Liberals only accept humanism.

Post-Modern Woke Snowflake Politics

Arriving in 2020, Democrats ride an unstable wave of progressive anger, hoping the tiger doesn’t turn and devour them. Between the economic and social shock of COVID-19 shutdowns, and the fury of Marxist-derived products Antifa and Black Lives Matter, they seek a sea-change. In typical revolutionary style, opportunist liberals use urban unrest to stifle opposition. This drives a wholly unethical and antinomian structure of Nihilism, claiming any activity is justified if driven by injustice to historically oppressed minorities. If this continues, the Rule of Law will collapse, replaced by the ad-hoc rule of despots, as seen in the USSR.

CONCLUSION

We’re told America is in the midst of a culture war. The problem with politics supplanting religion is it destroys both, amalgamating power. So Marxism, by demanding religion outlawed, and in its fake-messianic predictions, is a pseudo-faith. The threat to American liberty and safety is Marxism. Between Lenin, Stalin and Mao, more than 100,000,000 innocent souls were murdered in the name of the deified state. And no churches were allowed since Marxism will not accept competition. Therefore, we must all bone-up on Marxist theories and then commit ourselves to self defense. No better resistance training against tyranny has ever excelled the Bible. For, from the very beginning, church and state were separated to protect God’s people from usurpation of our Natural Rights & biblical Freedoms by fiery-eyed heathens.